Anomie Or Imitation? the Werther Effect of Celebrity Suicides on Suicide Rates in 34 OECD Countries, 1960-2014

Anomie Or Imitation? the Werther Effect of Celebrity Suicides on Suicide Rates in 34 OECD Countries, 1960-2014

A Service of Leibniz-Informationszentrum econstor Wirtschaft Leibniz Information Centre Make Your Publications Visible. zbw for Economics Lutter, Mark; Roex, Karlijn L. A.; Tisch, Daria Working Paper Anomie or imitation? The Werther effect of celebrity suicides on suicide rates in 34 OECD countries, 1960-2014 MPIfG Discussion Paper, No. 18/4 Provided in Cooperation with: Max Planck Institute for the Study of Societies (MPIfG), Cologne Suggested Citation: Lutter, Mark; Roex, Karlijn L. A.; Tisch, Daria (2018) : Anomie or imitation? The Werther effect of celebrity suicides on suicide rates in 34 OECD countries, 1960-2014, MPIfG Discussion Paper, No. 18/4, Max Planck Institute for the Study of Societies, Cologne, http://hdl.handle.net/21.11116/0000-0001-547E-4 This Version is available at: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/179368 Standard-Nutzungsbedingungen: Terms of use: Die Dokumente auf EconStor dürfen zu eigenen wissenschaftlichen Documents in EconStor may be saved and copied for your Zwecken und zum Privatgebrauch gespeichert und kopiert werden. personal and scholarly purposes. Sie dürfen die Dokumente nicht für öffentliche oder kommerzielle You are not to copy documents for public or commercial Zwecke vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, öffentlich zugänglich purposes, to exhibit the documents publicly, to make them machen, vertreiben oder anderweitig nutzen. publicly available on the internet, or to distribute or otherwise use the documents in public. Sofern die Verfasser die Dokumente unter Open-Content-Lizenzen (insbesondere CC-Lizenzen) zur Verfügung gestellt haben sollten, If the documents have been made available under an Open gelten abweichend von diesen Nutzungsbedingungen die in der dort Content Licence (especially Creative Commons Licences), you genannten Lizenz gewährten Nutzungsrechte. may exercise further usage rights as specified in the indicated licence. www.econstor.eu MPIfG Discussion Paper 18/4 Anomie or Imitation? The Werther Effect of Celebrity Suicides on Suicide Rates in 34 OECD Countries, 1960–2014 Mark Lutter, Karlijn L. A. Roex, and Daria Tisch MPIfG Discussion Paper MPIfG Discussion Paper Mark Lutter, Karlijn L. A. Roex, and Daria Tisch Anomie or Imitation? The Werther Effect of Celebrity Suicides on Suicide Rates in 34 OECD Countries, 1960–2014 MPIfG Discussion Paper 18/4 Max-Planck-Institut für Gesellschaftsforschung, Köln Max Planck Institute for the Study of Societies, Cologne April 2018 MPIfG Discussion Paper ISSN 0944-2073 (Print) ISSN 1864-4325 (Internet) © 2018 by the author(s) About the authors Mark Lutter is Professor of Sociology at the University of Wuppertal in Germany. He was a researcher at the Max Planck Institute for the Study of Societies from 2005 to 2017 and has headed the MPIfG Research Group on the “Transnational Sociology of Diffusion” since 2014. Email: [email protected] Karlijn L. A. Roex is a postdoctoral researcher at the Max Planck Institute for the Study of Societies, Cologne, and was a doctoral researcher at the International Max Planck Research School on the Social and Political Constitution of the Economy (IMPRS-SPCE), Cologne, from 2014 to 2018. Email: [email protected] Daria Tisch is a PhD student in sociology at the Cologne Graduate School in Management, Economics and Social Sciences at the University of Cologne. Email: [email protected] MPIfG Discussion Papers are refereed scholarly papers of the kind that are publishable in a peer-reviewed disciplinary journal. Their objective is to contribute to the cumulative improvement of theoretical knowl- edge. The papers can be ordered from the institute for a small fee (hard copies) or downloaded free of charge (PDF). Downloads www.mpifg.de Go to Publications / Discussion Papers Max-Planck-Institut für Gesellschaftsforschung Max Planck Institute for the Study of Societies Paulstr. 3 | 50676 Cologne | Germany Tel. +49 221 2767-0 Fax +49 221 2767-555 www.mpifg.de [email protected] Lutter, Roex, Tisch: Anomie or Imitation? iii Abstract Anomie and imitation have been prominent mechanisms explaining the Werther effect, i.e., the effect of celebrity suicides on a general population’s suicide rate. This study presents a new approach to empirically disentangle both mechanisms. Imitation theory suggests that celebrities act as role mod- els, and that the Werther effect is triggered by the status of the celebrity in question. Anomie theory, on the other hand, suggests that the Werther effect is triggered by the unexpectedness of the event. To this end, we empirically compare the effects of celebrity suicides with the effects of celebrities who died unexpectedly from causes other than suicide (accidents, illnesses, alcohol abuse). Based on language and page-link data from 3,855 Wikipedia pages of 495 celebrities who committed suicide between 1960 and 2014, we measure the status a celebrity has in a particular country and calculate the potential country-specific imitation effect of their suicide. In the same manner, we measure sta- tus effects of celebrities who died unexpectedly from accidents, illnesses, or alcohol abuse to reflect anomie-related effects. We use these measures in a time-series cross-sectional dataset for 34 OECD countries to assess their effects on a country’s overall annual suicide rate. Fixed-effects analyses reveal that country-specific status effects of celebrity suicides lead to significant increases in overall suicide rates, while anomie-related, unexpected celebrity deaths show no effects. The findings remain robust across a number of alternative specifications, such as controlling for further anomic factors at the macro level (divorce or unemployment rate, for instance). We conclude that the results support the imitation mechanism as an essential social explanation for the Werther effect. Keywords: anomie, imitation, celebrity suicides, contagion, status, suicide, Werther effect, Wikipedia Zusammenfassung Anomie und Imitation sind zwei wichtige Mechanismen zur Erklärung des Werther-Effektes, also der Annahme, dass es einen kausalen Zusammenhang zwischen Selbstmorden berühmter Personen und der allgemeinen Selbstmordrate gibt. Die vorliegende Studie präsentiert nun einen neuen Ansatz, der versucht, beide Mechanismen empirisch voneinander zu trennen. Imitationstheorien gehen davon aus, dass Berühmtheiten als Rollenvorbilder fungieren und dass der Werther-Effekt somit durch die Statushöhe der Berühmtheiten erklärt werden kann. Anomietheorien nehmen dagegen an, dass der Werther-Effekt eher durch die unerwartete Plötzlichkeit des Ereignisses erklärt werden kann. Wir vergleichen daher empirisch den Einfluss von Selbstmorden berühmter Personen mit dem plötzlich und unerwartet durch Unfälle, Krankheiten oder Alkoholmissbrauch gestorbener Berühmtheiten. Auf Basis der Sprach- und Page-Link-Daten von 3.855 Wikipedia-Seiten der 495 Berühmtheiten, die zwischen 1960 und 2014 durch Suizid gestorben sind, erfassen wir ein Maß für den Status und Einfluss, den die Personen in einem bestimmten Land aufweisen, und schätzen darüber den po- tenziellen Nachahmereffekt ihres Selbstmordes. Anomie-bezogene Effekte erfassen wir, indem wir Berühmtheiten einbeziehen, die unerwartet durch Unfälle, Krankheiten oder Alkoholmissbrauch gestorben sind. Wir nutzen diese Maße, um mithilfe eines gepoolten Paneldatensatzes für 34 OECD- Länder ihre Effekte auf die allgemeine Selbstmordrate zu schätzen. Fixed-Effects-Analysen zeigen, dass das Statusmaß mit einem signifikanten Anstieg der länderspezifischen Selbstmordraten ein- hergeht. Zugleich zeigen sich keine Effekte der anomie-bezogenen Maße zu den unerwartet durch Krankheiten, Unfälle oder Alkoholmissbrauch gestorbenen Berühmtheiten. Die Ergebnisse erweisen sich als robust über eine Reihe alternativer Spezifikationen wie beispielsweise der Konstanthaltung weiterer Anomie-Faktoren auf der Makroebene (zum Beispiel Scheidungs- oder Arbeitslosenraten). Aus diesen Ergebnissen schließen wir, dass der Werther-Effekt wesentlich durch Mechanismen der Nachahmung erklärt werden kann. Schlagwörter: Anomie, Ansteckung, Imitation, Status, Suizid, Suizid berühmter Personen, Werther- Effekt, Wikipedia iv MPIfG Discussion Paper 18/4 Contents 1 Introduction 1 2 Anomie and imitation: Mechanisms of the Werther effect 3 3 Data and methods 5 Predictor variable: Country-specific impact of celebrity suicides 6 Controls 8 4 Results 10 5 Conclusions 16 References 19 Lutter, Roex, Tisch: Anomie or Imitation? 1 Anomie or Imitation? The Werther Effect of Celebrity Suicides on Suicide Rates in 34 OECD Countries, 1960–2014 1 Introduction In 2008, a famous South Korean actress committed suicide, and her death led to a rise in the country’s suicide rate in the following months (Lee et al. 2014). This pattern of imitative suicide is called the Werther effect (Phillips 1974), named after the main character in Goethe’s 1774 novel The Sorrows of Young Werther, whose fictional suicide induced an increase in real suicides at the time in Europe (Stack 2003). Prior research has found empirical support for the Werther effect with regard to celebrity suicides (Lee et al. 2014; Niederkrotenthaler et al. 2012; Stack 1987; 1990; 2003; Wasserman 1984; Yang et al. 2013; Yip et al. 2006). Anomie and imitation are presented as the main explanatory mechanisms of the Werther effect. However, it remains a challenge to draw any conclusions about which of these mechanisms actually causes suicide (Hoffman and Bearman 2015). Since the two mechanisms are not directly observable, testing both theories empirically is a demanding task. Moreover,

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    29 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us