SAFETY AUDIT REPORT CARD SUMMARY AUDIT DATE: June 14th, 2011 AUDIT GROUP: 416 Community Support for Women AUDIT AREA: Seaton St. to Bleecker St. to Wellesley St. to Sherbourne St and Dundas St. E. Ward 27 and 28 – Toronto Centre‐Rosedale (north and south) Neighbourhood 73 Moss Park and 71 Cabbagetown – South St. James Town EXECUTIVE SUMMARY METRAC’s Safety Audit looks at how social and physical environments can make an area safe or unsafe. METRAC defines safety as ‘freedom from the threat, fear, and experience of all kinds of violence, oppression, and discrimination.’ The Community Safety Audit was organized by 416 Community Support for Women. The audit was conducted by women who access the services at the 416 and who were concerned about safety issues in the area. The Safety Audit was conducted on the morning of June 14th, 2011 and 3 individuals participated including a representative from the 416 Drop‐In Centre. The area audited was north along Seaton St., west on Carlton St., north on Bleecker St., west to Sherbourne St., south to Dundas St. E., ending at 416 Dundas St. E. The area audited falls within the Moss Park and Cabbagetown – South St. James Town neighbourhoods (Ward 27 and Ward 28). The Moss Park neighbourhood has a higher population of youth (15‐24) in comparison to the rest of the City and over half the population (72.5%) are of working age (25‐64).1 A majority of residents, 71%, live in rented units while 29% live in privately owned dwellings.2 The Cabbagetown – South St. James Town neighbourhood has a lower population of children (0‐14) and youth (15‐24) in comparison to the rest of the City and over half of the population (69.5%) are of working age (25‐64).3 The number of people living in high‐rise apartments in both areas is high ranging from 74‐76%re is also a high percentage (74‐76%).4 1 http://www.toronto.ca/demographics/cns_profiles/2006/pdf1/cpa75.pdf 2 http://www.toronto.ca/demographics/cns_profiles/2006/pdf3/cpa75.pdf 3 http://www.toronto.ca/demographics/cns_profiles/2006/pdf1/cpa71.pdf 4 http://www.toronto.ca/wards2000/ward27.htm/http://www.toronto.ca/wards2000/ward28.htm WALKABOUT PHOTO SUMMARY OVERVIEW OF SAFETY AUDIT RESULTS The information below is based on the results of the survey and comments made during the safety audit walkabout. Recommendations for action were both stated from participants and based on participants concerns. General C Some of the participants did not feel safe in the area, especially when they are alone, or leaving their Impressions house after dark. Some people avoid doing things in their community because of poor lighting, poor security patrols, too many bushes, and drugs in the area. One person sometimes felt unsafe near the front steps of their building, because of the people sitting on the steps outside of it. A ‐ Very Good B ‐ Good C ‐ Ok D ‐ Substandard F– Poor SAFETY GRADE SAFETY CONCERNS RECOMMENDATIONS FOR ACTION CONTACT FEATURES LIGHTING C Participants stated that the general Increased and brighter lighting is needed ‐ Contact Toronto lighting in the area is not good and throughout the area and broken lights Hydro about broken that there are broken lights and areas need to be fixed, particularly at: lights and clearing that need more lighting. ‐ The front of houses near 251 trees and bushes that Participants stated that lights should Sherbourne and in front of 251 are blocking lights be installed in front of houses and in Sherbourne St. front of 251 Sherbourne St. ‐ Contact TCHC about Some participants did not know who installing more to call if they saw lights that are lighting on their out/broken. property. Some participants stated that there are lights blocked by trees/ bushes. ‐ Contact Councillor Paths, sidewalks and signs are also not about lighting on city well lit. property and increasing lights near sidewalks and signs. SIGNS and C Some participants said there were ‐Signs need to be placed in areas where ‐Contact Councillor to MAPS enough signs in the area, and they are all people can see them. make sure signs are in easy to find, while other participants plain language so said there needs to be more signs and ‐ Signs need to be in clear writing and they are easy to see that signs are not easy to find. large enough for people to see. and understand. Participants stated that signs are not easy to read and understand. ‐ Emergency signs need to be located ‐Contact property One participant said they were unsure where everyone can see them and in managers of buildings if there were signs showing who to call plain language so everyone can to make emergency for help in emergencies in the area. understand the sign signs more visible and Participants found emergency exits easy to see. were easy to find in buildings, but also stated this was hard for a lot of people. TRAFFIC C Some participants said there needs to ‐ A traffic assessment of the area needs ‐ Contact Councillor be more crosswalks and traffic lights to be done to see if the area needs more about having a traffic throughout the area. traffic lights and crosswalks and also if assessment done in Participants stated traffic in the area is speed bumps or lower speed limits need the area and to assess too fast and speed limit should be to be put into place. the need for bike lowered or speed bumps added. lanes to be added. Some people stated there need to be ‐ Assessment for the need of bike lanes more bike lanes in the area. should be done. TTC B All participants have used public ‐ All bus stops should be properly lit ‐Contact TTC about transit in the area and generally feel the need for proper safe, including while waiting for the ‐ Emergency signs should be at all TTC lighting at bus stops bus at night. stops and on TTC stations and vehicles and emergency signs Some people stated buses are not always on time and should run more ‐ Contact Councillor frequently and that there needs to be about the need for more lighting at bus stops. more lighting at bus Participants stated there are no signs, stops in the area. or were unsure if there were signs about who to call in case of an emergency on the TTC. ISOLATION ‐ Participants did not think the area ‐Install emergency phones throughout ‐Contact Councillor looks/feels abandoned. the area. about installing Participants stated the area is full of emergency phones in people during the day and night. ‐Start a community watch group in the area. Participants feel people would hear community so there are places people them if they screamed for help, but can go/call if they are in an emergency. ‐Contact Crime some thought people would not Prevention respond. ‐Look at areas where people can get Association of Participants stated there are not trapped and look at how to block off Toronto (CPAT) and enough working payphones in area. those areas. community members Participants did not think there were about starting a different safe, well lit routes people community watch could use in the area. group. Some participants believed there are places in the area where they could get ‐Contact Councillor trapped. about blocking off One participant stated if they were in areas where people danger they had a place close by to go could get trapped in for help, while others were unsure. the area. VISIBILITY C Participants stated they are able to ‐Add mirrors to areas where there are ‐Contact Councillor clearly see ahead or around them sharp corners, walls, and fences. about adding mirrors while walking, but one participant to areas with sharp stated this was only in the day and not ‐Trim trees and bushes that block corners. Ask for trees at night. people’s views. and shrubs on public Some participants stated that sharp property to be corners, walls and fences block their ‐ Add lights to the end of pathways and trimmed. Also ask for view. walkways. lights to be installed All participants stated that trees and at end of pathways. bushes (such as in people’s yards), and ‐ Look at areas where people can hide parked cars on the street block their particularly at Ontario St. and Bleecker ‐ Have a community view. St. and work as a community to see what meeting with Some people said they could not see measures can be done to reduce the risk Councillor to address the end of paths and walkways. of those areas. the safety concerns All participants said there should be regarding visibility mirrors to help them see around. and hiding areas near Participants said there are places Ontario St. and people could hide and wait for people, Bleecker St. such as at Ontario St. and Bleecker St. and behind trees and in unlit doorways. MAINTENANCE B Some participants stated that the area ‐ Areas with garbage and litter should be ‐Contact 311 to clear is well maintained. However, some cleaned. areas that might have participants stated that there is a lot of large garbage garbage and litter in the area. ‐ Residents should be informed about Participants stated that there are no who to contact about maintenance ‐ Contact community hate slogans or a lot of vandalism in issues on City property. members to organize the area. community clean up. Participants stated they were unsure or that they did not think there are ‐Ask Councillor to signs showing who to call for send out information maintenance issues in the area. about 311 services.