Determinants of Glomerular Filtration in Experimental Glomerulonephritis in the Rat

Determinants of Glomerular Filtration in Experimental Glomerulonephritis in the Rat

Determinants of glomerular filtration in experimental glomerulonephritis in the rat. D A Maddox, … , T M Daugharty, B M Brenner J Clin Invest. 1975;55(2):305-318. https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI107934. Research Article Pressures and flows were measured in surface glomerular capillaries, efferent arterioles, and proximal tubules of 22 Wistar rats in the early autologous phase of nephrotoxic serum nephritis (NSN). Linear deposits of rabbit and rat IgG and C3 component of complement were demonstrated in glomerular capillary walls by immunofluorescence microscopy. Light microscopy revealed diffuse proliferative glomerulonephritis, and proteinuria was present. Although whole kidney and single nephron glomerular filtration rate (GFR) in NSN (0.8 plus or minus 0.04 SE2 ml/min and 2 plus or minus 2 nl/min, respectively) remained unchanged from values in 16 weight-matched NORMAL HYDROPENIC control rats (0.8 plus or minus 0.08 and 28 plus or minus 2), important alterations in glomerular dynamics were noted. Mean transcapillary hydraulic pressure difference (deltaP) averaged 41 plus or minus 1 mm Hg in NSN versus 32 plus or minus 1 in controls (P LESS THAN 0.005). Oncotic pressures at the afferent (piA) end of the glomerular capillary were similar in both groups ( 16 mm /g) but increased much less by the efferent end (piE) in NSN (to 29 plus or minus 1 mm Hg) than in controls (33 plus or minus 1, P less than 0.025). Hence, equality between deltaP and piE, denoting filtration pressure equilibrium, obtained in control but not in NSN rats. While glomerular plasma flow rate was slightly higher […] Find the latest version: https://jci.me/107934/pdf Determinants of Glomerular Filtration in Experimental Glomerulonephritis in the Rat D. A. MADDOx, C. M. BENNETr, W. M. DEEN, R. J. GLASSOCK, D. KNUTSON, T. M. DAUGHARTY, and B. M. BRENNER From the Departments of Medicine and Physiology, University of California, San Francisco, California 94143, Veterans Administration Hospital, San Francisco, California 94121, and the Department of Medicine, Harbor General Hospital, Torrance, California 90509, and the University of California, Los Angeles, California 90024 A B S T R A C T Pressures and flows were measured in TE, denoting filtration pressure equilibrium, obtained surface glomerular capillaries, efferent arterioles, and in control but not in NSN rats. While glomerular plasma proximal tubules of 22 Wistar rats in the early auto- flow rate was slightly higher in NSN (88+ 8 nl/min) logous phase of nephrotoxic serum nephritis (NSN). than in controls (76+6, P > 0.2), the failure to Linear deposits of rabbit and rat IgG and C3 component achieve filtration equilibrium in NSN rats was pri- of complement were demonstrated in glomerular capil- marily the consequence of a marked fall in the lary walls by immunofluorescence microscopy. Light glomerular capillary ultrafiltration coefficient, Kf, to a microscopy revealed diffuse proliferative glomerulone- mean value of -0.03 nl/(s-mm Hg), considerably phritis, and proteinuria was present. Although whole lower than that found recently for the normal rat, kidney and single nephron glomerular filtration rate 0.08 nl/ (s. mm Hg). Thus, despite extensive glomerular (GFR) in NSN (0.8+0.04 [SE] ml/min and 274+2 injury, evidenced morphologically and by the low Kf, nl/min, respectively) remained unchanged from values GFR remained normal. This maintenance of GFR in 16 weight-matched normal hydropenic control rats resulted primarily from increases in AP, which tended (0.8+0.08 and 28+2), important alterations in to increase the net driving force for filtration, and glomerular dynamics were noted. Mean transcapillary thereby compensate for the reduction in Kf. hydraulic pressure difference (AP) averaged 41+1 mm Hg in NSN versus 32+1 in controls (P < 0.005). INTRODUCTION Oncotic pressures at the afferent (7rA) end of the glomerular capillary were similar in both groups (- 16 Despite impressive advances in the understanding of mm Hg) but increased much less by the efferent end the immunologic and morphologic aspects of glo- (irE) in NSN (to 29+-1 mm Hg) than in controls merulonephritis, relatively little is known of the forces (33+1, P < 0.025). Hence, equality between AP and governing glomerular ultrafiltration in this disorder. This shortcoming is due in large part to the fact that Portions of these studies were presented at the 66th na- glomeruli are rarely encountered as surface structures tional meeting of the American Society for Clinical In- in the mammalian kidney and are therefore inaccessible vestigation, Atlantic City, N. J., 5 May 1974, and pub- lished in abstract form: J. Clin. Invest. 53: 5a, 1974. to direct study in vivo. This restriction has been over- Dr. Maddox is a postdoctoral research fellow of the come, however, in that a unique strain of Wistar rats National Institutes of Health (1-F02-GM-52, 889-02). Dr. with surface glomeruli has recently been discovered, Deen is a postdoctoral research fellow of the National Kid- allowing direct assessment of the determinants of ultra- ney Foundation. Dr. Knutson is supported on a U. S. Public filtration (1-5). Accordingly, Health Service Training Grant (AM 05383). Dr. Brenner the present study was is a Medical Investigator of the Veterans Administration. undertaken in an effort to examine, by using previously Received for publication 17 July 1974 and in revised form described micropuncture techniques (1-6), the initial 19 September 1974. changes in glomerular function in this disorder. The Journal of Clinical Investigation Volume 55 February 1975 305-318 305 GLOSSARY OF SYMBOLS scopy, this antiserum produced 4+ linear deposits on both glomerular and tubular basement membranes of frozen sec- AP Mean femoral arterial pressure, mm Hg. tions of normal rat kidneys, up to a dilution of 1:400. No A/G Albumin/globulin ratio. staining of tubule epithelial cell cytoplasm occurred. c Protein concentration, g/100 ml. Preliminary experiments showed that 33-35 days after EABF Efferent arteriolar blood flow, nl/min. intravenous injection of 0.5-1.0 ml of antiserum into Munich- GBF, GPF Glomerular blood flow and plasma flow, re- Wistar rats, kidneys were found to be pale and swollen with spectively, nl/min. scattered collapsed tubules, and to have glomeruli that were GBM Glomerular capillary basement membrane. so edematous and bloodless that micropuncture of capillaries GFR Glomerular filtration rate (whole kidney). was not possible. Accordingly, the dose of antiserum was HCtA Blood hematocrit in femoral artery or afferent reduced to one-fourth of that which regularly produced im- arteriole. mediate proteinuria. After control 24-h urine collections for H&E Hematoxylin and eosin. protein determination, adult Munich-Wistar rats weighing K, Ultrafiltration coefficient, nl/(s mm Hg) or 107-300 g were preimmunized by footpad injection with 0.5-1 nl/ (min * mm Hg). mg of partially aggregated rabbit IgG in complete Freund's KFAb Kidney fixing antibody. adjuvant. 48 h later a small dose of rabbit anti-rat GBM NSN Nephrotoxic serum nephritis. antiserum (41 ,ug of KFAb in 0.25 ml) was injected into the P Hydraulic pressure, mm Hg. tail vein and a 24-h urine collection was begun. Subsequently PAS Periodic acid-Schiff 24-h urine collections were usually collected on day 3 or 4 PUF Net ultrafiltration pressure, mm Hg. and at various times thereafter. 5-16 days after injection of AP Transmembrane hydraulic pressure difference, nephrotoxic serum the determinants of glomerular ultra- PGC - PT, mm Hg. filtration were measured by appropriate micropuncture Colloid osmotic pressure, mm Hg. techniques. Ar Transmembrane osmotic pressure difference, After micropuncture measurements, a midcoronal section TrGC - 7rT, mm Hg. of each kidney was snap-frozen in isopentane in a dry ice- R Resistance to blood flow, dyn- s cm-5. acetone bath for subsequent examination by immunofluores- RTA Total arteriolar resistance, RA + RE, dyn * s * cm-'. cence microscopy. An adjacent section of tissue was fixed in SNFF Single nephron filtration fraction. Bouin's solution for light microscopy. In addition, 1-mm' SNGFR Single nephron glomerular filtration rate, nl/min. sections of cortex from four rat kidneys were fixed in 2.5% (TF/P)1n Tubule fluid to plasma inulin concentration ratio. gluteraldehyde and subsequently prepared for electron micro- VTF Tubule fluid flow rate, nl/min. scopy. Fluorescence antisera (Cappel Laboratories, Inc., Downington, Pa.) against rabbit IgG, rat IgG, rat C3 and rat Superscript fibrinogen were used for immunofluorescence studies. Cryostat - Mean value. sections of tissue (6 ,um in thickness) fixed in acetone were examined by fluorescence microscopy. Normal rat kidneys Subscripts served as control. Sections (4 Mum) stained with hematoxylin A Afferent arteriole. and eosin (H&E) and periodic acid-Schiff (PAS) were ex- C Peritubular capillary. amined by light microscopy. E Efferent arteriole. Quantitative analysis of histology. An attempt was made to GC Glomerular capillary quantitate the extent and distribution of the proliferative T Proximal tubule. response engendered by nephrotoxic serum administration. H&E-stained midcoronal plane sections, 4 Mm in thickness, METHODS were viewed under 430X magnification, and glomerular cell Induction of experimental glomerulonephritis. A nearly pure counts (excluding inflammatory cells) were made randomly on suspension of glomeruli was prepared from frozen rat kidneys ten glomeruli, five deep and five superficial, by using a special (Pel-Freez Biologicals, Inc.,

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    15 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us