FINAL PERFORMANCE REPORT Federal Aid Grant No. F14AF01228 (T-81-1) Mapping Priority Areas for Oklahoma’s Ozark Karst Species of Greatest Conservation Concern Oklahoma Department of Wildlife Conservation October 1, 2014 through September 30, 2016 Mapping Priority Areas for Oklahoma’s Ozark Karst Species of Greatest Conservation Concern Michael E. Slay, Cory Gallipeau, Final Report for Oklahoma State Wildlife Grant and Jay Pruett Number T-81-1 The Nature Conservancy 10 November 2016 ii Table of Contents A. ABSTRACT ............................................................................................................................... 1 B. INTRODUCTION ...................................................................................................................... 1 C. OBJECTIVES ............................................................................................................................ 3 D. APPROACH ............................................................................................................................. 3 Study Area .................................................................................................................................. 3 Species Range Maps ................................................................................................................... 3 Threat Assessment ...................................................................................................................... 4 Terrestrial Community Group..................................................................................................... 5 Sites and Assessment Areas .................................................................................................... 5 Risk Model: Visitation (RVI) ................................................................................................. 5 Visitation Sub-Model: Population (RVIP).............................................................................. 5 Visitation Sub-Model: Access (RVIA) ................................................................................... 6 Visitation Sub-Model: Proximity (RVIX) .............................................................................. 6 Calculation of the Visitation Risk Model ............................................................................... 7 Calculation of the Terrestrial Community Threat Model ....................................................... 7 Bat Community Group ................................................................................................................ 7 Sites and Assessment Areas .................................................................................................... 7 Risk Model: Visitation (RVI) ................................................................................................. 7 Risk Model: Bat Habitat (RBH) ............................................................................................. 7 Bat Habitat Sub-Model: Forest (RBHF) ................................................................................. 7 Bat Habitat Sub-Model: Riparian (RBHR) ............................................................................. 8 Calculation of the Bat Habitat Risk Model ............................................................................. 8 Calculation of the Bat Community Threat Model .................................................................. 9 Aquatic Community Group......................................................................................................... 9 Sites and Assessment Areas .................................................................................................... 9 Risk Model: Visitation .......................................................................................................... 10 Risk Model: Surface Water Quality and Quantity (RWQ) ................................................... 10 Surface Water Sub-Model: Sediment (RWQS) .................................................................... 10 Surface Water Sub-Model: Nutrients (RWQN) .................................................................... 10 Surface Water Sub-Model: Pollutants (RWQP) ................................................................... 11 Surface Water Sub-Model: Hydrologic Alteration (RWQH) ............................................... 11 Calculation of the Water Quality and Quantity (RWQ) ....................................................... 12 iii Groundwater Vulnerability Model: DRASTIK .................................................................... 12 Groundwater Vulnerability Model Selection ........................................................................ 12 DRASTIC Model Background ............................................................................................. 12 DRASTIC Model Modifications........................................................................................... 13 Project Methodology ............................................................................................................. 14 DRASTIK Sub-Model: Depth to Water (D) ......................................................................... 15 DRASTIK Sub-Model: Recharge (R) ................................................................................... 15 DRASTIK Sub-Model: Aquafer Media (A) ......................................................................... 15 DRASTIK Sub-Model: Soil Media (S)................................................................................. 16 DRASTIK Sub-Model: Topography (T) .............................................................................. 16 DRASTIK Sub-Model: Impact of the Vadose Zone (I)........................................................ 16 DRASTIK Sub-Model: Karst Features (K) .......................................................................... 16 Calculation of the Groundwater Vulnerability Model: DRASTIK ....................................... 16 Calculation of the Groundwater Sensitivity Model: RWQ + DRASTIK ............................. 16 Calculation of the Aquatic Community Threat Model ......................................................... 17 E.1. RESULTS .............................................................................................................................. 17 Threat Assessment .................................................................................................................... 46 Terrestrial Community Group................................................................................................... 46 E.2. DISCUSSION........................................................................................................................ 49 E.2. APPENDICES ....................................................................................................................... 66 APPENDIX A. Descriptions of risk index variables and calculations. ................................... 67 APPENDIX B. DRASTIC Parameter ratings. ......................................................................... 72 APPENDIX C. Raw index values and scaled scores for components of the Visitation Risk Model for each terrestrial cave species population at each site. Scaled values are scaled from 0-1, with 1 being the score with the most ecological benefit. Threat scores (THREAT Scaled column) discussed in the text are generated by subtracting scaled values from 1 (e.g. [1- (RVI Scaled)] equals overall threat from visitation). Descriptions of abbreviations used in this table can be found in Appendix A. ...................................................................................................................... 75 APPENDIX D. Raw index values and scaled scores for components of the Visitation Risk Model, Bat Habitat Risk Model, and overall Bat Community Threat Model for each bat species population at each site. Scaled values are scaled from 0-1, with 1 being the score with the most ecological benefit. Threat scores (THREAT Scaled column) discussed in the text are generated by subtracting scaled values from 1 (e.g. [1- (RVI Scaled)] equals overall threat from visitation). Descriptions of abbreviations used in these tables can be found in Appendix A. ................................. 77 APPENDIX E. Raw index values and scaled scores for components of the Visitation Risk Model, Water Quality and Quantity Risk Model, Groundwater Vulnerability iv Model, Groundwater Sensitivity Model, and overall Aquatic Community Threat Model for each aquatic cave species population at each site. Scaled values are scaled from 0-1, with 1 being the score with the most ecological benefit. Threat scores (THREAT Scaled column) discussed in the text are generated by subtracting scaled values from 1 (e.g. [1- (RVI Scaled)] equals overall threat from visitation). Descriptions of abbreviations used in these tables can be found in Appendix A. ...................................................................................................................... 88 F. SIGNIFICANT DEVIATIONS: ............................................................................................. 133 PREPARED BY: ........................................................................................................................ 133 DATE: ......................................................................................................................................... 133 APPROVED BY: .......................................................................................................................