
Ancient Nursery Area for the Extinct Giant Shark Megalodon from the Miocene of Panama Catalina Pimiento1,2,3*, Dana J. Ehret2,4, Bruce J. MacFadden2,5, Gordon Hubbell6 1 Department of Biology, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, United States of America, 2 Division of Vertebrate Paleontology, Florida Museum of Natural History, Gainesville, Florida, United States of America, 3 Center of Paleoecology and Archaeology, Smithsonian Tropical Research Institute, Panama, Republic of Panama, 4 School of Natural Resources and Environment, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, United States of America, 5 Division of Research on Learning (DRL), Education and Human Resources (EHR), National Science Foundation, Arlington, Virginia, United States of America, 6 Jaws International, Gainesville, Florida, United States of America Abstract Background: As we know from modern species, nursery areas are essential shark habitats for vulnerable young. Nurseries are typically highly productive, shallow-water habitats that are characterized by the presence of juveniles and neonates. It has been suggested that in these areas, sharks can find ample food resources and protection from predators. Based on the fossil record, we know that the extinct Carcharocles megalodon was the biggest shark that ever lived. Previous proposed paleo-nursery areas for this species were based on the anecdotal presence of juvenile fossil teeth accompanied by fossil marine mammals. We now present the first definitive evidence of ancient nurseries for C. megalodon from the late Miocene of Panama, about 10 million years ago. Methodology/Principal Findings: We collected and measured fossil shark teeth of C. megalodon, within the highly productive, shallow marine Gatun Formation from the Miocene of Panama. Surprisingly, and in contrast to other fossil accumulations, the majority of the teeth from Gatun are very small. Here we compare the tooth sizes from the Gatun with specimens from different, but analogous localities. In addition we calculate the total length of the individuals found in Gatun. These comparisons and estimates suggest that the small size of Gatun’s C. megalodon is neither related to a small population of this species nor the tooth position within the jaw. Thus, the individuals from Gatun were mostly juveniles and neonates, with estimated body lengths between 2 and 10.5 meters. Conclusions/Significance: We propose that the Miocene Gatun Formation represents the first documented paleo-nursery area for C. megalodon from the Neotropics, and one of the few recorded in the fossil record for an extinct selachian. We therefore show that sharks have used nursery areas at least for 10 millions of years as an adaptive strategy during their life histories. Citation: Pimiento C, Ehret DJ, MacFadden BJ, Hubbell G (2010) Ancient Nursery Area for the Extinct Giant Shark Megalodon from the Miocene of Panama. PLoS ONE 5(5): e10552. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0010552 Editor: Anna Stepanova, Paleontological Institute, Russian Federation Received February 24, 2010; Accepted April 18, 2010; Published May 10, 2010 Copyright: ß 2010 Pimiento et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Funding: This project was funded by NSF EAR 0418042 (http://www.nsf.gov/funding), Sigma Xi G2009100426 (http://www.sigmaxi.org/programs/giar/index. shtml), The Florida Museum of Natural History (www.flmnh.ufl.edu), The Smithsonian Tropical Research Institute (www.stri.org), The Mitchell Hope Scholarship (http://www.southwestfloridafossilclub.com/) and the Ken Ericson Scholarship (http://www.flmnh.ufl.edu/vertpaleo/kenericsonscholarship.htm). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript. Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist. * E-mail: [email protected] Introduction The Gatun is a highly fossiliferous Neogene formation located in the Isthmus of Panama (Figure 1) with a diverse fauna of sharks Sharks, especially large species, are highly mobile organisms [5–7]. It was located within a marine strait that connected the with a complex life history and wide distribution. During their Pacific Ocean and the Caribbean Sea during the late Miocene lifetime they generally utilize three types of areas: adult feeding, (,10 Ma) [8]. Studies of different taxa, including the exceedingly reproduction and nurseries [1]. In modern species, nursery areas diverse molluscan fauna, indicate that it was a shallow-water are historically defined by the presence of gravid females and free- ecosystem (,25 m depth) with higher salinity, mean annual swimming neonates. It is also an area that can be shared by several temperature variations, seasonality and productivity relative to shark species, where young sharks spend their first weeks, months modern systems in this region [7,9–13]. Over the past 20 years, the or years [2]. More recent studies have defined nursery areas as Gatun Formation localities have been extensively used to extract geographically discrete essential zones for shark survival [3] that sediment for construction. During the more recent years, these provides them with two types of benefits: protection from extraction activities have increased substantially. Based on our predation (mainly larger sharks [2]) and abundant food resources. observations made during the two past years of fieldwork, we predict Productive, shallow-water ecosystems thus provide sharks signif- that these outcrops will soon likely be excavated completely. icant protection from larger predators and/or abundant food Therefore it is timely and urgent to study the fossils occurring in resources, both of which are essential to survival [4]. these outcrops before they are no longer available to science. PLoS ONE | www.plosone.org 1 May 2010 | Volume 5 | Issue 5 | e10552 Megalodon Nursery Area Figure 1. Study area. A. Location of Panama and the Gatun Formation. The shaded box represents the general study area in northern Panama. B. Expanded geological map (from ‘‘See Below’’ shaded box in Fig. A). This map shows the exposures of the Gatun Formation and surrounding rock units (modified from Coates et al., 1992). The two fossil localities collected from the Gatun Formation during this study include: (1) Las Lomas and (2) Isla Payardi. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0010552.g001 Fossil sharks were first reported from Panama in 1862 [5]. In paleoecology of the Gatun Formation as shallow-water habitat in a 1984, the first description of the elasmobranchs from the Gatun productive environment [7]. Formation was published [6]. More recently, in 2010 the Although it is not very common, the extinct Carcharocles biodiversity of the fossil sharks from the Gatun has been megalodon (Agassiz 1843) is one of the species that occurs in the documented from large new collections, and comprise 16 Gatun Formation. The taxonomic assignment of this species has recognizable taxa. This work also included paleoecological and been debated for nearly a century, and there are three possible paleodepth analyses that supported the interpretation of the interpretations: (1) Some authors place C. megalodon and other PLoS ONE | www.plosone.org 2 May 2010 | Volume 5 | Issue 5 | e10552 Megalodon Nursery Area megatoothed sharks with the extant white shark (Carcharodon In this study C. megalodon teeth were collected and measured carcharias) in the same genus (Carcharodon) and therefore the same from two localities within the Gatun Formation of Panama family (Lamnidae) [14–16]. (2) Other authors place C. megalodon (Figure 1). Surprisingly, large teeth are uncommon with specimens and megatoothed sharks in a different genus (Carcharocles) and recovered having CH ranging between 16 to 72 mm (Figure 2). family (Otodontidae) [17–23]. Although a minority point of The objective of this work is to determine if the late Miocene view, some workers recognize (3) megatoothed sharks as a series Gatun Formation was used as a nursery area by young C. of chronospecies of the genus Otodus, and place all megatoothed megalodon. Accordingly, we compared the tooth sizes from the sharks except C. megalodon in this genus. Furthermore, C. Gatun Formation with those found in older and younger megalodon is assigned to the genus Megaselachus, based on the formations to determine if the smaller size distribution observed loss of lateral cusplets [24]. We follow the second hypothesis; is unique to the species during the late Miocene. In addition, we that Carcharocles megalodon and Carcharodon carcharias belong to compared these sizes with tooth sets from individuals of different separate genera in different families. However, both species life stages to determine if the small size observed is related to age, belong to the order Lamniformes, and in the absence of living or position within the jaw. Finally, we calculated the TL of all C. members of the Otodontidae, C. carcharias should be regarded as megalodon individuals from the Gatun Formation to estimate their ecologically analogous species to C. megalodon.Webasethis life stage. The results obtained in this study from tooth analogy on the fact that both species share similar ecological measurement comparisons and individual total length estimates niches with presumed similarities in body shape, feeding habits, allowed us to determine the age
Details
-
File Typepdf
-
Upload Time-
-
Content LanguagesEnglish
-
Upload UserAnonymous/Not logged-in
-
File Pages9 Page
-
File Size-