The Low-Diversity Fecal Microbiota of the Critically Endangered Kākāpō Is

The Low-Diversity Fecal Microbiota of the Critically Endangered Kākāpō Is

ORIGINAL RESEARCH published: 20 October 2017 doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2017.02033 The Low-Diversity Fecal Microbiota of the Critically Endangered Kak¯ ap¯ o¯ Is Robust to Anthropogenic Dietary and Geographic Influences Elena K. Perry 1†, Andrew Digby 2 and Michael W. Taylor 1, 3* 1 School of Biological Sciences, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand, 2 Kak¯ ap¯ o¯ Recovery Programme, Department of Conservation, Invercargill, New Zealand, 3 Maurice Wilkins Centre for Molecular Biodiscovery, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand The critically endangered kak¯ ap¯ o,¯ an herbivorous parrot endemic to New Zealand, Edited by: is subject to intensive management to increase its population size. Key aspects of Malka Halpern, University of Haifa, Israel the management program include supplementary feeding and translocation of kak¯ ap¯ o¯ Reviewed by: between different predator-free islands to optimize the genetic composition of the Sarah M. Hird, breeding populations. While these practices have helped boost the kak¯ ap¯ o¯ population, University of Connecticut, their impact on the kak¯ ap¯ o¯ fecal microbiota is uncertain. Previous studies have found United States Jakub Kreisinger, that the kak¯ ap¯ o¯ possesses a low-diversity fecal microbiota, typically dominated by Charles University, Czechia Escherichia/Shigella spp. However, the question of whether the low diversity of the Adam C. N. Wong, University of Florida, United States kak¯ ap¯ o¯ fecal microbiota is an inadvertent consequence of human interventions has yet to *Correspondence: be investigated. To that end, we used high-throughput Illumina sequencing of 16S rRNA Michael W. Taylor gene amplicons obtained from fecal material of 63 kak¯ ap¯ o¯ representing different diets, [email protected] islands, and ages. Remarkably, neither supplementary feeding nor geographic location † Present Address: were associated with significant differences in the overall fecal microbial community Elena K. Perry, Division of Biology and Biological structures of adult kak¯ ap¯ o,¯ suggesting that the kak¯ ap¯ o’s¯ low-diversity fecal microbiota is Engineering, California Institute of both inherent to this species and robust to these external influences. Technology, Pasadena, CA, United States Keywords: gut microbiota, microbial communities, microbial ecology, symbionts, avian Specialty section: This article was submitted to INTRODUCTION Microbial Symbioses, a section of the journal The kak¯ ap¯ o¯ (Strigops habroptilus) is a critically endangered herbivorous parrot endemic to New Frontiers in Microbiology Zealand, notable for its flightlessness, large size (1.3–4 kg), and lek mating system (Powlesland Received: 28 July 2017 et al., 2006). Considerable effort has been devoted to the conservation of this species, which was Accepted: 05 October 2017 decimated in the last century by habitat destruction and introduced mammalian predators. The Published: 20 October 2017 kak¯ ap¯ o¯ is now confined to a small number of predator-free offshore islands, where it is intensively Citation: managed by the New Zealand Department of Conservation (NZDOC)(Clout, 2006). Perry EK, Digby A and Taylor MW Previous research has revealed key aspects of the kak¯ ap¯ o’s¯ genetics (Robertson, 2006), behavior (2017) The Low-Diversity Fecal (Powlesland et al., 2006), growth (Farrimond et al., 2006), habitat selection (Walsh et al., 2006), and Microbiota of the Critically Endangered Kak¯ ap¯ o¯ Is Robust to Anthropogenic diet (Best, 1984; Butler, 2006; Cottam et al., 2006). As a result, scientifically-informed management Dietary and Geographic Influences. practices, including supplementary feeding and relocation among different islands, have helped the Front. Microbiol. 8:2033. population increase from a low point of 51 birds in 1995 (Powlesland et al., 2006) to nearly 160 as of doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2017.02033 late 2016. In an attempt to further aid conservation efforts, kak¯ ap¯ o¯ research interests have recently Frontiers in Microbiology | www.frontiersin.org 1 October 2017 | Volume 8 | Article 2033 Perry et al. Robust Fecal Microbiota of Kak¯ ap¯ o¯ expanded to the gut and fecal microbiota (Waite et al., 2012, 2013, along with some indigenous forest but no podocarps (Walsh 2014). Avian gut microbiotas are shaped by diet (Rubio et al., et al., 2006). Anchor Island harbors beech (Nothofagus spp.), 1998; Torok et al., 2008; Janczyk et al., 2009; Hammons et al., yellow silver pine (Lepidothamnus intermedius), and pink pine 2010; Waite and Taylor, 2014) and can impact host health in (Halocarpus biformis) in addition to the podocarp species found diverse ways ranging from increased energy harvest from food on Codfish Island (Department of Conservation, 2013). While a (Torok et al., 2011) to modulation of the host immune system previous study (Waite et al., 2012) also included swab samples (Crhanova et al., 2011). Hence, greater understanding of the from the crop and choana of chicks, such samples are more influence of diet and geography on the kak¯ ap¯ o¯ fecal microbiota difficult to access in adult kak¯ ap¯ o,¯ due to both anatomical may contribute to improved management practices and disease differences between chicks and adults and the difficulty of safely prevention. restraining adults. Therefore, we did not pursue collection of crop Previous studies have found that the kak¯ ap¯ o¯ hosts a or choana samples in this study in order to have a more consistent low-diversity fecal microbiota typically dominated by basis for comparison across chicks and adults. Escherichia/Shigella (Waite et al., 2013, 2014). However, the Fecal samples were collected as directly as possible from the potential effects of supplementary feeding and geographic birds into sterile polypropylene vials or clean re-sealable plastic relocation on the kak¯ ap¯ o¯ fecal microbiota have yet to be zipper storage bags during routine health screenings and stored examined. Given that the supplementary food is made from at −20◦C. We avoided samples that dropped onto the ground or grains, legumes, and seeds, whereas the kak¯ ap¯ o’s¯ natural diet touched surfaces other than a clean bag before being transferred primarily consists of shoots, leaves, rhizomes, and (when to the vials. Freezing at −20◦C was done either within 1–4h available) podocarp fruit (Best, 1984; Cottam et al., 2006), we of collection in the case of adult samples, or the morning after hypothesized that data generated from supplementally-fed birds overnight sample collection in the case of chick samples. Samples might not reflect the natural state of the kak¯ ap¯ o¯ fecal microbiota. were shipped to the University of Auckland on dry ice and stored In addition, the natural kak¯ ap¯ o¯ diet may vary according to at −20◦C thereafter. The longer time between sample collection geographic differences in vegetation on different islands. We and freezing for chick samples was unavoidable, as chicks could therefore also hypothesized that kak¯ ap¯ o¯ adults and chicks living not be left unattended at night. on different islands might exhibit divergent fecal microbiotas in The fecal sample collection in this study was carried out as part ways that could be relevant to their health. of standard management of kak¯ ap¯ o,¯ as approved and authorized To test these hypotheses, we conducted a 16S rRNA gene by NZDOC. This non-invasive sampling does not require ethics survey on fecal samples from adult kak¯ ap¯ o¯ on three different approval from the NZDOC Animal Ethics Committee, which diets and three islands, as well as fecal samples from chicks on upholds NZDOC’s obligations under the New Zealand Animal two islands. By determining the extent to which supplementary Welfare Act. feeding and relocation may have disturbed the fecal microbiota of the kak¯ ap¯ o,¯ we aimed to assess whether such practices Supplementary Feeding may need to be recalibrated in order to promote the long- A subset of adult kak¯ ap¯ o¯ on Codfish Island were provided with term health of this species. More generally, this work belongs supplementary food prior to and during the 2014 and 2016 to a growing movement to understand the microbiotas of breeding seasons. Supplementary feeding began in the spring critically endangered species and their importance to successful (October 2013 and October 2015) and continued through the conservation efforts, as the relationship between animal- following summer. Different populations separated by a valley associated microbiotas and host health becomes increasingly which the birds rarely cross were fed either Harrison’s High apparent (Amato et al., 2013; Barelli et al., 2015). Potency Coarse (“HPC”) pellets or pumpkin-based (“Pumpkin”) pellets. HPC pellets were obtained from Harrison’s Bird Foods MATERIALS AND METHODS and consisted of sunflower seeds, a variety of legumes and grains, sea kelp, and algae meal, with additional vitamins and minerals. Sample Collection Pumpkin pellets were manufactured by Wombaroo/Passwell We obtained a total of 135 kak¯ ap¯ o¯ fecal samples from 40 adults Food Products and consisted primarily of white rice, yellow and 23 pre-fledged chicks (Table S1). Fresh fecal samples were peas, pumpkin powder, linseeds, and tapioca starch. Pumpkin collected from adult kak¯ ap¯ o¯ on Maud Island (41◦ 1′ S, 173◦ 53′ pellets were designed to mimic the protein-calcium ratio of rimu E), Pearl Island (47◦ 11′ S, 167◦ 42′ E), and Whenua Hou/Codfish fruit, the preferred natural food of kak¯ ap¯ o¯ on Codfish Island Island (hereafter referred to as Codfish Island) (46◦ 47′ S, 167◦ during breeding seasons (Cottam et al., 2006; Raubenheimer and 38′ E) in the years 1998–2001, and primarily on Codfish Island Simpson, 2006). in 2014–2016 (Figure S1). Fresh fecal samples from chicks were Supplementary food was provided at feeding stations collected during the 2016 breeding season on Codfish Island consisting of lidded plastic containers mounted on platforms. and Anchor Island (45◦ 45′ S, 166◦ 31′ E). Codfish Island and Each feeding station was placed within the home range of Pearl Island harbor similar vegetation dominated by indigenous a different individual.

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    13 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us