Generation and protection of steady-state quantum correlations due to quantum channels with memory You-neng Guo,1,2, ∗ Mao-fa Fang,3, † Guo-you Wang,4, ‡ and Ke Zeng1,2, § 1Department of Electronic and Communication Engineering, Changsha University, Changsha, Hunan 410022, People’s Republic of China 2Hunan Province Key Laboratory of Applied Environmental Photocatalysis, Changsha University, Changsha, Hunan 410022, People’s Republic of China 3Key Laboratory of Low-Dimensional Quantum Structures and Quantum Control of Ministry of Education, and Department of Physics, Hunan Normal University, Changsha 410081, People’s Republic of China 4College of Science, Hunan University of Technology, Zhuzhou 412008, People’s Republic of China We have proposed a scheme of the generation and preservation of two-qubit steady-state quan- tum correlations through quantum channels where successive uses of the channels are correlated. Different types of noisy channels with memory, such as amplitude damping, phase-damping, and depolarizing channels have been taken into account. Some analytical or numerical results are pre- sented. The effect of channels with memory on dynamics of quantum correlations has been discussed in detail. The results show that, steady-state entanglement between two initial qubits without entan- glement subject to amplitude damping channel with memory can be generated. The entanglement creation is related to the memory coefficient of channel µ. The stronger the memory coefficient of channel µ is, the more the entanglement creation is, and the earlier the separable state becomes the entangled state. The result also shows that there exists nonlocality in the absence of entanglement. Besides, we compare the dynamics of entanglement with that of quantum discord when a two-qubit system is initially prepared in an entangled state. We show that entanglement dynamics suddenly disappears, while quantum discord displays only in the asymptotic limit. Furthermore, two-qubit quantum correlations can be preserved at a long time in the limit of µ → 1. PACS numbers: 73.63.Nm, 03.67.Hx, 03.65.Ud, 85.35.Be I. INTRODUCTION ate and preserve the quantum correlations in the field of quantum information. Quantum correlations, such as quantum entanglement The generation and preservation of bipartite or mul- and quantum discord, have been proposed as the cru- tipartite quantum correlations have been widely studied cial resources applications in quantum information pro- both theoretically [7–20] and experimentally [21–26] in cessing [1]. Entanglement is a special type of quantum recent years. Usually, people use of methods to create correlations, and it has been proven to be very impor- entanglement either indirect coupled quantum systems tant for quantum communication networks and quantum or direct coupled quantum systems [27–33]. The former computations [2, 3]. On the other hand, quantum dis- is to introduce a simple ancillary system, whose interac- cord which captures more general quantum correlations tions with the decoupled subsystems lead to their indirect than entanglement, has initially been introduced by Ol- interactions with each other. For instance, the entangle- liver and Zurek [4]. It has been proven that quantum ment between two qubits can also be created by immers- discord can exist without entanglement and it provides ing in a common heat bath environment [28]. Recently, quantum advantages for some quantum information tasks it happens that even a dissipative common environment [5, 6]. Over the past decade, the study of quantum cor- or thermal electromagnetic field is able to induce entan- arXiv:1603.06676v2 [quant-ph] 14 Apr 2016 relations applying to quantum communication tasks and glement among subsystems [29, 31]. quantum computational models has attracted much at- tention, they however, are usually very difficult to be cre- At the same time, there are many methods developed ated, maintained, and manipulated in realistic systems. to protect quantum correlations from decoherence, such Furthermore, quantum correlations are fragile and prone as error-correcting codes [34, 35], strategies based on to environmental effect due to any systems inevitably in- decoherence-free subspaces [36, 37], or using detuning teracting with their external environments which result modulation [38]. Besides, dynamical decoupling [39–41] in quantum systems’ decoherence as well as disentangle- as well as quantum Zeno effect [42]can also be used to ment, therefore it is very important and necessary to cre- protect bipartite quantum correlations by tackling de- coherence. As mentioned above these previous studies, the back-action of the environment and the memory ef- fect of the environment play a significant role in combat- ∗ [email protected] ting decoherence. Recently, using the weak measurement † mff[email protected] and its reversal measurement to protect quantum correla- ‡ [email protected] tions from the amplitude damping decoherence has been § [email protected] demonstrated [43–48]. In addition, there have been sev- 2 eral interesting works [49, 50] that focused on the pro- lations, this can happen when environmental correlation tection of the long time limit of quantum correlations time is longer than the time between consecutive uses, so through the addition of qubits. that the channel acts dependently on each channel input, ⊗N In this paper, we aim to study how the correlated noise εN = ε . These kinds of channels are called memory 6 acting on consecutive uses of channel influences the quan- channels. tum correlations dynamics. In real physical quantum In what follows we consider N channel uses. Given an transmission channels, the noise over consecutive uses input state ρ, a quantum channel ε is defined as a com- provide a natural theoretical framework for the study pletely positive, trace-preserving map from input-state of any noisy quantum communication since they were density matrices to output-state density matrices, first considered by C. Macchiavello and G.M. Palma [51] † to study the problem of classical capacity. Later, the ε(ρ)= EiρEi (1) study of information transmission over a correlated chan- Xi nel with an arbitrary degree of memory in quantum in- formation process has attracted much attention [52–57]. where Ei = Pi1...iN Ai are the Kraus operators of the Recently, a report about the effect of correlated noise on channel whichp satisfy the completeness relationship, and the entanglement of X-type state of the Dirac fields in the i Pi1...iN = 1. Here Pi1...iN can be interpreted as the non-inertial frame has been investigated by M. Ramzan Pprobability that a random sequence of operations is ap- [54]. We here, have analyzed the generation and preser- plied to the sequence of N qubits transmitted through vation of two-qubit quantum correlations through quan- the channel. For a memoryless channel, these operations tum channels where successive uses of the channels are Ai are independent, and we have Pi1 ...iN = Pi1 Pi2 ...PiN . correlated. Different types of noisy channels with mem- However, for a channel with memory, these operations ory, such as amplitude damping, phase-damping, and de- are time-correlated, Pi1...iN = Pi1 Pi2|i1 ...PiN |iN−1 , here polarizing channels have been taken into account. The PiN |iN−1 is the conditional probability for that operation. effect of channels with memory on dynamics of quantum For simplicity, we consider the Kraus operators for two correlations has been discussed in detail. The results consecutive uses of a channel with partial memory are show that, steady-state entanglement between two inde- pendent qubits initially without entanglement subject to Ei,j = Pi[(1 µ)Pj + µδi,j ]Ai Aj (2) amplitude damping channel with memory can be gener- q − ⊗ ated. We observe that there exists nonlocality quantified where 0 µ 1 is the memory coefficient of channel. by quantum discord in the absence of entanglement. Be- Following,≤ ≤ we will focus on the noisy channels (e.g. am- sides, we compare the dynamics of entanglement with plitude damping, phase-damping, and depolarizing chan- that of quantum discord when a two-qubit system is ini- nels) with time-correlated Markov noise for two consec- tially prepared in an entangled state. We show that en- utive uses. Based on the Kraus operator approach, for tanglement dynamics suddenly disappears, whlie quan- any initial state ρ, the finial state under noise is given by tum discord vanishes only in the asymptotic limit. Two- [51, 55] qubit quantum correlations can be preserved at a long time due to the channels with prefect memory. † † ε(ρ)=(1 µ) Ei,j ρE + µ Ek,kρE (3) The layout is as follows: In Sec. II, we illustrate the − i,j k,k Xi,j Xk initial states and noise channels. In Sec. III, we devote to examining generation and protection of two-qubit quan- One can understand the above expression that the same tum correlations in different types of noisy channels with operation is applied to both qubits with probability µ memory. Finally, we give the conclusion in Sec. IV. while with probability 1 µ both operations are uncor- related. − II. INITIAL STATES AND NOISE MODEL A. Amplitude damping channel with memory We begin with a brief description of quantum-memory channels. As we all know, there are two different types Amplitude damping channel which is used to charac- of quantum channels including memoryless channels and terize spontaneous emission describes the energy dissipa- memory channels. The simplest models for quantum tion from a quantum system. The Kraus operators for a channels are memoryless, when environmental correla- single qubit are given by tion time is smaller than the time between consecutive uses, so that at each channel use the environment back √1 p 0 A0 = − (4) action can be negligible. Namely, the system under- 0 1 takes the same quantum channel ε, in which indepen- dent noise acts on each use. Suppose N times uses of this channel, then we have ε = ε⊗N . However, real sys- 0 0 N A = (5) tems among subsequent channel uses exhibit some corre- 1 √p 0 3 0.30 0.10 Μ = 1.0 ( a ) 0.25 0.08 Μ = 1.0 0.20 Μ = 0.7 0.06 Μ = 0.7 0.15 QE QD 0.04 Μ = 0.4 0.10 Μ = 0.4 0.05 0.02 Μ = 0.1 Μ = 0.1 Μ = 0.0 0.00 Μ = 0.0 0.00 0 5 10 15 20 0 1 2 3 4 5 Γt Γt 0.10 FIG.