Questionnaire for pilot sites Collection of facts and information of pilot sites for building a comparative, transnational typology of alpine territories For project partners: Please fill in the predefined gaps and boxes and try to answer all the questions clearly and completely. Use the predefined boxes and stick to the space limitations. If space isn’t enough, please use the attached document to add more information. The questionnaire will be transferred directly into a kind of factsheet of your pilot site. Therefor please try to give clear information and formulate it well, so that it can be used for presenting your pilot site. If you have questions concerning the filling in, the meaning of a question or anything else, do not hesitate to contact us (iSpace – Dagmar Lahnsteiner, [email protected], CEREMA – David Caubel, [email protected]) Name and type of the territory: Starnberg, Bavaria, Germany Location (political district / region, federal province, country, other relevant position information): county (14 municipalities) in Bavaria, Germany, part of the metropolitan area Munich (EMM) - PART A: MAIN TERRITORIAL FEATURES - Factor Description Please fill in… Population Number of inhabitants (main residence) and year 133,621 (2015) - shares by age groups - 14.68% under 15 years old 55.62% 15-64 years old 22.73% 65 and older - share of working population - 54.4% working population Area Total area of the municipality in km² 487.73 km² (Starnberg county) Pop. density Number of inhabitants per km² (year) 274 inhab./km² (2015) Settlement Number of inhabitants per km² settlement area/ 133621/70,33km² density theoretically inhabitable area (year) 1899.9 inhab./km² (2015) Elevation Height above mean sea level in m Highest point in Berndorfer Buchet with 750m, lowest point in Ampermoos with 533m Settlement Sprawled settlements or mainly compact? Satellite The county consists of 14 structure areas around a centre or more disconnected municipalities of which two, centres/settlements? Physical barriers? Starnberg and Gauting, are arranged in a star-shape. The Starnberger lake is a natural physical barrier for Starnberg towards the south. In the west are the rural areas of the municipalities Inning, Seefeld, Andechs and Herrsching which are physically bordered by the Wörthsee, Pilsensee and Ammersee. Topography of Is it flat land / hilly terrain/ alpine valley and basin The landscape of Starnberg settlement area landscape? Other? county was shaped by 1 glaciation. The Starnberger See, Ammersee, Wörthsee and Pilsensee are finger lakes which were created by deglaciation. Furthermore, the glacial period lead to a moraine landscape. This is also the case for Kloster Andechs which lies on a ridge. The presence of river Würm leads to the formation of further geological landscapes. This includes formation of lowland moors and valleys at Leustetten and Mühltal, respectively. Functional Are there any characteristics describing special - The county is located within characteristics functions of the municipality (e.g.: popular tourist the strong economic region destination, concentration of jobs, school centre, Oberbayern, south of the regional centre, winter sport resort, economically state capital Munich. attractive, isolated/ central/ interconnected to,..) - Oberbayern is an attractive tourist area. Starnberg Fünfseenland recorded 91,282 overnight stays in 2016. The number of day tourists would be a little higher since the inhabitants of Munich use the region as recreation area. - Around ten secondary schools, three vocational schools, one technical college and 18 primary schools can be found in Starnberg county Jobs Number of workplaces and employees within the 10,664 workplaces (2014) municipality (year) with 48,754 employees (2016) Commuter Number of working population commuting to outside 27,409 (2016) balance the municipality (year) Number of people commuting from outside into the 29,025 (2016) municipality (year) 2 - PART B: MOBILITY SUPPLY AND DEMAND- 1. Modal split: Please insert the smallest-scale modal split values of traffic volume available for the municipality/territory adding also the scale, source, and year (= percentage of travellers using a particular type of transportation). Scale, source, year At county level, study mobility in Germany (MiD), 2008, Share by foot value in % by foot 17% Share bicycle value in % bicycle 16% Share MIV value in % motorized individual transport 58% (driver & passenger) Share PT value in % public transport 8% Share other/n.s. value in % other / not specified 0% 2. Public transport - Existing offer: Please describe the existing mobility offer in the municipality/ territory. - Which means of transport do exist? ☒ Local bus ☒ Regional bus ☒ Local train ☐ Long-distance train ☒ Urban railways (S-Bahn) ☐ Tramway ☐ Metro ☐ Other: - Frequency of public transport services: what is the shortest interval? ☐ < 5 minutes ☒ 5 - 15 min. ☐ 15 - 30 min. ☐ 30 – 60 min. ☐ > 60 minutes - How long is the travel time to the next regional/national centre? ☐ < 15 min OR the next centre is within the pilot site /municipality ☒ 15 – 30 minutes ☐ 30 – 60 minutes ☐ > 60 minutes - Is there a multi/intermodal hub? If yes, of which services does it consist (in the case of several hubs, choose a representative/ the best developed one)? ☐ No ☒ Yes, consisting of: ☒ Bus/tram station ☒ Railway station ☐ Metro station ☒ Park & Ride area ☒ Bicycle parking ☒ E-bike charging ☒ E-car charging ☒ Car sharing ☒ Bike rental ☒ Taxi rank ☒ Other: Bike&Ride 3. Public transport - incentives: What is done to make public transport attractive? ☒ Dedicated tariff system (discounted tickets, annual passes, combined/integrated tickets for different means of transport, special offers, etc.) ☒ Dedicated information (websites, smartphone apps, campaigns etc.) ☐ Other (max.150 characters): 4. Supplementary mobility offer and initiatives: Please give a brief description (+ year of implementation, owner/ operator) of supplementary public transport systems and innovative initiatives in the municipality/territory which assist the PT or help to reduce private car use (Park & Ride areas, Carpooling/ Carsharing initiatives, bus-on-demand / call bus, share taxi, Secure hitchhiking, etc.). (max. 5 listings with max. 300 characters each) E-start initiative (2015, Starnberg district office). Installation of charging stations for e-vehicles 3 within the county “Regional management Munich southwest” Express Bus X900 Car sharing, Bike sharing 5. Conditions for non-motorized private transport: How is the situation for biking and walking within the Are there additional offers like (free) (electric) bicycle municipality/territory?(max. 500 characters) rental, bike sharing or special measures/initiatives for pedestrians? (max. 500 characters) There is a 471 km biking road network, which is There is a free bicycle rental in Gauting organized by indicated by consistent VSGV signage. Within the a small initiative. They aim for a consistent rental municipalities, the much-frequented roads are system for bicycles. equipped with sidewalks. Plus, there are numerous hiking tracks through the Fünf-Seen-Land. 6. Local mobility knowledge: Which kind of data or studies are used or gathered on local mobility knowledge? Is there any kind of observation system in place to enhance the information about current and forecast local mobility needs, practices and CO2 impacts? (max. 5 listings with max. 300 characters each) Each year a customer satisfaction index is provided for the area of MVV and for every single means of transport (S-Bahn, U-Bahn, tram, regional bus) MiD (Mobility in Germany) 2008 – a new one coming next year Regional database Real-time data collection of regional busses (Starnberg county commissioned MVV to carry out the project) 7. Mobility needs and demands: Do inhabitants or local stakeholders express mobility needs or gaps with regard to the current situation and territorial issues? If yes, what are the major ones? (max. 5 listings with max. 200 characters each) Dedicated personnel employed by Starnberg county as well as the MVV take care of the complaint management. Especially commuters and students ask for better coordinated MVV-Regionalbus schedules A smoothly working public transport network with good connections and transitions between traffic lines is most important to the inhabitants of the county. Numerous inquiries regarding the number of stops and their physical attributes have been received - PART C: MOBILITY AND SPATIAL PLANNING BACKGROUND - 1. Planning authorities: Please give an overview of the responsibilities concerning mobility and spatial/housing planning in the municipality/territory. Are there also authorities combining the spatial and mobility planning aspect? Mobility planning (max. 800 characters) Spatial/housing planning (max. 800 characters) Federal Ministry of Transport and Digital Federal Ministry for Environment, Nature Infrastructure: Planning of federal traffic routes Conservation, Building and Nuclear Safety: in coordination with every concerned nationwide guideline and objectives concerning administrative office at federal level. spatial and housing planning in coordination Interior Ministry of Bavaria for building and with every concerned administrative office at 4 transport: project planning at national level. federal level. Starnberg county: roads authority for supra- Interior Ministry of Bavaria for building and local road and bicycle lane planning, traffic transport: project planning based on the management;