Scaling of the Hydrostatic Skeleton in the Earthworm Lumbricus Terrestris

Scaling of the Hydrostatic Skeleton in the Earthworm Lumbricus Terrestris

© 2014. Published by The Company of Biologists Ltd | The Journal of Experimental Biology (2014) 217, 1860-1867 doi:10.1242/jeb.098137 RESEARCH ARTICLE Scaling of the hydrostatic skeleton in the earthworm Lumbricus terrestris Jessica A. Kurth* and William M. Kier ABSTRACT Many soft-bodied organisms or parts of organisms (e.g. terrestrial The structural and functional consequences of changes in size or and marine worms, cnidarians, echinoderms, bivalves, gastropods scale have been well studied in animals with rigid skeletons, but and nematodes) possess a hydrostatic skeleton. Hydrostatic relatively little is known about scale effects in animals with hydrostatic skeletons are characterized by a liquid-filled internal cavity skeletons. We used glycol methacrylate histology and microscopy to surrounded by a muscular body wall (Kier, 2012). Because liquids examine the scaling of mechanically important morphological features resist changes in volume, muscular contraction does not of the earthworm Lumbricus terrestris over an ontogenetic size range significantly compress the fluid, and the resulting increase in internal from 0.03 to 12.89 g. We found that L. terrestris becomes pressure allows for support, muscular antagonism, mechanical disproportionately longer and thinner as it grows. This increase in the amplification and force transmission (Chapman, 1950; Chapman, length to diameter ratio with size means that, when normalized for 1958; Alexander, 1995; Kier, 2012). mass, adult worms gain ~117% mechanical advantage during radial Animals supported by hydrostatic skeletons range in size from a expansion, compared with hatchling worms. We also found that the few millimeters (e.g. nematodes) to several meters in length (e.g. cross-sectional area of the longitudinal musculature scales as body earthworms), yet little is known about scale effects on their form and mass to the ~0.6 power across segments, which is significantly lower function. Indeed, many individual cephalopods, which rely on a type than the 0.66 power predicted by isometry. The cross-sectional area of hydrostatic skeleton termed a muscular hydrostat, may grow of the circular musculature, however, scales as body mass to the through this entire size range and larger. In addition, many of these ~0.8 power across segments, which is significantly higher than animals burrow, and the scaling of burrowing mechanics is also predicted by isometry. By modeling the interaction of muscle cross- poorly understood compared with other forms of locomotion. We sectional area and mechanical advantage, we calculate that the force also know little about the effects of the physical properties of the output generated during both circular and longitudinal muscle soil on burrowing organisms, or how changes in body size impact contraction scales near isometry. We hypothesize that the allometric soil–animal interactions. Further, this work is of interest because scaling of earthworms may reflect changes in soil properties and these animals are taxonomically diverse, they live in many burrowing mechanics with size. environments, and are ecologically and economically important in bioturbation, ecosystem engineering and soil maintenance. Human- KEY WORDS: Scaling, Allometry, Ontogeny, Annelid, Burrowing induced changes in soil properties from chemicals and heavy machinery could impose size-dependent effects on burrowers that INTRODUCTION can only be predicted by understanding the scaling of the Body size plays a pivotal role in the structure and function of all morphology and mechanics of burrowers. Finally, this research may organisms. Size affects how an organism interacts with its provide insights useful for the design of biomimetic soft robots for environment as well as the processes needed for survival (Vogel, surface locomotion and for burrowing (e.g. Trimmer, 2008; Trivedi 1988). Size also imposes physical constraints on organisms, with et al., 2008; Daltorio et al., 2013). fundamental effects on organismal design (Schmidt-Nielsen, 1997). Previous research on scaling in soft-bodied animals has provided A range of important traits change as a function of body size, a foundation for our understanding of the scaling of hydrostatic including: geometry, metabolic rate, kinematics, mechanics and even skeletons (Piearce, 1983; Quillin, 1998; Quillin, 1999; Quillin, 2000; lifespan. As a consequence, almost every facet of an organism’s life Che and Dorgan, 2010; Lin et al., 2011). A number of important may be influenced by its size, including its physiology, morphology, issues remain unexplored, however. Prior studies did not sample the ecology and biomechanics (Schmidt-Nielsen, 1984; Quillin, 1999; smallest specimens in the size range, and were unable to measure Vogel, 2013; Biewener, 2005; Hill et al., 2012). Scaling, the changes several mechanically relevant aspects of the morphology (e.g. in form and function due body size, has been studied primarily in circular muscle cross-sectional area) (Quillin, 1998; Quillin, 2000). the vertebrates and in some arthropods (e.g. Schmidt-Nielsen, 1997; The results of several previous studies were also contradictory. Biewener, 2005; Nudds, 2007; Chi and Roth, 2010). The effects of Some experiments indicate that the hydrostatic skeleton maintains scaling on soft-bodied animals have, however, received relatively geometric and kinematic similarity with change in body size (e.g. little attention. The aim of this study was to use histological and Quillin, 1998; Quillin, 1999), while others suggest disproportionate microscopic techniques to examine the effects of size and scale on scaling in both shape and force production (e.g. Piearce, 1983; components of the hydrostatic skeleton of an iconic soft-bodied Quillin, 2000). In addition, many hypotheses on the scaling of the animal, the earthworm. hydrostatic skeleton have not yet been tested, including possible size-dependent changes in muscle stress, muscle cross-sectional Department of Biology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA. area, skeletal leverage, burrowing kinematics, respiration and soil properties (Piearce, 1983; Quillin, 2000). *Author for correspondence ([email protected]) In this study, we investigated the scaling of functionally relevant Received 15 October 2013; Accepted 11 February 2014 aspects of hydrostatic skeleton morphology, using an ontogenetic The Journal of Experimental Biology 1860 RESEARCH ARTICLE The Journal of Experimental Biology (2014) doi:10.1242/jeb.098137 Table 1. Definition of variables used and their isometric scaling List of symbols and abbreviations exponents A muscle cross-sectional area b scaling exponent Isometric scaling Symbol Variable exponent (b ) bo isometric scaling exponent o amech mechanical advantage V Volume αM C projected coelomic area M Body mass αV D diameter L Body length αM1/3 L body length D Diameter αM1/3 M body mass A Cross-sectional muscle area αM2/3 OLS ordinary least squares C Projected coelomic area αM2/3 Pm pressure due to muscle contraction 0 Pm Pressure due to muscle contraction αM RMA reduced major axis 0 σm Muscle stress αM V volume F Force output to environment αM2/3 σm isometric muscle stress size range of the earthworm Lumbricus terrestris Linnaeus 1758. diverse and include, for example, burrowing mechanics, internal The results provide new insights into the effects of scale on hydrostatic pressure, respiration, heat exchange, evaporation, hydrostatic skeletons and allow us to make testable predictions predation, competition and fecundity. about the implications of body size for distance and mechanical advantage, force output and internal pressure production. Scaling of linear dimensions The scaling of the linear dimensions and muscle cross-sectional areas The hydrostatic skeleton of Lumbricus terrestris have important implications for the mechanics of the organism, Earthworms have a segmented hydrostatic skeleton. In L. terrestris, including its kinematics, force production, mechanical advantage and the number of segments remains constant during development internal coelomic pressure. For hydrostatic skeletons, a change in the (Piearce, 1983; Quillin, 1998). Each segment contains coelomic length-to-diameter (L/D) ratio affects the leverage provided by the fluid that is largely isolated from the fluid of adjacent segments by skeletal support system. This can be understood by first referring to muscular septae, allowing segments to act as essentially independent animals with rigid skeletons in which levers may amplify force (force hydraulic units (Seymour, 1969). Two orientations of muscle fibres, output > force input from muscle contraction and thus positive circular and longitudinal, are present. The circular fibres act to mechanical advantage) or amplify distance (distance output > distance radially thin the worm and elongate it, while the longitudinal fibres input from muscle contraction and thus positive distance advantage) shorten the worm and cause radial expansion. Earthworms crawl and (Kier and Smith, 1985; Vogel, 1988). Mechanical advantage and burrow using alternating waves of circular muscle and longitudinal distance advantage are reciprocal. Although cylindrical hydrostatic muscle contraction that pass from anterior to posterior down the skeletons lack rigid levers, they still allow mechanical advantage or length of the body and typically involve ~30 segments (Gray and distance advantage, depending on the orientation of the musculature Lissman, 1938; Sims and Gerard, 1985). When the circular muscles in question

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    8 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us