1 2 3 STABLE ADAPTIVE STRATEGY OF HOMO SAPIENS AND EVOLUTIONARY RISK OF HIGH TECH Transdisciplinary essay Edited by V.T.Cheshko, V.I.Glazko, G.Yu. Kosovsky, A.S.Peredyadenko 2015 4 УДК 608.1=03(02)-039 ББК 28.703(65.5) ISBN 978-5-905742-88-0 © CheshkoV.T., Glazko V.I., Kosovsky G.Yu., Peredyadenko A.S. STABLE ADAPTIVE STRATEGY of HOMO SAPIENS and EVOLUTIONARY RISK of HIGH TECH. Transdisciplinary essay / V.T.Cheshko, V.I.Glazko, G.Yu Kosovsky, A.S.Peredyadenko; Ed. by V.T.Cheshko. M., 2015. 252 p. The co-evolutionary concept of Three-modal stable evolutionary strategy of Homo sapiens is developed. The concept based on the principle of evolutionary complementarity of anthropogenesis: value of evolutionary risk and evolutionary path of human evolution are defined by descriptive (evolutionary efficiency) and creative-teleological (evolutionary correctly) parameters simultaneously, that cannot be instrumental reduced to others ones. Resulting volume of both parameters define the trends of biological, social, cultural and techno-rationalistic human evolution by two gear mechanism ˗ gene-cultural co-evolution and techno- humanitarian balance. The resultant each of them can estimated by the ratio of socio-psychological predispositions of humanization/dehumanization in mentality. Explanatory model and methodology of evaluation of creatively teleological evolutionary risk component of NBIC technological complex is proposed. Integral part of the model is evolutionary semantics (time-varying semantic code, the compliance of the biological, socio-cultural and techno-rationalist adaptive modules of human stable evolutionary strategy). 5 CONTENT INTRODUCTION……………………………………………………..... ………5 1. CONCEPTUAL FIELD, EVOLUTIONARY FOUNDATIONS AND IDEOLOGICAL HISTORY OF THE THEORY OF STABLE ADAPTIVE STRATEGIES OF HOMO SAPIENS……………………………… ......... 15 2. GENESIS OF STABLE ADAPTIVE STRATEGIES OF HOMO SAPIENS……………………………………………………………... ......... 76 3. EVOLUTION RISKS: NATURE, ORGANIZATION ANDSTRUCTURE………………………………………………... … ..... 86 3.1. Evolutionary load and evolutionary risk………………………………98 3.2 Evolutionary efficiency ...................................................................... 108 3.3 Evolutionary correctness .................................................................... 110 3.4. Objective and subjective components of the evolutionary risk........... 116 4. EPISTEMOLOGICAL AND EVOLUTIONARY ADAPTIVE ASPECTS OF POST-ACADEMIC SCIENCE………………………………… ....... 150 5. EVOLUTIONARY SEMANTICS OF TECHNO-HUMANITARIAN BALANCE AND DEVELOPMENTAL RISKS (CONTENT ANALYSIS OF WEB RESOURCES)……………………………………………. ....... 153 5.1 Materials and Methods ……………………………………………….151 5.2 Structure of BHDT-complex .............................................................. 158 5.3Prospects and risks of controlled evolution of human: the intentional structure of post-academic science (A.S.Peredyadenko) ........................... 167 5.4 The thematic structure of theoretical science and the predisposition of mass culture on technology-driven evolution(A.S.Peredyadenko) ............ 169 5.5 Mental predisposition of perception attributes of humanization and dehumanization as a factor of the evolutionary risk gene technology ....... 179 6. CONCLUSION………………………………………………………. ....... 205 SUMMARY…………………………………………………………………..207 Bibliography……………………………………………………………. ……229 6 Abbreviations BHDT, BHDTK ˗ Biological and Humanitarian Disciplinary Technological Complex SESH˗ Stable Adaptive (Evolutionary) Strategy of Homo E ˗ Evolutionary Efficiency High Hume technologies of control and enhancement of the genetic, socio- cultural and cognitive codes that let to control of biological and sociocultural human evolution, i.e.to technology of rational evolution in applied to Homo sapiens HN˗ «human nature» complex of mental-psychological predispositions HU˗ «humanity» complex of mental-psychological predispositions K˗ Evolutionary Correctness NBIC˗ nano-bio-information-cognitive technology (technology of driven evolution) 7 INTRODUCTION Welcome to the Anthropocene. Slavoj Zizek [1, p.327] In our struggle against its own vulnerability, we create new vulnerabilities and thus transforming the world transform themselves Mark Coeckelbergh [2, p. 87] The words of the philosopher-postmodernist cult of modern Western civilization, handed down in the epigraph, intuitively perceived as spiced with obvious irony, if not derision. The way it is. Anthropocene – not formalized unit of geological time scale, the geological epoch, characterized by the transformation of human activity in the primary factor in determining the direction and flow patterns of geological processes. The famous line that ends with «The Divine Comedy» by Dante Alighieri [Dante Alighieri. La Divina Comedia. Paradiso, Canto XXXIII] ─ «Love that moves the sun and light» (l'amor che move il sole e l'altre stelle) creates emotionally charged image of sensual evolving universe, which can be considered a brand of Western (Atlantic) civilization of the last millennium. The fundamental principle that the image becomes the prime mover, the substrate that is based on the synthesis of reason and faith, begets love, and that, in turn, determines the trajectory and the final goal of evolution of the cosmos. Only the accents in this triad (Will ─ Reason ─ Love). In the era of Dante in Love Will carried through reason. In the age of Enlightenment was the basis of everything impersonal, objective law. This socio-cultural transformation has reached its peak in terms of Darwin's theory. As a result, the confidence of Dante into a classical Kantian antinomy: «Evolution (Law of Nature and Reason) versus the Divine Will (and Love) moves the sun and the light?» As scientific and technological progress first fair was «Law and Mind driven by the sun and light» and then (with the advent of technology High Hume) ─ «laws of nature and is driven by the Will of sun and light». The scenario of the future course of evolution of the biosphere and man became a matter of personal choice and calculation. That is just the interpretation of the divine perfection hammered string Alighieri quietly disappeared. However, the human mind and Love, as it is known, to err or not see obvious facts. The world has entered an era Anthropocene. The term Anthropocene is in line with the concept of «noosphere» Vernadsky, Leroy, «pneumatosfere» Florensky etc. In all these cases, the original 8 intention of the genesis of these is the concepts of statement rationalization and technologizing current global evolution – its biological, geological and space components, not to mention the actual socio-anthropogenesis. However, differences still extremely important. Anthropocene is usually dated to the 17th century – the formation of an industrial society. In more advanced interpretation of this data is moved to the beginning of the Neolithic revolution [3, p. 835-836]. Thus, the concept of the noosphere and the Anthropocene are not equivalent. Noosphere implies a direct effect on the mind during the evolutionary process. Thus, the noosphere chronologically later stage Anthropocene. However, these significant differences between the two concepts are not exhausted. Offensive Noospheric era of thought of the author – Vladimir Vernadsky – diagnosed, so to speak, with the help of «socio-humanitarian syndrome» – a complex of symptoms related to the social and spiritual life (see: [4]).The latter include, for example, the elimination of war and the establishment of a world government, etc. The core, the backbone of the noosphere is a new feature of the mentality of human civilization, «the dictatorship of the Mind» as the root cause of the subsequent evolution. Thus, the origins lie in noospherization perfect, are the responsibility of not only natural, as the humanities. In our previous work, we have already mentioned that the concept of the noosphere Vernadsky in terms of the intellectual tradition has a «hybrid» origin. Equally, it was influenced by the ideas of Russian cosmists starting with Nikolai Fyodorov and theoretical understanding of accumulated empirical and scientific facts. Vernadsky and Tsiolkovsky, experienced in his youth influenced by the teachings of the founder of Russian cosmism, managed to reduce some of its ideas to scientist research and technological-innovation program, rationalizing the concept of Nikolai Fyodorov, made it acceptable to the technological mentality. The idea of the Anthropocene, owned by Eugene Stormer ecologist and Nobel laureate Paul Crutzen in 2000 [5], completes the process of rationalization of the irrational concept was originally seeking to overcome the hegemony of technocratic determinism. Offensive Anthropocene – it is not abstract, theoretical, let alone ideological and humanitarian problem. It is a matter of empirical verification, i.e. Search criteria (symptoms) of a new geochronological period clearly established purely empirically. Management of the evolutionary process, including in the least the man himself as, simultaneously, the object and the subject of manipulation transformations. This informs the term Anthropocene metaphorical sense by putting in another, without scientific terminology and emotionality metaphorical associative array, starting with Frankenstein and «Brave New World». This series has obvious signs anti-utopia, color negative perception of the image generated by them. Since then, the sequence of diagnostic signs of a new era once again split into technological and natural science (changing composition of the atmosphere,