Fire Regimes Approaching Historic Norms Reduce Wildfire-Facilitated

Fire Regimes Approaching Historic Norms Reduce Wildfire-Facilitated

Fire regimes approaching historic norms reduce wildfire-facilitated conversion from forest to non-forest 1, 1 2 3 RYAN B. WALKER, JONATHAN D. COOP, SEAN A. PARKS, AND LAURA TRADER 1School of Environment and Sustainability, Western State Colorado University, Gunnison, Colorado 81231 USA 2Aldo Leopold Wilderness Research Institute, Rocky Mountain Research Station, U.S. Forest Service, Missoula, Montana 59801 USA 3Fire Ecology Program, Bandelier National Monument, National Park Service, Los Alamos, New Mexico 87544 USA Citation: Walker, R. B., J. D. Coop, S. A. Parks, and L. Trader. 2018. Fire regimes approaching historic norms reduce wildfire-facilitated conversion from forest to non-forest. Ecosphere 9(4):e02182. 10.1002/ecs2.2182 Abstract. Extensive high-severity wildfires have driven major losses of ponderosa pine and mixed-coni- fer forests in the southwestern United States, in some settings catalyzing enduring conversions to non- forested vegetation types. Management interventions to reduce the probability of stand-replacing wildfire have included mechanical fuel treatments, prescribed fire, and wildfire managed for resource benefit. In 2011, the Las Conchas fire in northern New Mexico burned forested areas not exposed to fire for >100 yr, but also reburned numerous prescribed fire units and/or areas previously burned by wildfire. At some sites, the combination of recent prescribed fire and wildfire approximated known pre-settlement fire fre- quency, with two or three exposures to fire between 1977 and 2007. We analyzed gridded remotely sensed burn severity data (differenced normalized burn ratio), pre- and post-fire field vegetation samples, and pre- and post-fire measures of surface fuels to assess relationships and interactions between prescribed fire, prior wildfire, fuels, subsequent burn severity, and patterns of post-fire forest retention vs. conversion to non-forest. We found that Las Conchas burn severity was lowest, and tree survival was highest, in sites that had experienced both prescribed fire and prior wildfire. Sites that had experienced only prescribed or prior wildfire exhibited moderate burn severity and intermediate levels of forest retention. Sites lacking any recent prior fire burned at the highest severity and were overwhelmingly converted to non-forested vegetation including grassland, oak scrub, and weedy, herbaceous-dominated types. Burn severity in the Las Conchas fire was closely linked to surface woody fuel loads, which were reduced by prior wildfire and prescribed fire. Our results support the restoration of fire regimes via prescribed fire and resource benefit wildfire to promote the resiliency of forest types vulnerable to fire-mediated type conversion. The applica- tion of prescribed fire to reduce surface fuels following wildfire may reduce forest loss during subsequent fire under more extreme conditions. These findings are especially relevant given likely increases in vulnera- bility associated with climate change impacts to wildfire and forest dynamics. Key words: ecological restoration; fuel treatment; Pinus ponderosa; reburning; resilience; resource objective wildfire; Rx fire; transformation; type conversion. Received 21 December 2017; revised 1 March 2018; accepted 5 March 2018. Corresponding Editor: Franco Biondi. Copyright: © 2018 The Authors. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. E-mail: [email protected] INTRODUCTION (Dennison et al. 2014, Stephens et al. 2014, Forn- walt et al. 2016), in many cases leading to Major losses of ponderosa pine and dry apparent long-term vegetation conversion to mixed-conifer forests across the western United non-forested types (Savage and Mast 2005, States have been driven by recent wildfires of Abella and Fornwalt 2015, Coop et al. 2016, unprecedented intensity, severity, and scale Lauvaux et al. 2016, Rother and Veblen 2016, ❖ www.esajournals.org 1 April 2018 ❖ Volume 9(4) ❖ Article e02182 WALKER ET AL. Minor et al. 2017, Tepley et al. 2017). Recent stable states. First, competition from highly fire- increases in high-severity fire in these systems, adapted, resprouting grasses and shrubs can which were historically characterized primarily severely constrain tree seedling establishment by low-severity fire with short return intervals (Roccaforte et al. 2012). Second, vigorous (Touchan et al. 1996, Everett et al. 2000, Veblen regrowth of grasses and shrubs (combined with et al. 2000), have been attributed primarily to large dead and down woody fuels following sev- direct and indirect human influences. Intense ere wildfire) can contribute to high subsequent livestock grazing of grassy understories had lar- wildfire severity (Parks et al. 2014a), eliminating gely eliminated surface fire by the turn of the tree seedlings and young trees, and maintaining 20th century and was followed by direct wild- non-forested communities. As such, once estab- fire suppression (Savage and Swetnam 1990, lished, non-forested vegetation types may exhibit Allen et al. 2002). These land use legacies led to remarkable persistence as alternate stable states forests with higher tree densities and greater (e.g., Gambel’s oak scrub in the southwestern vertical and horizontal fuel continuity than United States; Guiterman et al. 2017). Finally, may have existed for millennia (Covington and warmer temperatures, increased drought, and Moore 1994, Swetnam et al. 1999). In addition longer and drier fire seasons associated with cli- to elevated fuel loads, warmer temperatures mate change are expected to further constrain and increased aridity in the western United tree regeneration and elevate the probability of States have lengthened fire seasons and additional wildfire (Westerling 2006, Johnstone increased flammability (Dennison et al. 2014, et al. 2010, Williams et al. 2012, Harvey et al. Jolly et al. 2015, Abatzoglou and Williams 2016, Stevens-Rumann et al. 2018). 2016). Under future climate projections, these Ecological, economic, and social impacts of factors are expected to further influence fire fre- wildfire and fire-driven forest losses compel quency, seasonality, and severity (Flannigan management interventions to increase forest et al. 2009, Littell et al. 2010, Westerling et al. resistance and resilience to fire and, where possi- 2011). Modern human ignitions have also ble, restore pre-settlement stand structure and expanded the duration of the fire season into processes (Moore et al. 1999, Swetnam et al. periods when natural ignitions are rare (Balch 1999, Allen et al. 2002). While mechanical treat- et al. 2017), though human ignitions likely ments may be useful to restore forest and fuel shaped pre-settlement fire regimes (Stephens structure and elevate stand fire resistance, fire et al. 2007). itself is essential to restoring ecological function Under altered fire regimes, ponderosa pine (Agee et al. 2000, Pollet and Omi 2002, Martin- and dry mixed-conifer forests may be vulnerable son and Omi 2003, Fule et al. 2012). Prescribed to fire-driven conversion to non-forested vegeta- fire has been shown to reduce the potential for tion. Several studies have documented sparse crown fire and tree mortality in fire-adapted tree regeneration by obligate-seeding conifers of landscapes (Harrington 1996, Fernandes and these forest types within recent wildfire interiors Botelho 2003, Strom and Fule 2007, Ryan et al. (Haire and McGarigal 2010, Ouzts et al. 2015, 2013, van Mantgem et al. 2016). Numerous Chambers et al. 2016, Rother and Veblen 2016, remote sensing-based studies have also shown Owen et al. 2017, Tepley et al. 2017). Factors that that exposure to previous wildfires can moderate reduce post-fire tree regeneration include poor subsequent burn severity and reduce the proba- seed dispersal by wind-dispersed conifers into bility of reburn (Collins et al. 2009, Parks et al. large, severely burned patches (Bonnet et al. 2014a, Prichard and Kennedy 2014, Holsinger 2005, Coop et al. 2010, Chambers et al. 2016, et al. 2016, Stevens-Rumann et al. 2016, Lyder- Rother and Veblen 2016, Owen et al. 2017). sen et al. 2017). Though their individual effects This constraint is amplified by episodic seed are commonly investigated, the additive effects production and seedling establishment that of prescribed fire and prior wildfire on subse- may already be limited by inter-annual climate quent fire severity, tree mortality, and fuel load- variation (Petrie et al. 2016). Strong positive feed- ings have not been examined. The combination backs may also play significant roles in maintain- of prescribed fire on top of earlier wildfire may ing non-forested vegetation types as alternate allow managers to achieve fuel reduction and ❖ www.esajournals.org 2 April 2018 ❖ Volume 9(4) ❖ Article e02182 WALKER ET AL. stand structure objectives across larger areas 1. Was Las Conchas burn severity (as inferred more efficiently than through repeated pre- from remotely sensed reflectance, e.g., dif- scribed fire alone (North et al. 2012, Houtman ferenced normalized burn ratio [dNBR]) sig- et al. 2013). nificantly reduced by prescribed fire, prior In 2011, the Las Conchas wildfire burned wildfire, or their combination? 63,370 ha in the Jemez Mountains of northern 2. In stands that were forested preceding Las New Mexico, largely under extremely dry, hot, Conchas, did prescribed fire, prior wildfire, and windy conditions. Much of this fire burned or their interaction increase tree retention very severely (with ~30% classified

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    17 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us