Tensor-Spinor Theory of Gravitation in General Even Space-Time Dimensions

Tensor-Spinor Theory of Gravitation in General Even Space-Time Dimensions

Physics Letters B 817 (2021) 136288 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Physics Letters B www.elsevier.com/locate/physletb Tensor-spinor theory of gravitation in general even space-time dimensions ∗ Hitoshi Nishino a, ,1, Subhash Rajpoot b a Department of Physics, College of Natural Sciences and Mathematics, California State University, 2345 E. San Ramon Avenue, M/S ST90, Fresno, CA 93740, United States of America b Department of Physics & Astronomy, California State University, 1250 Bellflower Boulevard, Long Beach, CA 90840, United States of America a r t i c l e i n f o a b s t r a c t Article history: We present a purely tensor-spinor theory of gravity in arbitrary even D = 2n space-time dimensions. Received 18 March 2021 This is a generalization of the purely vector-spinor theory of gravitation by Bars and MacDowell (BM) in Accepted 9 April 2021 4D to general even dimensions with the signature (2n − 1, 1). In the original BM-theory in D = (3, 1), Available online 21 April 2021 the conventional Einstein equation emerges from a theory based on the vector-spinor field ψμ from a Editor: N. Lambert m lagrangian free of both the fundamental metric gμν and the vierbein eμ . We first improve the original Keywords: BM-formulation by introducing a compensator χ, so that the resulting theory has manifest invariance = =− = Bars-MacDowell theory under the nilpotent local fermionic symmetry: δψ Dμ and δ χ . We next generalize it to D Vector-spinor (2n − 1, 1), following the same principle based on a lagrangian free of fundamental metric or vielbein Tensors-spinors rs − now with the field content (ψμ1···μn−1 , ωμ , χμ1···μn−2 ), where ψμ1···μn−1 (or χμ1···μn−2 ) is a (n 1) (or Metric-less formulation (n − 2)) rank tensor-spinor. Our action is shown to produce the Ricci-flat Einstein equation in arbitrary Einstein equation D = (2n − 1, 1) space-time dimensions. Even space-time dimensions © 2021 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier B.V. This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Funded by SCOAP3. 1. Introduction In late 1970’s, Bars and MacDowell (BM) presented an interesting re-formulation of the general relativity by A. Einstein, based on a purely vector-spinor field ψμ in four-dimensions (4D) [1]. Its action has only two fundamental fields: a vector-spinor ψμ and a Lorentz rs connection ωμ . The ψμ is a Majorana vector-spinor similar to the spin-3/2 field used in supergravity [2]. In other words, neither the m fundamental metric gμν nor the vierbein eμ is present in the basic lagrangian. Interestingly enough, upon using reasonable ansätze, the ψμ-field equation yields the conventional Einstein field equation, as desired. The basic philosophy behind the result in [1]is that a m vector-spinor ψμ is more fundamental than the metric gμν or vierbein eμ , that controls the ‘geometry of space-time’. (0) ≡ 4 L(0) 2 The action of BM-theory I4 d x 4 has the very simple lagrangian [1] L(0) =−i μνρσ R(0) R(0) =−∇ i μνρσ (0)rs 4 4 μν γ5 ρσ 8 ψμ γ5γrsψν Rρσ , (1.1) rs rs where Rμν and Rρσ are the field-strengths of ψμ and ωμ : (0) rs R ≡ − 1 −( ↔ ) ≡ − μν ∂μψν 4 ωμ γrsψν μ ν Dμψν Dνψμ , (1.2a) rs rs rs rt s rt s Rμν ≡∂μων − ∂νωμ + ωμ ωνt − ων ωμt . (1.2b) m L(0) Most importantly, there is neither metric gμν nor vierbein eμ introduced to define the lagrangian 4 [1]. * Corresponding author. E-mail addresses: [email protected] (H. Nishino), [email protected] (S. Rajpoot). 1 Also at California State University, Long Beach. ∇ 2 We use the symbol = for an equality up to a total divergence. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physletb.2021.136288 0370-2693/© 2021 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier B.V. This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Funded by SCOAP3. H. Nishino and S. Rajpoot Physics Letters B 817 (2021) 136288 rs As will be explained in section 2, the field-equations of ψμ and ωμ in (2.1)are satisfied by the peculiar ansätze (2.2), based on the rs covariantly-constant Majorana-spinor θ. Under these ansätze, the field equations of ψμ and ωμ are reduced to the Ricci-flat equation . 3 Rμν(e) = 0, i.e., the Einstein equation in vacuum with the torsion-free Lorentz connection in general relativity. The original BM-formulation [1] seems to work only in 4D, and therefore our 4D space-time is uniquely singled out. This is because of the combination of the totally antisymmetric 4th rank constant tensor μνρσ , multiplied by the bilinear form of the 2nd-rank gravitino R(0) ≥ field-strength μν . One possible generalization is to increase the rank of the vector-spinor ψμ to a tensor-spinor ψμ1···μn (n 2). But we are discouraged to do so, due to the common problem of the consistency with higher-rank spinors [3][4]. Even for a vector-spinor ψμ, supergravity [2]theory is supposed to be the only consistent interacting system. It is nowadays a common notion [5][6] that unless we introduce infinite tower of massive higher spins as in (super)string theory [7], no higher-spin fields can interact consistently. However, in our recent paper on supersymmetric BF-theories in diverse dimensions [8], we consider systems with higher-rank tensor- spinor ψμ1···μn without inconsistency. Our system is also shown to embed integrable models in lower dimensions, such as super KP systems. This example indicates that such higher-rank tensor can exist consistently even with consistent non-trivial interactions. (0) In the original BM-theory [1], there is also a technical weak point. It is related to the invariance of the action I4 under the ‘gradient’ symmetry: δψμ = Dμ. We will improve this point in the next section by introducing the Proca-Stëckelberg-type [9] compensator field χ , such that our improved action is invariant under the symmetry δ . Since δψμ = Dμ is regarded as nilpotent local fermionic symmetry [10][11][12][13][14], the original BM-theory [1]can be re-interpreted as nothing but an application of nilpotent local fermionic symmetry. In our present paper, we will also accomplish the generalization of the original BM-theory [1]into general even dimensions D = 2n 2n−1 − = + + ··· + − = with the signature (2n 1, 1) ( , , , , ), with the manifest action-invariance under the tensor-spinor symmetry: δ ψμ1···μn−1 − = rs (n 1)D[μ1 μ2···μn−1]. Our lagrangian in D 2n has only three fields ψμ1···μn−1 , ωμ and χμ1···μn−2 , where the 1st and the last fields are Majorana-spinors, with a possible additional index for the 2 of Sp(2), depending on D = (2n − 1, 1). 2. An improved action with invariance rs In the BM-formulation with the lagrangian (1.1)[1], there are only two fundamental fields ψμ and ωμ , whose field equations are [1] δL(0) 4 =− i μνρσ rs =. 4 (γ5γrsψν)Rρσ 0 , (2.1a) δψμ δL(0) 4 =− i μνρσ R(0) =. 4 (ψνγ5γrs ρσ ) 0 . (2.1b) δωμrs m Note that neither the metric gμν nor the vierbein eμ is involved in these field equations. 4 These field equations are solved under the following ansätze [1] ∗ m ∗ ψμ = (γμθ)≡ eμ (γmθ) , Dμθ = 0 , (2.2) m where eμ is the conventional vierbein. The Majorana-spinor θ resembles the fermionic coordinates in superspace [15], but the difference is that it is a covariantly-constant spinor [1], as (2.2)shows. First of all, (2.1b)implies that (0) ∗ iμνρσ (ψ γ γ R ) =+iμνρσ (θγ γ γ γ θ)T t ν 5 rs ρσ 5 ν rs t ρσ ∗ μ μ tu μ μ ∗ = 2e(θθ) T rs + 2e[r T s] + ie(θγ5θ)rs T tu + 2e[t Tu] = 0 μ μ ∗ r ∗ =⇒ T rs + 2e[r T s] = 0 =⇒ T μν = 0 , (2.3) r . where Tm ≡ Tmr . The last equation in (2.3)is obtained by taking the trace of the 1st equation in (2.3) via Tm = 0. We also regard two sectors (θθ) and i(θγ5θ) as two independent sectors, but they are mutually consistent. This implies that ωmrs (e) ≡ (1/2)(Cmrs − Cmsr − ∗ r r r Crsm) with Cμν ≡ 2∂[μeν] . In our present paper, we do not regard the torsion-freedom Tμν = 0as one of the ansätze, but it is implied by the ω-field equation under the other ansätze (2.2). rs rs t Second, the Riemann tensor in (2.1a)is now Rμν (ω(e)) ≡ Rμν (e), satisfying the Bianchi identity R[mrs] (e) ≡ 0 and Rmnrs(e) ≡ Rrsmn(e). Using this identity and the ansätze (2.2), we see that the Ricci-flatness (or Einstein equation in empty space-time): ∗ νρσ rs =+ ν − 1 =. iμ (γ5γrsψν)Rρσ (e) 4e(γ θ) Rμν(e) 2 gμν R(e) 0 . (2.4) m In the ansätze (2.2), the vierbein eμ is introduced, not as the basic fundamental field in the theory, but is defined by the no-fermion β m β background-state |B and one-fermion state |B, α as B|ψμ |B, α = eμ (γm)α [1]. As has been mentioned, a weak-point in this original BM-theory [1]is the lack of action-invariance principle. For example, the la- L(0) = R (0) = rs = grangian 4 in (1.1)is not invariant under the proper vector-spinor transformation δψμ Dμ, because δ μν (1/4)(γrs)Rμν 0.

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    9 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us