Quadruple Systems with Two Eclipsing Binaries

Quadruple Systems with Two Eclipsing Binaries

Doubly eclipsing binaries Surveys - candidates Our results Quadruple systems with two eclipsing binaries Petr Zasche Astronomical Institute Faculty of Mathematics and Physics Charles University, Prague Telˇc, Czech Republic 9/9/2019 1/61 Petr Zasche Quadruple systems with two eclipsing binaries History: V994 Her Doubly eclipsing binaries Method Surveys - candidates Some implications Our results Other systems Motivation - why doubly eclipsing binaries? Derive for both binaries: M, R, log g, Teff , ... Share the same: age, chemical compositions, distance, ... Study the 2+2 dynamics, perturbations, secular evolution, stability, ETV studies... 2/61 Petr Zasche Quadruple systems with two eclipsing binaries History: V994 Her Doubly eclipsing binaries Method Surveys - candidates Some implications Our results Other systems V994 Her: here the history begins 3/61 Petr Zasche Quadruple systems with two eclipsing binaries History: V994 Her Doubly eclipsing binaries Method Surveys - candidates Some implications Our results Other systems V994 Her First study: Lee et al. (2008) Doubly eclipsing system V = 7.0 mag Distance: ≈ 240 pc Two pairs: 2.1d + 1.4d Both detached Gravitationally bound system?? 4/61 Petr Zasche Quadruple systems with two eclipsing binaries History: V994 Her Doubly eclipsing binaries Method Surveys - candidates Some implications Our results Other systems V994 Her: Lee et al. (2008) 5/61 Petr Zasche Quadruple systems with two eclipsing binaries History: V994 Her Doubly eclipsing binaries Method Surveys - candidates Some implications Our results Other systems V994 Her Pair A: Period 2.083 day Components: B8V + A0V (2.83 + 2.30 M⊙) Algol-type: 0.30 + 0.15 mag Inclination 83◦.8 Eccentric orbit e ≈ 0.03 Pair B: Period 1.420 day Components: A2V + A4V (1.87 + 1.86 M⊙) Algol-type: 0.12 + 0.12 mag Inclination 86◦.0 Eccentric orbit e ≈ 0.08 6/61 Petr Zasche Quadruple systems with two eclipsing binaries History: V994 Her Doubly eclipsing binaries Method Surveys - candidates Some implications Our results Other systems V994 Her How to prove the two binaries are bound? Spectroscopically Interferometrically Photometrically (Dynamical perturbations...?) 7/61 Petr Zasche Quadruple systems with two eclipsing binaries History: V994 Her Doubly eclipsing binaries Method Surveys - candidates Some implications Our results Other systems V994 Her: Zasche & Uhlaˇr(2016) 2448000 2450000 2452000 2454000 2456000 2458000 2460000 0.03 0.061990 1995 2000 2005 2010 2015 2020 0.04 0.02 0.02 0.01 0 0 O−C (days) −0.02 −0.01 O−C (Period) −0.04 Pair A −0.02 0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 Epoch 2448000 2450000 2452000 2454000 2456000 2458000 2460000 0.06 1990 1995 2000 2005 2010 2015 2020 0.04 0.05 0.02 0 0 −0.02 O−C (days) O−C (Period) −0.05 −0.04 Pair B −0.06 −5000 −4000 −3000 −2000 −1000 0 1000 2000 3000 Epoch 8/61 Petr Zasche Quadruple systems with two eclipsing binaries History: V994 Her Doubly eclipsing binaries Method Surveys - candidates Some implications Our results Other systems V994 Her: Zasche & Uhlaˇr(2016) Pair A Pair B Parameter Unit Value Error Value Error JD0 HJD 2453855.1339 0.0034 2453857.4361 0.0054 P Day 2.0832649 0.0000029 1.4200401 0.0000042 e 0.0307 0.0085 0.1253 0.0069 ω Deg 9.9 6.0 300.7 4.9 dω/dt Deg/Cycle 0.0018 0.0012 0.0126 0.0073 p3 Year 2.91 0.14 2.91 0.14 T0 HJD 2456045 122 2456045 122 A Day 0.0091 0.0032 0.0134 0.0037 ω3 Deg 236.2 26.7 56.2 26.7 e3 0.758 0.071 0.758 0.071 9/61 Petr Zasche Quadruple systems with two eclipsing binaries History: V994 Her Doubly eclipsing binaries Method Surveys - candidates Some implications Our results Other systems V994 Her: Lee et al. (2008) 10/61 Petr Zasche Quadruple systems with two eclipsing binaries History: V994 Her Doubly eclipsing binaries Method Surveys - candidates Some implications Our results Other systems V994 Her: Zasche & Uhlaˇr(2016) 40 20 0 −20 Systemic velocity (km/s) −40 −60 3800 3810 3820 3830 3840 3850 3860 3870 HJD−2450000 11/61 Petr Zasche Quadruple systems with two eclipsing binaries History: V994 Her Doubly eclipsing binaries Method Surveys - candidates Some implications Our results Other systems V994 Her: Zasche & Uhlaˇr(2016) −300 −200 −100 RV [km/s] 0 Pair A 100 −0.5 −0.4 −0.3 −0.2 −0.1 0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 Phase −300 Pair B −200 −100 RV [km/s] 0 100 200 −0.5 −0.4 −0.3 −0.2 −0.1 0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 Phase 12/61 Petr Zasche Quadruple systems with two eclipsing binaries History: V994 Her Doubly eclipsing binaries Method Surveys - candidates Some implications Our results Other systems V994 Her: Zasche & Uhlaˇr(2016) 20 2016.0 2016.5 15 2018.5 10 2017.0 DE[mas] 5 2017.5 0 −5 2018.0 −15 −10 −5 0 5 10 RA[mas] 13/61 Petr Zasche Quadruple systems with two eclipsing binaries History: V994 Her Doubly eclipsing binaries Method Surveys - candidates Some implications Our results Other systems Method of detection Study of ETV for both pairs Model of the light curves for both binaries Limitations: Number of data points Subtracting individual light curves Algol-types better Cadency Time span Selection effects (period, depth, amplitude,...) Powerful method when using surveys 14/61 Petr Zasche Quadruple systems with two eclipsing binaries History: V994 Her Doubly eclipsing binaries Method Surveys - candidates Some implications Our results Other systems What can be derived? Assumption: ETV dominated by the Light-Time Effect! Ratio of amplitudes ⇔ mass ratio: AA ⇔ MB AB MA (quite unusual to derive mass ratio only from photometry!) Moreover: Know the masses - we can estimate the inclination Distance - Semimajor axis of visual orbit 15/61 Petr Zasche Quadruple systems with two eclipsing binaries History: V994 Her Doubly eclipsing binaries Method Surveys - candidates Some implications Our results Other systems Definitely confirmed V482 Per: Torres et al. (2017): Both Algol-types Spectral types B/A Pair A: 2.447 d Pair B: 6.002 d Mutual orbit: 16.7 yr LITE detection of pair A + RV 16/61 Petr Zasche Quadruple systems with two eclipsing binaries History: V994 Her Doubly eclipsing binaries Method Surveys - candidates Some implications Our results Other systems V482 Per: Torres et al. (2017) 17/61 Petr Zasche Quadruple systems with two eclipsing binaries History: V994 Her Doubly eclipsing binaries Method Surveys - candidates Some implications Our results Other systems Definitely confirmed ? EPIC 220204960: Rappaport et al (2017): Both Algol-types, sp M Pairs: 13.3 d + 14.4 d Mutual orbit: 300 – 500 d (slight indication only) OGLE LMC-ECL-15674 & OGLE LMC-ECL-22159:Hong et al.(2018) OGLE LMC-ECL-15674: 1.43 + 1.39 d OGLE LMC-ECL-22159: 2.99 + 3.41 d Mutual orbit: indicated by the inclination change 18/61 Petr Zasche Quadruple systems with two eclipsing binaries Kepler Doubly eclipsing binaries Corot Surveys - candidates Others Our results OGLE Many candidates Photometric surveys - big advantage! Data coverage, cadency, time span, ... Pipelines for identification of doubly eclipsing binaries Several publications with candidates, some of them with ground based follow-up → But none of them definitely confirmed! 19/61 Petr Zasche Quadruple systems with two eclipsing binaries Kepler Doubly eclipsing binaries Corot Surveys - candidates Others Our results OGLE Kepler candidates KIC 4247791: Lehmann, et al. (2012): 4.10 + 4.05 d 20/61 Petr Zasche Quadruple systems with two eclipsing binaries Kepler Doubly eclipsing binaries Corot Surveys - candidates Others Our results OGLE KIC 4247791: Lehmann, et al. (2012) ] ] 12.81 g g 11.6 de [ma de [ma u u nit nit 12.82 g g 11.7 Kepler Ma Kepler Ma 12.83 ] ] g -2 g -2 -1 -1 0 0 1 1 2 2 O-C [mma O-C [mma -0.2 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 -0.2 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 Phase Phase 21/61 Petr Zasche Quadruple systems with two eclipsing binaries Kepler Doubly eclipsing binaries Corot Surveys - candidates Others Our results OGLE Kepler candidates KIC 4247791: Lehmann, et al. (2012): 4.10 + 4.05 d EPIC 219217635: Borkovits et al. (2018) 22/61 Petr Zasche Quadruple systems with two eclipsing binaries Kepler Doubly eclipsing binaries Corot Surveys - candidates Others Our results OGLE EPIC 219217635: Borkovits et al. (2018) 0.45 1.05 0.40 1.00 0.35 Relative Flux 0.95 0.30 d 0.90 A536712912CIPE T0=2457305.973 P=3.5947 0.01 0.00 Relative Flux 0.85 -0.01 Residual Flux -0.6 -0.4 -0.2 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.80 Phase 0.60 0.75 0.02 0.55 0.00 -0.02 Relative Flux Residual Flux 57332 57334 57336 57338 57340 57342 57344 0.50 BJD - 2400000 d B536712912CIPE T0=2457301.855 P=0.6182 0.02 0.00 -0.02 Residual Flux -0.6 -0.4 -0.2 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 Phase 23/61 Petr Zasche Quadruple systems with two eclipsing binaries Kepler Doubly eclipsing binaries Corot Surveys - candidates Others Our results OGLE Kepler candidates KIC 4247791: Lehmann, et al. (2012): 4.10 + 4.05 d EPIC 219217635: Borkovits et al. (2018) EPIC 212651213 & EPIC 212651234: Rappaport et al (2016) KIC 4150611: Helminiak et al. (2017) ...and others 24/61 Petr Zasche Quadruple systems with two eclipsing binaries Kepler Doubly eclipsing binaries Corot Surveys - candidates Others Our results OGLE COROT candidates COROT 310266512 - Periods: 7.42 + 3.27 d (Fern´andez Fern´andez & Chou 2015) Hajdu et al.

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    63 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us