CENSUS OF INDIA 1961 VOLUME XIV RAJASTHAN PART VI-C VILLAGE SURVEY MONOGRAPHS 4. GORIYA , Field imestigation and First Draft by B. R. GULATJ Supenision and Final Dra!, by G. R. GUPTA Editor C. S. GUPTA OF THE fNDlAN ADMINlSTKATIVE SERVICE Superintendent of Census Operations, Rajasthall 1966 FOREWORD Apart from laying the foundation of to find out how much of a village was static and demography in this sub-continent, a hundred yet changing and how fast the winds of change years of the Indian Census has also produced were blowing and from where. 'elaborate and scholarly accounts of the variegated phenomena of Indian life, sometimes with no Randomness of selection was, therefore, statistics attached but usually with just enough eschewed. There was no intention to build up a statistic~, to give empirical underpinning to their picture for the whole State in quantitative terms conclusions'. In a country, largely illiterate, where on the basis of villages selected statistically at statistical or numerical comprehension of even random. The selection was avowedly purposive: such a simple thing as age was liable to be the object being as much to find out what was inaccurate, an understanding of the social struc­ happening and how fast to those villages which ture was essential. It was more necessary to had fewer reasons to choose cbange and more attain a broad understanding of what was happen­ to remain lodged in the past as to discover bow ing around oneself than to wrap oneself up in the more 'normal' types of villages were changing. 'statistical ingenuity' or 'mathematical manipula­ They were to be primarily type studies which, tion'. This explains why the Indian Census came by virtue of their number and distribution, would to be interested in 'many by-paths' and 'nearly also give the reader a 'feel' of what Was going on every branch of scholarShip, from anthropology and some kind of a map of the country. aud sociology to geography and religion'. A brief account of tbe tests of selection wiII In the last few decades the Census has help to explain. A minimum of thirty-five villages increasingly turned its efforts to the presentation of was to be chosen with great care to represent village sta1istics. This suits the temper of the times adequately geographical, occupational and even as well as our political and economic structure. ethnic diversity. Of this minimum of thirty-five, For even as we have a great deal of centralisation the distribution was to be as follows: on the one hand and decentralisation on the other, my colleagues thought it would be a wel­ (a) At least eight villages were to be so come continuation of the Census tradition to selected that each of them would contain one try to invert the dry bones of village statistics with dominant community with one predominating flesh-and-blood accounts of social structure and occupation, e. g., fishermen, forest workers, jhum social change. 1t was accordingly decided to cultivators, potters, weavers, salt-makers, quarry select a few villages in every State for special workers etc. A village should have a minimum study, where personal observation would be popUlation of 400, the optimum being between brought to bear on the interpreta1ion of statistics 500 and 700. (i v) (b) At least seven villages were to be of the Surveys set itself the task of what might be numerically prominent Schedu1ed Tribes of the called a record in situ of matenal traits, like settle­ State. Each village could represent a particular ment patterns of the village; house types; diet; tribe. The minimum population should be 400, dress; ornaments and footwear; furniture and the optimum being between 500 and 700. storing vessels; common means of transport of goods and passengers; domestication of animals (c) The third group of villages should each and birds; markets attended; wOfl>hip of deities; be of fair size, of an old and settled character festivals and fairs. There were to be recordings, and contain variegated occupations and be, if of course, of cultural and social traits and occu­ possible, multi-ethnic in composition. By fair pational mobility. This was followed up in March size was meant a population of 500-700 persons 1960 by two specimen schedules, one fur each household, the other for the village as a whole or more. The village should mainly depend on which, apart from spelling out the mode of inquiry agriculture and bc sufficiently away from the major sources of modern communication such as suggested in the September 1959 conference, in­ the district administrative headquarters and troduced groups of questions aimed at sensing changes in attitude and behaviour in such fields as business centres. It should be roughly a day's marriage, inheritance, movable and immovable journey from the above places. The villages were property, indu~try, indebtedness, education, com­ to be selected with an eye to variation in terms of size, proximity to city and other means of munity life and collective activity, social disabili­ ties, forums of appeal over disputes, village lea­ modern communication, nearness to hills, jungles and major rivers. Thus there was to be a regional dership, and organisation of cultural life. It was distribution throughout the State of this category now plainly the intention to provide adequate of villages. If, however, a particular district statistical support to empirical 'feel', to approach contained Significant ecological variations within qualitative change through statistical quantities. its area, more than one village in the dit>tflct It had been difficult to give thought to the impor­ might be selected to study the special adjustments tance of 'just enough statistics to give empirical to them. underpinning to conclusion', at a time when my colleagues were straining themselves to the utmost It is a unique feature of these village for the success of the main Census operations, surveys that they rapidly outgrew their original but once the census ('aunt itself was left behind terms of reference, as my colleagues warmed up in March 1961, a series of three regional seminars to their work. This proved for them an absorbing in Trivandrum (May, 1961), Darjeeling and Srina­ voyage of discovery and their infectious enthusiasm gar (June, 1961) restored their attention to this compelled me to enlarge the inquiry's scope again field and the importance of tracing social change and again. It was just as well cautiously to feel through a number of well-devised statistical tables one's way about at first and then venture further was once again recognised. This itself presuppo­ afield, and although it accounts to some extent sed a fresh survey of villages already done; but for a certain unevenness in the quality a it was wor th the trouble in view of the possibili­ coverage of the monographs, it served to com pen· ties that a close analysis of statistics offered, and sate the pureJy honorary and extra-mural rigours also because the 'comanguinit)' schedule remained of the task. For, the Survey, along with its many to be conva~sed. By November 1961, however, ancillaries like the survey of fairs and festivals more was expected of these 5Urveys than ever of small and rural industry and others, was a~ before. There was dissatisfaction on the one hand 'extra', over and above the crushing load of the with too many general statements and a growing 1961 Census. desire on the other to draw conclusions from statistics, to regard social and economic data as It might be of interest to recount briefly the interrelated processes, and finally to examine the stages by which the Survey enlarged its scope. At social and economic processes set in motion through the first Census Conference in September 1959 land reforms and other laws, legislative and (v) administrative measures, technological and cultural quantity has been more than made up for in change. Finally, a study camp was organised in quality. This is, perhaps, for the first time that the last week of December 1961, when the whole such a Survey has been conducted in any country, field was carefully gone through over again and a and that purely as a labour of love. It has programme worked out closely knitting the various succeeded in attaining what it set out to achieve: aims of the Survey together. The social studies to construct a map of village India's social Section of the Census Commission rendered structure. One hopes that the volumes of this assistance to State Superintendents by way 0 f Survey will help to retain for the Indian Census scrutiny and technical comment on the frame of its title to 'the most fruitful single source' of Survey and presentation qf results. information about the country'. Apart from other features, it will perhaps be conceded that the This gradual unfolding of the aims of the Survey has set up a new Census standard in Survey prevented my colleagues from adopting as pictorial and graphic documentation. TheSchedules many villages as they had originally intended to. finally adopted for the monographs have been But I believe that what may have been lost in printed in an appendix. New Delhi, A. MITRA July 30, 1964. Refistrar General, India Villages selected for the Survey Village Tehsil District Rang Mahal Suratgarh Ganganagar Mukam Nokha Bikaner Mudh Kolayat .. Bajawa Udaipurwati Jhunjhunu' Bhangarh Rajgarh Alwar Hasanpur Tijara " Poonchhari Deeg Bharatpur Aghapur Bharatpur ., Sanganer Sanganer Jaipur Chimanpura Bairath Nangal Soosawatan .. , Amber " Abhaneri Baswa ".. Shivpura Ghata Beawar Ajmer Ramdeora Pokaran Jaisalmer Bujawa:r Jodhpur Jodhpur Kalija) Jodhpur ., Malar Phalodi " Ehadwasi Nagau.r Nagaur Goriya Bali Palj Tilwara Pachpadra Barmer Pachpadra Ramsin " Janvi Sanchor Jalor Hotigaon SanchoI' >, Nichlagalh Abu Road Sirohi Eagor Mandai Bhilwara Panarwa Phalasia Udaipur Manpur Phalasia Kallashpuri Girwa " Sadri Ranawatan Bhupalsagar .