Lesser Known Breach of Contract Defenses

Lesser Known Breach of Contract Defenses

LESSER KNOWN BREACH OF CONTRACT DEFENSES Jack A. Walters, III Cooper & Scully, P.C. Founders Square 900 Jackson Street, Suite 100 Dallas, Texas 75202 (214) 712-9500 (214) 712-9540 fax www.cooperscully.com [email protected] 3rd Annual Construction Symposium January 25, 2008 TABLE OF CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION...............................................................................................................1 II. BACKGROUND ON CONSTRUCTION CONTRACTS..................................................1 A. Contract Documents...............................................................................................1 B. Checklist of Issues Covered in a Contract..............................................................1 C. Definitions..............................................................................................................2 III. CONTRACT DEFENSES...................................................................................................3 A. Limitations (Statute of Limitations & Statute of Repose)......................................3 B. Standing/Privity......................................................................................................5 C. Failure of consideration / Lack of consideration....................................................6 D. Mistake 7 E. Ratification.............................................................................................................8 F. Waiver 9 G. Plaintiff's Prior Material Breach.............................................................................9 H. Estoppel by contract & Quasi-estoppel ................................................................10 I. Mitigation of damages..........................................................................................11 J. Repudiation ..........................................................................................................11 K. Revocation............................................................................................................11 L. Lack of capacity ...................................................................................................11 M. Fraud 13 N. Modification.........................................................................................................13 O. Failure to perform conditions precedent...............................................................14 P. Impossibility of performance ...............................................................................14 Q. Limitatition-of-liability provisions.......................................................................15 i TABLE OF AUTHORITIES CASES 1464-Eight, Ltd. v. Joppich, 154 S.W.3d 101 (Tex. 2004)......................................................................................................7 46933, Inc, v. Z&B Enters., 899 S.W.2d 800 (Tex.App.—Amarillo 1995, writ denied) .......................................................3 A.L.G Enters v. Huffman, 660 S.W.2d 603 (Tex.App.—Corpus Christi 1983), aff'd, 672 S.W.2d 230 (Tex. 1984).................................................................................................................................8 ANCO Ins. Servs. v. Romero, 27 S.W.3d 1 (Tex.App.—San Antonio 2000, pet. denied) ........................................................5 Adkins Servs. v. Tisdale Co., 56 S.W.3d 842 (Tex.App.—Texarkana 2001, no pet.) ..............................................................6 Affright, Inc, v, Elledge, 515 S.W.2d 266 (Tex. 1974)....................................................................................................15 Alamo Clay Prods, v. Gunn Tile Co., 597 S.W.2d 388 (Tex.App.—San Antonio 1980, writ ref'd n.r.e.) ..........................................15 American Garment Props., Inc. v. CB Richard Ellis-El Paso, L.L.C., 155 S.W.3d 431 (Tex.App.—El Paso 2004, no pet.)...............................................................13 Antwine v. Reed, 199 S.W.2d 482 (Tex. 1947)....................................................................................................11 Arthur's Garage, Inc, v. Racal-Chubb Sec. Sys., 997 S.W.2d 803 (Tex.App. —Dallas 1999, no pet.)................................................................15 Askey v. Williams, 11 S.W. 1101 (Tex. 1889)........................................................................................................12 Atlantic Lloyds Ins. Co. v. Butler, 137 S.W.3d 199 (Tex.App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 2004, pet. denied)........................................8 Atomic Fuel Extraction Corp, v. Estate of Slick, 386 S.W.2d 180 (Tex.App. —San Antonio 1964), writ ref'd. n.r.e., 403 S.W.2d 784 (Tex.1965)............................................................................................................14 Austin Hill Country Rlty., Inc. v. Palisades Plaza, Inc., 948 S.W.2d 293 (Tex. 1997)....................................................................................................11 B.D. Holt Co. v. OCE, Inc., 971 S.W.2d 618 (Tex.App.—San Antonio 1998, pet. denied) ..................................................7 ii Bank One v. Stewart, 967 S.W.2d 419 (Tex.App.—Houston [14th Dist.] 1998, pet. denied) .....................................9 Barker v. Eckman, __ S.W.3d. __ (Tex. 2006).........................................................................................................3 Barrera v. Hondo Creek Cattle Co., 132 S.W.3d 544 (Tex.App.—Corpus Christi 2004, no pet.)......................................................5 Belew v. Rector, 202 S.W.3d 849 (Tex.App.—Eastland 2006, no pet.) ...............................................................7 Bencon Mgmt, & Gen. Contracting, Inc, v. Boyer, Inc., 178 S.W.3d 198 (Tex.App. —Houston [14th Dist.] 2005, no pet) ..........................................14 Board of Regents v. Yarbrough, 470 S.W.2d 86 (Tex.App.—Waco 1971, writ ref'd n.r.e.).......................................................13 Boland v. Mundaca Inv., 978 S.W.2d 146 (Tex.App.—Austin 1998, no pet.) ..................................................................7 Bolle, Inc. v. American Greetings Corp., 109 S.W.3d 827 (Tex.App.—Dallas 2003, pet. denied) ............................................................8 Bookout v. Bookout, 165 S.W.3d 904 (Tex.App.—Texarkana 2005, no pet.) ............................................................5 Bowles v. Fickas, 167 S.W.2d 741 (Tex. 1943)....................................................................................................11 Breaux v. Allied Bank, 699 S.W.2d 599 (Tex.App.—Houston [14th Dist.] 1985, writ ref'd n.r.e.) .......................12, 13 Bristol-Myers Squibb Co. v. Burner, 964 S.W.2d 299 (Tex.App.—Corpus Christi 1998, no pet.)....................................................10 Brown-McKee, Inc. v. Western Beef, Inc., 538 S.W.2d 840 (Tex.App.—Amarillo 1976, writ ref'd n.r.e.)..................................................8 Cal-Tex Lumber Co. v. Owens Handle Co., 989 S.W.2d 802 (Tex.App.—Tyler 1999, no pet.) ....................................................................9 Carson Energy, Inc. v. Riverway Bank, 100 S.W.3d 591 (Tex.App.—Texarkana 2003, pet. denied) .....................................................6 Centex Corp. v. Dalton, 840 S.W.2d 952 (Tex.1992).....................................................................................................14 Champlin Oil & Ref. Co. v. Chastain, 403 S.W.2d 376 (Tex. 1965)......................................................................................................8 iii Cherry v. McCall, 138 S.W.3d 35 (Tex.App.—San Antonio 2004, pet. denied) ....................................................8 Cigna Ins. Co. v. Rubalcada, 960 S.W.2d 408 (Tex.App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 1998, no pet.) ..............................................7 City of Corpus Christi v. Taylor, 126 S.W.3d 712 (Tex.App.—Corpus Christi 2004, pet. dism'd) ...............................................3 Commercial Credit Corp. v. Taylor, 448 S.W.2d 190 (Tex.App.—Tyler 1969, no writ)....................................................................9 Conquest Drilling Fluids, Inc. v. Tri-Flo Intl, 137 S.W.3d 299 (Tex.App.—Beaumont 2004, no pet.).............................................................6 Consolidated Eng'g v. Southern Steel, 699 S.W.2d 188 (Tex. 1985)......................................................................................................9 Cook Composites, Inc. v. Westlake Styrene Corp., 15 S.W.3d 124 (Tex.App.--Houston [14th Dist.] 2000, pet. dism'd).......................................11 Copeland v. Alsobrook, 3 S.W.3d 598 (Tex.App.—San Antonio 1999, pet. denied) ......................................................5 Cowman v. Allen Monuments, Inc., 500 S.W.2d 223 (Tex. App.-Texarkana 1973, no writ) ...........................................................10 D.E.W., Inc. v. Depco Forms, Inc., 827 S.W.2d 379 (Tex.App.—San Antonio 1992, no writ) ........................................................3 Dairyland Cty. Mut. Ins. Co. v. Roman, 498 S.W.2d 154 (Tex. 1973)..............................................................................................11, 12 Dallas Joint Stock Land Bank v. Dolan, 120 S.W.2d 798 (Tex.Comm'n App. 1938, judgm't adopted)..................................................12 Davis v. Grammer, 750 S.W.2d 766 (Tex. 1988)......................................................................................................8 de Monet v. PERA, 877 S.W.2d 352 (Tex.App.—Dallas 1994,

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    30 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us