27 Principal Ideal Domains and Euclidean Rings

27 Principal Ideal Domains and Euclidean Rings

Note. From now on all rings are commutative rings with identity 1 6= 0 unless stated otherwise. 27 Principal ideal domains and Euclidean rings 27.1 Definition. If R is a ring and S is a subset of R then denote hSi = the smallest ideal of R that contains S We say that hSi is the ideal of R generated by the set S. 27.2 Note. We have hSi = fb1a1 + : : : bkak j ai 2 I; bi 2 R; k ≥ 0g 27.3 Definition. An ideal I C R is finitely generated if I = ha1; : : : ; ani for some a1; : : : ; an 2 R. An ideal I C R is a principal ideal if I = hai for some a 2 R. 27.4 Definition. A ring R is a principal ideal domain (PID) if it is an integral domain (25.5) such that every ideal of R is a principal ideal. 27.5 Proposition. The ring of integers Z is a PID. Proof. Let I C Z. If I = f0g then I = h0i, so I is a principal ideal. If I 6= f0g then let a be the smallest integer such that a > 0 and a 2 I. We will show that I = hai. 110 Since a 2 I we have hai ⊆ I. Conversely, if b 2 I then we have b = qa + r for some q; r 2 Z, 0 ≤ r ≤ a − 1. This gives r = b − qa, so r 2 I. Since a is the smallest positive element of I, this implies that r = 0. Therefore b = qa, and so b 2 hai. 27.6 Proposition. If F is a field then F is a PID. Proof. If I C F and 0 6= a 2 I then for every b 2 F we have b = (ba−1)a 2 I And so I = F. As a consequence the only ideals of F are f0g = h0i and F = h1i. 27.7 Proposition. If F is a field then the ring of polynomials F[x] is a PID. Proof. Let I 2 R. If I = f0g then I = h0i. Otherwise let 0 6= p(x) be a polynomial such that p(x) 2 I and deg p(x) ≤ deg q(x) for all q(x) 2 I − f0g. Check that I = hp(x)i. 27.8 Note. Z[x] is not a PID. E.g. the ideal h2; xi is not a principal ideal of Z[x] (check!). 27.9 Definition. A Euclidean domain is an integral domain R equipped with a function N : R − f0g −! N = f0; 1;::: g such that 111 1) N(ab) ≥ N(a) for all a; b 2 R − f0g 2) for any a; b 2 R, a 6= 0 there exist q; r 2 R such that b = qa + r and either r = 0 or N(r) < N(a). The function N is called the norm function on R. 27.10 Examples. 1) Z is a Euclidean domain with the norm function given by the absolute value. 2) Any field F is a Euclidean domain with N(a) = 0 for all a 2 F − f0g. 3) If F is a field then F[x] is a Euclidean domain with N(p(x)) = deg p(x) for p(x) 2 F[x], p(x) 6= 0. Note: Z[x] is not a Euclidean domain with N(p(x)) = deg p(x). E. g. there are no q(x); r(x) 2 Z[x] such that either r(x) = 0 or deg r(x) < 1 and that x = 2q(x) + r(x) 4) The ring of Gaussian integers is the subring Z[i] ⊆ C given by Z[i] := fa + bi 2 C j a; b 2 Zg Z[i] is a Euclidean domain with N(a + bi) = a2 + b2 = (a + bi)(a + bi) (exercise). 5) Define p p Z[ −5] := fa + b 5i j a; b 2 Zg p Exercise: Z[ −5] is not a Euclidean domain. 112 27.11 Theorem. If R is a Euclidean domain then R is a PID. Proof. Let ICR, I 6= f0g. Choose a 2 I such that a 6= 0 and that N(a) ≤ N(b) for all b 2 I − f0g. Check that hai = I. 27.12 Note.p It is not true that every PID is a Euclidean domain. Take e.g. 1 19 α = 2 + 2 i and let Z[α] = fa + bα j a; b 2 Zg Then Z[α] is a PID, but it is not a Euclidean domain. See J. C. Wilson, A principal ideal ring that is not a euclidean ring, Mathematics Magazine, 46 (1) (1973), 34-38. (Note: this link requires a JSTOR access) 113 28 Prime ideals and maximal ideals 28.1 Definition. Let R be a ring. 1) An ideal I C R is a prime ideal if I 6= R and for any a; b 2 R we have ab 2 I iff either a 2 I or b 2 I 2) An ideal I C R is a maximal ideal if I 6= R and for any J C R such that I ⊆ J ⊆ R we have either J = I or J = R. 28.2 Examples. 1) The zero ideal f0g 2 R is a prime ideal iff R is an integral domain, and it is a maximal ideal iff R is a field. 2) Recall that if I C Z then I = nZ for some n ≥ 0. Check: (nZ is a prime ideal) iff (nZ is a maximal ideal) iff (n is a prime number) 3) hxi C Z[x] is prime ideal (check!) but it is not a maximal ideal: hxi ⊆ h2; xi C Z[x] 28.3 Proposition. Let I C R 1) The ideal I is a prime ideal iff R=I is an integral domain. 2) The ideal I is a maximal ideal iff R=I is a field. 28.4 Corollary. Every maximal ideal is a prime ideal. 114 Proof. If I C R is a maximal ideal then R=I is a field. In particular R=I is an integral domain, and so I is a prime ideal. Proof of Proposition 28.3. 1) Assume that I C R is a prime ideal. For a + I; b + I 2 R=I we have (a + I)(b + I) = ab + I Thus if (a + I)(b + I) = 0 + I then ab + I = 0 + I i.e. ab 2 I. Since I is a prime ideal we get that either a 2 I (and so a + I = 0 + I) or b 2 I (and so b + I = 0 + I). Therefore R=I is an integral domain. The other implication follows from a similar argument. 2) Assume that I C R is a maximal ideal. Let a + I 2 R=I, a + I 6= 0 + I. We want to show that there exists b + I 2 R=I such that (a + I)(b + I) = 1 + I Take the ideal J = hai + I. We have I ⊆ J ⊆ R and I 6= J (since a 62 I). Since I is a maximal ideal we must have J = R. In particular 1 2 J, so 1 = ab + c for some b 2 R, c 2 I. This gives 1 + I = (ab + c) + I = ab + I = (a + I)(b + I) Conversely, assume that R=I is a field, and let J C R be an ideal such that I ⊆ J ⊆ R 115 We will show that either J = I or J = R. Take the canonical epimorphism π : R ! R=I. Since π(J) is an ideal of R=I (check!) and R=I is a field we have either π(J) = f0 + Ig or π(J) = R=I. Also, since I ⊆ J, we have π−1(π(J)) = J. If follows that either J = π−1(f0 + Ig) = I or J = π−1(R=I) = R 28.5 Examples. 1) Since an ideal nZ of Z is prime (and maximal) iff n is a prime number therefore Z=nZ is an integral domain (and in fact a field) iff n is a prime number. 2) Take x2 + 1 2 R[x]. We have an epimorphism of rings f : R[x] −! C f(p(x)) = p(i) Check: Ker(f) = hx2 + 1i. By the First Isomorphism Theorem (26.13) 2 ∼ 2 we get R[x]=hx + 1i = C. Since C is a field this shows that hx + 1i is a maximal ideal of R[x]. 28.6 Note. For I;J C R define IJ := fa1b1 + ::: + akbk j ai 2 I; bi 2 J; k ≥ 0g Check: IJ is an ideal of R. 28.7 Proposition. Let I C R, I 6= R. The ideal I is a prime ideal iff for any ideals J1;J2 such that J1J2 ⊆ I we have either J1 ⊆ I or J2 ⊆ I. Proof. Exercise. 116 29 Zorn's Lemma and maximal ideals Goal: 29.1 Theorem. If R is a ring, I C R, and I 6= R then there exists a maximal ideal J C R such that I ⊆ J. 29.2 Definition. A partially ordered set (or poset) is a set S equipped with a binary relation ≤ satisfying 1) x ≤ x for all x 2 S (reflexivity) 2) if x ≤ y and y ≤ z then x ≤ z (transitivity) 3) if x ≤ y and y ≤ x then y = x (antisymmetry). 29.3 Example. If A is a set and S is the set of all subsets of A then S is a poset with ordering given by the inclusion of subsets. 29.4 Definition.

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    14 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us