Volume 29 Issue 1 Wilderness: Past, Present, and Future Winter 1989 A Look at Wilderness Use and Users in Transation Robert C. Lucas Recommended Citation Robert C. Lucas, A Look at Wilderness Use and Users in Transation, 29 Nat. Resources J. 41 (1989). Available at: https://digitalrepository.unm.edu/nrj/vol29/iss1/5 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Law Journals at UNM Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Natural Resources Journal by an authorized editor of UNM Digital Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected], [email protected], [email protected]. ROBERT C. LUCAS* A Look at Wilderness Use and Users in Transition ABSTRACT Wilderness has a variety of values for individuals and society. Some of these values are derivedfrom onsite use of the wilderness resource. Other values comefrom offsite uses. Recreationaluse poses a strong challenge to those who manage wilderness. Recreational use of wilderness, after many years of rapid growth, has leveled off or declinedin many areasin recent years. The reasonsfor this change are unclear,but the implications of changes in use patternsand user characteristicsare important for both management and future wil- derness allocation decisions. INTRODUCTION Although "wilderness use" commonly serves as a synonym for "rec- reational use" within wilderness, there are many other wilderness uses, some even taking place outside wilderness boundaries. Manning has dis- cussed many of these uses in an earlier paper in this issue. These uses vary in the degree to which they depend on the wilderness setting. Without wilderness, some uses would scarcely be possible, while other uses take place in wilderness almost coincidentally, for reasons unrelated to wil- derness conditions. This paper discusses recreational uses of wilderness as arguably the most important and certainly the most studied wilderness use. Although wilderness and related land classifications and management are found in several countries, this paper focuses on the United States National Wilderness Preservation System (NWPS) that now includes about 450 areas and 89 million acres. Understanding wilderness use and users is an essential foundation for any decisions about wilderness management.' Most wilderness values stem from wilderness use, and so do most threats to the resource. Because of this, most management problems arise from wilderness use, and most wilderness management is use management. Management is inherently complex and difficult, and without good knowledge of the character of *Project Leader, Wilderness Management Research and Research Social Scientist, Intermountain Research Station, Forest Service, U.S. Dep't of Agriculture, Missoula, Mont. i. J. HENDEE, G. STANKEY & R. LUCAS, WILDERNESS MANAGEMENT 281 passim (USDA Forest Service Miscellaneous Publication No. 1365, 1978). NATURAL RESOURCES JOURNAL [Vol. 29 use, effective management is impossible. This is particularly true for recreational use if management seeks to minimize visitor regimentation and rely instead on indirectly influencing use, thus providing visitors more freedom.' Decisions about what lands should or should not be classified as wil- derness also are aided by understanding uses, the benefits they yield, and who receives benefits. Trends in various uses may help form expectations about likely future uses and thus contribute to decisions about possible allocation of lands to wilderness. RECREATIONAL USE Amount of Use Recreational use includes commercial operations by outfitters and guides, as well as general public use. Up to a fifth of the visitors use outfitters in some Rocky Mountain wildernesses.' Most outfitters offer horseback camping trips, especially during hunting seasons. Some provide river float trips while some rent canoes and camping equipment. National Forests in Idaho, for example, have about 300 outfitting businesses with permits to operate. The proportion of visitors using outfitters may be declining." Current recreational use of wilderness totals about 15 million, 12-hour recreation visitor days [RVD] annually. Wilderness in National Forests accounts for about 85 percent of this use, a figure close to the National Forest's proportion of total wilderness acres in the lower 48 States. Wil- derness in National Parks makes up almost all of the remainder, with only light use of wilderness in National Wildlife Refuges and Bureau of Land Management areas. Comparing recreational use among wildernesses managed by the four Federal agencies with wilderness responsibilities (Forest Service, Park Service, Fish and Wildlife Service, and Bureau of Land Management) requires conversions using approximate rules of thumb because units of measure vary among agencies, as do reporting proce- dures.5 Wilderness recreational use can be characterized in many ways, such 2. Lucas, The Role of Regulations in Recreation Management, 9 WESTERN WILDLANDS 6 (Summer 1983). 3. R. LUCAS, VISITOR CHARACTERISTICS, ATTITUDES, AND USE PATTERNS IN THE BOB MARSHALL WILDERNESS COMPLEX, 1970-1982, at 7 (USDA Forest Service, Intermountain Research Station, Research Paper INT-345, 1985). 4. Id.; Lime, Who Uses Rivers for Recreation and What of the Future? in NATIONAL RIVER RECREATION SYMPOSIUM 15, 19-22 (Oct. 31-Nov. 3, 1984) (Baton Rouge. La). 5. J. HENDEE, G. STANKEY & R. LUCAS, supra note I. Winter 19891 A LOOK AT WILDERNESS USE AND USERS as length of stay, party size, and others. Roggenbuck and Lucas provide the most recent data about wilderness use characteristics. Length of Stay Most wilderness visits are short, and many smaller wildernesses are mainly day-use areas. Average lengths of stay in a few large areas, such as the Boundary Water Canoe Area Wilderness in Minnesota and the Bob Marshall Wilderness in Montana, both over I million acres in size, exceed five days, but about two to three days is a much more common average in most wilderness areas. Trips of a week or more are uncommon almost everywhere. Differences seem related to area size and type of use, not regional location or managing agency. Stays appear to be a little shorter in recent years. Group Size Groups of wilderness visitors are typically small. From half to three- fourths of the parties at all areas for which data are available consist of two to four people. Lone visitors are rare although more common in National Parks than in National Forests. In most wilderness areas, parties of more than ten people are scarce, usually accounting for only about five percent of all visitor groups. Party size is declining everywhere data are available. Method of Travel Hiking is the most common method of travel in almost all wilderness areas. An exception is the Boundary Waters Canoe Area, where about 80 percent of visitors use canoes while most of the rest travel by motorboat in parts of the area where this is permitted.7 In a few western areas-the Bob Marshall Wilderness, for example-more than half the visitors ride horses. Hiking and nonmotorized boating have become more common relative to horse travel and motorized boats everywhere trend data are available. Activities In many wilderness areas, especially in the West, fishing is the leading activity in participation rate (leaving out travel). Photography, nature 6. Roggenbuck & Lucas, Wilderness Use and User Characteristics: A State-of-Knowledge Review, in PROCEEDINGS-NATIONAL WILDERNESS RESEARCH CONFERENCE: ISSUES, STATE-OF-KNOWLEDGE, FUTURE DtRECnoNs 204 (USDA Forest Service, Intermountain Research Station, General Technical Report INT-220, 1987). 7. Id. at 215. NATURAL RESOURCES JOURNAL [Vol. 29 study, and wildlife observation are also common activities, and swimming is common in many areas-all low-impact, nonconsumptive uses. Hunt- ing varies from minor to common in these areas open to hunting. (Almost all National Park areas and part or all of many Wildlife Refuges are closed to hunting.) Mountain climbing is rare in all but a few areas. Season of Use For most places, summer is the main use season. Even in two wilderness areas well known for elk hunting, the Bob Marshall and the Selway- Bitterroot in Montana and Idaho, summer visitors substantially outnumber fall hunters. Many of the areas in the South, Southwest, and low elevations in California receive most of their use in winter or spring) In the North, and at higher elevations in mountain wilderness, winter use is light but more common than a decade ago and growing. In many areas, use seasons are becoming longer, with more people coming earlier and later. Weekend peaks in use also vary, with sharp peaks at some smaller, more accessible areas, but not at many large areas with longer stays and small local populations. Eastern wildernesses seem to show much less peaking, even though many are small. Weekend peaks are probably be- coming less severe over time. Type of Group In almost all wilderness, a large majority of the visitors are family groups, sometimes also with friends. A half to a third of the groups in most areas studied include children under 16. The next most common type are small groups of friends. Organization-sponsored groups range from almost none in some areas to about a tenth in others.9 Distribution of Use The geographical distribution of wilderness recreational use is un- even-heavy in a few places and light in many others. This unevenness is evident among different wilderness areas as well as within individual wilderness areas, whether the focus is on numbers of visitors by trailheads, on trails through the area, or at campsites. Area-to-area variation covers a wide range (Table 1). Total use per National Forest wilderness in 1986 varied from more than I million, 12- hour RVD at the Boundary Waters Canoe Area Wilderness to only 100 RVD at Hell Hole Bay Wilderness in South Carolina. If use intensity is 8. R. WASHBURNE & D. COLE, PROBLEMS AND PRACTICES IN WILDERNESS MANAGEMENT: A SURVEY OF MANAGERS 18-23 (USDA Forest Service, Intermountain Forest and Range Experiment Station, Research Paper INT-304, 1983). 9. Roggenbuck & Lucas, supra note 6, at 226.