Draft version December 9, 2020 Preprint typeset using LATEX style emulateapj v. 12/16/11 ULTRAMASSIVE BLACK HOLES IN THE MOST MASSIVE GALAXIES: MBH − σ VERSUS MBH − RB Bililign T. Dullo,1 Armando Gil de Paz,1 and Johan H. Knapen2,3 1 Departamento de F´ısica de la Tierra y Astrof´ısica, Instituto de F´ısica de Part´ıculas y del Cosmos IPARCOS, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, E-28040 Madrid, Spain; [email protected] 2Instituto de Astrof´ısica de Canarias, V´ıa L´actea S/N, E-38205 La Laguna, Spain and 3Departamento de Astrof´ısica, Universidad de La Laguna, E-38206 La Laguna, Spain Draft version December 9, 2020 ABSTRACT We investigate the nature of the relations between black hole (BH) mass (MBH) and the central velocity dispersion (σ) and, for core-S´ersic galaxies, the size of the depleted core (Rb). Our sample of 144 galaxies with dynamically determined MBH encompasses 24 core-S´ersic galaxies, thought to be products of gas-poor mergers, and reliably identified based on high-resolution HST imaging. For core-S´ersic galaxies—i.e., combining normal-core (Rb < 0.5 kpc) and large-core galaxies (Rb & 0.5 ∝ 1.20±0.14 kpc), we find that MBH correlates remarkably well with Rb such that MBH Rb (rms scatter in log MBH of ∆rms ∼ 0.29 dex), confirming previous works on the same galaxies except three new ones. Separating the sample into S´ersic, normal-core and large-core galaxies, we find that S´ersic 4.88±0.29 and normal-core galaxies jointly define a single log-linear MBH − σ relation MBH ∝ σ with ∆rms ∼ 0.47 dex, however, at the high-mass end large-core galaxies (four with measured MBH) are offset upward from this relation by (2.5 − 4) × σs, explaining the previously reported steepening of the MBH − σ relation for massive galaxies. Large-core spheroids have magnitudes MV . −23.50 mag, 12 half-light radii Re & 10 kpc and are extremely massive M∗ & 10 M⊙. Furthermore, these spheroids 10 tend to host ultramassive BHs (MBH & 10 M⊙) tightly connected with their Rb rather than σ. The less popular MBH − Rb relation exhibits ∼ 62% less scatter in log MBH than the MBH − σ relations. Our findings suggest that large-core spheroids form via multiple major ‘dry’ merger events involving super/ultramassive BHs, consistent with the flattening of the σ − LV relation observed at MV . −23.5 mag. Subject headings: galaxies: elliptical and lenticular, cD — galaxies: fundamental parameter — galax- ies: nuclei — galaxies: photometry— galaxies: structure 1. INTRODUCTION enables the core sizes of core-S´ersic galaxies to be Observational works on nearby galaxies in the last measured by its break radius Rb (e.g., Graham et al. 25 yrs have revealed that black holes (BHs) in a mass 2003; Ferrarese et al. 2006; Dullo & Graham 2012, 6 10 2014, 2013; Dullo 2019; Rusli et al. 2013a). Recently, range M ∼ 10 − 10 M⊙ reside at the centers of all BH Dullo (2019) revealed two types of core-S´ersic galaxies: massive elliptical galaxies and massive bulges of disk “normal-core” (i.e., R < 0.5 kpc) and “large-core” (i.e., galaxies (Kormendy & Richstone 1995; Magorrian et al. b R > 0.5 kpc) galaxies. 1998; Ferrarese & Ford 2005; McConnell et al. 2011; b The SMBH masses have been found to correlate Thomas et al. 2016; Mehrgan et al. 2019). The BH can with several host galaxy properties including central have a major impact on the central and large-scale prop- stellar velocity dispersion (σ, Ferrarese & Merritt erties of its host galaxy. Luminous (M . −21.50 ± 0.75 V 2000; Gebhardt et al. 2000; Graham et al. 2011; mag) core-S´ersic galaxies contain partially depleted McConnell & Ma 2013), luminosity (L , e.g., stellar cores, a flattening in the inner stellar light sph arXiv:2012.04471v1 [astro-ph.GA] 8 Dec 2020 Kormendy & Richstone 1995; McLure & Dunlop distributions, that are thought to be generated by 2002; Graham & Scott 2013) and mass (M , the scouring action of inspiraling supermassive black sph e.g., Magorrian et al. 1998; Marconi & Hunt 2003; hole (SMBH) binaries formed in major dry merger H¨aring & Rix 2004; Sahu et al. 2019a). Later studies events. As the inspiraling SMBH binary sinks to found that a tight relation exists between SMBH masses the center of the merger remnant, it transfers orbital and the sizes of the depleted cores for core-S´ersic angular momentum to the surrounding stars. The galaxies (R , e.g., Lauer et al. 2007; Rusli et al. 2013a; gravitation slingshot ejection of the inner stars by b Dullo & Graham 2014; Thomas et al. 2016; Dullo 2019). this decaying SMBH binary creates the central light Dullo et al. (2020) discover correlations between SMBH deficit, i.e., the flattened core (e.g., Begelman et al. mass and the host galaxy total UV-[3.6] color. In this 1980; Ebisuzaki et al. 1991; Milosavljevi´c& Merritt new (SMBH mass)-color diagram, early- and late-type 2001; Merritt 2006; Gualandris & Merritt 2012; galaxies define a red and blue sequence, respectively. Khan et al. 2013; Vasiliev et al. 2015; Rantala et al. These local SMBH scaling relations have generated 2018; Nasim et al. 2020). The light profiles of core- great interest as they are believed to indicate a strong S´ersic galaxies, which break from a steep outer S´ersic evolutionary coupling between the growth of a SMBH profile to a flattened core, are well described using the and the buildup of its host galaxy (see recent reviews core-S´ersic model (Graham et al. 2003). This model by Kormendy & Ho 2013; Graham 2016) governed by 2 Dullo, Gil de Paz & Knapen perhaps active galactic nucleus (AGN) feedback (e.g., galaxies (i.e., σ ∼ 300 − 390 km s−1, Lauer et al. 2007; 9 Silk & Rees 1998; Fabian 1999; Springel et al. 2005; Bernardi et al. 2007) of MBH . 5 × 10 M⊙, and these Di Matteo et al. 2005; Croton et al. 2006; Hopkins et al. values underestimate the actual black hole mass by up 2006) or hierarchical merging processes (e.g., Peng to a factor of 40 (Dullo 2019), whereas predicted MBH 10 2007; Jahnke & Macci`o2011). The expectation is that from the MBH − L relation can exceed MBH ∼ 10 M⊙ the slopes, strength, level of scatter and substructures (Lauer et al. 2007; Dullo 2019). Indeed, Wu et al. (2015) of such relations can yield clues to the underlying found a quasar at a redshift of z ∼ 6.3 powered by an 10 mechanism that establishes supposed coupling between UMBH with MBH ∼ 1.2 × 10 M⊙, and such BHs have SMBHs and host galaxies. been identified at the centers of extremely massive (M∗ & 12 It seems reasonable that the central BH is more in- 10 M⊙) present-day galaxies (e.g., McConnell et al. timately related to the size of the depleted core it cre- 2011; Thomas et al. 2016; Mehrgan et al. 2019). ated than the stellar velocity dispersion. However, the Separating core-S´ersic galaxies into normal-core and − MBH σ relation is regarded as the most fundamen- large-core galaxies, our findings (Dullo 2019) suggested tal of all the SMBH scaling relations due to its tight- that the offset evident at the high-mass end of the ness and small scatter (e.g., Tremaine et al. 2002, ∼ 0.3 MBH − σ relation is due to large-core spheroids with dex in the log M ), which are claimed to be compa- 12 BH MV . −23.50 ± 0.10 mag, M∗ & 10 M⊙ and Re & rable to those of the scaling relations involving MBH 10 kpc. It worth noting such spheroids are not sim- and two spheroid parameters (e.g., σ, Lsph and half- ple high-mass extensions of the relatively less massive 10 12 light radii Re), defining a “BH fundamental plane” (e.g., normal-core spheroids (M∗ ∼ 8 × 10 − 10 M⊙). Beifiori et al. 2012; Saglia et al. 2016; Shankar et al. A key observation in Dullo (2019) was that a single 2016; van den Bosch 2016; Krajnovi´cet al. 2018a; MBH − Rb relation holds across the full mass range Shankar et al. 2019; de Nicola et al. 2019). Therefore, of core-S´ersic spheroids confirming Lauer et al. (2007); the relation is commonly used for estimating the SMBH Rusli et al. (2013a); Dullo & Graham (2014), but this masses of nearby galaxies when direct SMBH mass mea- conclusion was based on a small sample of 11 core-S´ersic surements are not available. This is particularly true galaxies with direct SMBH mass measurements; 3/11 for the brightest and most massive galaxies with very galaxies are large-core galaxies. Establishing this tight faint central surface brightness (e.g., Dullo 2019) that MBH − Rb relation, as well as the offset at the high-mass render the modeling stellar or ionized gas kinematics end of the MBH−σ relation being due to large-core galax- for the dynamical SMBH mass measurements challeng- ies, requires a reasonably large sample of galaxies with − ing. In contrast, the MBH Rb relation has been dynamical SMBH mass measurements. largely overlooked, despite displaying a similar level In this work, we build upon Dullo (2019) and inves- of scatter as the M − σ relation (e.g., Rusli et al. BH tigate the nature of the MBH − Rb and MBH − σ re- 2013a; Dullo & Graham 2014; Thomas et al. 2016; Dullo lations using 24 core-S´ersic galaxies with published di- 2019). This is mainly because the offset nature of the rect SMBH mass determinations. We additionally in- most massive galaxies (at the high-mass end) from the clude 27 core-S´ersic with predicted SMBH masses and − mean MBH σ relation is still not well established robust break radii to further investigate the the BH scal- − and also the MBH Rb relation can only be applied ing relations.