Draft version September 7, 2020 Interstellar communication network. II. Deep space nodes with gravitational lensing Michael Hippke 1, 2 1Sonneberg Observatory, Sternwartestr. 32, 96515 Sonneberg, Germany 7 @hippke 2Visiting Scholar, Breakthrough Listen Group, Berkeley SETI Research Center, Astronomy Department, UC Berkeley Abstract Data rates in an interstellar communication network suffer from the inverse square law due to the vast distances between the stars. To achieve high (Gbits/s) data rates, some combination of large apertures and high power is required. Alternatively, signals can be focused by the gravitational lenses of stars to yield gains of order 109, compared to the direct path. Gravitational lens physics imposes a set of constraints on the sizes and locations of receivers and apertures. These characteristics include the minimum and maximum receiver size, the maximum transmitter size, and the heliocentric receiver distance. Optimal sizes of receivers and transmitters are of order meters. Such small devices allow for the capture of the main lobe in the beam while avoiding the temporal smearing which affects larger apertures. These and other properties can be used to describe the most likely parameters of a lensed communication network, and to determine exact position of communication nodes in the heliocentric reference frame. Keywords: general: extraterrestrial intelligence { planets and satellites: detection 1. Introduction 1979; Maccone 2011). While the lens gains are large, it The bending of light around the sun was predicted was not clear whether coronal noise would prohibit its by Einstein(1911, 1915) and experimentally confirmed use (Haugstad 1981; Landis 2017). Recent work indicates during solar eclipses (Eddington 1919; Dyson et al. 1920). that a coronograph or occulter enables a stable receiver Later, Einstein(1936) also noted the focusing of starlight channel (Hippke 2018), as it can block the majority of by the gravitational field of another star. The use of this the noise. A detailed view into the physics of the solar lensing for communication has been suggested (Eshleman gravitational lens (SGL) can be found in Turyshev & Toth(2017). A communication scheme of an interstellar network of nodes was introduced in the first paper of this series d = 1 pc = z = 1,000 au d = 1 pc = z = 1,000 au (Hippke 2019a). It assumes the capability to travel be- 200,000 au 200,000 au tween the stars, and place nodes and probes in multiple locations. Then, it is also feasible to travel to the grav- 3 Dt DSGL,r Dr DSGL,t itational lens plane, whose distance is of order 10− pc from each star. This paper explores the properties of a receiver and a transmitter on the focal line, includ- ing their heliocentric locations and sizes. We develop the framework using the more common assumption of arXiv:2009.01866v1 [astro-ph.IM] 3 Sep 2020 a receiver in the lens plane (Figure1, left panel). Af- terwards, we calculate the difference for the case where a transmitter is placed in the same location, while the Figure 1. Cartoon diagram of SGL configurations. Left: A receiver is at parsec distance in free space (Figure1, right transmitter at parsec distance beams towards the sun. The panel). Scaling relations show that an increase in aper- receiver is located in the SGL. Right: The transmitter is in ture size for receivers in the SGL produces only a linear the SGL and beams towards the Einstein ring. The receiver increase in data rate, in contrast to a quadratic profit is at parsec distance. Nothing is to scale. when increasing the transmitter size. These and similar size preferences will be noted, but their consequences for the network topology will be given in a subsequent paper [email protected] of this series. 2 Hippke proper motion z0 z Tau Ceti Einstein ring b Sun focal line Transmitter Dt DSGL,r R Earth Figure 2. Cartoon diagram of the solar gravitational lens configuration. The receiver with aperture DSGL;r on the focal line (right) observes the flux at distance z from the sun which comes through the Einstein ring from the transmitter at distance d. 2. General lens characteristics A = 2π((b + w)2 b2) with b as the inner edge of the ER − This section describes lens characteristics applicable to ring, w = DSGL;r as the width, and DSGL;r as the aper- both cases of receiver and transmitter in the lens plane. ture of the receiver. A telescope with aperture DSGL;r, A detailed derivation of these properties can be found in placed at the heliocentric distance z on the optical axis, Turyshev & Toth(2017). receives light from a family of rays with different impact parameters with respect to the Sun, ranging from b to 2.1. Schwarzschild radius b + DSGL;r (for details, see explanation before Equation 145 in Turyshev & Toth 2017). A meter-sized telescope The sun's gravitational field deflects light rays with sees a meter-sized (width) Einstein ring with a diameter a bending angle inversely proportional to the impact slightly larger than the sun. As the width of the ring parameter b > R (Figure2). This makes it different to 9 is very small compared to the radius (w=b 10− ) we a classical lens with its single focal point. In contrast, a can approximate A = πbw. The width is≈ unresolved gravitational lens has a focal line (a caustic) beginning ER 2 by a telescope in the SGL except for extremely large at a minimum distance z0 = R =2rg 547:8 au, with 2 ∼ apertures (section 4.1). rg = 2GM =c 2; 953 m as the Schwarzschild radius ∼ of the sun (Liebes 1964; Eshleman 1979). When nothing 2.3. Point spread function else is specified, we assume z = 1;000 au and a wavelength of λ = 1 µm throughout the paper. In the image plane, the flux follows an Airy pattern. The point spread function (PSF) width can be described 2.2. Location and width of the Einstein ring as (Turyshev & Toth 2017, their Eq. 142) From the perspective of an observer located in the SGL, λ z 1=2 the distance between the solar center and the Einstein ρ = 6:3 cm: (3) ring is the impact parameter b, which is a function of 1 µm 1;000 au heliocentric distance z > z0 (Turyshev & Andersson The PSF follows a Bessel function of zeroth order J0, 2003): making its decay much slower compared to a classical PSF, which is proportional to J 2(2px)=x2. It is therefore 2 1 b possible to scan over the structure of the Airy pattern z(b) = z0 (1) R2 in the image plane to find the focal line. which can be solved solve for b: 2.4. Upper limit on the wavelength r z No lens is perfect, and the same is true for the solar b(z) = (2) z0 gravitational lens. The turbulent free-electron gas in the sun's atmosphere blocks photons . 191 MHz (Turyshev in units of R . For example, we get z(b = 1:05) & Toth 2019b). Higher frequencies are bent towards 600 au and b(z = 1000 au) 1:35 R . The distance∼ the sun by plasma refraction, reducing the flux on the between the solar limb and the∼ Einstein ring is 1 b. focal line. Earlier estimates found a cut-off frequency − The area covered by the thin Einstein ring is the effec- f < fcrit 123 GHz, for which no focus occurs. Later tive telescope aperture. This area can be calculated as estimates∼ are at 300 GHz (Galea & Swinney 2011). The Interstellar communication network. II. Deep space nodes with gravitational lensing 3 Frequency (GHz) Pros and cons of various wavelengths will be explored in 103 102 101 a future paper of this series. 1.0 3. Receiver in the lens plane There are two possible configurations to consider. In 0.8 the first, the receiver is located in the lens plane (Fig- ure2). The second, with the transmitter in the lens 0.6 plane, will be treated in section4. 3.1. Lens gain 0.4 The gain for distant point sources on-axis is a function Relative lens quality of wavelength λ and heliocentric distance z (Turyshev & 0.2 Toth 2017, their Eq. 135) 0.0 2 3 4 5 2 r 10 10 10 10 4π rg 2 ρ 2rg µ = 2 J0 2π (4) Wavelength (micron) 1 e 4π rg /λ λ λ z − − The sum of the collected transmitter flux can be calcu- Figure 3. Quality of the lens as a function of wavelength. lated by spherically integrating over the PSF (Turyshev Lens quality is near-perfect for λ & 100 µm (f . 1;000 GHz), & Toth 2017, their Eq. 143) for the receiving telescope but deteriorates quickly for lower frequencies. Estimates aperture in the SGL DSGL;r are from the electron density model following Eq. 285 in Turyshev & Toth(2019a). 2 4π rg µ¯(z; DSGL;r; λ) = 2 4π rg /λ most recent model indicates a gradual decrease in lens 1 e− λ × r − r (5) quality between 10 and 1;000 GHz (Turyshev & Toth n D 2r D 2r o J 2 π SGL;r g + J 2 π SGL;r g : 2019a). For higher frequencies, i.e. wavelengths shorter 0 λ z 1 λ z than 100 µm, the effects on the lens are minor (Figure3). It has been pointed out by Landis(2018) that the The corresponding aperture of a standard telescope variation in the refractive index produces a randomness is Dclassical = DSGL;rpµ¯ 87 km. This shows the large ∼ in the phase of the focused light, which degrades the gain of the SGL as a receiver: an availability of infinitely diameter of the focal spot considerably.