o NIKOS A. SALINGAROS ANTI-ARCHITECTURE AND DECONSTRUCTION: THE TRIUMPH OF NIHILISM FOURTH EDITION with christopher alexander, james stevens curl, brian hanson, james kalb, michael mehaffy, terry m. mikiten, Ray Sawhill, hillel schocken, and lucien steil o SUSTASIS PRESS “Anti-Architecture and Deconstruction: The Triumph of Nihilism”, Fourth Edition, by Nikos A. Salingaros Published by: Sustasis Foundation, Portland, Oregon (USA) Formatted by Harald Gottfried, Umbau-Verlag, Solingen (Germany) Printed in Europe (by MijnBestseller.nl) © Author, 2004, 2007, 2008, 2014. All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photography, recording, or by any information storage or retrieval system or technologies now known or later developed without permission in writing from the author. For a list of the original places of publication of the unrevised texts, see AC- KNOWLEDGMENT, page 4. Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Salingaros, Nikos A. Anti-Architecture and Deconstruction: The Triumph of Nihilism ISBN 978-0-9893469-2-4 Fourth (European) Edition “More irritating than someone’s actual stupidity is their mouthing a scien- tific vocabulary... One of the worst intellectual catastrophes is found ni the ap- propriation of scientific concepts and vocabulary by mediocre intelligences.” — Nicolas Gomez-Davila, 1992 “In architectural and art schools, soulless dogma is still being taught; against reason, beauty, nature and man. Man is misused as a guinea pig for perverse, dog- matic, educational, architectural experiments... Young architects who still have dreams of a more beautiful and better world in their heads, these get their dreams taken away from them by force or else they don’t receive their architectural diplo- ma. Thus, only architects who have been brought into line become certified and so have the right to build.” — Friedrich Hundertwasser, 1993 “There grew around the modernists a class of critics and impresarios, who of- fered initiation into the modernist cult. This impresario class began to promote the incomprehensible and the outrageous as a matter of course, lest the public should regard its services as redundant. It owes much to state patronage, which is now the principal source of funding for high culture; it shares in the serene unanswerability of all bureaucracies with power to reward the “experts” appointed to oversee them... The new impresario surrounds himself with others of his kind, promoting them to all committees which are relevant to his status and expecting to be promoted in his turn.” — Roger Scruton, 2000 “The humanities have, in adopting jargon, tried to ape the sciences with- out grasping the actual nature of scientific thinking. In other respects, heyt have consciously and dogmatically rejected the scientific model altogether.” – Dennis Dutton, 2003 “One thing becomes ever clearer, however, and that is that schools of architec- ture, as presently constituted, should be closed down, and architectural education replaced by practical training, as was once the case. Certainly it is arguable that the resulting architecture was greatly superior to that produced after “architectur- al education” became a supposedly “academic” subject, with spurious degrees giv- en to mark each hurdle jumped.” — James Stevens Curl, 2004 ACKNOWLEDGMENT Grateful acknowledgment is made for permission to reprint the following material, which originally appeared in various journals, both printed and online. “TheChessboard Model of Architectural Styles” was originally published in Italian in Il Covile, No. 320 (April 2006), English translation by the author. “The Danger of Deconstructivism” first appeared in Italian in Temi di Stefano Borselli (February 2003); English version in 2Blowhards (March 2003). A much shortened version of “Charles Jencks and the New Paradigm in Architecture” appeared in Chaos & Complexity Letters Volume 3 (2004); the present full version is previously unpublished. “Deconstructing the Decons” in PLANetizen (January 2003); shorter version in The American Enterprise, Volume 13, No. 2 (March 2003), page 13; Spanish version in AMBIENTE Revista 90 (March 2003). “Death, Life, and Libeskind” published in Architectural Record Online — In the Cause of Architecture (February 2003); shortened version in 2Blowhards (January 2003), reprinted with permission from ArchitecturalRecord. com. Postscripts are hitherto unpublished. Book review of Anthony Vidler’s “Warped Space. Art, Architecture, and Anxiety in Modern Culture” in Journal of Urban Design, Volume 6 (2001), pages 332-334, reprinted with permission from Carfax Publishing, Taylor & Francis Ltd. “Twentieth-Century Architecture as a Cult” in INTBAU Volume 1, Essay Number 3 (November 2002). Postscript is unpublished. “Anti-architecture and Religion” first appeared in Portuguese in Brotéria (Lisbon) Volume 155 (November 2002), pages 381-388; English version in Sacred Architecture, Issue 7 (Fall/Winter 2002), pages 11-13, reprinted with permission from The Institute for Sacred Architecture. “Contemporary Church Architecture and Saint Augustine’s ‘The City of God’” was originally published in Italian in Il Covile, No. 300, Speciale Architettura Religiosa (January 2006), English translation by the author. “The Derrida Virus” in TELOS No. 126 (2003), pages 66-82. “The New Ara Pacis Museum” was originally published in Italian in Il Covile, No. 329 (June 2006), English translation by the author. “The New Acropolis Museum” in 2blowhards (February 2004); republished in Temi di Stefano Borselli, No. 196 (March 2004), in I Fileleftheri (March 2004), and in Archimagazine (April 2004); “Architectural Cannibalism in Athens” originally published in Orthodoxy Today (November 2007); republished in Greek Architects (November 2007). “Architectural Theory and the Work of Bernard Tschumi” in 2blowhards (April-May 2004). “The Nature of Order: Christopher Alexander and the New Architecture” appeared in Vogue Hommes International 15 (Spring-Summer 2004), pages 116-119; French version in Vogue Hommes International 15 (Printemps-Été 2004), pages 116-119. “Aggression In Architectural Education: The ‘Coup’ In Viseu” appeared in a shorter version in 2Blowhards (September 2004). “Why Do We Have Horrible Inhuman Architecture?” by James Kalb was originally published in three parts in Turnabout (January 2008). www.umbau-verlag.com • [email protected] www.umbau-verlag.com • [email protected] 4 CONTENT with Annotations by Ray Sawhill AUTHOR’S PREFACE P. 11 FOREWORD BY JAMES STEVENS CURL P. 17 “SOME THOUGHTS ON CULPABILITY” bY JAMES KALB P. 19 INTRODUCTION BY RAY SAWHILL P. 23 PART 1 THE CHESSBOARD MODEL OF ARCHITECTURAL STYLES P.29 One objection that inevitably arises to the Alexander-Salingaros approach is that it limits the artist’s creativity. And aren’t freedom and creativity always good, as well as signs of life? Shouldn’t we always be looking to expand our sense of what’s pos- sible? Salingaros addresses these anxieties in a subtle but wide-ranging way. Why not conceive of architectural styles as a chessboard? A chessboard represents a very special kind of complexity: a variety of elements and rules that promote life. Beyond the chessboard is blankness, death — an infinity of combinations, via none of which life can come to fruition. In the name of creativity, Modernism and its descendents have steered us away from the chessboard and hurtled us out into cold wastelands where non-life is inevitably the result. Let’s return then to what works. Constraints aren’t deterministic; rules and patterns can enable creativity. Besides, the num- ber of possible chess games — of life-giving moves and solutions — is infinite. Who should feel limited by this? And if we’re to choose infinities, why shouldn’t we opt for the one that confers life instead of death? PART 2 THE DANGER OF DECONSTRUCTIVISM P. 39 What is the relationship between intellect and emotion in art and architecture? Here Salingaros establishes the primacy of emotional experience in architecture. In his discussion, he also demonstrates something fundamental: that the exploration of 5 emotional experience does not itself have to become a histrionic scene, but can in fact be a rational, civilized exercise. PART 3 CHARLES JENCKS & THE NEW PARADIGM IN ARCHITECTURE P. 45 Charles Jencks is a perceptive phrase maker and style tracker. In this review of some recent Jencks writing and thinking, Salingaros takes note of Jencks’ use of scientific concepts to justify his contention that Deconstructivist architecture is an exciting and significant development. A man of science himself, Salingaros gently intsh that Jencks’ understanding of these concepts is, to be kind, superficial. In fact, Deconstructivist architecture represents no deep engagement at all with these ideas. Here it is simply fashion, a “look” that has been glamorized by clouds of fancy rhetoric. PART 4 DECONSTRUCTING THE DECONS P. 57 (with Michael Mehaffy) In this short essay, Salingaros lets himself begin to ask the question: what might Deconstructivism really represent? He doesn’t hesitate, however modestly, to intro- duce a positive alternative to it, one that truly is based in the new science. PART 5 DEATH, LIFE, AND LIBESKIND P. 61 (with Brian Hanson) Salingaros turns his attention to a single, prominent Decon project, Daniel Libeskind’s proposal for the rebuilding of the World Trade Center site. How to interpret this proposal? For one thing, how does it feel? Once again, a return to