Recent Shifts in Distribution of Microlepidoptera in the Netherlands

Recent Shifts in Distribution of Microlepidoptera in the Netherlands

Recent shifts in distribution of Microlepidoptera in The Netherlands Willem N. Ellis, J.H. Donner & J.H. Küchlein ELLIS, W. N., J. H. DONNER & J. H. KÜCHLEIN, 1997. RECENT SHIFTS IN DISTRIBUTION OF MICROLEPI¬ DOPTERA IN THE NETHERLANDS. - ENT. BER., AMST. 57 (8): 119-125. Abstract: Possible changes in the pattern of distribution of Microlepidoptera species in The Netherlands in the last few decades were investigated. For that purpose the country was divided into six blocks, and the number of records of 104 species in the Tinea database before and after 1975 was counted. The results show that over 50% of the species have un¬ dergone a significant change in distribution. Changes are strongest in species for which the distribution limit crosses the country. Generally, the pattern of change shows a NW/SE opposition, matching the major trend in climatic isolines. Although these results cannot be interpreted as a testimony of a major recent climatic change, we assume that the pattern changes are climate-induced. Our results imply a strong dynamism in the composition of local biocenoses; moreover it demonstrates that, as far as the cryptobiota is concerned, there is little point in monitoring Red List species as parame¬ ters of the conservation status or value of protected areas. Tinea Foundation, c/o Institute for Systematics and Population Biology, University of Amsterdam, Plantage Middenlaan 64, 1018 DH Amsterdam, The Netherlands. Introduction placement of the noctuid Omphaloscelis luno- sa (Haworth) (De Vos & Zumkehr, 1995) and In a previous paper (Ellis et al., 1997) we de¬ of Thaumetopoea processioned Linnaeus monstrated that the flight peak of a large (Stigter & Romeijn, 1992), and the microlepi¬ sample of Microlepidoptera in The Nether¬ doptera Phyllonorycter leucographella Zeller lands has shifted during the last twenty years (Stigter & Van Frankenhuyzen, 1991), P. pla- to a date roughly eleven days earlier. In the sa¬ tani (Staudinger) (Küchlein & Donner, 1993) me paper we suggested that this phenological and Bucculatrix thoracella (Thunberg) (Küch¬ shift, that is probably connected to the global lein & Van Frankenhuyzen, 1994). change in temperature, might be accompanied An essential problem is that the informa¬ by changes in the patterns of distribution. In tion present in a database like that of Tinea has the present paper the latter aspect will be ana¬ not been collected in a systematic way. This is lysed. Again we used the Tinea database as the a general problem with faunistic data, espe¬ source of our data. cially where it concerns the relatively poorly Large, and mostly northward jumps of spe¬ sampled cryptobiota. Moreover, negative da¬ cies are often recorded, but these usually are ta, i.e., the local absence of a species, are ne¬ based on a few records, at the outer limit of the ver recorded (if that can be established at all). area of distribution. Examples for the fauna of Most importantly, the amount of information The Netherlands include the sawfly Corynis per region per year generally rises in the cour¬ crassicornis (Rossi) (Mol, 1988), the tortricid se of time, but not for all regions at the same Cydia amplana (Hübner) (De Vos, 1991), the pace. This prohibits a direct comparison of the geometrid Stegania trimaculata (Villers) distribution patterns in various periods. To put (Lempke & Ottenheim, 1989), and a number the question if there is a displacement of the of Heteroptera (see Aukema, 1989). The more fauna as a whole within The Netherlands the¬ important, but often less spectacular “creep” refore is like trying to pull oneself up by the of a species’ area by changes in abundance hairs. But we can ask ourselves the more res¬ close to the area border are less frequently re¬ tricted question if the pattern of abundance of ported. Exceptions include the northward dis¬ the species within The Netherlands has chan- 120 Ent. Ber., Amst. 57 (1997) ged. We therefore wil investigate if the relati¬ extracted from the Tinea database. All records ve (compared with all other species) abundan¬ concern adults, collected in the field. More de¬ ce of each single species in parts of the coun¬ tails about the data set can be found in Ellis et try has changed over time. al. (1997). All records were used this time; in Populations tend to be smallest and most particular there was no limitation as to the widely scattered near the edge of the distribu¬ minimal number of records per species per tional area of a species. Ecological theory pre¬ year. We divided the country into six blocks: dicts that year-to-year fluctuations in popula¬ the same as the three sectors in the previous tion size will be largest in these peripheral paper, with an additional east-west division populations (Brown, 1984; Hengeveld, 1990; (fig. 1). The number of records per species in Inkinen, 1994; Klomp, 1962; Lawton, 1995; the six blocks were counted, those from Zeegers, 1991). Several species in our dataset < 1975 (a few dating back as far as 1850) se¬ have the border of their area of distribution parately from those > 1976. We have chosen crossing The Netherlands (table 1, data deri¬ 1975 as the pivotal year for two reasons: to ved from table 10.8 in Küchlein & Donner, have a sufficient number of old records to ena¬ 1993). We will test the prediction that these ble statistical treatment, and because there is a “peripheral” species have changed more than clear dip in the number of records around that the “central” species, that live closer to their year. As already remarked in the introduction, distribution centre. the number of records rises differently in the blocks (fig. 1). Records from before and after 1975 are referred to below as ‘old’ and ‘new’ Material and methods records, respectively. We used a data set consisting of the records of For each species we calculated an index 104 of the most common Microlepidoptera, which indicates the degree to which the spe- Fig. 1. Number of records per block per year. (Lines are smoothed curves, obtai¬ ned by the locally weighted least square error method, taking 70% of the data into account; individual data- points not shown). The inset shows the arrangement of the blocks, and the total number of records per block 1990 1950 1960 1970 1980 before and after 1975. Ent. Ber., Amst. 57 (1997) 121 cies has a “preference” for each of the blocks. to vary widely, and independently in the two The index (I), is based on the number of re¬ periods, the test is quite severe; this was con¬ cords observed in a block (X), divided by the firmed by some experiments with synthetic number expected there (E) on the ground of data sets. the total number of records of the species and the general pattern of all species combined. Ebs Results is the number of records of a species s in block b if species 5 were distributed over the blocks Table 1 gives for all species the values of like all species taken together; it is obtained by Db>riew, and the significance of Db and C. More multiplying the total number of records of s than half of the species show a significant by: the total number of records (over all spe¬ change in the pattern of their distribution. cies) in block b, divided by the total number of (Note that, for one species, the highest values all records for all species and all blocks. / is of D are not necessarily the most strongly sig¬ calculated as a logarithm, because its value nificant; this is because the width of distribu¬ will be positive if X exceeds E (and their quo¬ tion of the simulated values is strongly influ¬ tient is larger than 1), zero if X and E are equal, enced by the value Bb/Bbn). The values of Dbs and negative if X is less than E. I was calcula¬ are significantly positively correlated for ted for old and new records separately. The blocks 1-2 (Spearman’s R = 0.340, P = 0.006, formulae are: Ibp, = ln((Xbsp+l)/Ebsp). Here Xbsp Bonferroni correction applied) and blocks 1-3 = the number of records of species s in block {R = 0.216, P = 0.041). This suggests that the b in period p (“old” or “new”), and Ebsp = Ssp * changes in distributional patterns very roughly Bbp fTp, where Ssp is total number of records of show a NW-SE opposition. species 5 over all blocks in in period p, Bbp is The values of Cs for the peripheral species the total number of records in block b in pe¬ are significantly higher than for the central riod p for all 104 species, and Tp is the total species; averages are 6.57 and 4.63, respecti¬ number of records of all 104 species over all vely (Mest; df = 102, P = 0.008). blocks in period p. The difference Dbs = lbsm - IbsM then is an Discussion indication of the degree of change of preferen¬ ce of the species for block b. Because E is cal¬ Our results show that over half of the species culated for the periods and blocks separately, have undergone a significant shift of their re¬ the effect of the unequal rise in observation gional pattern of abundance. A strong dyna¬ density in the blocks is factored out. The va¬ mism in the distribution of individual species lue Cs, viz., the sum of the absolute value of in itself is not uncommon. A well-known Dbs over all blocks is a more global indication example of a species with a fluctuating pattern of the change in distribution pattern of the spe¬ of abundance in The Netherlands is Araschnia cies.

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    7 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us