Performance Analysis

Performance Analysis

PERFORMANCE ANALYSIS WHICH COMPANIES DOES THE COMMITTEE USE TO COMPARE OUR PERFORMANCE? The table below shows the list of performance peer group companies; checkmarks in the columns under Textron’s manufacturing segments mean that the peer company competes in some way, or operates in similar industries, with that segment. 2015 Performance Peer Group 2014 Revenue Company Name ($ in billions) Bell Aviation Industrial Systems The Boeing Company $90.8 3 3 3 United Technologies Corporation 65.1 3 3 3 3 Lockheed Martin Corporation 45.6 3 3 Johnson Controls Inc. 42.8 3 Honeywell International Inc. 40.3 3 3 3 3 Deere & Company 36.1 3 General Dynamics Corporation 30.9 3 3 3 Northrop Grumman Corporation 24.0 3 Raytheon Company 22.8 3 Eaton Corporation Plc 22.6 3 3 3 3 Ingersoll-Rand Plc 12.9 3 L-3 Communications Holdings Inc. 12.1 3 3 Spirit AeroSystems Holdings, Inc. 6.8 3 3 Harris Corporation 5.0 3 Rockwell Collins Inc. 5.0 3 3 3 Textron Inc. 13.9 Three companies were removed from the 2014 performance peer group due to corporate transactions or lack of publicly available information: Alliant Techsystems Inc., Exelis Inc., and Kubota Corp. The Committee added Harris Corporation, the acquirer of Exelis Inc., to the performance peer group for 2015. The 2014 performance peer group was used for the Committee’s annual incentive compensation and performance analysis. WHAT WERE OUR PERFORMANCE GOALS? Performance goals for the 2015 annual incentive compensation program and PSUs under the long-term incentive compensation program largely focused on profitability and cash flow with an additional goal related to workforce diversity. The profitability target focused executives on delivery of segment profit in each of our segments.The cash flow target focused executives on improving operational efficiency and sustaining the strength of the balance sheet.The diversity metric focused management on having a diverse employee profile. In addition, PSUs are subject to a discretionaryTSR modifier that can decrease, but not increase, the payout by as much as 40% based on how Textron’s 3-year TSR compares to our performance peer group. 27 TEXTRON 2016 PROXY STATEMENT.

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    1 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us