Irreducible Subgroups of Symplectic Groups in Characteristic 2

Irreducible Subgroups of Symplectic Groups in Characteristic 2

J. Austral. Math. Soc. 73 (2002), 85–95 IRREDUCIBLE SUBGROUPS OF SYMPLECTIC GROUPS IN CHARACTERISTIC 2 CHRISTOPHER PARKER and PETER ROWLEY (Received 13 January 2000; revised 25 July 2001) Communicated by R. B. Howlett Abstract Suppose that V is a finite dimensional vector space over a finite field of characteristic 2, G is the symplectic group on V and a is a non-zero vector of V . Here we classify irreducible subgroups of G containing a certain subgroup of O2.StabG hai/ all of whose non-trivial elements are 2-transvections. 2000 Mathematics subject classification: primary 20CDE. Keywords and phrases: symplectic group, orthogonal group, 2-transvections, transvections. 1. Introduction Let k denote the Galois field GF.q/,whereq = 2m , and suppose V is a finite dimen- sional vector space over k. An involution g of GL.V / is a transvection (respectively a 2-transvection) of V if CV .g/ has codimension 1 (respectively 2) in V . A subgroup K of GL.V / is called a transvection subgroup if CV .K / has codimension 1, [V; K ] has dimension 1, and K is isomorphic to the additive group of k. Assume, additionally, that dim V = 2n where n ≥ 2and f is a non-degenerate alternating bilinear form on V . Letting G denote Sp.V /, the symplectic group on V defined by f , we may now state our main result. THEOREM 1.1. Let a be a non-zero vector of V and put H = StabG hai. Suppose that X is a subgroup of O2.H/ which satisfies .i/ |X|=q2n−2; and .ii/ no element of X acts as a transvection on V . c 2002 Australian Mathematical Society 1446-8107/2000 $A2:00 + 0:00 85 86 Christopher Parker and Peter Rowley [2] If L is a subgroup of G which contains X and acts irreducibly on V , then L acts naturally on V as one of Sp.V /, .V /, O.V / or q = n = 2 and L =∼ Alt.6/ =∼ . /0 0 . ; / =∼ . / Sp4 2 or L 2 4 Sym 5 . We remark that the listed groups all satisfy the hypothesis of Theorem 1.1.The = = . / =∼ exceptional cases when q n 2 are caused by the non-simplicity of Sp4 2 Sym.6/ in the Alt.6/ case and by the fact that Sym.6/ has two classes of subgroups isomorphic to Sym.5/ in the second case. To clarify the second case further take V to be the doubly deleted GF.2/-permutation module for Sym.6/, the point stabilizer . / −. / . / . / Sym 5 acts on V as O4 2 , while the transitive Sym 5 when restricted to Alt 5 acts on V as SL2.4/. Observe that, as the non-trivial elements of the elementary abelian 2-group O2.H/ are either transvections or 2-transvections, every non-trivial element of X must act as a 2-transvection on V . So Theorem 1.1 may be seen as a kindred spirit to the results of McLaughlin [3, 4], on irreducible linear groups which contain transvection subgroups and also to work of Dempwolff’s [1, 2]. In [1, 2] Dempwolff shows that an irreducible subgroup Y of SL.V / which is generatedby 2-transvections either contains transvections, has a normal abelian subgroup of odd order which has 1-dimensional homogeneous components on V which Y permutes transitively, contains a normal complex of Stellmacher elements, or a normal complex of roots involutions. Theorem 1.1 generalizes a result due to Timmesfeld for the case q = 2, which plays an important part in the proof of his Theorem 4.5 [9]. This more general theorem plays an equally vital role in the classification of symplectic amalgams [5]. The proof given here is modelled on Timmesfeld’s approach. We remark that Theorem 1.1 is also the principal content of [7, Satz 3.10]. However, the proof there calls upon the (lengthy) classification of groups generated by root involutions and then deals with the resulting configurations case by case. Our proof is direct and elementary—the only substantial results we use being the classification of groups generated by transvections due to McLaughlin [3, 4]. Our notation follows that of [8]. The following elementary result will be used in the proof of Theorem 1.1. LEMMA 1.2. Let V be a vector space of dimension 2n, n ≥ 1 which is equipped with a non-degenerate alternating bilinear form f .PutG = Sp.V /.Ifa and b are non-zero vectors of V with f .a; b/ 6= 0, then G =hO2.StabGhai/; O2.StabGhbi/i: PROOF. See [6]. [3] Irreducible subgroups of symplectic groups 87 2. Orbits on points and vectors and a quadratic form From now on we assume the situation depicted in Theorem 1.1.IfL con- tains a transvection subgroup, then we may avail ourselves of McLaughlin’s re- sults ([3, 4]) to conclude, since L ≤ Sp.V /, that L must be isomorphic to one of Sp.V /; O.V /; Sym.2n + 1/,orSym.2n + 2/. Of these groups only Sp.V / and O.V / can contain an elementary abelian 2-group as large as X and so Theorem 1.1 holds in this case. Henceforth, therefore, we shall suppose that L contains no transvec- tion subgroups. ⊥ LEMMA 2.1. .i/ [a ; X]=hai; .ii/ [V; X]=a⊥; .iii/ CV .X/ =hai; and .iv/ Let Z be a subgroup of index q in X and let U =ha; ci be a 2-dimensional ⊥ subspace of a .IfZ centralizes U, then CV .Z/ = U. ⊥ ⊥ PROOF. Since O2.H/ ≥ X, hai=[a ; O2.H/]≥[a ; X] and part (i) follows as X contains no transvections. Now suppose that [V; X] < a⊥. Then |[V; X]| ≤ q2n−2. v ∈ \ ⊥ ={[v; ]| ∈ } 2n−2 So, letting V a , Î x x X contains at most q vectors. If | 2n−2 |= Î =[ ; ] [v; ]= ∈ Î q , then V X and hence, by part (i), x a,forsomex X. But then [V; x]≤h[a⊥; x]; [v; x]i ≤ hai; which implies that x is a transvection on V , | | < 2n−2 | |= 2n−2 a contradiction. Thus Î q .SinceX q , there must exist distinct x1; x2 ∈ X with [v; x1]=[v; x2], whence [v; x1x2]=0. This then implies that x1x2 is a transvection on V . Hence we infer that [V; X]=a⊥, and we have (ii). Using ⊥ ⊥ ⊥ part (ii) gives CV .X/ =[V; X] = .a / =hai; so proving (iii). For part (iv), since Z centralizes a and c,wehave[V; Z]≤a ⊥ ∩ c⊥ = U ⊥ with |U ⊥|=q2n−2.Now,as|Z|=q 2n−3, we may argue as in part (ii) to obtain ⊥ ⊥ [V; Z]=U . Hence CV .Z/ =[V; Z] = U. By hypothesis L acts irreducibly upon V and so haL i=V . Thus we can find an image hbi of hai (under L) with b ∈ V \ a⊥. Select the vector representative b of hbi . ; / = ½ ∈ = {h x + ½ i| ∈ } ; so as f a b 1. Then, for k we put ǽ b a x X and note that \ ⊥ each ǽ is an X-orbit which consists of points (1-spaces of V )inV a . ⊥ LEMMA 2.2. X has q regular orbits on the points in V \ a .TheseX-orbits are ½ ∈ ǽ, k. ⊥ PROOF. Suppose hvi is a point of V \ a whichisfixedbyx ∈ X #. Then, by Lemma 2.1 (ii), [hvi; x]≤[V; X]∩hvi=a⊥ ∩hvi=0: Hence [V; x]=[a⊥ +hvi; x]=[a⊥; x]≤hai; 88 Christopher Parker and Peter Rowley [4] a contradiction as X contains no transvections. Therefore the X-orbits of points of V not contained in a⊥ are regular. So, by counting, we see that X has exactly q orbits on the points in V \ a⊥. To complete the proof of the lemma we must show that for ½;¼ ∈ = Ç ½ = ¼ ½;¼ ∈ Ç = Ç k, ǽ ¼ implies that .Let k be such that ½ ¼. Then b + ½a = bx + ¼a for some x ∈ X.So[b; x]=b + bx = .¼ + ½/a ∈hai and consequently [V; x]≤hai. Since no element of X # is a transvection on V , we must have x = 1andthen½a = ¼a. Hence ½ = ¼. # ⊥ For each x ∈ X we define a 2-dimensional subspace Tx of a by Tx =[V; x]=ha; [b; x]i = hai+h[b; x]i: # ⊥ x LEMMA 2.3. For x ∈ X we have Tx ∩ b =h[b; x]+ f .b; b /ai. ⊥ ⊥ ⊥ PROOF. Since dim b = 2n − 1andhai6≤b ,dim.Tx ∩ b / = 1. Now f .b; [b; x]+ f .b; bx /a/ = f .b; b + bx / + f .b; bx / f .b; a/ = f .b; b/ + f .b; bx / + f .b; bx / = 0; x ⊥ x and so [b; x]+ f .b; b /a ∈ Tx ∩ b . Thus, as [b; x]+ f .b; b /a 6= 0, Lemma 2.3 holds. ⊥ LEMMA 2.4. Suppose T is a 2-dimensional subspace of a which contains hai. Then # .i/ there exists x ∈ X such that Tx = T ; and # .ii/ XT := {x ∈ X | Tx = T }∪{1} is a subgroup of X of order q. ⊥ PROOF. Let T be a 2-dimensional subspace of a containing hai, and suppose that # ⊥ {x ∈ X | Tx = T } has at least q distinct elements. Then, since dim.T ∩ b / = 1, # Lemma 2.3 implies there exists x1; x2 ∈ X with x1 6= x2 such that x1 x2 [b; x1]+ f .b; b /a =[b; x2]+ f .b; b /a: So b + bx1 + b + bx2 = . f .b; bx1 / + f .b; bx2 //a, whence − − x x 1 x x x 1 x x b + b 1 2 = . f .b; b 1 / + f .b; b 2 //a 2 = . f .b; b 1 / + f .b; b 2 //a ∈hai: −1 This forces x1x2 to be a transvection of V and so we conclude that # |{x ∈ X | Tx = T }| ≤ q − 1: So there must be at least .|X|−1/=.q − 1/ = .q2n−2 − 1/=.q − 1/ 2-dimensional # subspaces of V of the form Tx ,forsomex ∈ X .

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    11 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us