Hypopharyngeal Surgery in Obstructive Sleep Apnea an Evidence-Based Medicine Review

Hypopharyngeal Surgery in Obstructive Sleep Apnea an Evidence-Based Medicine Review

ORIGINAL ARTICLE Hypopharyngeal Surgery in Obstructive Sleep Apnea An Evidence-Based Medicine Review Eric J. Kezirian, MD, MPH; Andrew N. Goldberg, MD, MSCE Objective: To perform an evidence-based medicine re- Results: We identified 36 articles. These were primarily view of the literature describing outcomes of hypopha- case series studies (level 4 evidence), although some stud- ryngeal surgery in obstructive sleep apnea. ies provided levels 1 and 2 evidence. Hypopharyngeal sur- gery demonstrates improvements in respiratory physiol- Design: We performed a MEDLINE search of English- ogy during sleep, daytime somnolence, and quality of life. language articles or abstracts using the keywords sleep Severalfactorssuchasthebodymassindex,apnea-hypopnea and surgery in combination with any of the following index, Friedman stage, and SNB angle on lateral cepha- terms: hypopharynx, tongue, tongue base, epiglottis, genio- logram have been associated with surgical outcomes. Con- glossus, advancement, mortised, genioplasty, glossectomy, sidering the improvement in respiratory physiology alone, tongue radiofrequency, hyoepiglottoplasty, hyoid, suspen- successful outcomes are achieved in 35% to 62% of patients; sion, and stabilization. Additional studies were identi- certain subgroups achieve higher success rates. fied from their reference lists. We reviewed abstracts to select publications reporting outcomes of hypopharyn- Conclusions: Hypopharyngeal surgery in obstructive geal surgery in obstructive sleep apnea. Articles were in- sleep apnea is associated with improved outcomes, al- cluded only if patients underwent treatment of the pal- though this benefit is supported largely by level 4 evi- ate for suspected retropalatal obstruction. dence. Future research should include larger, higher- level studies that consider the variety of treatment effects, Data Extraction: Evidence-based medicine review for compare surgical treatments, and identify factors asso- level of evidence, preoperative patient characteristics, sur- ciated with outcomes. gical outcomes, and patient-specific factors associated with outcomes. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2006;132:206-213 LANNING FOR SURGICAL (with response defined as a 50% decrease treatment of obstructive sleep in the respiratory disturbance index and a apnea (OSA) begins with postoperative respiratory disturbance in- evaluation to determine the dex of Ͻ20, or as a 50% decrease in the ap- most likely site(s) of airway nea index and a postoperative apnea index Pnarrowing or collapse. By functionally di- of Ͻ10) in patients with OSA treated with viding the pharynx into the retropalatal uvulopalatopharyngoplasty alone, regard- (corresponding to the portion of the oro- less of site of obstruction. In patients with pharynx at the level of the soft palate and suspected retropalatal narrowing alone (type tonsils) and the so-called hypopharyn- I obstruction), the response rate increased geal (actually corresponding to both the to 52.3%, but for those with a component portion of the oropharynx at the level of of hypopharyngeal obstruction (types II and the tongue base and the hypopharynx) re- III), the response rate was only 5.3%.4 gions, Fujita and Simmons1 described the In the years since the publication of that following 3 patterns of obstruction: type literature review,4 several procedures have I, retropalatal obstruction alone; type II, been developed to achieve higher re- both retropalatal and hypopharyngeal sponse rates in patients with hypopharyn- obstruction; and type III, hypopharyn- geal obstruction, and multiple studies have geal obstruction alone. reported the results of the new and older In 1981, Fujita et al2 described uvulo- procedures. The procedures available to palatopharyngoplasty as a treatment for pa- treat hypopharyngeal obstruction in OSA tients with retropalatal airway obstruc- include genioglossus advancement, mor- Author Affiliations: Department of tion. Although highly effective for simple tised genioplasty, tongue radiofrequency Otolaryngology–Head and Neck snoring, with a control rate ranging from treatment, surgical reduction of the tongue Surgery, University of 75% to 87%,3 a literature review by Sher et base (midline glossectomy), hyoepiglotto- California–San Francisco. al4 showed an overall response rate of 40.7% plasty, hyoid suspension, and tongue base (REPRINTED) ARCH OTOLARYNGOL HEAD NECK SURG/ VOL 132, FEB 2006 WWW.ARCHOTO.COM 206 ©2006 American Medical Association. All rights reserved. Downloaded From: http://archotol.jamanetwork.com/ by a University of California - Los Angeles User on 03/19/2014 stabilization. These procedures can be performed alone or ment, mortised, genioplasty, glossectomy, tongue radiofre- in combination under the same anesthetic. The specific quency, hyoepiglottoplasty, hyoid, suspension, and stabilization. description of the technical aspects of these procedures is We reviewed abstracts to select publications reporting out- beyond the scope of this report, but multiple studies5-41 comes of hypopharyngeal surgery in patients with OSA. We iden- have shown that these procedures improve outcomes in tified additional publications from the lists of references in this subset of articles. Articles were reviewed only if patients un- patients with suspected types II and III obstruction. 42 derwent treatment of the palate when retropalatal obstruction Sackett et al outlined many of the foundations of was suspected. present-day evidence-based medicine, which they de- All studies were reviewed for the following information: scribed as “the integration of [the] best research evi- v dence with clinical expertise and patient values.”42(p1) To Preoperative characteristics of patient populations, such as body mass index (BMI) (calculated as weight in kilograms describe the quality of research evidence, a hierarchy has divided by the square of height in meters) and preoperative sleep been developed that assigns each study a level of evi- study results such as the reported apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) dence based on the study design and the quality of the and lowest oxygen saturation (LSAT) during sleep 43 study. The following tabulation presents the study de- v Postoperative sleep study results, such as AHI and LSAT signs that correspond to the 5 levels of evidence. v Surgical success, defined by the most common criteria of Level of Evidence Study Design sleep study results (ie, a reduction in AHI of 50% or more and an AHI of less than 20) 1 Randomized, controlled trial v 2 Cohort study Any factors (eg, preoperative BMI or AHI) that were as- sociated with outcomes 3 Case-control study v 4 Case series Improvement in daytime somnolence, measured by the 44 5 Expert opinion Epworth Sleepiness Scale v Improvement in quality of life, measured as sleep-related quality of life (using the Functional Outcomes of Sleep Ques- This tabulation is simplified because there is a great tionnaire45 or the Symptoms of Nocturnal Obstruction and Re- deal of overlap between study designs and levels of evi- lated Events46 questionnaire) or global health-related quality dence as well as subgroups within the levels that reflect of life (based on the 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey47) the quality of the study and data analysis. v Level of evidence Evidence-based medicine combines studies (based on We then compared the results for each procedure or com- their levels of evidence) to develop treatment recommen- bination of procedures according to the criteria for a success- dations. The strength of these recommendations is based ful surgical outcome as outlined. We used the ␹2 test to deter- 43 on the quality of the available evidence. The following mine whether there was a difference in the share of patients tabulation presents the grades that correspond to the lev- with a successful outcome among treatments, and PϽ.05 was els of evidence on which the recommendations are based. considered statistically significant. Grade of Levels of Evidence Supporting Recommendation Recommendation* RESULTS A Consistent level 1 B Consistent level 2 or 3 or extrapolation from level 1 We identified a total of 36 studies. Many studies did not C Level 4 or extrapolation from level 2 or 3 D Level 5 or troubling, inconsistent, or report or did not consider some of the information we inconclusive studies of any level of outlined in the “Methods” section. Thirty-four (94%) of evidence the 36 studies were case series and therefore provided *Levels of evidence are described in the preceding tabulation. level 4 evidence. Patients undergoing genioglossus advancement as the Evidence-based medicine is commonly misinter- sole treatment of hypopharyngeal airway obstruction preted as a technique that ignores all studies except the (Table 1) demonstrated, on average, severe OSA before randomized controlled trial (level 1 evidence); al- surgery.5-8 After the procedure, there was significant im- though high-quality randomized controlled trials re- provement in the AHI in the 3 series that reported aggre- ceive the most weight in an evidence-based medicine re- gate group data. Using the criteria for success based on AHI view, all available studies are explicitly included in the results, 3 studies6-8 reported success rates of more than 60%; development of treatment recommendations. Again, clini- 1 series5 had a lower rate. The 2 studies that considered cal decisions will ultimately be based on clinical exper- the LSAT also showed an improvement in this metric. tise and patient values as well as this evidence. One report9 presented

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    8 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us