The Surgical Management of Vault Prolapse

The Surgical Management of Vault Prolapse

THE SURGICAL MANAGEMENT OF VAULT PROLAPSE A REAPPRAISAL WITH AN ASSESSMENT OF THE SACROSPINOUS COLPOPEXY AND SACROSPINOUS CERVICOPEXYTown Cape Mark C Slack Formerly ofRegistrar and Senior Registrar Obstetrics and Gynaecology Groote Schuur Hospital, University of Cape Town University A dissertation submitted to the University of Cape Town in fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Medicine (Obstetrics and Gynaecology) . The copyright of this thesis vests in the author. No quotation from it or information derived from it is to be published without full acknowledgement of the source. The thesis is to be used for private study or non- commercial research purposes only. Published by the University of Cape Town (UCT) in terms of the non-exclusive license granted to UCT by the author. University of Cape Town THE SURGICAL MANAGEMENT OF GENITAL PROLAPSE A REAPPRAISAL WITH AN ASSESSMENT OF THE SACROSPINOUS COLPOPEXY AND SACROSPINOUS CERVICOPEXY MARK C SLACK I H S Li)c /( here declare that the work on which this thesis is based is original ( except where acknowledgements show otherwise) and that neither the whole work nor any part of it has been, is being, or is to be submitted for another degree in this or any other university. I empower the university to reproduce for research either the whole or any portion of the content in any manner. // 7 7~C:--/ 10/1 lrr.1 CONTENTS ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ......................................... .. LIST OF FIGURES . 11 LIST OF TABLES . 111 ABSTRACT . lV INTRODUCTION l LITERATURE REVIEW . 3 HISTORICAL PERSPECTIVE. 3 REVIEW OF THE FUNCTIONAL ANATOMY...................... 5 AETIOLOGY AND PREVENTION . 10 MANAGEMENT . 11 CONSERVATIVE . 11 SURGICAL PROCEDURES FOR VAGINAL VAULT PROLAPSE . 13 Colporrhaphy . 14 Colpectomy and colpocleisis . 15 Abdominal Procedures . 15 Ventral Fixation Procedures . 16 Sacrocolpopexy Procedures . 17 Abdominoperineal procedure . 20 Transvaginal vault supporting procedures . 21 Sacrospinous colpopexy . 21 Iliococcygeus vault suspension . 22 SURGICAL PROCEDURES FOR MASSIVE UTEROV AGIN AL PROLAPSE . 24 Vaginal hysterectomy and repair . 24 Repair with conservation of the uterus . 25 Abdominal . 26 Transvaginal . 27 HYPOTHESIS AND AIMS 29 PATIENTS AND METHODS . 30 STUDY DESIGN . 30 PATIENT SELECTION . 31 OPERATIVE TECHNIQUE: . 32 GROUP I: . 32 GROUP II: . 35 GROUP III . 36 OPERATIVE AND PATIENT ASSESSMENT . 37 GROUP I: PATIENTS DETAILS . 38 GROUP II: PATIENT DETAILS . 40 GROUP III: PATIENT DETAILS . 41 RESULTS: . 43 GROUP I PATIENTS . 43 GROUP II PATIENTS . 45 GROUP III PATIENTS . 4 7 DISCUSSION . 49 CONCLUSION . 69 REFERENCES . 71 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I would like to thank my colleague Marcus Carey for leading me down the path of vaginal surgery and for providing the moral and technical backup to undertake new and varied surgical techniques. Also for the shared enjoyment of gynaecology, and the enthusiasm brought to all our research projects. Many thanks to Mr J Sutherst for helping with the initial drafts of this dissertation and for so willingly reading and correcting my repeated attempts. To Prof Z van der Spuy for agreeing to supervise my work despite an already busy work load. I would also like to thank her for the inspiration and motivation given throughout my period of training at the University of Cape Town. Finally, to Dianne for the constant support given me for all my endeavours, especially with work and research. Your tolerance, patience and encouragement are much appreciated . 1 LIST OF FIGURES Figure I Level I fibres of the paracolpium. ................... 7 Figure II Sagittal view of the pelvis following hysterectomy. 9 Figure III Severe vault prolapse. ..... 10 Figure IV Examples of Ring and Shelf Pessaries. 12 Figure V Abdominal Sacrocolpopexy . 18 Figure VI A case of Procidentia.. .......................... 24 Figure VII The Miya Hook Ligature Carrier. 32 Figure VIII Notched Speculum. 33 Figure IX Suture placement into the middle of the ligament. 34 Figure X Final position of the vault after tying the sutures. 3 5 Figure XI Sacrospinous cervicopexy . 36 Figure XII Surgical extras required for the operation:. 53 11 LIST OF TABLES Table I Surgical Options for Vault Prolapse .................... 13 Table II Results of the Transabdominal Repair . 19 Table III Results of the Transvaginal Sacrospinous Colpopexy . 21 Table IV Type of Previous Hysterectomy . 3 8 Table V Number of preceeding operative procedures . 38 Table VI Presenting Symptoms - vault prolapse . 39 Table Vil Examination Findings . 40 Table VIII Comparison of Groups II & III . 41 Table IX Presenting Signs & Symptoms - Groups II & III . 42 Table X Group I - Outcome of operation at final review . 45 Table XI Operative details of Groups II & III . 46 Table XII Groups II & III -- Results . 48 111 ABSTRACT The study was undertaken to assess the results of the sacrospinous colpopexy procedure for the treatment of vmt!t prolapse following hysterectomy. It was also to assess the results of the procedure in the treatment of marked uterovaginal prolapse and to compare its role in a group undergoing hysterectomy with a group in whom the utems was conserved. A prospective study was undertaken between December 1991 and December 1992. Forty women with vm1lt prolapse following hysterectomy were included in one group. All these patients undenvent posterior vaginal repair, enterocele sac obliteration and sacrospinous colpopexy. In 25 patients an anterior vaginal repair with sub urethral buttressing sutures was also perfom1ed. A long-needle bladder neck suspension operation was included for three women with coexistent stress incontinence. The mean follow-up period was six months. The success rate was 92%. Of the three failures one undenvent a successful repeat sacrospinous colpopexy and repair. The main long tenn complication was cystoce/e fomiation. A further 2./ women with marked uterovaginal prolapse were also included. All women . IV undenvent anterior and posterior vaginal repairs, enterocele sac obliteration and sacrospinous ligament fixation. In 13 patients a vaginal hysterectomy was peiformed and in I I the utents was consen•ed. In the hysterectomy group the follow-up was four months. A !though there hm.·e been no failures, one woman had developed a small asymptomatic cystocele. Follow-up in the group with uterine preservation was three and a half months. A gain, no failures were seen but three women had developed small asymptomatic cystoceles. There were no dffferences between the groups apart from a significantly shorter operating time in the patients who did not undergo hysterectomy. The sacrospinous colpopexy is effective in the treatment of vault prolapse. It avoids major abdominal surgery: and allows the surgeon to correct coexistent cystocele and rectocele. The procedure is a useful adjuvent to vaginal repair for marked degrees of uterovaginal prolapse, resulting in a well-supported vagina in the correct anatomical position. V l INTRODUCTION Vault prolapse and major uterovaginal prolapse are distressing conditions for those afflicted. One rarely encounters more appreciative patients than those with these conditions who have been successfully treated. With the dramatic increase in life expectancy a gynaecologist can expect to see increasing numbers of women with these conditions. These women will have a greater expectation of effective therapy, and especially the maintenance of coital function and body image. Many operations have been described to treat vault prolapse but most fall short of being effective in relieving symptoms and restoring anatomy and function. The standard vaginal colporrhaphy may be adequate in the treatment of cystocele, rectocele and enterocele in the absence of vault prolapse. However it is naive to expect colporrhaphy to be effective in restoring vault support when vaginal eversion is present. Effective and sustained vault support can be achieved by both the transvaginal sacrospinous colpopexy and the transabdominal sacrocolpopexy. The former procedure is particularly suitable for the elderly or obese patient where the avoidance of major abdominal surgery is desirable. 2 However, with the greater morbidity associated with abdominal repairs the experienced vaginal surgeon will reserve this procedure for cases where there is a coexistent need for abdominal surgery. The sacrospinous colpopexy can also be used for the management of marked uterovaginal prolapse. This can be done at the time of hysterectomy or as a primary procedure with conservation of the uterus. When maintenance of fertility is required sacrospmous ligament fixation may be an alternative to the Manchester-Fothergill operation, the sacrouteropexy or ventral fixation of the uterus. This would avoid the problems of infertility and pregnancy wastage associated with the Manchester repair and prevent the risk of tubal damage with the abdominal approaches. 3 LITERATURE REVIEW HISTORICAL PERSPECTIVE. The history of genital prolapse can be traced to records in Egyptian papyrus in 1550 BC. Reports describing the condition are also noted in ancient Hindu writings and in the work of Hippocrates. Many fanciful, bizarre and mutilating procedures were described to manage the condition. From the time of Hippocrates to the mid-fourteenth century, obliteration of the vaginal canal by mechanical means was the most popular method of treatment. A host of different substances were employed to achieve this aim. Until the sixteenth century these were mainly foodstuffs but by 1559 brass and waxed cork pessaries were being employed.

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    95 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us