Gas Transit Risks in Eurasia and Their Impacts On

Gas Transit Risks in Eurasia and Their Impacts On

GasGas TransitTransit RisksRisks inin EurasiaEurasia andand theirtheir ImpactsImpacts onon TransitTransit InfrastructureInfrastructure DevelopmentDevelopment Paul Shapiro, Senior Banker,Banker, EBRD Natural Resources Team 19-20 October 2004 ▪ Brussels, Belgium TheThe EuropeanEuropean gasgas imbalanceimbalance 500 z Shortage 100bcma 450 within next 7 years 400 350 – current import + 1/3 300 250 – 50% already under MTOE contract => to be met 200 15 0 Shortage from projected – 50 bcma new 10 0 Demand Net Contracted imports volumes => to be 50 Indigenous production contracted 0 2001 2005 2010 2015 2020 Source: Eurogas ChallengesChallenges forfor increasedincreased FSUFSU exportsexports toto WesternWestern EuropeEurope z Meeting these increased gas flows to Europe is a challenge: – New field development in remote areas – Refurbishment of existing gas transportation systems – Construction of new gas transmission infrastructure – Securing adequate contractual arrangements – Management of political issues at both ends KeyKey projectsprojects forfor thethe future:future: MidstreamMidstream z Ukrainian gas transit system upgrade: $1bn? – International consortium – Political hurdles z TransBaltic gas pipeline: $6bn? – Financing of Russian stake – With or without Shtokman? z Yamal-Europe II: $2bn? StrongStrong AsianAsian GasGas DemandDemand GrowthGrowth South Korean Gas Consumption, 1986-2002 25 22.8 20.93 20 18.95 16.94 14.87 13.91 15 12.2 9.26 10 7.65 5.75 4.62 Billion Cubic Meters 5 3.51 3.03 2.12 2.75 2.63 0.85 0 1986 1987 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 SiberiaSiberia--AsiaAsia GasGas PipelinePipeline ProposalsProposals Current and Proposed Asian Pipelines SakhalinSakhalin IIII PhasePhase 22 -- KeyKey ProjectProject infrastructure infrastructure Detail 1 PA-B Okha 41 km PA-B to Nikolayevsk 14” Gas - shore Line na-Amure 14” Oil Additional offshore Detail 1 Onshore Tie-in point Line Piltun with pig traps for all PA-A Boatasyn pipelines platform 172 km Piltun Nogliki 17.5 km PA-A to shoreline to Katangli shore OPF Oil & Gas Detail 2 20” Oil Line DeKastri Nysh 20” Gas pipelines Boatasyn Line Russia Aleksandrovsk- stretching Sakhalinskiy 20” Oil line Detail 2 Sakhalin 20” Gas line Development of the length Island LUN-A of the Lunskoye gas field BS#1 4.5” glycol 636 km 636 km 172 km onshore return island 48” Gas Line 24” Oil Line to OPF through offshore Poronaysk 2 x 30” platform 48” Gas multiphase Gas Compression Oil Booster OPF (BS#2) (BS#2) Nysh 24” Oil 636 km Domestic Supply Detail 3 Off-Take OPF to OET 24” Liquid Line 48” Gas Line LNG Construction of Plant Oil Export Terminal Yuzhno- LNG plant and oil Sakhalinsk 36” 5.5 km Detail 3 Loading Line export terminal LNG Tanker TLU GeneralGeneral PerspectivePerspective z Huge investment need by 2010 – At least $10bn upstream + $10bn midstream z Very high investment concentration – $1bn entry ticket minimum z Substantial legal challenges – Legal framework in FSU / Offtake arrangement in EU z Many sector reforms necessary z Large political hurdles Regional cooperation z Huge competition from the East z Generic project finance challenges RegionalRegional andand SectorSector ReformReform IssuesIssues z Technical Issues z Unbundling of Activities and Services z Rationalise Tariffs, Transit Fees and Taxes z Enforce Payment Discipline z Regulatory Framework z Attracting Strategic Investors and Privatisation z Political Issues z Civil and Social Progress z Environmental Issues TechnicalTechnical IssuesIssues z Routing of infrastructure to Soviet production z General deficiency of internal and transit pipes for current export demand z Antiquated pumps and metering z Lack of batching and separation facilities z Deficient local parts and service industry z Current expense of “clean” technology UnUn--bundlingbundling z Gas trading, transit and bulk sales z Long distance gas transport – high pressure network z Local gas distribution z Gas Storage z Unbundling removes distorting cross- subsidies and promotes commercialisation RationaliseRationalise TarrifsTarrifs,, TransitTransit FeesFees andand TaxesTaxes z Full cost recapture tariffs with incentive for maintenance and investment z Geographic price differentiation for transit cost z Full deduction for tax purposes of necessary depreciation PaymentPayment DisciplineDiscipline z Comprehensive gas metering z Progressive restriction of supply for late or non-payment z Forgiveness, conversion or other renegotiation of arrears z Build sinking fund for arrears from profit RegulatoryRegulatory FrameworkFramework z Service Obligations z Conditions of third party access z Monitoring of gas trading z Bulk and end user tariff setting and monitoring mechanisms z Independent regulatory body PoliticalPolitical IssuesIssues z Patronage and Funding z Affordability, Subsidies and Welfare z International Competition Economic, Military and Ideological Offensive and Defensive z Governance and Efficiency EnvironmentalEnvironmental IssuesIssues z Legacy of Environmental Damage z Demands for impact minimization z Differentiation of social impacts z Agitation for “Renewables” CivilCivil andand SocialSocial IssuesIssues z Routing z Human Rights z Consultation process and compensation z Shift in focus from purely environmental aspects of large oil and gas projects to more ‘political’ topics like – Revenue management – Transparency – Corruption – Democracy Safe,Safe, FairFair andand SustainableSustainable z Environmental and health and safety aspects z Fairness and transparency for all parties involved – Tariff payments to Governments – Consultation – Land compensation – Publish what you pay / receive – Disclosure of key agreements z Benefits for the local population – Community investment programmes – Transparent revenue allocation – Regional development initiative GenericGeneric RisksRisks z Construction / Completion Risk – contractual structure (delays, cost over-runs, etc.) z Operational Risk – technological integration and experience / viability z Utilisation / Supply Risk – type of throughput arrangement – fundamentals (Market/Competition) GenericGeneric RisksRisks cont.cont. z Competition / Market – effect of oil price (linked to gas and oil products) – regional supply / demand – impact on tariff z Political & Regulatory Risks – regulatory intervention (tariffs & export volumes) – political turmoil / disputes / violence / nationalisation – discriminatory taxation RisksRisks andand theirtheir mitigationmitigation z Economic & financial – minimised through financial package and due diligence z Technical risks – reliance on strong and technically competent sponsor z Environmental risks – sponsor commitment to appropriate guidelines z Political risks – minimised through involvement of IFI’s and ECA’s LessonsLessons LearnedLearned Chernogorskoye, Komiarcticoil, Polar Lights, Samotlor, West Siberia II Oil, Chernogorneft, Geoilbent, Gas Transit and Gas Transit II, SeverTEK z engagement of independent technical adviser to review condition of the borrower’s assets z advance structuring of reporting for the Bank’s monitoring purposes z conducting sensitivity analysis on the basis of conservative assumptions z ability of a relatively small project to create a transition impact HOWHOW EBRDEBRD CANCAN ASSISTASSIST AvailableAvailable FinancingFinancing SourcesSources z Equity – Strategic investors (oil and gas majors) – Investment funds (limited scope) – IFI’s (EBRD, IFC) z Debt Financing – IFI's (EBRD, IFC) (own funds) – EIB (European portion) – Commercial banks (participating in IFI B Loans) – ECAs (Hermes, Coface, JBIC, Exim…) z Capital Markets – Equity (IPO's) – Bonds DebtDebt asas FinancingFinancing SourceSource z Loans – Tailor made instruments with negotiated conditions – Bank lenders familiar with different structures z Bonds – Relatively rapid issuance process – No covenants for straight instruments – Tradable instruments – But lack of flexibility PurePure ProjectProject FinanceFinance isis nono longerlonger anan optionoption z Lenders and Sponsors will have to structure projects that go beyond funding project cost Sustainability + Good Governance are high on the agenda – International Financial Institutions (Extractive Industry Review) – Commercial Banks (Equator Principles) – Socially Responsible Investors – NGOs and civil society – Governments (EITI) EBRDEBRD NGONGO involvementinvolvement z Committed to dialogue with NGOs from an early stage z Addressing NGO issues with Sponsors z Acting as “catalyst” to facilitate dialogue between Governments, independent experts and Sponsors z Multi-Stakeholder-Forums seeking dialogue with directly affected people to verify ‘mood on the ground’ z Continue dialogue with NGOs during project implementation ContactContact DetailsDetails Paul Shapiro Senior Banker Natural Resources Team European Bank for Reconstruction and Development 1 Exchange Sq. London, EC2A 2JN Tel. 44 (0) 207 338 6244 Fax 44 (0) 207 338 6101 Mob. 44 (0) 7764 230 775 MoreMore information:information: www.ebrd.comwww.ebrd.com.

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    29 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us