I'lrillia~Rz D. Ross' Aid Malcolnz E. Corden

I'lrillia~Rz D. Ross' Aid Malcolnz E. Corden

MICROSCOPIC AND HISTOCHEAIICAL CHANGES IN IIOUGLAS-FIR BARK ACCOMPANYING FUNGAL INVASION' I'lrillia~rz D. Ross' aid Malcolnz E. Corden Ilepa~t~ncnt\of Fo~cstProducts and Botany and Plant P<~thology,Oregon State Univcrdy Corv,1lli5, Oregon 97331 (Received 9 J~lly1973) ABSTRACT Dorlglas-fir bark in the proccbss of I~iological clcterioration contained t\vo types of tissr~r "1)leaching." Sclcreid walls \tTcre "bleached" as \\,all lignin was removed in tissues infested \vith Bispora betzllinu, and parc.nchynla and sclcreids were "l~leachedas a rcs~iltof thc selective rcrllovnl of condensed tannins from \\-all surfaces and lnmina in tissues con- sistcntly i~lfestcd\vith an nnidentified fungus resembling Isariu. Rle;lchcd tissne symptol~~s \\-c.rc>not p~)ducedin hark tissncs inoculated with B. betrllil~u or the fungus resellll~ling Isczria, I~litI)oth fungi significantly altered specific bark coniponents. Atl(litiotrc11 l;c,r~rc;orcl.r: Pscrrrlotsrigu nlel~ziesii, lignin, condensed tannin, Bispora hettrlincl, tlecay. INTHODUCTIOS tion of colored materials, and to identify AIxroscopic examination of cuts through the a'socinted the ],ark of Douglas-fir frecluently reveals I'REVIOUS WORK 1)iologically degraded tissues of two dis- tinct types. In one case, tan-colored scle- General descriptions of outer hark and rcids with normally lignified walls stand of ontoge~lyand structure of the i1lner bark out against a backgro~mdof "bleached," and periden-n layers of Douglas-fir are available (<:hang 1954; Grillos 1956; white parenchyma, and in the seco~ldcase, Grillos and Smith 1959; Ross and Krahmer "l)lcached," white sclereids appear on a 1971) . 1)nckground of dark 11ro\v11 pi~renchyn~a. The recldisll-brown appearance of the It was suspected fro111 these ol~servations cut surface of Douglas-fir outer bark is due that two 11iajor classes of phenolic coin- largely to polymeric polypheilols in the polrents in Douglas-fir bark, lignin and phloem tissne ( IIergert 1960). Specific condensed tanni~~s,mere differentially de- fractions of these polyphenols h:lvc, been graded. named ( e.g. phenolic acids, phlol npl~enes, The present study was initiated to con- and tannins) depending primarily on their firm the location of 1igni11 and condensed solubility in various solve~lts(Kurt11 et al. tannins in bark tissues, to describe "l~leach- 1949). All these fractions are chemically ing" of specific cell types through degrada- similar and are polymers of leucocya~lidins and catechins (Fujii and Kurth 1966). I11 the present study, all reddish-brow11 ma- ' This research was s~ipporteclin part 1,y hlc- 111tirt.-Stennis frunds. Appreciation is extended to terials encrusting cell walls and residual Dr. C. J. K. Wang for ~rrifyingthe identification protoplasts of bark cells are called con- of Uisl~oruhctrtlitra, and to Dr. Hol)ert L. Krahmer densed tan~lins. for hrlpf~~l;tdvicc and criticism. This paper is part of the 1'11.U. dissertation of the, senior aiithor, and Although lignin fractions froin Douglas- is I'aper No. 907 of the Forcst Rrsearch Labora- fir bark have bee11 described (Kurt11 and to1.1, School of I'orc.stry and Technical Paprr 3622 Smith 1954; Kiefer aild Kurth 1953; Fiolmes of the, Oregon Agricultul.al Experiment Station. and Kl~rth1961; Fujii and Kurth 1966), a 'Presc~~tatldrcss: Box 3354, ITniversity Station, l'la~lt Science Division, trniversity of Wyoming, sul~stancethat fits the criteria for lignin 1,an-:u~~ic~,\l'yo~r~ing 82070. suggested 1)y Aranns and Brauns (1960) 130 \VJI,I,IA~\C I). ~~OSSAND ;\IAI,COI,~SI E. COHDEN IS. 3 1) Cr~ss-s~~cti~~iof Doi~glas-fir I)ar!i fl.on~a 235-y~ar-oldtree, \\~iih(A) vasc~ilarcan- I)iunr, (H) perider~rilayer, (C) innel.-l~arkphloem, (D) a dotted line illustrating a possible location for friture pt~ridrrnldifferelltiatio~i in the inner I~ark,(E) outer l)ar!i \vitli, (F) the ends of sclereids \ isil)lc., and ( C: ) sclcricds dc~ca~.c~d. I\.IODIYICATI~N oP' DOUGLAS-FIRBARK BY FUNGI 131 and Kratzl ( 1965) has not beell isolated. this residue was considered the third Thus, the presence in sclereicl walls of "lignin" fraction. ligni1-1 meeting several criteria of the latter ;illthors was sought in the present study. MATEHIALS AND hlETHOUS Early lignin preparations from Douglas- Isolation and selection of fungi associated fir bark failed to give a positive red to with decay of bark violet reaction when treated with Wiesner reagent (phloroglucinol-HC1) (Kurth and To isolate fungi associated with decay Smith 1954); however, Fujii and Kurth symptonis in bark, individual bark cells or ( 1966) later reported that a Ilouglas-fir small groups of cells with discrete evidence bark preparation "which contained some of fungal attack were plated in a range of I~astfibers and cork fragments" did give a solid media ( Ross 1971) . Followiilg in- positive TViesner test. Not all cell types in cubation at 20-24 C, individual fungi were tree I~arksgive a uniform \Viesner reaction, transferred to potato-dextrose agar slants Ilut fibers and sclereids of coniferous I~arks for storage. generally do ( Srivastava 1966). Two of these media were particularly Tlie chemical composition of isolated successful for culturing bark fungi. A11 sclereid fractions from Douglas-fir bark has inner-bark extract medium was prepared by becn studied, and three "lignin" fractions leaching 20 g of dry inner-bark fines (see have been described (Kiefer and Kurth below) in 500 ml of water for $4 hr. hlineral 1953). The total lignin content of the salts (iron reduced to ?/lo strength) and sclereids was 44.8% as deterinilled by the vitamins of Bf-2 medium (Fihraeus and Klason procedure: however, one fraction, Tulla~lder1956) were added with 90 g/liter constituting 49% of the Klason lignin, was of sucrose. The medium was sterilized by isolated 1)y extracting the sclereids with filtration through a Millipore HA filter, 1%h'aOI3. This fraction, termed "phenolic and agar (15 g/liter) was added when a acids," contained a relatively low methoxyl solid medium was desired. I11 addition, value (4.3%), a high carboxyl content modifications of the Bf-2 medium were (4.9-5.3%), gave a relatively low yield of used in which NI14N03(1 g/liter) was sub- vanillin ( 1.639 ) by nitrobenzene oxidation, stituted for s spa rag in, phenylalanine was hut failed to give a positive T17icsner reac- omitted, the iron content was reduced to lAo tion (Kiefer and Kmth 1953). strength, anil various carbon sources re- A second lignin preparation was obtained placed sucrose. I)y extraction with a dioxane-HC1 reagent Fungi repeatedly isolated from bark following the removal of "phenolic acids" were incubated in a lirluid inner-bark ex- with 1% NaOH. This fraction was prob- tract medium to determine their ability to ably most similar to lignins fotmd in the modify the bark polyphenols. The nledium wood of gyrnnospen~lsandhad ;L methoxyl (100 ml) in 250-ml Erle~lmeyerflasks was content of 13.5-14.3%. The results of a inoculated with mycelial fragments and the IViesner test and vanillin yield followi~lg cultures were incubated 24 weeks in the ~iitrol~enzeneoxidation were not given for dark at 20-24 C, either still or 011 a rotary this preparation ( Kiefer and Kurth 1953). shaker. Fungi causing precipitation of About one-follrth of the Klason lignin re- reddish phenolic materials in the inedium mained after the first two extractions and were retained for further study. 2) Cross-section of i11nc.r bark with (A) a sclereid with conderised tannins in the lumen, (B) an axial l~arenchq~i~acell containing starch grains, (C) ray parenchyma, and (11) sieve cells. :3) Cross-section of outer-hark phloe~ilwith (A) an ol~ter bark sclereid with condensed tannin cncr~lstingthe outer cell-wall layer, (R) expanded phloem parenc*hynla cell and (C) crl~shrtlsieve c,c.lla. 132 WILLIA~I n. ~ossANI) A~ALCOLAIE. CORDEN F~c:s.4-7. 3) A split pit~ceof infested outer-hark ph1oe111 containing white ("bleached") sclereids a~ldtliukeued parnichq-111atissr~e. 5 ) Longitndinal section of tx11.k containing "1)leached" sclereids, with (A) parenchyma cells con- tiii~~ing,rlarL~,~~c.d residi~nl protoplast5 ;1nc1 fungal hyphacl, a~~d(B) degraded sclereid walls. \IODIFICATI~N OF DOUGLAS-FIIIIIAIIK I~YFUNGI 133 Incul~ationof fungi on burk while lying on the silica gel. Sterile Bf-2 Bark samples and isolated sclereids were nledium was added to allow thorough incubated with fungal isolates in an at- \vetting of the silica gel via the paper teinpt to reproduce specific decay symp- wicks. The slide cultures were incubated t0111~. in the dark ;at 20-24 C. Vial c~lltures. Outer bark was cut into Preparation of isolated sclereid frclctions 1-cm cubes and a 2-mm hole was bored through the center of each cube. Two bark \\'hole bark call be ground and then frac- cnbes were enclosed in each vial (21 x tionated by screening into homogeneous 70 mm) 1)y attaching a glass rod (2 x 60 batches of cork, sclereids, and parenchyma mm) to the vial stoppers and passing the cells (Hergert and Kurth 1952; Kiefer and rod through the holes in the two bark cubes. Kurth 1953). Methods used in this study Rloisture content of the bark was main- and descriptio~lsof the resulting bark frac- tained by submerging the lowest bark tions are given by Ross and Krahmer sainple halfway in water in the bottom of ( 1971 ) . Washed sclereids that passed the vial. The upper bark sample was above through a 100-mesh Tyler screen were con- the water in a saturated atmosphere.

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    10 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us