Priority Question for Written Answer

Priority Question for Written Answer

Priority question for written answer P-004884/2020 to the Commission Rule 138 Ville Niinistö (Verts/ALE), Michael Bloss (Verts/ALE), Henrike Hahn (Verts/ALE), Heidi Hautala (Verts/ALE), Kira Marie Peter-Hansen (Verts/ALE), Monika Vana (Verts/ALE), Alviina Alametsä (Verts/ALE), Bas Eickhout (Verts/ALE), Damien Carême (Verts/ALE), Sirpa Pietikäinen (PPE), Pär Holmgren (Verts/ALE), Grace O'Sullivan (Verts/ALE), Alice Kuhnke (Verts/ALE), Jakop G. Dalunde (Verts/ALE) Subject: Subsidising Estonia's oil shale industry with co-firing biomass does not merit state aid The Estonian Government is proposing to amend the Electricity Market Act to guarantee the approval of an auction scheme for renewable energy, in which practically only one state-owned company, Eesti Energia, will be eligible to co-fire wood with oil shale in its power plants. This goes against Article 4 of Directive (EU) 2018/2001 ('Renewable Energy Directive’) and the Guidelines on State Aid for environmental protection andeEnergy 2014-2020. This proposed change is incompatible with EU State aid rules and objectives for the following reasons: There are concerns regarding the effects had on the internal market and competitiveness, since support would be awarded without competitive auctioning in a manner that is not technology-neutral. The Estonian Minister for Economic Affairs and Infrastructure, Taavi Aas, and the Explanatory Note to the proposal have both confirmed that the aim in using State aid for biomass co-firing would be to increase the profitability of the oil shale plants (i.e. to burn more fossil fuels). No assessment has been made regarding the cost-effectiveness of this measure to reach the objective of common interest (i.e. the production of renewable energy and therefore the reduction in greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions). The costs associated with both biomass and oil shale (i.e. GHG impacts, air pollution and the loss of biodiversity) have not been considered and can have long-term impacts on Estonia’s forests and carbon balance. 1. Will the Commission carry out an in-depth investigation before this State aid is approved so as to prevent any potential breaches to the State aid rules and objectives? Supporter1 1 This question is supported by a Member other than the authors: Jutta Paulus (Verts/ALE) PE658.103v01-00.

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    1 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us