Sterile Neutrinos and B-L Symmetry Pavel Fileviez Perez´ 1, Clara Murgui2 1Department of Physics, Center for Education and Research in Cosmology and Astrophysics (CERCA), and Institute for the Science of Origins (ISO), Case Western Reserve University, Rockefeller Bldg. 2076 Adelbert Rd. Cleveland, OH 44106, USA 2Departamento de F´ısica Teorica,´ IFIC, Universitat de Valencia-CSIC, E-46071, Valencia, Spain We revisit the relation between the neutrino masses and the spontaneous breaking of the B − L gauge sym- metry. We discuss the main scenarios for Dirac and Majorana neutrinos and point out two simple mechanisms for neutrino masses. In this context the neutrino masses can be generated either at tree level or at quantum level and one predicts the existence of very light sterile neutrinos with masses below the eV scale. The predictions for lepton number violating processes such as µ ! e and µ ! eγ are discussed in detail. The impact from the cosmological constraints on the effective number of relativistic degree of freedom is investigated. I. INTRODUCTION ios where the neutrinos are Majorana particles and one pre- dicts the existence of very light right-handed neutrinos. In − The discovery of the Standard Model (SM) boson responsi- the first scenario, the B L is broken in two units but the ble for the electroweak symmetry breaking five years ago was right-handed neutrinos are very light, with masses below the crucial to establish the SM as one of the successful theories eV scale. In this case, the neutrino masses are generated at of nature. Nowadays it is well-known the mechanism respon- tree level through the inverse Type II ‘seesaw’ mechanism. In sible to generate masses for the charged fermions in the SM the second mechanism, the right-handed and left-handed Ma- but unfortunately we cannot explain the ratio between their jorana neutrino masses are generated at the one-loop level. In masses. this case the right-handed neutrinos are also very light. We investigate the main phenomenological constraints for Today, we know that the neutrinos are not massless: the so- the neutrino mass mechanisms where the right-handed neu- lar and atmospheric mass squared differences are known from trinos are very light. We discuss in detail the cosmological neutrino experiments with a very good precision, see Ref. [1] bounds on the effective number of relativistic degrees of free- for the current values, and there are some important bounds dom to impose non-trivial bounds on the neutrino interactions. from cosmology, see for example Refs. [2–6]. However, we We show that the cosmological bounds are as competitive as still do not have any clue about the mechanism behind their the current collider bounds on new gauge bosons interacting mass generation. Clearly, the fact that in the Standard Model with all the SM fermions. The predictions for the lepton num- neutrinos are exactly massless forces one to go beyond to un- ber violating processes such as µ ! e and µ ! eγ are in- derstand the origin of their masses. See Refs. [7–9] for recent vestigated in detail. Lepton flavor violating (LFV) transition reviews about neutrino mass mechanisms. searches are nowadays one of the most sensitive probes of new In the Standard Model the charged fermion masses are pro- physics and their sensitivity is expected to be improved at least portional to the electroweak (EW) symmetry breaking scale. 3-4 orders of magnitude in the near future. Therefore, the pre- In the case of the neutrinos, the simplest way one can relate diction of light sterile neutrinos and testable lepton number their masses to a new symmetry breaking scale is to consider violating signals at the current and future experiments make scenarios where B − L is a local gauge symmetry. Here B the Radiative seesaw model proposed in this Letter an appeal- and L are for baryon and lepton numbers, respectively. As ing mechanism to generate neutrino masses in the context of it is well-known, B − L can be an anomaly free local sym- B − L gauge symmetries. metry by adding three copies of right-handed neutrinos to the This letter is organized as follows: In section II we discuss arXiv:1708.02247v2 [hep-ph] 18 Dec 2017 standard fermion content. If B − L is never broken one can the main mechanisms for neutrino masses in simple theories explain why neutrinos are Dirac particles, while when it is where B − L is a local symmetry, in section III the main fea- spontaneously broken one can investigate the generation of tures of the B − L radiative seesaw mechanism are discussed, Majorana masses. in section IV we discuss the cosmological bounds, in section In this article we revisit the connection between the neu- V we discuss the predictions for lepton number violating pro- trino masses and the B − L symmetry breaking scale. We cesses, while in section VI we summarize the main results. discuss the different scenarios where the neutrinos can be Dirac or Majorana fermions. In the case where they are Dirac fermions, we discuss the B − L Stueckelberg extension of II. NEUTRINO MASSES AND B-L GAUGE SYMMETRY the SM. We also discuss the well-known scenario of canon- ical seesaw, where the B − L symmetry is spontaneously It is very well-known that there is a simple connection be- broken in two units. In this context, the right-handed neutri- tween the generation of neutrino masses and the B − L gauge nos are typically heavy and the light neutrinos are Majorana symmetry. The B − L local symmetry is the simplest sym- particles. However, in this letter, we point out two scenar- metry which can be anomaly free by adding three copies of 2 i right-handed neutrinos, i.e. νR with i = 1; 2; 3. Here we dis- the upper bound on the B − L breaking scale is around cuss the simplest mechanisms for neutrino masses where the 1014 GeV. Therefore, there is a priori no reason to ex- B − L gauge symmetry is spontaneously broken and define pect this particular realization of the seesaw mechanism the seesaw scale. to be tested in the near future. • Dirac Neutrinos: As the other SM fermions, neutrinos In the case when the right-handed neutrino masses are can be Dirac fermions, and in this case the relevant La- below the TeV scale, they can be produced through the ∗ grangian is given by B − L gauge boson, i.e. pp ! ZBL ! NN, see for example Ref. [13] for the study of these signatures at the ∗ − L ⊃ Yν `Liσ2H νR + h.c.; (1) LHC. It is important to emphasize that in the context of the canonical seesaw the symmetry breaking scale can where `L ∼ (1; 2; −1=2; −1), H ∼ (1; 2; 1=2; 0), and be large and we might never be able to test this idea. νR ∼ (1; 1; 0; −1). Here the local B − L gauge sym- metry forbids the Majorana mass for right-handed neu- • B − L Inverse Type II seesaw: One can have a dif- trinos, and the gauge boson ZBL can acquire mass in ferent scenario for the generation of neutrino masses two different ways: by breaking the B − L symmetry with a scalar triplet a) Using the Stueckuelberg mechanism [10] one can ∆ ∼ (1; 3; 1; 2), which generates Majorana masses for generate a mass for the ZBL without breaking the gauge the left-handed neutrinos. In this context, the B − L symmetry [11] through the following terms symmetry is broken in two units but the right-handed neutrinos are very light as we will show. The relevant 1 µ µ Lagrangian for our discussion is given by − LSt ⊃ (MBLZ + @ σ)(MBLZBLµ + @µσ) ; (2) 2 BL II ∗ T µ − Lν = Yν `Liσ2H νR + λL`LCiσ2∆`L + h.c.; (6) where the gauge transformation is written as δZBL = @µλ and δσ = −M λ. See Ref. [11] for a detailed T BL with λL = λL and ∆ is given by study. p + ++ b) One can break B − L through the Higgs mechanism δ = 2 δ p ∆ = 0 + : (7) where the new Higgs SBL has a B−L quantum number δ −δ = 2 larger than two, and with the minimal field content one In this context the neutrino mass matrix in the basis cannot generate Majorana masses for the right-handed C neutrinos. (ν; ν ) reads as L D In both cases the neutrinop masses are given by Mν = II Mν Mν 1 M (8) p , with 0 GeV and ν = D T ; 2 Yν vH vH = 2 H = 246 (Mν ) 0 −13 −12 Yν ≈ 10 −10 in order to reproduce the values of the squared mass differences measured in the neutrino where p experiments. L Mν = 2λLv∆; (9) • Canonical Seesaw [12]: In the case when SBL ∼ p (1; 1; 0; 2) breaks B − L one can generate Majorana with v∆= 2 being the vacuum expectation value of 0 masses for the right-handed neutrinos at tree level. This the neutral component of the triplet, δ . Clearly, in is the case of canonical Type I seesaw and the relevant this scenario the right-handed neutrino masses will be Lagrangian is given by smaller or have similar values as the left-handed neu- trino masses. In this case there are two main possibili- I ∗ T − Lν = Yν `Liσ2H νR + λR νR CνRSBL + h.c.; (3) ties to consider: T L D with λR = λR. The neutrino mass matrix in the basis – Pseudo-Dirac neutrinos when Mν << Mν , C (ν; ν ) reads as D L – Majorana neutrinos when Mν << Mν . D I 0 Mν Mν = D T R ; (4) In order to avoid large mixing between the active and (Mν ) Mν D sterile neutrinos one should work in the limit Mν << L where Mν , and in this case the neutrino masses are given by 1 p L D 2 L D R MνL ≈ Mν ; and MνR ≈ (Mν ) =Mν : Mν = p Yν vH ; and Mν = 2 λRvBL: (5) 2 p Then, we have the interesting result that the right- Here vBL = 2 hSBLi defines the seesaw scale.