Optimization of a Reusable Rocket-Powered, VTVL Launch System: a Case Study of the Falcon 9-R

Optimization of a Reusable Rocket-Powered, VTVL Launch System: a Case Study of the Falcon 9-R

Optimization of a Reusable Rocket-Powered, VTVL Launch System: A Case Study of the Falcon 9-R 04 August 2014 John E. Bradford, Ph.D. President, Principal Engineer [email protected] | 1+770.379.8007 Brad St. Germain, Ph.D. Director, Advanced Concepts Group [email protected] | 1+770.379.8010 Kevin Feld Sr. Aerospace Engineer [email protected] | 1+770.379.8005 DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A UNLIMITED. APPROVED FOR PUBLIC RELEASE. 1 Case Study . SpaceWorks was interested in examining the performance of the SpaceX Falcon 9-R system that is currently under development as a test case for the VTVL simulation . System closure simulation created in PHX ModelCenter™ allowed us to quickly reverse engineer the baseline Falcon 9 system and anchor the models to various pieces of public information . Gross mass and propellant loads . Engine performance specifications . Vehicle dimensions and fairing geometry . Mission launch profile (times, altitudes, velocities) . Statements made by SpaceX employees . Anticipate that as additional details on the F-9R performance are released, the model can be further validated and/or calibrated . Using the reference closure model, we were then able to assess the impact of reusability on the system and explore various sensitivities DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A UNLIMITED. APPROVED FOR PUBLIC RELEASE. 2 Reference Concept . Non-proprietary Falcon 9 v1.1 system . Public data sources and engineering models calibrated for: . Geometry . Propellant loads . Propulsion . Aerodynamics . Trajectory . Fairing . Assumed flight constraints common for expendable launch systems Parameter Value Gross Liftoff Weight 1,115,200 lbm Upperstage Gross Weight 246,150 lbm Total Height 224 feet Diameter 12 feet Liftoff T/W 1.2 Reported Payload to LEO 28,990 lbm Image Credit: SpaceX DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A UNLIMITED. APPROVED FOR PUBLIC RELEASE. 3 VTVL Assessment . Examined downrange booster recovery as well as RTLS option . Fixed vehicle size and mass, per the reference concept . Booster stage mass model includes landing system/legs . Recovery/Landing Requirements: . Vertical orientation (gamma -90 deg) at touchdown . Velocity @ touchdown < 20.0 fps . Single-engine operation for terminal maneuver . 3 engines operable for any initial boostback burn . Max. heat rate constraint of 15 BTU/ft2-s (assumed) . Optimization: Maximum upperstage payload mass that can be delivered to LEO for either the expendable booster case, booster with RTLS recovery, or booster with downrange landing DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A UNLIMITED. APPROVED FOR PUBLIC RELEASE. 4 VTVL Concept Simulation Model . Created a multi-disciplinary simulation using Phoenix Integration’s ModelCenter™ engineering environment DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A UNLIMITED. APPROVED FOR PUBLIC RELEASE. 5 Results : FlightSight™ Images Downrange Landing Booster Parameter Value Flight Time 390 sec Final Downrange Distance 156 nmi Max Downrange Distance 156 nmi Mach Number @ Staging 7.1 Altitude @ Staging 201,500 feet Peak Altitude 271,500 feet RTLS Maneuver Booster Parameter Value Flight Time 480 sec Final Downrange Distance ~0 nmi Max Downrange Distance 57 nmi Mach Number @ Staging 6.0 Altitude @ Staging 187,000 feet Peak Altitude 423,500 feet DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A UNLIMITED. APPROVED FOR PUBLIC RELEASE. 6 Results : Trajectory Details Altitude vs. Time Mach Number vs. Time DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A UNLIMITED. APPROVED FOR PUBLIC RELEASE. 7 Results : Trajectory Details(2) Downrange vs. Time Thrust vs. Time DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A UNLIMITED. APPROVED FOR PUBLIC RELEASE. 8 Results: Performance Summary Booster Parameter Expendable Downrange RTLS Landing Propellant Used 0 lbm 44,350 lbm 84,680 lbm Recovery Propellant (% Booster Total Prop) 0.0 % 5.5 % 10.5 % Staging Mach Number 8.4 7.1 6.0 Videal Post-Staging 0 fps 5,400 fps 8,900 fps DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A UNLIMITED. APPROVED FOR PUBLIC RELEASE. 9 Trade Study . Examined impact of removing max. heat rate constraint for recovery trajectories . RTLS trajectory was not impacted (inactive constraint), but the downrange case was impacted significantly DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A UNLIMITED. APPROVED FOR PUBLIC RELEASE. 10 Conclusions DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A UNLIMITED. APPROVED FOR PUBLIC RELEASE. 11 Summary . SpaceWorks has developed a system closure and optimization model for VTVL concepts . Simulation capability was tested using performance data for the SpaceX Falcon 9 v1.1 . PHX ModelCenter implementation enabled rapid trade studies and system sensitivity analyses . For case study, the performance impacts of two different first stage propulsive recovery options (downrange landing and RTLS) were evaluated and compared to non-recoverable options . Downrange propulsive landing results in a ~20% drop in payload performance compared to expendable booster mission; RTLS results in a ~40% drop in payload compared to expendable (no recovery) approach . Regarding the cost savings due to reusability, gains must outweigh performance reductions . Expendable upperstage, estimated at ~$20M, establishes floor for $/lbm-payload . Must also include booster propellant and refurbishment costs (at a minimum) . Cost savings may not be as significant as some claim, but appears to still be a net gain . Progress is being made, but we need to continue push for full reusability on these systems DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A UNLIMITED. APPROVED FOR PUBLIC RELEASE. 12 SPACEWORKS ENTERPRISES, INC. (SEI) | www.sei.aero | [email protected] 1040 Crown Pointe Parkway, Suite 950 | Atlanta, GA 30338 USA | 1+770-379-8000 DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A UNLIMITED. APPROVED FOR PUBLIC RELEASE. 13 .

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    13 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us