Habituation: Effects of Regular and Stochastic Stimulation

Habituation: Effects of Regular and Stochastic Stimulation

Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry, 1972, 35, 234-242 J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry: first published as 10.1136/jnnp.35.2.234 on 1 April 1972. Downloaded from Habituation: effects of regular and stochastic stimulation M. R. DIMITRIJEVIC, J. FAGANEL, M. GREGORIC, P. W. NATHAN', AND J. K. TRONTELJ From the Neurophysiological Institute, School of Medicine, Ljubljana, Jugoslavia, and the National Hospital for Nervous Diseases, Queen Square, London S U M MARY The different effects of regular and stochastic stimulation on the flexor reflex of patients with the spinal cord totally divided and of normal subjects and on the blink reflex of normal subjects were studied. When the cutaneous stimulus was above but less than twice threshold, with regular stimulation habituation occurred; with stochastic stimulation, habituation either did not occur or it was mini- mal. Stochastic stimulation was at random stimulus intervals or with random stimulus intensities. When stimulus intensity was around threshold, habituation occurred with both kinds of stimula- tion, the response to stimulation soon ceasing to occur. When stimulus intensity was greater than stimulation. twice threshold, habituation did not occur with both kinds of Protected by copyright. When regular stimulation was given after the response had ceased to occur, extinction of the response beyond zero occurred. When a dishabituating stimulus was repeatedly applied in a regular manner, habituation to the dishabituating stimulus occurred. With regular and stochastic stimulation given as conditioning and test series, it was seen that stochastic stimulation caused, in addition to the short-term excitatory effect, the same long-term cumulative depressing effect on excitability as did regular stimulation. The purpose of this paper is to report the differ- series. Their work seems to have been an isolated ent effects obtained with regular repetitive physiological investigation for it was only stimulation and stochastic repetitive stimulation within the last few years that physiologists began in man and to consider the general principles of to be interested in habituation and dishabitua- habituation and dishabituation. tion. In 1965 Buchwald, Halas, and Shramm Up to the last five years, this subject came into published their investigation of repetitive evoca- http://jnnp.bmj.com/ the field of psychology rather than that of tion of flexor reflexes of the spinal cat; and in physiology. Yet one of the first physiological 1966 similar studies were published by Spencer, investigations was carried out in 1937: Pumphrey Thompson and Neilson, and Thompson and and Rawdon-Smith examined the effect of Spencer. Before this, some studies of habitua- repetitive stimulation of the acoustic nerves on tion and dishabituation had been made in man: the response of the last abdominal ganglion of Oldfield (1937) reported observations on the the cockroach. They observed that repetitive auditory blink reflex; and Hagbarth and on September 25, 2021 by guest. stimulation gave a decline in response. Examin- Kugelberg (1958) studied repetitive evocation of ing the effects of changing the frequency and the abdominal cutaneomuscular reflex. intensity of the stimulus, they found that when In this paper we are presenting some of our the response had 'disappeared almost com- evidence to illustrate some of the principles of pletely', it could be brought back by an 'increase habituation and dishabituation that we have in the stimulating intensity', an 'increase in the learned from studies of the flexor reflex of stimulating frequency', or by the interpolation normal man by Faganel (1970); the flexor reflex of an extra stimulus into those of the regular of man with the spinal cord totally divided by Dimitrijevic and Nathan (1970, 1971); and the 1 External Scientific Staff, Medical Research Council, Great Britain. blink reflex by Gregoric (1970). In the first 234 Habituation 235 J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry: first published as 10.1136/jnnp.35.2.234 on 1 April 1972. Downloaded from paper by Dimitrijevic and Nathan, the following and when stimulus intensity was randomized, stimu- phases of changes in the response to a regularly lus intervals were kept constant. With both kinds of repeated stimulus were recognized: build-up stimulation, the series lasted from a few seconds to phase, phase of fluctuation, phase of diminution, several minutes. The number of stimuli in a series was between 45 and 1,040. In some experiments, and phase of cessation of response. These terms habituation was carried on to beyond zero; this was will be used here. shown by examination of the rate of spontaneous recovery of responsiveness. METHODS The noxious cutaneous stimulus used was an electric BLINK REFLEX OF NORMAL MAN These experiments stimulus generated by a stimulator with built-in were performed on 10 subjects aged 17 to 31 years. programme, designed by Trontelj, Trontelj, and Stimuli of 15 to 30 V were delivered to the skin over Trontelj (1967). The stimulus consisted of trains of the supraorbital foramen above the right eye rectangular pulses, pulse-width 0-2-0 3 msec, fre- through cup-shaped silver-silver chloride electrodes. quency of 2 kHz, duration 20, 30, or 40 msec. The intensity of the stimulus was adjusted for each Repetitive stimulation was either regular or random subject so that it was 5000 above his threshold; this in either frequency or intensity, the randomness stimulus was slightly painful. Stochastic stimulation having a Gaussian distribution function. Electro- at random stimulus frequencies was with stimulus myographic (EMG) responses were detected by intervals of 333 msec to 3 sec; stimulus intervals of surface electrodes and were amplified and displayed regular stimulation were 1,666 msec, this being the on a Tektronix type 565 oscilloscope with 2A61 mean of the random stimulus intervals. The response amplifier and were recorded on tape. They were examined was that of the ipsilateral orbicularis subsequently rectified and integrated by an analogue oculi muscle. The latency and the duration of the unit, designed by Trontelj and Trontelj (1968) and second component of the response were measured; fed into a CAT 1000 computer. Histograms of mean the amount of the response 24 to 100 msec from Protected by copyright. EMG activity were computed. Where percentages of the beginning of the stimulus was computed in each the amount of response are given, they are per- subject. In three subjects, there was a third compon- centages of the mean of 20 responses; so that if, for ent, but, as it occurred after 100 msec, no observa- instance, a response is said to have gone down to tions or computations were made on it. As the second 5000, it means that the mean of the last 20 responses component of the blink reflex is analogous to that of is 5000 less than the mean of the first 20 responses. the spinal flexor reflex (Shahani and Young, 1968; Shahani, 1970) it is this component that is reported FLEXOR REFLEX OF NORMAL MAN These experiments upon here. were performed on eight subjects, aged 20 to 28 years. Stimuli of 40 to 80 V were delivered to the skin RESULTS of the medial side of the plantar surface of the foot through electrodes designed by Copland and Davies Habituation is seen with rhythmical (regularly (1964). Regular stimulation usually consisted of 50 applied repetitive) stimulation; it is not seen stimuli, stimulus intervals of 16-66 msec; stochastic with stochastic stimulation. This statement stimulation at random frequencies was with stimulus holds, however, only when the stimulus intensity http://jnnp.bmj.com/ intervals of from 333 msec to 3 sec. In the flexor and less than threshold. reflex of the normal subjects and the patients with is well above, twice, divided spinal cord, the response computed was that These features of habituation are illustrated in of the tibialis anterior muscle; computation was Figs 1 to 3. from 50 to 150 msec after the beginning of the Figures la and b show the different effects of stimulus. regular stimulation and stimulation at random stimulus intervals in a patient with a total cord FLEXOR REFLEX OF SPINAL MAN These experiments division; the division was at the 6th thoracic on September 25, 2021 by guest. were performed on 12 patients, aged 20 to 35 years. segment. In both series, stimulus intensity was Stimuli of 5 to 100 V were delivered to the skin of 15 V. With regular stimulation 50 stimuli were the medial side of the plantar surface of the foot given at 1 sec intervals; with stochastic stimula- through Copland-Davies electrodes. Stimulus inter- tion 1,025 stimuli at 0-8 to 2 sec intervals were vals of regular stimulation were 0 5 to 10 sec and of it can be seen that before half stochastic stimulation at random frequencies were given. In Fig. la, 0 3 to 2 sec. When the stimulation rate was as fast as of the 50 stimuli have been given, the response of 5 Hz, each stimulus was on most occasions occurring the tibialis anterior muscle has reached the phase at a time when the response to the previous stimulus of cessation of response. Figure lb shows the was still continuing. When stimulus intervals were responses to the first 200 of the stochastic randomized, stimulus intensity was kept constant stimuli. After the first 14 stimuli, there is a 236 M. R. Dimitrijevic, J. Faganel, M. Gregoric', P. W. Nathan, and J. K. Trontelj J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry: first published as 10.1136/jnnp.35.2.234 on 1 April 1972. Downloaded from 200- 0 ( - I w 0 0 0 w-100- S..00 (D * : z 0a * sip0 I ^ #. _ 0O 6 20 40 60 so 100 SEQUENTIAL STIMULI (a) 200 - 0 . 0 0 I) 0 Protected by copyright. 0 0000 W 100- 0~~~~.0 0 0 cr 0 *0 * **004 ?.. .O:o .0 *0 P o 0 0 0 1-.

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    9 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us