Sample Taking Problems in Measuring Actual Histamine Levels Of

Sample Taking Problems in Measuring Actual Histamine Levels Of

Gut: first published as 10.1136/gut.26.11.1165 on 1 November 1985. Downloaded from Gut, 1985, 26, 1165-1178 Alimentary tract and pancreas Sample taking problems in measuring actual histamine levels of human gastroduodenal mucosa: specific and general relevance in clinical trials on peptic ulcer pathogenesis and selective proximal vagotomy K P THON, W LORENZ, Ch OHMANN, D WEBER, H ROHDE, AND H D ROHER From the Surgical Clinic and Department of Theoretical Surgery, Centre of Operative Medicine I, University of MarburglLahn, FRG SUMMARY Changes in histamine storage in the oxyntic mucosa of duodenal ulcer patients and their reversal by vagotomy and the histamine H2-antagonist cimetidine supported the hypothesis that histamine could be a causal factor in peptic ulcer pathogenesis. The specificity of these findings was impaired by problems in biopsy taking, however, and in the preparative steps before measuring the actual histamine contents in all parts of the gastric mucosa and in the duodenum. A prospective trial was carried out in 190 patients to identify these sources of bias and to overcome them by appropriate study designs.1 Usually a direct correlation was found between weight of biopsy and mucosal histamine content. This problem was solved by selecting a biopsy forceps producing smaller variations in sample size, by limiting the time of cold ischaemia to four to five minutes only and by taking three biopsy specimens for each single histamine value.2 The actual histamine content of mucosal biopsies remained constant for about four to five minutes only. The 'disappearance' rate was faster in control subjects than in duodenal ulcer patients. Hence by variation of the cold ischaemia time any artefacts of differences between mucosal http://gut.bmj.com/ histamine levels in controls and duodenal ulcer patients could be produced.3 Using the optimised sample taking procedure mucosal histamine contents of several gastric regions and the duodenal bulb were measured in 24 patients with duodenal ulcer, after selective proximal vagotomy without drainage and in control subjects without any stomach disease (randomised controlled trial). The histamine content was lower in all parts of the upper gastrointestinal tract in duodenal ulcer patients than in controls and was raised again in all regions after selective proximal vagotomy. As the most likely hypothesis it is suggested that vagal reflexes with'afferent fibres on October 2, 2021 by guest. Protected copyright. coming from the oxyntic mucosa stimulate histamine release in duodenal ulcer patients by efferent peptidergic neurones to all parts of the stomach and the duodenum where the ulcer lesion is situated. A series of congruous findings in the last decadel-8 compared with those subjects with normal clinical supports the hypothesis that histamine is a causal and endoscopical findings in stomach and duode- factor (contributory condition or even sufficient num. These alterations are reversed in patients after determinant9) in duodenal ulcer pathogenesis. Fun- adequate selective vagotomy2 10 and cimetidine dic6 and corpus' 5 mucosal histamine content and treatment5 but not in those with Hollander- histamine methyltransferase activity3 6 7 9 1( are de- incomplete vagotomy2 and with recurrent ulceration creased in patients with chronic duodenal ulcer as both after gastric and selective proximal vago- tomy.2 5 "0 The mucosal histamine content after selective vagotomy and pyloroplasty is inversely Address for correspondence: Klaus Thon, MD, surgical Clinic, Centre of correlated to the residual acid and Operative Medicine I, Philipps-University of Marburg, Boldingerstrasse, 3550 corltd te rsdalpa3cdotu n peak output Marburg (Lahn), Federal Republic of Germany. directly proportional to its reduction.3 Received for publication 20 December 1984 In order to establish histamine as a pathogenetic 1165 Gut: first published as 10.1136/gut.26.11.1165 on 1 November 1985. Downloaded from 1166 Thon, Lorenz, Ohmann, Weber, Rohde, and Roher factor in peptic ulcer disease, however, specificity of (D Biopsy forceps with all these changes and associations is a vital criterion 100- spike (ACMI) which has many dimensions. Most of which are not 326 Samples investigated thoroughly enough or even are a matter 75- 111 Patients of considerable debate because histamine is only R ±SD =51±1 4 (mg) one candidate among so many active substances" 50 Range =16-117 (mg) which are claimed to be involved in peptic ulcer CV% = 274 disease. The criteria include (a) specificity of the 25- U) fluorometric and radio-enzymatic assays in most cu common gastric diseases and after medical treat- ment,2 3 7 12-15 (b) that of sample taking3 16-8 and 2 6 8 10 11 U) of the reference systems (wet weight, tissue protein - 100- 0 (¶ 'Hot biopsy" forceps and DNA), (c) specificity with regard to the 0 z (Olympus) patient's attributes (age, sex, additional genetic and 75- 160 Samples environmental factors, smoking, alcohol and 54 Patients drugs'-7 19 20) and the status of health and disease 50- ± SD=704+±12 (mg) healing the Range =23-1*7(mg ) (return of the values to 'normal' after CV% =16 2 ulcer), (d) specificity of the alterations with regard 25- to the topographical distribution (oxyntic mucosa, duodenum) and finally (e) the specificity of inter- 0- preting the decrease of mucosal histamine une- 2 4 6 8 10 11 quivocally as histamine release. 2 3 8 15 21 Weights of biopsy specimens (mg ) Two of these problems in specificity are the Fig. 1 Frequencv distributions ofbiopsy weights obtained subject of this communication: sample taking and with two different types ofbiopsyforceps. Single values regional distribution. Preliminary reports were obtainedfrom three specimens ofan individual patient. A given at the European Gastro Club 2 and the few samples were lost (seven in series a, two in series b). In German Surgical Society.23 the two trials only two endoscopists were involved in sample taking. Forfurther conditions see Materials and Methods. Methods MATERIALS were removed from the fundus (paracardially at the http://gut.bmj.com/ This series of prospective trials was carried out in greater curvature), from the antrum (2-5 cm orally 190 German patients of the Surgical Clinic, Mar- from the pylorus again at the greater curvature) and burg/Lahn from 1973 to 1983 by five endoscopists, from the duodenum (middle of the bulb at the lesser two technicians and one coordinator who remained curvature). From each gastric region one biopsy was throughout. The seven series of the study were used for microscopical examination. conducted with relatively long lasting intervals as we The mucosal specimens were placed on hard filter of the numerous No 2) in a petri dish which was became only gradually aware paper (Whateman on October 2, 2021 by guest. Protected copyright. problems associated with sample taking of mucosal moistened with a few drops of Ringer solution, were biopsies-.2 3 1648 The attributes of the patients were weighed on an analytical microbalance (Sartorius compiled in detail in Table 1 except those from 126 type 2774 in 1973, and then Mettler, type H-20 T) subjects from whom only the frequency distributions within no more than five minutes after withdrawal of biopsy weights were reported (Fig. 1). or after defined points of time in the corresponding Biopsy specimens were removed from all the experiments and were each suspended in 2 ml 1 M patients in study who had fasted overnight, during HC104. These mixtures were kept at -20°C in a routine endoscopy from 0830 am-1200 noon. A deep freezer for no longer than two weeks before panendoscope 7089 P (ACMI, WaVpler, Munich) histamine determination. was used in the first 136 subjects, an Olympus The same drugs and reagents for histamine assay endoscope GIF-Q with the 'hot biopsy' forceps were used as described by Rohde et al.'6 Usually, FD-12 in the remaining 54 patients. however, no premedication was necessary in the As soon as the final diagnosis was established by patients. Some of them asked for a local anaesthetic clinical and endoscopical findings four to 11 speci- spray (xylocaine), only three in 1983 received the mens were withdrawn from the middle of the corpus previously used premedication, 16 but all of the region at the greater curvature.16 During stepwise subjects drank 1-2 ml SAB-Simplex®' (Parke-Davis) biopsy taking, however, in the controlled clinical in about 30 ml tap water. Most of the patients were trial (no 7) additionally four mucosal specimens admitted to hospital in the precimetidine era, but Gut: first published as 10.1136/gut.26.11.1165 on 1 November 1985. Downloaded from Sample taking and actual histamine 1167 Table 1 Details ofpatients Patients Date of Patients Date of No Initials Sex Age Diagn Concomitant dis endoscopy No Initials Sex Age Diagn Concomitant dis endoscopy 1 NK M 80 UV(J1) None 23.6.76 35 WA F 67 CS None 8.2.83 2 LCh F 75 CS None 7.7.76 36 BM M 51 UD Adipositas 9.2.83 3 SchE M 52 CS None 7.7.76 per-magna, Bypass 4 PA F 50 UD None 12.7.76 op, renal calc. 5 CPh M 68 UV(J1) Coronary insuff, 15.7.76 37 BP M 71 CS None 9.2.83 Diabetes, gout 38 SW M 45 SPV None 22.2.83 6 DKH M 29 CS Cholelithiasis 19.7.76 39 FH M 23 CS None 1.3.83 7 FB M 50 CS Cholelithiasis 20.7.76 40 KI F 53 UD None 16.3.83 8 EF M 55 CS Bronchial carc. 20.7.76 41 WK F 42 CS None 17.3.83 9 EE F 40 CS None 21.7.76 42 SchA F 55 UD None 22.3.83 10 PE M 46 UD None 21.7.76 43 LL M 60 UD Ca of the tongue 28.3.83 11 JJ M 71 CA None 2.8.76 44 BH M 50 SPV Herniated disc 29.3.83 12 HM F 67 CS Diabetes 2.8.76 45 BK F 71 SPV None 5.4.83 13 GA F 67 UD Coronary insuff.

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    14 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us