Sarcoidosis Masquerading As Eosinophilic Pneumonia

Sarcoidosis Masquerading As Eosinophilic Pneumonia

• Sarcoidosis masquerading as eosinophilic pneumonia SANDRA K. WILLSIE-EDIGER, DO GARY A. SALZMAN, MD WILLIAM P. SCHAETZEL, DO A 29-year-old woman pre­ nosis without biopsy.1,2 We describe the clini­ sented with progressive dyspnea, fever, cal course of a patient with roentgenographic cough, and weight loss. A chest roent­ and clinical features compatible with CEP in genogram revealed bilateral peripheral in­ whom a trial of corticosteroids did not support filtrates suggestive of chronic eosinophilic the diagnosis. Sarcoidosis was diagnosed by pneumonia. Bronchoscopic evaluation, as findings observed in tissue recovered at open well as a therapeutic trial of cortico­ lung biopsy. steroids, was nondiagnostic. Open lung bi­ opsy revealed findings consistent with a Report of case diagnosis of sarcoidosis. Roentgenographi­ A 29-year-old woman was hospitalized with a 1- cally, differentiating between sarcoidosis month history of cough, progressive dyspnea, chest and chronic eosinophilic pneumonia can tightness, low-grade fevers, generalized malaise, be difficult. A diagnostic approach, as well and an associated 3-kg weight loss. The patient de­ scribed her cough as initially nonproductive, chang­ as the differential diagnosis of bilateral pe­ ing to productive 2 weeks before admission. She ripheral pulmonary infiltrates, is dis­ reported no other significant symptoms. cussed. The patient denied using any prescription medi­ (Key words: Sarcoidosis, eosinophilic cations. She said she had used an over-the-counter pneumonia, pulmonary infiltrates) cold preparation on two occasions before admission. She reported 25 pack-years of tobacco use and the Chronic eosinophilic pneumonia (CEP), as episodic use of free-base cocaine and marijuana. first described by Carrington and associates Her occupational history was unremarkable; the in 1969,1 is associated with characteristic pe­ patient had previously been employed only as a wait­ ress. ripheral pulmonary infiltrates described as the She had a temperature of 99.4°F and a respira­ "photographic negative" of pulmonary edema. tory rate of 24 per minute; chest examination re­ It has been suggested that typical roentgenogra­ vealed diffuse expiratory wheezing. The patient's phic findings in combination with compatible admission chest roentgenogram is shown in Fig­ clinical features and a rapid therapeutic re­ ure 1. Results of an intermediate-strength purified sponse to corticosteroids may permit the diag- protein derivative skin test were negative; delayed hypersensitivity responses to candida and mumps Dr Willsie-Ediger is assistant professor and Dr Salzman antigens were intact. is associate professor of medicine and pulmonary dis­ eases, School of Medicine, University of Missouri-Kan­ The patient's complete blood cell count revealed sas City, Mo, and Dr Schaetzel is assistant professor of a total white blood cell count of 5.9 x 103 cells/ pathology, University of Health Sciences, College of Os­ mm3 with 4 eosinophils, 49 segmented neutrophils, teopathic Medicine, Kansas City, Mo. 42 lymphocytes, 4 monocytes, and 1 basophil. Ar­ Reprint requests to Sandra K. Willsie-Ediger, DO, Uni­ terial blood gases on room air revealed a pH of7 .44, versity of Missouri-Kansas City School of Medicine, 2411 Holmes, Kansas City, Mo 64108. a PaC02 of 35 mm Hg, and a PaC02 of 90 mm Hg. Case report· Willsie-Ediger et a l JAOA • Vol 92 • No 6 • June 1992 • 795 remained stable clinically and by pulmonary func­ tion testing. Discussion Since its description in 1969,1 CEP has been considered diagnosable when the classic roent­ genographic findings described as the "photo­ graphic negative" of pulmonary edema are seen in association with typical clinical fea­ tures,1.3 including fever, dyspnea, productive cough, and weight loss. Recent reviews, how­ ever, have suggested that the typical roent­ genographic features of CEP may be present in only one fourth of the cases, and that, in fact, the chest roentgenogram may be entirely Figure 1. Posteroanterior chest roentgenogram reveal­ normaP ing bilateral peripheral infiltrates (with upper lobe pre­ The differential diagnosis of peripheral pul­ dominance) in the absence of hilar or mediastinal ade­ monary infiltrates (in addition to CEP) in­ nopathy. cludes Loeffler's syndrome, mycobacterial and fungal diseases, periarteritis nodosa, Churg­ The serum angiotensin-converting enzyme level Strauss vasculitis, lymphoma, eosinophilic was 48 U/L (normal, 8 to 53 U/Ll, and sputum ex­ granuloma, desquamative interstitial pneumo­ amination failed to reveal typical or atypical patho­ nitis, pneumonitis or fibrosis complicating ax­ gens. Results of pulmonary function studies were illary radiation, bronchiolitis obliterans organ­ within normal limits, with the exception of a total izingpneumonia (HOOP), and sarcoidosis. 1·3,6,7 lung capacity of 4.0 L (69% of predicted values) and Common chest roentgenographic features of a diffusion capacity for carbon monoxide of 55% sarcoidosis have been described, including tho­ of predicted values. racic lymphadenopathy with or without par­ Bronchoscopy with bronchoalveolar lavage and enchymal infiltrates.8,g Uncommonly, periph­ transbronchial biopsies was performed. The bron­ eral pulmonary infiltrates may be seen in sar­ choalveolar lavage was performed in the posterior coidosis which resemble those seen typically segment of the right upper lobe with less than 25% in CEP.7,lO Glazer and associates7 delineated return of instilled fluid. The bronchoalveolar lav­ age differential revealed 84% macrophages, 13% several roentgenographic features useful in dis­ lymphocytes, and 3% eosinophils. Results of spe­ tinguishing between these two diseases. These cial stains for acid fast, fungal, and parasitic mi­ features include adenopathy and a nodular qual­ croorganisms (as subsequent culture results) were ity of the infiltrates, the presence of which is negative. The transbronchial biopsies were remark­ more suggestive of a diagnosis of sarcoidosis able only for the finding of a single noncaseating than of CEP.7 granuloma. Our patient had clinical and roentgenogra­ Therapy was instituted with prednisone, 40 mg phic features compatible with a diagnosis of daily, and maintained for 3 weeks. The patient's CEP. Results of the transbronchial biopsies, symptoms and roentgenographic abnormalities per­ which revealed a single noncaseating gran­ sisted despite this therapy. The prednisone ther­ uloma, and the lack of peripheral eosinophilia, apy was discontinued, and an open lung biopsy of did not initially dissuade us from this diagno­ the left upper lobe was performed. Grossly, diffuse parenchymal nodularity extending to the pleura sis because a lack of peripheral eosino­ was found. Histopathologic findings included mul­ philia,1,3,4 as well as the presence of noncase­ tiple non caseating granulomas, asteroid bodies, and ating granulomas,1,4 has been described in interstitial fibrosis (Figure 2). These findings were CEP. consistent with a diagnosis of sarcoidosis. In addition, the bronchoalveolar lavage dif­ At long term follow-up (36 months), the patient ferential was made suspect by the poor return 796 • JAOA • Vol 92 • No 6 • June 1992 Case report· Willsie·Ediger et a l Figure 2. Open lung biopsy specimen revealing a noncaseating granuloma and an aster­ oid body (arrow), consistent with a diagnosis of sarcoidosis (original magnification x 1000). of instilled fluid. The absence of adenopathy has been described.13.14 Bronchoalveolar lav­ and the nodularity of the infiltrates seen on age eosinophil counts i.n five untreated CEP chest roentgenogram also suggested a diagno­ patients ranged from 14% to 75% as reported sis of CEP as opposed to sarcoidosis when by Dejaegher and Demedts.!4 In sarcoidosis, Glazer's criteria were used.7 The absence of bronchoalveolar lavage findings are extremely a response to corticosteroids led us to perform variable and are dependent on both the activ­ an open lung biopsy; hence, a diagnosis of sar­ ity and stage of the disease.15 Bronchoalveo­ coidosis was confirmed. lar lavage differentials from patients with sar­ The use of free-base cocaine has been asso­ coidosis, as opposed to those from patients with ciated with significant respiratory complica­ CEP, rarely include significant numbers of tions and has been the subject of a recent re­ eosinophils. view.!l Hypersensitivity pneumonitis has been Certainly, when bronchoalveolar lavage or reported as a complication of this form of sub­ transbronchial biopsy or both are nondiagnos­ stance abuse12; typical features include fever, tic for CEP or when the disease course does transient pulmonary infiltrates, eosinophilia, not respond to a trial of corticosteroids, open and bronchospasm temporally linked to the in­ lung biopsy is indicated to rule out other pa­ halation of cocaine. In addition, BOOP has thologic entities that may require alternative been associated with free-base cocaine use. As modes of therapy. Additional information pro­ previously indicated, BOOP has also been re­ vided by open lung biopsy is often related to ported to exhibit peripheral pulmonary infil­ the larger tissue sampling available from trates.6 It is unlikely, however, that either of grossly abnormal regions oflung parenchyma, these reported complications was a factor in as opposed to the random small samples re­ this case because the clinical and pathologic trieved by transbronchial biopsy. findings are not supportive of either diagnosis. The utility of bronchoscopy and, in particu­ Comment lar, bronchoalveolar

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    4 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us