Lyrurus mlokosiewiczi (Caucasian Grouse) European Red List of Birds Supplementary Material The European Union (EU27) Red List assessments were based principally on the official data reported by EU Member States to the European Commission under Article 12 of the Birds Directive in 2013-14. For the European Red List assessments, similar data were sourced from BirdLife Partners and other collaborating experts in other European countries and territories. For more information, see BirdLife International (2015). Contents Reported national population sizes and trends p. 2 Trend maps of reported national population data p. 3 Sources of reported national population data p. 5 Species factsheet bibliography p. 6 Recommended citation BirdLife International (2015) European Red List of Birds. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities. Further information http://www.birdlife.org/datazone/info/euroredlist http://www.birdlife.org/europe-and-central-asia/european-red-list-birds-0 http://www.iucnredlist.org/initiatives/europe http://ec.europa.eu/environment/nature/conservation/species/redlist/ Data requests and feedback To request access to these data in electronic format, provide new information, correct any errors or provide feedback, please email [email protected]. THE IUCN RED LIST OF THREATENED SPECIES™ BirdLife International (2015) European Red List of Birds Lyrurus mlokosiewiczi (Caucasian Grouse) Table 1. Reported national breeding population size and trends in Europe1. Country (or Population estimate Short-term population trend4 Long-term population trend4 Subspecific population (where relevant) 2 territory) Size (calling/lekking Europe (%) Year(s) Quality Direction5 Magnitude (%)6 Year(s) Quality Direction5 Magnitude (%)6 Year(s) Quality males)3 Armenia 200-400 2 2002-2012 medium ? ? Azerbaijan 700-3,000 9 1996-2000 medium ? ? Georgia 7,551-15,759 64 2009 good ? ? Russia 1,500-3,500 13 2000-2006 poor 0 0 2001-2012 medium - 5-30 1980-2012 medium Turkey 1,500-2,800 12 2013 good - 10-19 2000-2012 poor - 0-19 1990-2013 medium EU27 0 <1 n/a Europe 11,500-25,500 100 Unknown 1 See 'Sources' at end of factsheet, and for more details on individual EU Member State reports, see the Article 12 reporting portal at http://bd.eionet.europa.eu/article12/report. 2 The designation of geographical entities and the presentation of the material do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of IUCN or BirdLife International concerning the legal status of any country, territory or area, or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. 3 In the few cases where population size estimates were reported in units other than those specified, they were converted to the correct units using standard correction factors. 4 The robustness of regional trends to the effects of any missing or incomplete data was tested using plausible scenarios, based on other sources of information, including any other reported information, recent national Red Lists, scientific literature, other publications and consultation with relevant experts. 5 Trend directions are reported as: increasing (+); decreasing (-); stable (0); fluctuating (F); or unknown (?). 6 Trend magnitudes are rounded to the nearest integer. THE IUCN RED LIST OF THREATENED SPECIES™ BirdLife International (2015) European Red List of Birds Trend maps A symbol appears in each country where the species occurs: the shape and colour of the symbol represent the population trend in that country, and the size of the symbol corresponds to the proportion of the European population occurring in that country. KEY Ç Large increase (≥50%) È Large decrease (≥50%) Ç Moderate increase (20–49%) È Moderate decrease (20–49%) Ç Small increase (<20%) È Small decrease (<20%) ñ Increase of unknown magnitude ò Decrease of unknown magnitude å Stable or fluctuating 0 Unknown ¢ Present (no population or trend data) Ð Extinct since 1980 Each symbol, with the exception of Present and Extinct, may occur in up to three different size classes, corresponding to the proportion of the European population occurring in that country. ñ Large: ≥10% of the European population ñ Medium: 1–9% of the European population ñ Small: <1% of the European population The designation of geographical entities and the presentation of the material do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of IUCN or BirdLife International concerning the legal status of any country, territory or area, or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. THE IUCN RED LIST OF THREATENED SPECIES™ BirdLife International (2015) European Red List of Birds Figure 1. Breeding population sizes and short-term trends across Europe. Figure 2. Breeding population sizes and long-term trends across Europe. THE IUCN RED LIST OF THREATENED SPECIES™ BirdLife International (2015) European Red List of Birds Lyrurus mlokosiewiczi (Caucasian Grouse) Sources Armenia Breeding population size: ASPB data Azerbaijan Breeding population size: BirdLife International 2004 Georgia Breeding population size: BirdLife International 2004 Russia Breeding population size: Belik V.P. 2005. Cadastre of breeding avifauna of South Russia. Strepet 3, no. 1-2: 5-37 (in Russian). Tilba P.A. 2007. Caucasian Black Grouse. - Zamotailov A.S. (ed.). Red Data Book of Krasnodar Territory (Animals). Krasnodar: 387-388 (in Russian). Abdurakhmanov G.M. (ed.) 2009. Red Data Book of Republic Dagestan. Plants and animals. Makhachkala. Breeding short-term trend: Karavaev A.A., Khubiev A.B. 2007. Bird List of Karachaevo-Cherkessia and their status. - Caucasian Ornithological Bulletin, 19: 82-93 (in Russian). Tilba P.A. 2007. Caucasian Black Grouse. - Zamotailov A.S. (ed.). Red Data Book of Krasnodar Territory (Animals). Krasnodar: 387-388 (in Russian). Breeding long-term trend: Tilba P.A. 2001. Caucasian Black Grouse. - Pavlov D.S., Flint V.E. (eds.). Red Data Book of Russian Federation. Moscow: 463-465 (in Russian). Turkey Breeding population size: Murat Bozdoğan, Soner Bekir personal communication. Gottschalk, T., Ekschmitt, K., Isfendiyaroglu, S., Gem, E., Wolters, V., 2007. Assessing the potential distribution of the Caucasian black grouse (Tetrao mlokosiewiczi) in Turkey through spatial modeling) Journal of Ornithology,148:4, Sf:427-435 Isfendiyaroglu S., Welch G., Ataol M., 2007. The Caucasian Black Grouse (Tetrao mlokosiewiczi) in Turkey – recent survey results and conservation recommendations, Wildlife Biology 13 (Suppl. 1): sf. 13-20 Breeding short-term trend: Doğa Derneği, Eken G., Bozdoğan M., İsfendiyaroğlu S., Kılıç D.T., Lise Y. (2006) Key Biodiversity Areas of Turkey (Türkiye’nin Önemli Doğa Alanları) Doğa Derneği, Ankara, KILIÇ, T., EKEN, G. 2004, Türkiye'nin Önemli Kuş Alanları Güncellemesi, Doğa Derneği. Ankara. Breeding long-term trend: Birdlife International (2004) Birds in Europe: population estimates, trends and conservation status, Cambridge UK: Birdlife International (Birdlife Conservation series no: 12) THE IUCN RED LIST OF THREATENED SPECIES™ BirdLife International (2015) European Red List of Birds Bibliography Azniashvili, L. 2004. Caucasian black grouse. Caucasus Environment: 33-37. Baskaya, S. 2003. Distribution and principal threats to Caucasian black grouse Tetrao mlokosiewiczi in the Eastern Karadeniz Mountains in Turkey. Wildlife Biology, 9(4): 377-383. de Juana, E. and Kirwan, G.M. 2014. Caucasian Grouse (Lyrurus mlokosiewiczi). In: del Hoyo, J., Elliott, A., Sargatal, J., Christie, D.A. and de Juana, E. (eds.) 2014. Handbook of the Birds of the World Alive. Lynx Edicions, Barcelona. (retrieved from http://www.hbw.com/node/53327 on 19 January 2015). Gavashelishvili, A. and Javakhishvili, Z. 2010. Combining radio-telemetry and random observations to model the habitat of Near Threatened Caucasian Grouse Tetrao mlokosiewiczi. Oryx 44(4): 491-500. Isfendiyaroglu, S., Welch, G. and Ataol, M. 2007. The Caucasian black grouse Tetrao mlokosiewiczi in Turkey: recent survey results and conservation recommendations. Wildlife Biology 13(1): 13-20 IUCN; SSC; BirdLife; WPA Grouse Specialist Group. 2002. Clarifying the status of the Caucasian Black Grouse. Klaus, S., Bergmann, H.H., Wiesner, J., Vitovich, O.A., Etzold, J. and Sultanov, E. 2003. Verhalten und Ökologie des Kaukasusbirkhuhns Tetrao mlokosiewiczi - stumme Balz am steilen Hang. Limicola 17(5): 225-268. Klaus, S. and Vitovich, A.V. 2006. Clarifying the status of the Caucasian Black Grouse Tetrao mlokosiewiczi - methodical approach. Grouse News: 11-15. Sultanov, E. 2006. Surveys in Caucasian Black Grouse habitats in Azerbaijan. Grouse News: 25-28. Tucker, G.M. and Heath, M.F. 1994. Birds in Europe: their conservation status. Cambridge, UK: BirdLife International (BirdLife Conservation Series no. 3). WWF/IUCN. 1994. Centres of plant diversity: a guide and strategy for their conservation. World Wide Fund for Nature and International Union for Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources, Cambridge, U.K. THE IUCN RED LIST OF THREATENED SPECIES™ BIRDLIFE INTERNATIONAL (2015) EUROPEAN RED LIST OF BIRDS.