18-349 ======In the Supreme Court of the United States

18-349 ======In the Supreme Court of the United States

No. 18-349 ================================================================ In The Supreme Court of the United States ----------------------------------------------------------------------- DARRELL PATTERSON, Petitioner, v. WALGREEN CO., Respondent. ----------------------------------------------------------------------- On Petition For Writ Of Certiorari To The United States Court Of Appeals For The Eleventh Circuit ----------------------------------------------------------------------- BRIEF OF THE CHURCH OF JESUS CHRIST OF LATTER-DAY SAINTS; THE JEWISH COALITION FOR RELIGIOUS LIBERTY; ETHICS AND RELIGIOUS LIBERTY COMMISSION OF THE SOUTHERN BAPTIST CONVENTION; MUSLIM PUBLIC AFFAIRS COUNCIL; THE LUTHERAN CHURCH–MISSOURI SYNOD; THE SIKH COALITION; AND CHURCH OF GOD IN CHRIST, INC. AS AMICI CURIAE IN SUPPORT OF PETITIONER ----------------------------------------------------------------------- ALEXANDER DUSHKU Counsel of Record R. SHAWN GUNNARSON KIRTON MCCONKIE Key Bank Tower 36 South State Street, Suite 1900 Salt Lake City, Utah 84111 (801) 328-3600 [email protected] Counsel for Amici Curiae ================================================================ COCKLE LEGAL BRIEFS (800) 225-6964 WWW.COCKLELEGALBRIEFS.COM i TABLE OF CONTENTS Page TABLE OF CONTENTS ...................................... i TABLE OF AUTHORITIES ................................. iii INTEREST OF AMICI CURIAE ......................... 1 SUMMARY OF ARGUMENT .............................. 2 ARGUMENT ........................................................ 4 I. THE QUESTIONS PRESENTED ARE RECURRING ISSUES OF NATIONAL IMPORTANCE THAT AFFECT NEARLY EVERY CLAIM OF RELIGIOUS ACCOM- MODATION UNDER TITLE VII .............. 4 A. Judicial confusion as to the meaning of “reasonable accommodation” denies re- ligious employees genuine protection ... 4 B. Judicial confusion about how to dem- onstrate “undue hardship” allows an employer’s speculations to justify its re- fusal to accommodate religious prac- tice ....................................................... 7 C. Trans World Airlines, Inc. v. Hardison should be revisited and overruled be- cause it obscures the statutory meaning of “undue hardship,” to the detriment of religious employees ............................... 9 D. The departures from statutory text that we describe cause severe hardship for economically vulnerable workers .......... 10 ii TABLE OF CONTENTS – Continued Page II. THE QUESTIONS PRESENTED ARE RE- CURRING ISSUES OF NATIONAL IM- PORTANCE THAT AFFECT MILLIONS OF AMERICANS FROM DIVERSE FAITH COMMUNITIES ......................................... 12 A. Sabbaths, holy days, and the duty to worship ................................................ 12 1. Christianity .................................... 13 2. Judaism .......................................... 14 3. Islam ............................................... 15 B. Religious dress and grooming stand- ards ...................................................... 15 1. Women’s head coverings ................. 16 2. Men’s head coverings ...................... 17 3. Other dress ..................................... 18 4. Religious symbols ........................... 19 5. Hair and beards .............................. 20 III. RELIGIOUS FREEDOM IN EMPLOYMENT IS A CIVIL RIGHT. ..................................... 21 CONCLUSION ..................................................... 27 APPENDIX Statements of Interest ................................................ 1a iii TABLE OF AUTHORITIES Page CASES Abdelwahab v. Jackson State Univ., No. CIV.A 309CV41TSLJCS, 2010 WL 384416 (S.D. Miss. Jan. 27, 2010) ................................................... 8 Adams v. Retail Ventures, Inc., 325 Fed. App’x 440 (7th Cir. 2009) ................................................... 10 Cloutier v. Costco Wholesale Corp., 390 F.3d 126 (1st Cir. 2004) ............................................................ 9 Daniels v. City of Arlington, Tex., 246 F.3d 500 (5th Cir. 2001) .................................................... 10, 19 Dewey v. Reynolds Metals Co., 429 F.2d 324 (6th Cir. 1970) ................................................................. 23 E.E.O.C. v. Firestone Fibers & Textiles Co., 515 F.3d 307 (4th Cir. 2008) ............................................. 5 E.E.O.C. v. Thompson Contracting, Grading, Pav- ing, & Utils., Inc., 793 F. Supp. 2d 738 (E.D.N.C. 2011) .......................................................................... 5 F.C.C. v. Beach Communications, Inc., 508 U.S. 307 (1993) .................................................................. 7 Finnie v. Lee Cty., 907 F. Supp. 2d 750 (N.D. Miss. 2012)............................................................... 18 Fraternal Order of Police Newark Lodge No. 12 v. City of Newark, 170 F.3d 359 (3d Cir. 1999) ....... 20 George v. Home Depot, Inc., No. 00-2616, 2001 WL 1558315 (E.D. La. Dec. 6, 2001) ..................... 5, 8 iv TABLE OF AUTHORITIES – Continued Page Henry v. Rexam Beverage Can of N. Am., No. CA 3:10-2800-MBS-SVH, 2012 WL 2501994 (D.S.C. Apr. 18, 2012) ................................................ 6 In re Palmer, 386 A.2d 1112 (R.I. 1978) ..................... 18 Leonce v. Callahan, No. 7:03-CV-110-KA, 2008 WL 58892 (N.D. Tex. Jan. 3, 2008) .......................... 10 McCarter v. Harris Cty., Tex., No. CIV.A. H-04- 4159, 2006 WL 1281087 (S.D. Tex. May 5, 2006) .................................................................. 11, 18 McGowan v. Maryland, 366 U.S. 420 (1961) ........ 23, 24 Mohamed v. 1st Class Staffing, LLC, 286 F. Supp. 3d 884 (S.D. Ohio 2017) ............................ 11 Nobach v. Woodland Vill. Nursing Home Ctr., Inc., No. 1:11CV346-HSO-RHW, 2012 WL 3811748 (S.D. Miss. Sept. 4, 2012) .......................... 11 O’Lone v. Estate of Shabazz, 482 U.S. 342 (1987) ....... 15 Prach v. Hollywood Supermarket, Inc., No. 09- 13756, 2010 WL 3419461 (E.D. Mich. Aug. 27, 2010) ........................................................................ 11 Shatkin v. Univ. of Texas at Arlington, No. 4:06- CV-882-Y, 2010 WL 2730585 (N.D. Tex. July 9, 2010) ........................................................................ 11 Sherbert v. Verner, 374 U.S. 398 (1963) ................ 24-25 Trans World Airlines, Inc. v. Hardison, 432 U.S. 63 (1977) .............................................................. 9, 10 v TABLE OF AUTHORITIES – Continued Page STATUTES AND REGULATIONS 42 U.S.C. § 2000e(j) ................................. 3, 7, 22, 23, 25 42 U.S.C. § 2000e-2(a) ................................................. 22 Executive Order No. 13798 § 4, 82 Fed. Reg. 21,675 (May 4, 2017) ............................................... 25 Law Concerning Liberty of Conscience, 2 Pa. Stats. at Large 34 (1700) ........................................ 24 OTHER AUTHORITIES 118 Cong. Rec. S705 (daily ed. Jan. 21, 1972) ............ 23 Is Saturday the Sabbath?, Adventist (July 9, 2013) ........................................................................ 14 Al-Qur’an .............................................................. 15, 16 Daniel Barbarisi, No Beards—And That’s Final: The Yankees Have No Intention of Ever Drop- ping the Boss’s Rules on Facial Hair, WALL ST. J. (Feb. 23, 2013) ...................................................... 20 Charge Statistics (Charges filed with the EEOC) FY 1997 Through FY 2017, E.E.O.C. ...................... 22 W. Owen Cole, Understanding Sikhism 122 (2004) ....................................................................... 17 Council on American-Islamic Relations, An Em- ployer’s Guide to Islamic Religious Practices (2017) ....................................................................... 16 Doctrine and Covenants ............................................. 13 vi TABLE OF AUTHORITIES – Continued Page EEOC Compliance Manual, Religious Discrimi- nation (2008) ........................................................... 25 The Encyclopaedia of Sikhism (Harbans Singh ed., 1992) ................................................ 18, 19, 20-21 Karen Engle, The Persistence of Neutrality: The Failure of the Religious Accommodation to Re- deem Title VII, 76 Tex. L. Rev. 317 (1997) .............. 21 Caesar E. Farah, Islam: Beliefs and Obser- vances 136 (7th ed. 2003) ........................................ 15 Sampson-Raphael Hirsch, Hirsch Siddur 14 (1969) ....................................................................... 18 The Holy Bible (KJV) ..................................... 13, 19, 20 Muhammed al-Jibaly, The Beard Between the Salaf & Kalaf ch. 1 (1999) ....................................... 20 Surinder Singh Johar, Handbook on Sikhism 94 (1977) ................................................................. 17, 19 Congregation Meetings of Jehovah’s Witnesses, JW.org ...................................................................... 14 What Are Our Meetings Like?, JW.org ....................... 14 Aryeh Kaplan, Sabbath: Day of Eternity, in 2 The Aryeh Kaplan Anthology 107 (1998) ......... 14-15 Rabbi Yosef Karo, 1 Shulchan Aruch Orach Cha- yim 242–365 (1977) ........................................... 14, 15 FAQs, Kaur Foundation ............................................. 16 Her Chunni, Her Brand, Kaur Life (Sept. 16, 2014) ........................................................................ 17 vii TABLE OF AUTHORITIES – Continued Page A.H. Lewis, A Critical History of Sunday Legis- lation 81-108 (1888) ................................................ 23 Hew McLeod, The Five Ks

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    36 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us