Semiquantitative Histologic Evaluation Improves Diagnosis of Esophageal

Semiquantitative Histologic Evaluation Improves Diagnosis of Esophageal

Modern Pathology (2013) 26, 806–815 806 & 2013 USCAP, Inc All rights reserved 0893-3952/13 $32.00 Semiquantitative histologic evaluation improves diagnosis of esophageal carcinoma cuniculatum on biopsy Derrick Chen1, John R Goldblum1, Michael Landau1, Thomas W Rice2, Rish K Pai1, Shu-Yuan Xiao3 and Xiuli Liu1 1Department of Anatomic Pathology, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA; 2Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA and 3Department of Pathology, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA Carcinoma cuniculatum, a unique variant of well-differentiated squamous cell carcinoma, has been only rarely reported in the esophagus. The present study was undertaken to determine if a previously observed common histologic pattern for carcinoma cuniculatum is diagnostically useful in esophageal mucosal biopsy specimens. Thirty-five esophageal mucosal biopsies obtained from 25 procedures in 11 patients with a resection-proven diagnosis of carcinoma cuniculatum were compared with 92 esophageal biopsies from 69 patients with benign diagnoses. All biopsies were assessed for the presence of hyperkeratosis, acanthosis, dyskeratosis, deep keratinization, intraepithelial neutrophils, neutrophilic microabscess, focal cytologic atypia, koilocyte-like cells, and keratin-filled cyst/burrows. Each feature, if present, was given one point, and the final histologic score was calculated for each biopsy by summing the points. The mean histologic score was 6.66 (s.d. 1.88) in biopsies from carcinoma cuniculatum vs a mean score of 1.93 (s.d. 1.75) for biopsies with benign diagnoses (Po0.0001). Using a cutoff value of 7 for carcinoma cuniculatum, 57% of biopsies (20/35) from 64% esophagogastroduodenoscopy procedures (16/25) in 91% patients (10/11) would be diagnostic, in comparison to the initial diagnostic rates of carcinoma of 9, 12, and 27%, respectively (Po0.0001 for all). None of the 92 benign biopsies showed a score of Z7. Our results demonstrate that a semiquantitative histologic evaluation of mucosal biopsies taken from an esophageal mass greatly improves the diagnostic sensitivity from patients with carcinoma cuniculatum with 100% specificity. Larger studies are necessary to confirm the current findings. Modern Pathology (2013) 26, 806–815; doi:10.1038/modpathol.2012.224; published online 25 January 2013 Keywords: candida esophagitis; carcinoma cuniculatum; dyskeratosis; esophagus; hyperkeratosis; mucosal biopsy; neutrophil; squamous cell carcinoma Carcinoma cuniculatum is a rare variant of squamous specimens in seven men and two women during cell carcinoma first described in the plantar skin by a 20-year period. A common histologic pattern Ayrd et al in 1954.1 Subsequently, it was described in was recognized in this unique variant of well- both cutaneous2,3 and non-cutaneous sites such as differentiated squamous cell carcinoma, including the oral mucosa and larynx.4,5 Carcinoma cunicu- hyperkeratosis, acanthosis, dyskeratosis, deep kera- latum has a distinctive morphology characterized by tinization, intraepithelial neutrophils, intraepithe- burrowing channels lined by extremely well-differen- lial neutrophilic microabscess, focal cytologic tiated squamous epithelium.3 atypia, koilocyte-like cells, and keratin-filled cyst/ We previously reported nine cases of esophageal burrows.6 Some of these common features were also carcinoma cuniculatum diagnosed on esophagectomy observed in two cases of esophageal carcinoma cuniculatum reported by de Petris et al.7 However, preoperative diagnosis of this entity is extremely Correspondence: Dr X Liu, MD, PhD, Assistant Professor of difficult, particularly in small biopsy specimens. Pathology, Cleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine of Case This study was undertaken to determine if this Western Reserve University, 9500 Euclid Avenue/L25, Cleveland, common histologic pattern observed in surgically OH 44195, USA. E-mail: [email protected] resected esophageal carcinoma cuniculatum is Received 22 August 2012; revised 3 December 2012; accepted 5 diagnostically useful in esophageal mucosal biopsy December 2012; published online 25 January 2013 specimens. www.modernpathology.org Esophageal carcinoma cuniculatum D Chen et al 807 Materials and methods duration of symptoms, tumor location, and endo- scopic appearance. Endoscopic ultrasound results Our series consisted of nine patients with carcinoma were also obtained when available. In the control cuniculatum diagnosed on esophagectomy speci- 6 group, esophagogastroduodenoscopic reports were mens and two patients with carcinoma cunicu- available for 72 procedures (of 74, 97%) and none latum diagnosed on endoscopic mucosal resection had mucosal mass lesions. specimens at the Cleveland Clinic during a 20-year period (1991–2011). All esophageal mucosal biopsies (a total of 35 from 25 esophagogastroduo- Statistical Analysis denoscopic procedures) performed at our institution prior to the definitive diagnosis from these cases In statistical analysis, w2 test was performed for cate- were retrieved. In addition, 92 esophageal mucosal gorical data and the frequency of each feature. biopsies taken from 69 patients were included as Student t-test was used to analyze continuous data. controls and had the following clinical conditions: The results for patient age were expressed as mean hiatus hernia (5), reflux disease (33), active ±s.d. All P-values were two-sided, and statistical esophagitis (5), candida esophagitis (2), herpetic significance was set at Pr0.05. esophagitis (1), eosinophilic esophagitis (1), acute graft vs host disease (1), achalasia (4), radiation- related esophagitis (1), bullous diseases (5), esopha- Results geal ulcer (1), non-specific small (o1 cm nodule) nodule or nodules (4), benign-appearing, intrinsic Demographics and Clinical Features stricture (2), non-obstructive Schatzki ring (2), and As shown in Table 1, our series consisted of 11 normal (2). The histologic interpretations of these patients including nine previously reported cases6 biopsies were as follows: normal esophagus (28), and two additional cases (cases 10 and 11). Seven reflux-induced reactive changes (30), reflux patients were males and four were females. The age esophagitis (10), active esophagitis of unknown etio- of the patients ranged from 40 to 72 years (mean 57 logy (11), esophageal ulcer (3), candida esophagitis years; s.d. 12 years). Eleven tumors from nine pati- (4), herpetic esophagitis (1), eosinophilic esopha- ents were diagnosed on esophagectomy specimens gitis (2), and others (3). Among the control group, and two tumors from two patients on endoscopic nine biopsies were from five patients with bullous mucosal resection specimens (cases 10 and 11). Of diseases (not further specified) diagnosed between the 11 patients, 10 (91%) had dysphagia, 7 (64%) 1997 and 2008; the remaining 83 specimens were had a smoking history, 3 (27%) had a history of consecutive esophageal biopsies from 64 adult pati- excessive ethanol use, and 8 (73%) had either ents encountered during a 1-month period in 2011. gastroesophageal reflux disease or prior treatment The study was approved by the Institutional with anti-reflux medication. For each of the 11 Review Board of Cleveland Clinic. patients, an esophagogastroduodenoscopic report All surgical pathology reports and esophageal documented an esophageal mass. The location of biopsy slides were retrieved and reviewed by a gastro- the mass was in the cervical/mid-esophagus for two intestinal pathologist (XL). All cases were evaluated patients, in the mid-esophagus for two patients, in for the following features: hyperkeratosis (either para- the distal esophagus for five patients, and in the keratosis and/or orthokeratosis), acanthosis (defined distal esophagus/gastroesophageal junction for two as overall squamous epithelial hyperplasia), dysker- patients. Endoscopic ultrasound examination was atosis (defined as the presence of individual apoptotic performed for eight patients and showed evidence of keratinocytes), deep keratinization, intraepithelial wall invasion in all patients and findings suspicious neutrophils (defined as the presence of neutrophils for nodal metastasis in four patients. Of the nine in the neoplastic epithelium), intraepithelial neutro- patients who underwent esophagectomy, two philic microabscess (defined as the presence of six or patients died post-operatively due to complicat- more neutrophils with associated epithelial injury), ions; the remaining patients were followed up for a cytologic atypia, koilocyte-like cells, and keratin-filled median duration of 84 months (48–214 months). cyst/burrows. Each feature, if present, was given 1 During the follow-up period, three patients died at point, and the final histologic score was calculated for 49, 66, and 214 months after esophagectomy at the each biopsy by summing up the points. ages of 66, 68, and 91 years, respectively, from In addition, the presence of intraepithelial causes unrelated to recurrent or metastatic esopha- lymphocytosis (defined as the presence of Z15 geal cancer. Four patients were alive without lymphocytes per high power field in the neoplastic disease at 48, 49, 84, and 87 months post-esophagec- epithelium), was also assessed. Further, the pre- tomy. Of the two patients with endoscopic mucosal sence of Candida and bacterial overgrowth was also resection-proven carcinoma cuniculatum treated assessed on hematoxylin and eosin stain and/or with radiation, one was alive at 19 months without Grocott’s methenamine silver

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    10 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us