The future of a hellenistic illusion : some observations on Callimachus and religion Autor(en): Bulloch, Anthony W. Objekttyp: Article Zeitschrift: Museum Helveticum : schweizerische Zeitschrift für klassische Altertumswissenschaft = Revue suisse pour l'étude de l'antiquité classique = Rivista svizzera di filologia classica Band (Jahr): 41 (1984) Heft 4 PDF erstellt am: 08.10.2021 Persistenter Link: http://doi.org/10.5169/seals-31861 Nutzungsbedingungen Die ETH-Bibliothek ist Anbieterin der digitalisierten Zeitschriften. Sie besitzt keine Urheberrechte an den Inhalten der Zeitschriften. Die Rechte liegen in der Regel bei den Herausgebern. Die auf der Plattform e-periodica veröffentlichten Dokumente stehen für nicht-kommerzielle Zwecke in Lehre und Forschung sowie für die private Nutzung frei zur Verfügung. Einzelne Dateien oder Ausdrucke aus diesem Angebot können zusammen mit diesen Nutzungsbedingungen und den korrekten Herkunftsbezeichnungen weitergegeben werden. Das Veröffentlichen von Bildern in Print- und Online-Publikationen ist nur mit vorheriger Genehmigung der Rechteinhaber erlaubt. Die systematische Speicherung von Teilen des elektronischen Angebots auf anderen Servern bedarf ebenfalls des schriftlichen Einverständnisses der Rechteinhaber. Haftungsausschluss Alle Angaben erfolgen ohne Gewähr für Vollständigkeit oder Richtigkeit. Es wird keine Haftung übernommen für Schäden durch die Verwendung von Informationen aus diesem Online-Angebot oder durch das Fehlen von Informationen. Dies gilt auch für Inhalte Dritter, die über dieses Angebot zugänglich sind. Ein Dienst der ETH-Bibliothek ETH Zürich, Rämistrasse 101, 8092 Zürich, Schweiz, www.library.ethz.ch http://www.e-periodica.ch The Future of a Hellenistic Illusion Some observations on Callimachus and religion By Anthony W. Bulloch, University of California, Berkeley When Demetrius son of Antigonus, Poüorcetes, very much a politician, very much a soldier, and very much a man, rode into the subject-city of Athens in August of 291 B.C., the Athenians, those victors of Marathon, greeted him with the notorious hymn which began: 'Clc, oi \izyicsxoi xäv Seö)v Kai tpiAxaTOt Tfj nöXei 7täpeimv evtaüSa (ydp ArJnnTpa Kai) Armürpiov a^ta 7tapfjx' ö Kaipöc;. 5 Xf| uev xä o£|ivd xf\c; Köpr|<; nuaTfjpia epxe9' iva itoifjorj, 6 8' lAapöc;, a>rj7tep xöv 9eöv 8eT, Kai KaAöc; Kai YeAräv Ttäpecm. Se|ivöv ti tpaived', oi tpiAoi rcävTec; kükAoj, io ev \tsaovn 8' aüxö«;, öjioiov coanzp oi tpiÄot |iev doxepec;, fJAioc; 8' eKetvoc;. TQ toü KparioTOt) nai noaei8ä)vo<; 9eoü, Xdipe, KdtppoSiTri«;1. We possess very few literary texts written outside Alexandria whose express purpose was mundane exposition of the divine Status of a human ruler, and * An earlier version of this essay was deüvered as a paper at Harvard University in October 1982, in London in December 1983, and in Bern in Jury 1984. I am much indebted to the friends and colleagues who gave generously of their comments and criticisms on each of these occasions. I am especially indebted to Linda A. Colman who prompted me to reflect on the nature of Callimachus' child-gods and was very generous with her own thoughts and ideas on the subject. 1 J. U. PoweU, Colledanea Alexandrina (Oxford 1925) 173-175. In v. 3 ydp Af|pr|Tpa Kai is a Supplement provided by Toup, but is required both by the sense ofthe foUowmg lines (v. 5 xf| psv and by the metre. The text is preserved by Athenaeus 253 D-F, quoting from the twenty-second book of the Histories of Duris of Samos, a contemporary of Demetrius (FGrHist 76 F 13). The author ofthe verses is not given, but it may have been one Hermocles (otherwise unknown): Athenaeus 697 A quotes Philochorus (FGrHist 328 F 165) as saying that in the case of Antigonus and Demetrius 'A9r|vaioix; g8eiv icmävac; toui; iteitoiripevou? ünö 'Eppiitnoo toü Ku£iKr|voü, b<f>a\iiXXa>v yevopeviov rröv itaidvoi; noinadviiov Kai xoü 'EppoKXioui; itpoKpi9evroc; where Schweighäuser corrected ünö 'Eppiititou to üitö 'Eppo- 14 Museum Helveticum 210 Anthony W. Bulloch these hnes are therefore invaluable; indeed the whole hymn is somewhat diag- nostic for the modern reader of early Hellenistic reügious poetry, for we see just how direct and uncomplicated the equation of man with god could be. Demetrius is incorporated straightforwardly into the royal Olympian family, with all the famihar concern that the new Hellenistic rulers had for their ances- try: not only is he cast in the role of Dionysus, by the suggestive collocation with Demeter on the occasion ofthe festival ofthe Eleusinian mysteries, but he is made directly the son of Poseidon, and also of Aphrodite2. The Athenians were certainly not alone in their treatment of Demetrius: for example, Athenaeus 253 B refers to Polemon for the Theban foundation of a whole temple to Aphrodite Lamia, one of Demetrius' mistresses (L. Preller, Polemonis Periegetae Fragmenta, Leipzig 1838, fr. 15). But it was the Athenians who blurred the distinctions between man and god for Demetrius most extensively, setting up an altar to him as 'Kataibates' on the spot where he first kXeovc,. The occasion referred to by Philochorus may have been the same as that mentioned by Duris (Athenaeus refers to Philochorus only as one in a üst of indirect citations, without context), which we know from the twenty-first book of the Histories of Demochares of Athens to have been Demetrius' return from Leucas and Corcyra (cited by Athenaeus 253 B-D FGrHist 75 F 2, just before his quotation from Duris). F. Jacoby, FGrHist 3b (Suppl.) 1 p. 541f. considered this to have been the restoration of JXEudepia and uaxpio? noXirsia in 307/6 after the capture of Munichia, but K. J. Beloch's dating of 291 (or 292) has been generally aeeepted because of the reference to the Aetoüan Situation in w. 21-30 of the hymn (Griechische Geschichte IV 2, Berün 21927, 248f.: see C. Habicht, Untersuchungen zur politischen Geschichte Athens im 3. Jahrhundert v. Chr., Vestigia 30, 1979, 39ff.). - For useful discussion and notes see L. Cerfaux and J. Tondriau, Le culte des souverains (Tournai 1957) 180-187, for an important analysis of the religious motifs see O. Weinreich, Antikes Gottmenschentum, Neue Jahrbücher 2 (1926) 633-651, and in general see K. Scott, The deification of Demetrius Poliorcetes, AJP 49 (1928) 137-166. 217-239, and V. Ehrenberg, Aspects ofthe Ancient WbrM (Oxford 1946) 179-198 'Athenian hymn to Demetrius Poüorcetes'. 2 The ancestry was no Athenian invention. Demetrius, much of whose success was based on naval strength, appropriately claimed Poseidon for his own, and the Earthshaker brandish- ing, or holding, his trident appears as a Standard image on the reverse of Demetrius' coinage from about 300 B.C. on: see E. T. NeweU, The Coinages of Demetrius Poliorcetes (London 1927) 24ff. Aphrodite's presence is generally explained as representing Demetrius' active love-üfe and/or his good looks (so, for example, K. Scott, 77ie deification p. 233 [see n. 1 above], F. Taeger, Charisma I, Stuttgart 1957, 272); this is unsuitable to her role here as a parent, and she must rather be the marine Aphrodite, Euploia, Pontia, Galenaia, etc., a familiär eult-figure around the Aegean islands and coastüne and a normal associate of Poseidon in this role: see L. R. Farnell, Cults ofthe Greek States II (Oxford 1896) 636f, L. PreUer and C. Robert, Griechische Mythologie I (Berlin 41894) 364f, and for an important discussion of the spread of marine Aphrodite's eult in Egyptian territories, in formal association with Arsinoe II, see L. Robert, Un dicret d'Ilion et un papyrus concernant des cultes royaux, in: Essays in Honor of C. Bradford Weites (New Haven 1966) 175-211 and esp. 199-202. Another 'son' of Poseidon and Aphrodite was Rhodes: scholia to Pindar O. 1, 24f. Herodorus FGrHist 31 F 62, Herophüus FGrHist 533 F 4). - For marine and naval iconography in Demetrius' important new foundation on the Gulf of Pagasae, Demetrias, see U. Krön, Das Siegel der Stadt Demetrias: Ikonographie, Mitt. d. dt. archäol. Inst., Athen. Abt. 93 (1978) 149-160. The Future of a HeUenistic IUusion 211 stepped down from his chariot (Plutarch, Demetrius 10, 5) as if he were Zeus or ApoUo, and voting, on the Suggestion of the politician Stratocles3, even to embroider the ünages of Demetrius and Antigonus alongside those of Zeus and Athena on the latter's sacred 7r.ejr.Aoc; (Plutarch, Demetrius 10, 5) as well as allowing him to live in the opisthodomus of Athena's Parthenon (Plutarch, Demetrius 23, 5). Hence, as Athenaeus 252 F remarks, the behaviour of the Athenians towards Demetrius became a notorious example for writers of all periods on the topic of flattery (Siaßörftoc; 8e eyevexo zni KoÄaKeia Kai 6 tcöv A9r|vaicov Sfjuoc;). Demochares, a nephew of Demosthenes, recorded, some- what implausibly, that even Demetrius himself was taken aback and thought the less of contemporary Athenians (Athenaeus 253 A-B quoting book 20 of the Histories FGrHist 75 F 1), and the gods of longer, Olympian, standing made their views piain too: we know from the Athenian comedian Phiüppides (Kock CAF III 308 fr. 25) and Plutarch, Demetrius 12, 3 that at the Great Panathenaea of 302 B.C., as the 7teitAoc; was being paraded in procession, a hurricane descended, ripped the garment in two and smashed the sacred mast and spar on which it was carried - furthermore, an extraordinary and unsea- sonable frost destroyed the grape, fig and com crops, and all round the altars set up to Demetrius and Antigonus hemlock sprouted4. Before long the Athenians were struggling for hberation from this 'divine' Macedonian5. These were difficult and confused times, and while the familiär, traditional reügious attitudes and practices continued with the tenacity that habit and repeated ritual do give to the expression of man's Spiritual needs, much was inevitably changing in the relationship between man and god.