Nie Tylko Dialogi

Nie Tylko Dialogi

Nie tylko dialogi Jan Kucharski Przemysław Marciniak Katarzyna Warcaba Nie tylko dialogi Recepcja twórczości Lukiana w Bizancjum Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Śląskiego • Katowice 2019 Redaktor serii: Bibliotheca Byzantina Przemysław Marciniak Recenzent Joanna Janik Praca powstała w ramach projektu NCN UMO-2013 / 11 / B / HS2 / 0 3 1 4 7 Spis treści Dialog lukianowy w Bizancjum ~ 7 ~ Nowy dialog na nowe (bizantyńskie) czasy ~ 15 ~ Eksperyment Michała Hapluchejra? ~ 19 ~ Hermippos, Hermodotos i Musokles – dialogi (nie całkiem) lukianowe? ~ 25 ~ Teodor Prodromos i jego lukianowe utwory ~ 29 ~ Moc starych i nowych logoi, czyli Filopatris ~ 43 ~ Charidemos – dialog inny niż wszystkie ~ 57 ~ Od tłumaczy ~ 73 ~ Dialogi anonimowe Charidemos ~ 75 ~ Filopatris albo uczeń ~ 105 ~ Utwory Teodora Prodromosa wzorowane na Lukianie Amarantos, czyli miłosne życie starca ~ 131 ~ Nieuk albo samozwańczy gramatyk ~ 153 ~ Filoplaton albo garbarz ~ 167 ~ Kat albo lekarz ~ 181 ~ Wyprzedaż żywotów ~ 201 ~ Bibliografia ~ 231 ~ 1 Bibliografia* Adkins 1960: A.W. Adkins, Merit and Responsibility. A Study in Greek Values, Oxford 1960. Agapitos 2014: Grammar, genre and patronage = P.A. Agapitos, Grammar, genre and patronage in the twelfth century: A scientific paradigm and its implications, „Jahrbuch der Österreichischen Byzantinistik” 64 (2014), s. 1–22. Anastasi 1964: R. Anastasi, Sul Philopatris, „Siculorum Gymna- sium” 18.1.N.S. (1964), s. 127–144. Anastasi 1965: R. Anastasi, Appunti sul Charidemus, „Siculorum Gymna- sium” 17.2 (1965), s. 259–283. Anastasi 1967: R. Anastasi, Sul testo del Philopatris et del Charidemus, „Si- culorum Gymnasium” 20 (1967), s. 111–119. Anastasi 1971: R. Anastasi, Incerti auctoris Χαρίδημος. Introduzione, testo critico e note, Bologna 1971. Anderson 1976: G. Anderson, Lucian. Theme and Variation in the Second Sophistic, Leiden 1976. Andrés, Irigoin, Hörandner 1974: G. de Andrés, J. Irigoin, W. Hörand- ner, Johannes Katrares und seine dramatische-poetische Produktion, „Jahr- buch der Österreichischen Byzantinistik” 23 (1974), s. 201–214. Angelidou 1977‒1978: C. Angelidou, Η Χρονολόγηση χ και ο συγγραφέας του διαλόγου Φιλόπατρις, „Hellenika” 30 (1977‒1978), s. 34–50. Arierti 1991: J.A. Arierti, Interpreting Plato: the Dialogues as Drama, Sa- vage, MD 1991. * Zastosowane w książce skróty obejmujące greckich autorów i ich dzieła opracowano na podstawie: A Greek–English Lexicon (Liddell – Scott – Jones). ~ 231 ~ Baldwin 1982: B. Baldwin, The date and purpose of the Philopatris, „Yale Classical Studies” 27 (1982), s. 321–344. Baldwin 1984: B. Baldwin, Beyond the House Call: Doctors in Early Byzantine History and Politics, „Dumbarton Oaks Papers” 38 (1984), s. 15–19. Bazzani 2007: M. Bazzani, The Historical Poems of Theodore Prodromos, the Epic-Homeric Revival and the Crisis of Intellectuals in Twelfth Century, „Byzantinoslavica” 65 (2007), s. 211‒228. Beck 1971: H-G. Beck, Geschichte der byzantinischen Volksliteratur, Mu- nich 1971. Bernabé 1996‒2005: Poetae Epici Graeci, ed. A Bernabé, vols. 1‒2, Leipzig 1996‒2005. Bernardinello 1972: Theodori Prodromi De Manganis, ed. S. Bernardi- nello, Padova 1972. Blanchet 2008: M-H. Blanchet, Georges-Gennadios Scholarios (vers 1400– vers 1472). Un intellectuel orthodoxe face à la disparition de l’empire byzan- tine, Paris 2008. Blondell 2013: R. Blondell, Helen of Troy. Beauty, Myth, Devastation, Ox- ford 2013. Bodin – Hedlung 2013 (eds): Byzantine Gardens and Beyond, eds. H. Bodin, R. Hedlung, Uppsala 2013. Boissonade 1962: Anecdota Graeca, descripsit annotatione illustravit J.Fr. Boissonade, vol. 3, Hildesheim 1962 (reprint). Boissonnade 1838: J.F. Boissonnade, Michael Psellus de Operatione daemo- num, Nürnberg 1838. Bompaire 1958: J. Bompaire, Lucien Écrivain. Imitation et Création, Paris 1958. Bowie 1993: E. Bowie, Greek Table-Talk before Plato, „Rhetorica” 11.4 (1993), s. 355–371. Bracht 2017 (ed.): Methodius of Olympus: State of the Art and New Perspec- tives, ed. K Bracht, Berlin 2017. Breitenberger 2007: B. Breitenberger, Aphrodite and Eros. The Deve- lopment of Erotic Mythology in Early Greek Poetry and Cult, London 2007. Bremmer 2014: J.N. Bremmer, Initiation into the Mysteries of the Ancient World, Berlin 2014. Burkert 1972: W. Burkert, Lore and Science in Ancient Pythagoreanism, trans. E.L. Minar, Jr., Cambridge (Mass.) 1972. ~ 232 ~ Burkert 1985: W. Burkert, Greek Religion: Archaic and Classical, trans. J. Raffan, Cambridge (Mass.) 1985. Burkert 2007: W. Burkert, Starożytne kulty misteryjne, tłum. K. Bielawski, Kraków 2007. Caccia 1915: N. Caccia, Note su la Fortuna di Luciano nel Rinascimento: Le Versioni e i Dialoghi Satirici di Erasmo da Rotterdam e di Ulrico Hutten, Milano 1915–1916(?). Cairns 1993: D. Cairns, Aidôs, Oxford 1993. Caley – Richards 1956: E.R. Caley, J.F. Richards, Theophrastus on Stones, Columbus 1956. Carey 1992: Ch. Carey, [Demosthenes], Against Neaera, Warminster 1992. Carey 2007: Ch. Carey, Epideictic Rhetoric, w: I. Worthington, A Compa- nion to Greek Rhetoric. Oxford–Malden 2007. Cashford 2015: J. Cashford, How Hermes and Apollo came to love each other in the Homeric Hymn to Hermes: imagination and form in Ancient Greece and modern psyche, w: Ancient Greece, modern psyche: archetypes evolving, eds. V.B. Rutter, T. Singer, London‒New York 2015, s. 101–146. Cataudella 1940 / 1941: Q. Cataudella, Michele Apluchiro e il ‘Pluto’ di Aristofane, „Dioniso” 8 (1940 / 1941), s. 88‒93. Cavallero 2017: P. Cavallero, Los versos bizantinos de Miguel Haplouk- heír: ¿comedia, tragedia o mimo?, „MINERVA. Revista de Filología Clási- ca” 30 (2017), s. 61‒95. Christidis 1980: D.A. Christidis, Γιὰ τὴ βυζαντινὴ μίμηση τοῦ Λουκιανοῦ στὸν κώδ. Ambrosianus gr. 655, „Hellenika” 32 (1980), s. 86–91. Christidis 1984: D. A. Christidis Markiana anekdota: Anacharsis ē Ananias; Epistoles, Sigillio, Thessalonike 1984. Clavaud 1974: R. Clavaud, Démosthène. Discours d’ apparat, Paris 1974. Clinton 2010: K. Clinton, The Mysteries of Demeter and Kore, w: Ogden 2010. Codellas 1946: P.S. Codellas, The Case of Smallpox of Theodore Prodromus. „Bulletin of the History of Medicine” 20 (1946), s. 207–215. Cohen 1992: E.E. Cohen, Athenian Economy and Society. A Banking Perspec- tive, Princeton 1992. Cook 1925: A.B. Cook, Zeus. A Study in Ancient Religion, vol. 2.2, Cam- bridge 1925. ~ 233 ~ Cottas 1931: V. Cottas, Le théâtre à Byzance, Paris 1931. Courtney 1990: R. Courtney, Drama and Intelligence: A Cognitive Theory, Montreal–London–Buffalo 1990. Craik 2015: E.M. Craik, The ‘Hippocratic’ Corpus. Content and Context, London 2015. Crampe 1894: R. Crampe, Philopatris, ein heidnisches Konventikel, Halle 1894. Cullhed 2014: E. Cullhed, The blind bard and ‘I’: Homeric biography and authorial personas in the twelth century, „Byzantine and Modern Greek Studies” 38 (2014), s. 49–67. Cullhed 2015: E. Cullhed, „Teodoro Pródromo en el Jardín de Epicu- ro”. w: Aproximaciones interdisciplinarias a la Antiguedad griega y latina. V I Jornadas Filológicas, Bogotá. Universidad Nacional de Colombia, Universidad de los Andes, Universidad de la Sabana, eds. R. Álvarez, L. Almandós, Bogotá 2015, s. 271–289. Cullhed 2017: E. Cullhed, Theodore Prodromos in the garden of Epicurus: the Amarantos, w: Dialogues and Debates from Late Antiquity to Late Byzan- tium, eds. A. Cameron, N. Gaul, Abingdon 2017, s. 153–166. DELG: Dictionnaire étymologique de la langue grecque, ed. P. Chantraine, Paris 1968. Dickie 2001: M. Dickie, Magic and Magicians in the Greco-Roman World, London 2001. Dillon 19962: J. Dillon, The Middle Platonists, 80 B.C to A.D. 220, Itha- ca 1996 (oryg. 1977). Dillon 2017: M. Dillon, Omens and Oracles. Divination in Ancient Greece, London 2017. Dölger 1953: F. Dölger, Zur Bedeutung von φιλόσοφος und φιλοσοφία in byzantinischer Zeit, w: Idem, Byzanz und die europäische Staatenwelt: Ausgewählte Vorträge und Aufsätze, Ettal 1953, s. 197–208. Dostálová 1982: R. Dostálová, Die byzantinische Theorie des Dramas und die Tragödie Christos Paschon, „Jahrbuch der Österreichischen Byzanti- nistik” 32.3 (1982), XVI Internationaler Byzantinistenkongress Akten II / 3, s. 73–82. Dover 1974: K.J. Dover, Greek Popular Morality in the Time of Plato and Aristotle, Indianapolis‒Cambridge 1974. ~ 234 ~ Dudley 1937: D.R. Dudley, A History of Cynicism. From Diogenes to the 6th century A.D., London 1937. Edwards 2010: M.J. Edwards, Lucian of Samosata in the Christian Memory, „Byzantion” 80 (2010), s. 142–156. Eideneier 1991: H. Eideneier, Ptochoprodromos, Cologne 1991. Fleury 2017: P. Fleury, Éroticos: Un dialogue (amoureux) entre Platon et la seconde sophistique, REG 120.2 (2017), s. 776–787. Fontenrose 1978: J.E. Fontenrose, The Delphic Oracle, Berkeley 1978. Fontenrose 1988: J.E. Fontenrose, Didyma. Apollo’s Oracle, Cult, and Com- panions, Berkeley 1988. Ford 2008: A. Ford, The Beginnings of Dialogue: Socratic Discourses and the Fourth-Century Prose, w: Goldhill 2008, s. 29–34. Fowler 2018: R.C. Fowler, Variations of Receptions of Plato during the Se- cond Sophistic, w: Brill’s Companion to the Reception of Plato in Antiquity, eds. H. Tarrant, D.A. Layne, D. Baltzly, F. Renaud, Leiden 2018, s. 223‒249. Gallavotti 1935 : C. Gallavotti, Novi Laurentiani Codicis Analecta. „Studi Bizantini e Neoellenici” 4 (1935), s. 203‒236. Gara 2013: N. Eugenianos, Drosilla i Charikles, tłum. K. Gara, Kraków 2013. Garland 2000‒2001: L. Garland, A Treasury Minister in Hell – a Little Known Dialogue of the Dead of the Late Twelfth Century, „Modern Greek Studies Yearbook” 17 (2000 / 2001), s. 481–489. Gautier 1972: Michel Italikos, Lettres et discours,

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    22 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us