Analysis of the Zcs(3985) as the axialvector tetraquark state Zhi-Gang Wang 1 Department of Physics, North China Electric Power University, Baoding 071003, P. R. China Abstract In this paper, we choose the scalar and axialvector diquark operators in the color antitriplet as the fundamental building blocks to construct the four-quark currents and investigate the diquark-antidiquark type axialvector tetraquark states ccu¯ s¯ in the framework of the QCD sum rules. The predicted tetraquark mass MZ = 3.99±0.09 GeV is in excellent agreement with the +2.1 ± experimental value 3985.2−2.0 1.7 MeV from the BESIII collaboration, which supports iden- PC +− tifying the Zcs(3985) as the cousin of the Zc(3900) with the quantum numbers J = 1 . We take into account the light flavor SU(3) mass-breaking effect to estimate the mass spec- trum of the diquark-antidiquark type hidden-charm tetraquark states having the strangeness according to the previous works. PACS number: 12.39.Mk, 12.38.Lg Key words: Tetraquark state, QCD sum rules 1 Introduction Very recently, the BESIII collaboration observed an excess over the known contributions of the 0 0 + conventional charmed mesons near the Ds−D∗ and Ds∗−D mass thresholds in the K recoil-mass + + 0 0 spectrum with the significance of 5.3 σ in the processes of the e e− K (Ds−D∗ + Ds∗−D ) [1]. It is the first candidate of the charged hidden-charm tetraquark state→ with strangeness. The Breit- +2.1 Wigner mass and width of the new structure, Zcs(3985), were determined to be 3985.2 2.0 1.7 MeV +8.1 − ± and 13.8 5.2 4.9 MeV, respectively. According to the production mode, it is nature to draw the − ± conclusion that the Zcs(3985) should be a cousin of the well-known Zc(3885/3900) with strangeness, + + the Z (3885) was observed in the precess e e− (DD¯ ∗)−π , which means that the Z (3885) and c → c Zcs(3985) are governed by a similar production mechanism and have a similar quark structure ccq¯ u¯ with the q = d or s. The discovery of the Zcs(3985) could provide some unique hints to uncover the secrets of the charged exotic Zc structures. 0 0 The existence of an exotic Zcs state with a mass, which lies near the Ds−D∗ and Ds∗−D thresh- olds 3975.2MeV and 3977.0 MeV respectively, has been predicted in several theoretical models, including the diquark-antidiquark type tetraquark model [3, 4], the DsD¯ ∗ molecule model [5, 6], the hadro-quarkonium model [4, 7], and the initial-single-chiral-particle-emission mechanism [8]. arXiv:2011.10959v2 [hep-ph] 29 Mar 2021 Just like the Zc states, the decay rate of the Zcs to open-charm final states is expected to be larger than the decay rate to charmonium final states. After the discovery of the Zcs(3985), several possible explanations for its nature were proposed, ¯ ¯ such as the tetraquark state [9, 10], D∗Ds DDs∗ hadronic molecular state or dynamically generated resonance with the coupled-channel effects− [9, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16], re-scattering effects [17, 18], and we can study its nature with the photo-production [19]. In Ref.[20], we investigate the spin-parity J P = 1+ hidden-charm tetraquark states without strangeness in the framework of the QCD sum rules, and examine the dependence of the masses and pole residues on the energy scales µ of the spectral densities at the quark-gluon level at length for the first time. Our reliable calculations support identifying the X(3872) and Zc(3900) as the diquark- antidiquark type tetraquark states having hidden-charm with the quantum numbers J PC = 1++ + and 1 −, respectively. In Ref.[21], we take the diquark and antidiquark operators in the color an- titriplet and color triplet respectively as the fundamental building blocks to construct the scalar, axialvector and tensor four-quark local currents to investigate the mass spectrum of the ground state tetraquark states with hidden-charm but without strangeness in the framework of the QCD 1E-mail: [email protected]. 1 sum rules comprehensively, and revisit the possible identifications of the existing tetraquark can- didates with hidden-charm, such as the X(3860), X(3872), X(3915), X(3940), X(4160), Zc(3900), Zc(4020), Zc(4050), Zc(4055), Zc(4100), Zc(4200), Zc(4250), Zc(4430), Zc(4600), etc. N P In Refs.[20, 21], we choose the local axialvector four-quark currents ηµ (x) and ηµ (x), ijk imn N ε ε T ¯ T T ¯ T ηµ (x) = uj (x)Cγ5ck(x)dm(x)γµCc¯n (x) uj (x)Cγµck(x)dm(x)γ5Cc¯n (x) , √2 n − o ijk imn P ε ε T ¯ T T ¯ T ηµ (x) = uj (x)Cγ5ck(x)dm(x)γµCc¯n (x)+ uj (x)Cγµck(x)dm(x)γ5Cc¯n (x) , (1) √2 n o PC + ++ to investigate the lowest tetraquark states with the quantum numbers J = 1 − and 1 , N respectively, where the i, j, k, m, n are color indices. The four-quark current ηµ (x) has the PC + + quantum numbers J =1 − and couples potentially to the Zc (3900), in fact, the Zc±(3900) have non-zero electric charge, and do not have definite charge conjugation, or they are not eigenstates 0 of the charge conjugation, only the electric neutral state Zc (3900) has definite charge conjugation. If the Zcs−(3985) is really a tetraquark state, irrespective of whether it is the diquark-antidiquark type or meson-meson type tetraquark state, its valence quarks are ccs¯ u¯, and has no definite electric conjugation indeed (to be more precisely), we suppose that it has definite conjugation, just like its cousins ccq¯ q¯ and ccs¯ s¯. In the present work, we tentatively identify the Zcs−(3985) as the diquark- antidiquark type axialvector tetraquark state with the four valence quarks ccs¯ u¯ and examine its mass in the framework of the QCD sum rules at length. Then we take into account the light flavor SU(3) mass-breaking effect to explore the mass spectrum of the diquark-antidiquark type tetraquark states with hidden-charm and with strangeness according to our previous works. The article is arranged as follows: in Sect.2, we get the QCD sum rules for the masses and pole residues of the J P =1+ tetraquark states with hidden-charm and with strangeness; in Sect.3, we obtain numerical results and give discussions; and Sect.4 is aimed to get a conclusion. 2 The QCD sum rules for the axialvector tetraquark states with strangeness If we choose the favorable diquark configurations, the scalar (S) and axialvector (A) diquark states in the color antitriplet, as the fundamental building blocks to construct the diquark-antidiquark type tetraquark states, we can obtain two nonets with the symbolic structures, I = 1 : [uc] [d¯c¯] [uc] [d¯c¯] , [dc] [¯uc¯] [dc] [¯uc¯] , S A − A S S A − A S [uc] [¯uc¯] [uc] [¯uc¯] [dc] [d¯c¯] + [dc] [d¯c¯] S A − A S − S A A S ; √2 [uc] [¯uc¯] [uc] [¯uc¯] + [dc] [d¯c¯] [dc] [d¯c¯] I = 0 : S A − A S S A − A S , √2 [sc] [¯sc¯] [sc] [¯sc¯] ; S A − A S 1 I = :[qc] [¯sc¯] [qc] [¯sc¯] , [sc] [¯qc¯] [sc] [¯qc¯] , (2) 2 S A − A S S A − A S 2 and I = 1 : [uc]S[d¯c¯]A + [uc]A[d¯c¯]S , [dc]S[¯uc¯]A + [dc]A[¯uc¯]S , [uc] [¯uc¯] + [uc] [¯uc¯] [dc] [d¯c¯] [dc] [d¯c¯] S A A S − S A − A S ; √2 [uc] [¯uc¯] + [uc] [¯uc¯] + [dc] [d¯c¯] + [dc] [d¯c¯] I = 0 : S A A S S A A S , √2 [sc]S[¯sc¯]A + [sc]A[¯sc¯]S ; 1 I = :[qc] [¯sc¯] + [qc] [¯sc¯] , [sc] [¯qc¯] + [sc] [¯qc¯] , (3) 2 S A A S S A A S 1 where the I = 1, 0, 2 are the isospins of the hidden-charm tetraquark states, q = u, d. 1 In the first nonet, only the charge-neutral tetraquark states √ [uc]S[¯uc¯]A [uc]A[¯uc¯]S 2 − − ¯ ¯ 1 ¯ ¯ [dc]S[dc¯]A + [dc]A[dc¯]S , √ [uc]S[¯uc¯]A [uc]A[¯uc¯]S + [dc]S [dc¯]A [dc]A[dc¯]S and [sc]S[¯sc¯]A 2 − − − [sc]A[¯sc¯]S are eigenstates of the charge conjugation operators, and have the definite charge conju- gation C = . − 1 In the second nonet, only the charge-neutral tetraquark states √ [uc]S[¯uc¯]A + [uc]A[¯uc¯]S 2 − ¯ ¯ 1 ¯ ¯ [dc]S[dc¯]A [dc]A[dc¯]S , √ [uc]S[¯uc¯]A + [uc]A[¯uc¯]S + [dc]S [dc¯]A + [dc]A[dc¯]S and [sc]S[¯sc¯]A + − 2 [sc]A[¯sc¯]S are eigenstates of the charge conjugation operators, and have the definite charge conju- gation C = +. Thereafter, we will assume that the first nonet and second nonet have the negative and positive charge conjugations respectively so as to distinguish the two nonets, and we should bear in mind that the charge conjugation is not a good quantum number. Routinely, let us write down the two-point vacuum Green’s functions Πµν (p), 4 ip x Πµν (p) = i d xe · 0 T Jµ(x)J †(0) 0 , (4) Z h | ν | i N P where the interpolating currents Jµ(x)= Jµ (x) and Jµ (x), ijk imn N ε ε T T T T Jµ (x) = uj (x)Cγ5ck(x)¯sm(x)γµCc¯n (x) uj (x)Cγµck(x)¯sm(x)γ5Cc¯n (x) , √2 n − o ijk imn P ε ε T T T T Jµ (x) = uj (x)Cγ5ck(x)¯sm(x)γµCc¯n (x)+ uj (x)Cγµck(x)¯sm(x)γ5Cc¯n (x) , (5) √2 n o the superscripts N and P stand for the negative and positive charge conjugations, respectively, N the i, j, k, m, n are color indices.