Genetic Variation in Adaptive Traits and Seed Transfer Zones for Pseudoroegneria Spicata (Bluebunch Wheatgrass) in the Northwestern United States John Bradley St

Genetic Variation in Adaptive Traits and Seed Transfer Zones for Pseudoroegneria Spicata (Bluebunch Wheatgrass) in the Northwestern United States John Bradley St

Evolutionary Applications Evolutionary Applications ISSN 1752-4571 ORIGINAL ARTICLE Genetic variation in adaptive traits and seed transfer zones for Pseudoroegneria spicata (bluebunch wheatgrass) in the northwestern United States John Bradley St. Clair,1 Francis F. Kilkenny,1 Richard C. Johnson,2 Nancy L. Shaw3 and George Weaver4 1 United States Department of Agriculture Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station, Corvallis, OR, USA 2 United States Department of Agriculture Agricultural Research Service, Plant Germplasm Research and Testing, Pullman, WA, USA 3 United States Department of Agriculture Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, Boise, ID, USA 4 Department of Statistics, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR, USA Keywords Abstract climate change, genecology, plant adaptation, Pseudoroegneria spicata, seed transfer, seed A genecological approach was used to explore genetic variation in adaptive zones traits in Pseudoroegneria spicata, a key restoration grass, in the intermountain western United States. Common garden experiments were established at three Correspondence contrasting sites with seedlings from two maternal parents from each of 114 John Bradley St. Clair, USDA Forest Service, populations along with five commercial releases commonly used in restoration. Pacific Northwest Research Station, 3200 SW Traits associated with size, flowering phenology, and leaf width varied consid- Jefferson Way, Corvallis, OR 97331, USA. Tel.: 541 750 7294; erably among populations and were moderately correlated with the climates of fax: 541 750 7329; the seed sources. Pseudoroegneria spicata populations from warm, arid source e-mail: [email protected] environments were smaller with earlier phenology and had relatively narrow leaves than those from mild climates with cool summers, warm winters, low Received: 21 November 2012 seasonal temperature differentials, high precipitation, and low aridity. Later Accepted: 6 May 2013 phenology was generally associated with populations from colder climates. Releases were larger and more fecund than most of the native ecotypes, but doi:10.1111/eva.12077 were similar to native populations near their source of origin. Differences among native populations associated with source climates that are logical for survival, growth, and reproduction indicate that genetic variation across the landscape is adaptive and should be considered during restoration. Results were used to delineate seed transfer zones and population movement guide- lines to ensure adapted plant materials for restoration activities. Natural selection is suggested when populations differ in Introduction putative adaptive traits, those differences are correlated Genecology is the study of intraspecific genetic variation with characteristics of the source environments, and the in relation to source environments, a term first used by relationship between a trait and an environmental charac- Swedish evolutionary biologist Gote€ Turesson (1923). ter is logical for growth, survival, or reproduction. Strong and interpretable correlations between geographic One practical advantage of genecology studies is the genetic variation as revealed in common garden studies ability to evaluate a large number of populations from a and the environments in which populations evolved sug- wide range of source environments in one or a few eas- gest adaptation as determined by natural selection ily accessible common gardens. By relating traits to cli- (Heslop-Harrison 1964; Endler 1986). Presumably, parents mates or other environmental variables, researchers are with heritable characteristics that allowed them to grow, able to map adaptive traits across the landscape (Camp- survive, and reproduce in a past environment at a source bell 1986; Sorensen 1992; Rehfeldt 1994a; Erickson et al. location produced progeny that express those characteris- 2004; St. Clair et al. 2005). Large numbers of popula- tics when grown together in a common environment. tions are particularly useful in highly heterogeneous © 2013 The Authors. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative 933 Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. Plant adaptation and seed transfer zones Bradley St. Clair et al. environments such as in the mountainous terrain of wes- Genecological studies have been used for some time to tern North America. These maps may be used to delin- delineate seed zones and population movement guidelines eate seed transfer zones or population movement for commercial forest trees (e.g., Campbell 1986; Sorensen guidelines to ensure that germplasm used in restoration 1992; Beaulieu et al. 2004; St. Clair et al. 2005). More or revegetation is adapted to the site; however, population recently, seed zones have been delineated using a geneco- movement guidelines based on genecology studies assume logical approach for several nontree native plants used in that local populations are best adapted to local environ- restoration, including Elymus glaucus (Erickson et al. 2004; ments and less well adapted as you move to different Kitzmiller 2009), Bromus carinatus (Kitzmiller 2009; John- environments. Nevertheless, a large number of studies son et al. 2010a,b), Bromus orcuttianus (Kitzmiller 2009), have shown that in most cases, locally derived germplasm Festuca roemeri (Wilson et al. 2008), and Holodiscus dis- is at least approximately best adapted to local climatic color (Horning et al. 2010). In this study, we use a geneco- and environmental conditions (Hufford and Mazer 2003; logical approach to map geographic genetic variation in Savolainen et al. 2007; Johnson et al. 2010a). Genecology adaptive traits and delineate seed zones for P. spicata studies also assume that the most important adaptive (Pursh) A. Love€ (Poaceae, bluebunch wheatgrass), a species traits have been evaluated. This assumption may be used widely in restoration, but for which little is known addressed by measuring many putative adaptive traits, by about adaptive geographic variation. P. spicata is a cool- measuring traits that are strongly correlated with several season, outcrossing perennial bunchgrass of semi-arid physiological or morphological traits important for adap- regions of western North America (Cronquist et al. 1977; tation such as phenology, or by measuring traits that Zlatnik 1999; Carlson 2007; Monsen et al. 2004). It is integrate physiology or stress response over time such as found in a wide variety of habitats in inland regions from growth and survival. Traits that may not have been evalu- Alaska and Saskatchewan to California and west Texas. It is ated – disease and insect resistance, for example – should a dominant species of many grasslands of the intermoun- be considered when delineating seed zones or population tain western United States, occurring at elevations from movement guidelines. Although a large number of traits 150 to 3,000 m. It is best adapted where precipitation is may complicate interpretations from genecology studies, 250–500 mm, but occurs in areas with as little as 200 mm. multivariate statistics such as principle component analy- Pseudoroegneria spicata is fairly common on sandy and sis may be used to reduce the number of interacting clayey soils, but also grows well on thin, rocky, and gravelly factors and make it easier to consider several uncorrelated soils. It is not tolerant of alkaline or saline soils or excessive factors when delineating seed zones (Campbell 1986; St. soil moisture. Two subspecies or forms are recognized: Clair et al. 2005). P. spicata ssp. spicata and P. spicata ssp. inerme (beardless The assumption of local adaptation is best tested using bluebunch wheatgrass) (Cronquist et al. 1977; Zlatnik reciprocal transplant studies in which samples of genotypes 1999; Carlson 2007). The only difference between them is from local populations are compared with samples from the presence or absence of divergent awns. The two distant populations in a series of common garden test sites, subspecies are conterminous and hybridize (Daubenmire preferably in native habitats (Kawecki and Ebert 2004). 1939). Pseudoroegneria spicata is predominately diploid Most reciprocal transplant studies, however, have their (2n = 14), although autotetraploid forms (4n = 28) may own limitations. First, the challenge of testing a large num- be found in eastern Washington and northern Idaho ber of populations over a large number of locations limits (Hartung 1946). most reciprocal transplant studies to only a few popula- Pseudoroegneria spicata is an important forage species for tions evaluated in a few test environments, making it diffi- both livestock and wildlife (Zlatnik 1999). It has been cult to interpolate between locations to adequately reduced over extensive areas by overgrazing, as well as by characterize population response functions or transfer mechanical disturbance and frequent fires (Monsen et al. functions, as well as produce maps of adaptive variation, a 2004). Although bluebunch wheatgrass recovers well after particular problem in areas of highly heterogeneous envi- fires, invasion by annual weeds, particularly Bromus tecto- ronments (but see Wang et al. 2010 for an exception using rum (cheatgrass), has hindered re-establishment (Zlatnik a large Pinus contorta provenance test). Second, although 1999; Monsen et al. 2004). Although not as resistant to reciprocal transplant studies can provide a test of adapta-

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    16 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us