(SHWPC) Highways Review 2020-2021

(SHWPC) Highways Review 2020-2021

St Helen Without Parish Council (SHWPC) Highways Review 2020-2021 Review Team: Richard Bahu, Chair, Highways & Amenities Sub-committee Lee Church, Highways & Amenities Sub-committee Michael Page, Chair, Parish Council Stakeholders: Richard Webber, County Councillor, Oxfordshire County Council (OCC) Will Pedley and Harry Etchells, Traffic Planners, OCC Mark Francis, Senior Technical Officer, OCC Catherine Webber, District Councillor, Vale of White Horse District Council Rich Osborn, PCSO, Thames Valley Police Date: 17 February 2021 Adopted by SHWPC on 1 March 2021 Foreword The issues raised in this review have, in one form or another, troubled the St Helens Without Parish Council for many years. We have sought, through this document, to look at the problems identified as a whole. This will enable us to engage with partners, stakeholders and agencies in a more focussed and co-ordinated manner. I am indebted to Councillors Richard Bahu and Lee Church for undertaking the considerable research required. Their efforts reflect the Parish Council’s ethos of trying to improve the safety and well- being of our communities. I commend this review to you. Michael Page Chair, St Helen Without Parish Council 1 of 28 CONTENTS Forward 1. Background 2. Summary of Resident's Views, VAS Data and Emerging Options 2.1 Consultation 2020 2.2 Speed limit Vehicle Activated Sign (VAS) Barrow Rd data 2.3 Joint Wootton & St Helen Without Neighbourhood Plan 3. Recommendations for The Way Forward 3.1 Short term (2021) 3.1.1 Speeding 3.1.2 Safety 3.1.3 Congestion 3.1.4 Air Quality 3.2 Medium Term (2022) 3.2.1 Shippon Traffic Management Scheme 3.2.2 Safety 3.3 Long term (2024 and beyond) 3.3.1 Congestion / Safety / Pedestrians / Cyclists / Public Transport 4. Finances Appendix 1 - Residents Consultation 2020 / Barrow Rd VAS Data Appendix 2 - Wootton and St Helen Without Neighbourhood Plan 2019-2031 Appendix 3- Submission to OCC Highways Programme 2021 Appendix 4 - Impact of New Developments Appendix 5 - Organisations 2 of 28 1. Background This review was sanctioned by the Parish Council at its meeting on 14 September 2020. It was triggered by residents of Shippon expressing concerns over significant congestion on roads in Shippon since Schools restarted on and after 3 September 2020, speeding vehicles and safety of pedestrians and cyclists. These concerns are not new. However, congestion may have been exacerbated by the Coronavirus pandemic guidance to schools and people avoiding public transport. A key aim was to identify, in conjunction with partners, local agencies and key players, an acceptable, viable and sustainable solution to the difficulties currently created in the morning and evening rush hours by the volume of traffic seeking to use roads, particularly Barrow Road and Elm Tree Walk, which are not capable of carrying such volume due to their unsuitability by reason of their width, limited capacity and lack of footpaths. It was agreed that the review would cover the whole of the Parish to ensure comprehensive coverage of the issues to the whole Parish community. 2. Summary of Resident's Views, VAS Data and Emerging Options 2.1 Consultation 2020 The Parish Council received a number of communications in autumn 2020 from Shippon residents with concerns over issues relating to congestion, traffic, pedestrians, cyclists and speeding. You can see some of these on the Shippon Residents Community Group Facebook Page. We posted the following on the St Helen Without Parish Council Facebook page in September 2020: "At last night's Parish Council meeting it was agreed to undertake a comprehensive strategic review of travel, transport and roads in Shippon. As chair of Highways & Amenities subcommittee I'll be taking the lead. We will be supported by our District and County Councillors. We will engage with all stakeholders including the local schools and residents. I expect it will take a couple of months. Watch this space. In the meantime do feel free to comment to the PC and of course directly to the schools if appropriate. Clearly we are operating in a Covid secure environment which adds a burden to all activities. However we are conscious that our area will grow significantly in coming years and these issues are likely to get worse." We distributed a letter to residents in October 2020 setting out the purpose of the review and asking for their concerns and any ideas on how to tackle these issues. This was further communicated via a November WADS Newsletter article and Parish Notice boards posters. See Appendix 1 for the analysis of the consultation responses received. The key points are: • Roads of Residents Concerns - Most concerns in Shippon =Faringdon Rd / Elm Tree Walk / Barrow Rd. • Cause of Residents Concerns -Shippon congestion = Private school traffic (cars and coaches) / Speeding parish wide / safety. In addition, some residents were concerned about Besselsleigh Rd which is also in Wootton Parish. Residents Proposed Solutions: • Private schools to develop smoother traffic flow to entrances 3 of 28 • Private schools to organise a drop off a shuttle service • Private schools to stagger drop off times • Prevent school buses from leaving Shippon via Barrow Rd at peak times • Permanent "no entry" from Barrow Rd to Elm Tree Walk • Peak time "no entry" from Barrow Rd to Elm Tree Walk • Peak time traffic lights at Faringdon Rd / Barrow Rd • Roundabout at Faringdon Rd / /Barrow Rd • Weight restriction on Barrow Rd • Traffic calming along Barrow Rd • No more cycle lanes A number of comments and concerns were received from residents which were specific to them and will be dealt with directly and not in the Review. 2.2 Speed limit Vehicle Activated Sign (VAS) Barrow Rd data The VAS is located on the entrance to Shippon from the West on Barrow Rd. See Appendix 1 for the analysis of the VAS data between 15 September and 17 November 2020 and which yielded the following points (data refers to number of vehicle movements): • Term time weekday average 21/9 to 13/11 = 2718 • Private school half term weekday average = 2065 (76%, -653) • Private and state school half term weekday average = 2045 (75%, -673) • The data was then refined to look at traffic entering Shippon from the West on Barrow Road during the morning rush hours between 7am and 10am:Term time weekday morning rush hour average 21/9 to 13/11 = 822 • Private school half term weekday morning rush hour average = 499 (61%, -323) • Private and state school half term weekday morning rush hour average = 291 (35%, -542) • Difference due to state school half term = 208 This shows that congestion on Barrow Rd during the morning peak is due to primarily private school traffic but also state school traffic. It highlights that working with the private schools on congestion will be critical to achieving any improvement. A further data set was downloaded from the Barrow Rd VAS for the period 1 December 2020 to 2 February 2021. This was similarly analysed and also included in Appendix 1. It confirms the interpretation from the previous data set above. It is interesting to note that with schools largely closed except for key workers how little reduction there was during Lockdown 3. 2.3 Joint Wootton & St Helen Without Neighbourhood Plan In 2019 the Joint Wootton & St Helen Without Neighbourhood Plan was made by the VWHDC and became a legal part of the planning process. See https://www.whitehorsedc.gov.uk/wp-content/uploads/sites/3/2020/10/WSHSNP- final-Referendum-document-8SEPT19.pdf. The Plan included an extensive community consultation covered in the Consultation Statement. See https://www.whitehorsedc.gov.uk/wp-content/uploads/sites/3/2019/07/Wootton-and-St-Helen-Without-NP- Consultation-Statement_0.pdf. 4 of 28 Appendix 2 contains extracts from the Consultation Statement relevant to this review as well as the relevant Infrastructure Policies. The key points are: • 63% thought design of buildings, roads etc in keeping with the character of our area was important • 42% thought our road infrastructure poor and 19% very poor • 63% thought our road infrastructure would get worse over 5-10 years • 63% thought our road infrastructure was not very safe for cyclists and 38% for pedestrians, 45% mobility scooters and 41% pushchair / pram users • 93% use the car as their primary mode of transport • 65% wanted cycle paths developed • 68% wanted improved walking, cycling and public transport infrastructure • Local roads with traffic problems were Wootton Rd, Honeybottom Lane, Long Tow, Barrow Rd, Faringdon Rd and Cholswell Rd The Neighbourhood Plan's policies IN3 (Transport Mitigation) and IN4 (Transport Opportunities Review) are relevant. They set out how planning applications in the Parish will either be supported or not, particularly, relating to the strategic development at Dalton Barracks / Abingdon Airfield. The options considered in this review are fully compatible with these policies. 3. Recommendations for The Way Forward It has to be recognised that the impact of the changes resulting from the COVID pandemic may well lead to a "New Normal", for example, more people working from home and household use of vehicles decreased by rationalised trips for shopping etc. This could take a couple of years to stabilise and therefore reliance on historical data may not be valid. Residents ideas and suggestions together with discussions with stakeholders and highways experts have yielded the options are set out in a series of maps in Appendix 3. This section looks purely at options. Finances are discussed in Section 4. Note - As some of the highways issues cut across our neighbouring parishes we will look at ways of working with them on options where this is sensible. The parish Chair will write to Wootton, Marcham, Besselsleigh and Sunningwell parish councils and to Abingdon-on-Thames Town Council.

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    28 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us