SoA and Benchmarking, delivrable 1.1 K. Touliou, M. Maglavera, Christophe Ecabert, Annie Pauzie, Tania Willstrand, Christer Ahlström, Luca Zanovello, Michelle Brasca, Stas Krupenia, Marta Perteira Cochron, et al. To cite this version: K. Touliou, M. Maglavera, Christophe Ecabert, Annie Pauzie, Tania Willstrand, et al.. SoA and Benchmarking, delivrable 1.1. [Research Report] IFSTTAR - Institut Français des Sciences et Tech- nologies des Transports, de l’Aménagement et des Réseaux. 2017, 187 p. hal-01794742 HAL Id: hal-01794742 https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01794742 Submitted on 17 May 2018 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. ADAS&ME (688900) D1.1 Adaptive ADAS to support incapacitated drivers Mitigate Effectively risks through tailor made HMI under automation D1.1- SoA and Benchmarking Version number 0.2 K.Touliou, M. Maglavera, C. Britsas (CERTH/HIT), Christophe.Ecabert (EPFL), Anie Pauzie (IFSTTAR), Tania Willstrand, Christer Ahlström (VTI), Luca Zanovello (DUCATI), Main author Michelle Brasca (DAINESE), Stas Krupenia (SCANIA), Marta Perteira Cochron (TUC), George Georgoulas (UoP), Andreas Wendemuth (OVGU), Alex Valejo (IDIADA). Dissemination level Public Lead contractor CERTH/HIT Due date 28/02/2017 Delivery date 28/02/2017 Online resource Link-to-Deliverable This project has received funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under grant agreement No 688900 ADAS&ME (688900) D1.1 – SoA and Benchmarking Revision and history sheet Version history Version Date Main author(s) Summary of changes v0.2 28/02/2017 Katerina Touliou Name Date Prepared Katerina Touliou, M. Maglavera, C. Britsas 28.02.2017 (CERTH/HIT) and WP1.1 partners Reviewed Name of reviewer DD.MM.YYYY Approved Name of authorizer DD.MM.YYYY Circulation Recipient Date of submission European Commission DD.MM.YYYY Consortium DD.MM.YYYY Authors (full list) K.Touliou, M. Maglavera, C. Britsas (CERTH/HIT) Christophe.Ecabert (EPFL) Anie Pauzie (IFSTTAR) Tania Willstrand, Christer Ahlström (VTI), Luca Zanovello (DUCATI) Michelle Brasca (DAINESE) Stas Krupenia, Sonja Troberg (SCANIA) Marta Perteira Cochron (TUC) George Georgoulas (UoP) Andreas Wendemuth (OVGU) Alex Valejo (IDIADA). Project Coordinator Dr. Anna Anund Research Director / Associate Professor VTI - Olaus Magnus väg 35 / S-581 95 Linköping / Sweden Tel: +46-13-20 40 00 / Direct: +46-13-204327 / Mobile: +46-709 218287 E-mail: [email protected] February, 2017 Page 2 of 187 Version 0.1 ADAS&ME (688900) D1.1 – SoA and Benchmarking Legal Disclaimer The information in this document is provided “as is”, and no guarantee or warranty is given that the information is fit for any particular purpose. The above referenced authors shall have no liability for damages of any kind including without limitation direct, special, indirect, or consequential damages that may result from the use of these materials subject to any liability which is mandatory due to applicable law. The present document is a draft. The sole responsibility for the content of this publication lies with the authors. It does not necessarily reflect the opinion of the European Union. Neither the INEA nor the European Commission is responsible for any use that may be made of the information contained therein. © 2016 by ADAS&ME Consortium February, 2017 Page 3 of 187 Version 0.1 ADAS&ME (688900) D1.1 Table of Contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ................................................................................................................. 10 1. INTRODUCTION ...................................................................................................................... 12 1.1 OBJECTIVES .............................................................................................................................. 13 1.2 METHODOLOGY ........................................................................................................................ 13 1.3 CONNECTION TO USE CASES .................................................................................................... 14 2 OVERVIEW OF AFFECTIVE STATE RECOGNITION TECHNIQUES ......................... 16 2.1 AFFECTIVE STATES’ DEFINITIONS ............................................................................................ 16 2.2 DRIVER MONITORING ............................................................................................................... 18 3 LITERATURE REVIEW ON DRIVER IMPAIRMENT AND MONITORING ................ 19 3.1 DRIVER IMPAIRMENT ................................................................................................................ 19 3.1.1 FATIGUE, DROWSINESS AND SLEEPINESS ............................................................................. 19 3.1.2 STRESS ................................................................................................................................. 28 3.1.3 EMOTIONS ............................................................................................................................ 33 3.1.4 INATTENTION/ DISTRACTION/ WORKLOAD .......................................................................... 43 3.1.5 PHYSIOLOGICAL STATES ...................................................................................................... 54 4 APPLICATIONS (DRIVER’S/ RIDER’S MONITORING SYSTEMS) ............................... 58 4.1 PASSENGER CAR & TRUCKS ...................................................................................................... 58 4.1.1 FATIGUE/ DROWSINESS/ SLEEPINESS ................................................................................... 58 4.1.2 INATTENTION/ DISTRACTION/ COGNITIVE LOAD ................................................................. 73 4.1.3 STRESS/ ANXIETY ................................................................................................................. 84 4.1.4 EMOTIONS ............................................................................................................................ 87 4.2 RIDER MONITORING SYSTEMS .................................................................................................. 98 4.2.1 RIDER MONITORING SYSTEMS AND ACCESSORIES ............................................................... 98 4.3 TRANSFER OF KNOWLEDGE FROM AVIATION, RAIL AND MARITIME ....................................... 115 5 ALIGNMENT OF RESULTS ............................................. ERREUR ! SIGNET NON DEFINI. 5.1 ALIGNMENT WITH ACEM PRIORITIES ....................................... ERREUR ! SIGNET NON DEFINI. 5.1.1 OBJECTIVE............................................................................. ERREUR ! SIGNET NON DEFINI. 5.1.2 ACEM PRIORITIES................................................................. ERREUR ! SIGNET NON DEFINI. 5.1.3 ALIGNMENT METHODOLOGY ................................................ ERREUR ! SIGNET NON DEFINI. 5.1.4 RESULTS ................................................................................ ERREUR ! SIGNET NON DEFINI. 5.1.5 CONCLUSION ......................................................................... ERREUR ! SIGNET NON DEFINI. 5.2 ALIGNMENT WITH ERTRAC PRORITIES .................................... ERREUR ! SIGNET NON DEFINI. 5.2.1 OBJECTIVE............................................................................. ERREUR ! SIGNET NON DEFINI. 5.2.2 ERTRAC’S PRIORITIES ......................................................... ERREUR ! SIGNET NON DEFINI. 5.2.3 ALIGNMENT........................................................................... ERREUR ! SIGNET NON DEFINI. 5.2.4 RESULTS ................................................................................ ERREUR ! SIGNET NON DEFINI. 5.2.5 CONCLUSION ......................................................................... ERREUR ! SIGNET NON DEFINI. 5.3 ALIGNMENT WITH TRILATERAL WORKING GROUP ON AUTOMATION (EU-US-JAPAN) – CARTRE PROJECT ............................................................................. ERREUR ! SIGNET NON DEFINI. 5.3.1 CARTRE’S PRIORITIES ......................................................... ERREUR ! SIGNET NON DEFINI. 5.3.2 METHODOLOGY .................................................................... ERREUR ! SIGNET NON DEFINI. 5.4 ALIGNMENT WITH EURO NCAP PRIORITIES .............................. ERREUR ! SIGNET NON DEFINI. 6 CONCLUSION ......................................................................................................................... 127 REFERENCES .................................................................................................................................. 130 ANNEX. 1 COMPEDIUM OF LITERATURE REVIEW ............................................................ 136 ANNEX 2. AUTOMATION STRATEGIES FOR MOTORCYCLES ......................................... 165 ANNEX 3. TRANSFER OF KNOWLEDGE FROM OTHER TRANSPORTATION AREAS 174 December 2016 Page 4 of 187 CERTH/HIT ADAS&ME (688900) D1.1 – SoA & Benchmarking Index of Figures FIGURE 1: SAE INTERNATIONAL’S NEW STANDARD J3016: