Flavanones in Grapefruit, Lemons, and Limes: a Compilation and Review of the Data from the Analytical Literature

Flavanones in Grapefruit, Lemons, and Limes: a Compilation and Review of the Data from the Analytical Literature

ARTICLE IN PRESS JOURNAL OF FOOD COMPOSITION AND ANALYSIS Journal of Food Composition and Analysis 19 (2006) S74–S80 www.elsevier.com/locate/jfca Critical Review Flavanones in grapefruit, lemons, and limes: A compilation and review of the data from the analytical literature Julia J. Petersona,Ã, Gary R. Beecherb,1, Seema A. Bhagwatc, Johanna T. Dwyera, Susan E. Gebhardtc, David B. Haytowitzc, Joanne M. Holdenc aTufts University Friedman School of Nutrition Science & Policy, Boston, MA, USA bFood Composition Laboratory, Beltsville Human Nutrition Research Center, Beltsville, MD, USA cNutrient Data Laboratory, Beltsville Human Nutrition Research Center, Beltsville, MD, USA Received 29 March 2004; received in revised form 4 November 2005; accepted 7 December 2005 Abstract In order to develop a database for flavanones, the dominant flavonoid class in the genus citrus, the relevant scientific literature on flavonoids in grapefruit, lemons, and limes was searched, abstracted, documented, standardized by taxons and units (mg/100 g) and examined for quality. Values for eight flavanones (didymin, eriocitrin, hesperidin, naringin, narirutin, neoeriocitrin, neohesperidin, poncirin) are presented. Grapefruit had a total flavanone content (summed means) of 27 mg/100 g as aglycones and a distinct flavanone profile, dominated by naringin. White grapefruit varieties tended to be slightly but not significantly higher in total flavanones than pink and red varieties. For lemons, total flavanones (summed means) were 26 mg/100 g and for limes 17 mg/100 g. The flavanone profiles of both lemons and limes were dominated by hesperidin and eriocitrin. r 2006 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. Keywords: Database; Flavanones; Citrus; Citrus X paradisi,-limon, and -aurantiifolia 1. Introduction that the flavonoid composition of citrus fruits be docu- mented so dietary intakes can be measured and linked to Currently, there is much interest in the healthfulness of disease outcomes. citrus fruits because their intakes appear to be associated This paper focuses on the flavanone content of grape- with reduced risk of certain chronic diseases (Chen et al., fruit, lemons, and limes in the genus Citrus, each of 2002; Feldman, 2001; Joshipura et al., 1999; Kurowska which has several varieties (Fig. 1). A similar treatment of et al., 2000; Levi et al., 1999, 2000; McCullough et al., oranges, tangerines (mandarins), tangors, and tangelos is 2001; Palli et al., 2001) and increased survival (Fortes et al., presented in this journal issue (Peterson et al., 2006). All 2000). One or more of the citrus flavonoids may be grapefruit are members of the species Citrus X paradis; responsible for their possible beneficial effects, although at the varieties vary in the color of their flesh owing to present such evidence is limited chiefly to in vitro and the presence (pink/red) or absence (white) of lycopene. mechanistic studies (Areias et al., 2001; Bae et al., 1999; Although several species of citrus are called lemons or Bear and Teel, 2000a, b; Borradaile et al., 1999; de limes (such as C. jambhiri or C. limettioides, respectively), Gregorio Alapont et al., 2000; Jeon et al., 2001; Kato this paper focuses on the several varieties of C. limon for et al., 2000; Kim et al., 2000; Kohno et al., 2001; Lee et al., lemons, and C. aurantiifolia for limes as information about 2001; Manthey et al., 2001; Miyake et al., 2000; Wilcox the consumer use of the other species was not readily et al., 2001; Zhang et al., 2000). Therefore, it is important available and the flavanone data was sparse. The goals of this study were to summarize analytic data ÃCorresponding author. Tel.: +1 978 927 0414; fax: +1 617 636 8325. of acceptable quality from the scientific literature and E-mail address: [email protected] (J.J. Peterson). present values on the flavanones in grapefruit, lemon, and 1Retired. lime fruits for a provisional flavonoid food composition 0889-1575/$ - see front matter r 2006 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. doi:10.1016/j.jfca.2005.12.009 ARTICLE IN PRESS J.J. Peterson et al. / Journal of Food Composition and Analysis 19 (2006) S74–S80 S75 Citrus Common Name Grapefruit Lemon Lime Species Name X paradisi limon aurantiifolia Variety Marsh, Thompson Eureka, Indian Indian, Key Red Blush, Ruby Red Lisbon, Splendor Mexican, West Indian Highest flavanone Moderate flavanone Lowest flavanone content content content 30 mg aglycones /100 g 26 mg aglycones /100 g 17 mg aglycones /100 g Fig. 1. Taxonomic description and flavanone content of grapefruits, lemons and limes. table. Data on both glycosides and aglycones are summar- Following our earlier methods (Peterson et al., 2006,in ized because these sugars affect the taste of citrus fruits and this journal issue) we focused on the 4 major aglycones— juices. We also compared the Davis spectrophotometric hesperetin, naringenin, eriodictyol, and isosakuranetin— method and the HPLC method to determine if the with their rutinose or neohesperidose glycosides for a total flavanone values differed. In addition, the association of 8 separate compounds (didymin, eriocitrin, hesperidin, between color and flavanone content of grapefruit was narirutin, naringin, neoeriocitrin, neohesperidin, and pon- examined. cirin) (Fig. 2). Data on four other glycosides of naringenin [naringin-40-glucoside, naringin-600-malonate (closed form), naringin-600-malonate (open form), narirutin-40-glucoside] 2. Methods were excluded because only one study (Berhow et al., 1998) was available. Using methods previously described (Peterson et al., The quality of the flavanone analytical data was assessed 2006, in this journal issue), the relevant food composition using the criteria for evaluating food composition data that analytical literature was searched for articles dealing with were originally developed and used in compiling United grapefruit, lemons, and limes using Food Science and States Department of Agriculture (USDA) food composi- Technology Abstracts from 1968 to 1998 with a follow up tion tables (Holden et al., 2002; Mangels et al., 1993). This search of Commonwealth Agriculture Bureau 1973–2002 system was adapted for evaluation of citrus flavonoids in and abstracted. All flavanone compounds in citrus were consultation with collaborators familiar with the chemistry listed in the search and fifteen articles were found for this and food science of citrus. The five quality assessment study. criteria (number of samples, sample handling, sampling There were 10 useful articles on grapefruit, 5 articles on plan, analytical method, and analytical quality control) lemons, and 4 articles on limes. There were some studies on were utilized and applied to each citrus datapoint in the grapefruit for flavonols (Berhow et al., 1998; Hertog et al., analytical literature that could be identified for flavanones 1993; Justesen et al., 1998) and hydroxyflavones (Berhow in these citrus. Only data meeting these criteria were et al., 1998; Hertog et al., 1993; Hsu et al., 1998), on lemons utilized in the calculation of descriptive statistics for the for flavonols (Berhow et al., 1998; Hertog et al., 1993; food composition tables. Justesen et al., 1998; Vandercook and Tisserat, 1989) and With respect to the evaluation of the number of samples, for hydroxyflavones (Berhow et al., 1998; Justesen et al., a ‘‘datapoint’’ was taken to be whatever analytical value 1998) and on limes for flavonols (Berhow et al., 1998; was reported, usually a mean of duplicate or triplicate Justesen et al., 1998) and for hydroxyflavones (Berhow analytical values but occasionally a single analytical value. et al., 1998; Justesen et al., 1998) and no studies on Each datapoint was conservatively treated as an N of 1 and anthocyanins, flavan-3-ols, or isoflavonoids for these fruits. no weighting factor was applied to adjust if a greater Using preliminary data, we estimated that grapefruits’ number of samples were included. Datapoints described as flavonoid content was 24 mg aglycones/100 g edible fruit or ‘‘not detected’’ were assigned a value of zero. ‘‘Trace’’ juice, lemons contained 30 mg aglycones/100 g edible fruit values were assigned to be 71% of the limit of quantifica- or juice and limes contained 18 mg aglycones/100 g edible tion for the method used based on calculations described fruit or juice. Flavanones constituted virtually all of the previously (Mangels et al., 1993). total flavonoids present (e.g., 98% in grapefruit, 90% To evaluate the sampling plan, the data were placed lemons and 96% limes) and, therefore, they were the focus in a standardized format with respect to taxons (genus, of our study. Although citrus flavonoid data on flavanones, species). All varieties were verified using Germplasm flavones, flavonols and anthocyanins were compiled, this Resources Information Network (GRIN),2 Evaluer Ge´rer, article will focus on the flavanones as they are the major class of flavonoids present in citrus. Articles on the other compounds are planned for the future. 2http://www.ars-grin.gov/cgi-bin/npgs/html/taxgenform.pl ARTICLE IN PRESS S76 J.J. Peterson et al. / Journal of Food Composition and Analysis 19 (2006) S74–S80 H2C O Neohesperidose glycosides HO OH OH Aglycones Rutinose glycosides OCH O 3 OCH3 OCH3 OH O Sugars O HO o O HO O HO HO OH O O O OH HO HO H2C O H3C OH HO O Hesperidin HO OH O HO OH O lemons, limes OH O OH O OH Hesperetin HO H C Neohesperidin O 2 HO O OH HO O HO OH O OH rutinose OH OH O OH HO o O HO O HO O HO O O HO O H2C O OH HO OH Narirutin HO OH O O OH O grapefruit OH HO Naringin Naringenin HO OH O HO o H2C grapefruit H C O 3 O O HO HO OH OH O OH O OH HO OH OH OH O HO o O HO O HO HO OH neohesperidose O O O OH HO H C O OH 2 HO Eriocitrin lemons HO OH O OH O OH HO H C OH O Neoeriocitrin Eriodictyol 2 O HO OH O OCH2 OH OCH2 OCH3 O O HO o O HO O O HO HO O HO H C O OH 2 O HO Didymin HO OH O OH O OH O OH Poncirin Isosakuranetin Isosakuranetin 7-O-rutinoside, Neoponcirin Isosakuranetin 7-O-neohesperidoside Fig.

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    7 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us