And Melphalan Administration Vaccines Is Not Hampered By

And Melphalan Administration Vaccines Is Not Hampered By

The Immunogenicity of Dendritic Cell-Based Vaccines Is Not Hampered by Doxorubicin and Melphalan Administration This information is current as Anna Casati, Valérie S. Zimmermann, Fabio Benigni, Maria of September 29, 2021. T. S. Bertilaccio, Matteo Bellone and Anna Mondino J Immunol 2005; 174:3317-3325; ; doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.174.6.3317 http://www.jimmunol.org/content/174/6/3317 Downloaded from References This article cites 55 articles, 25 of which you can access for free at: http://www.jimmunol.org/content/174/6/3317.full#ref-list-1 http://www.jimmunol.org/ Why The JI? Submit online. • Rapid Reviews! 30 days* from submission to initial decision • No Triage! Every submission reviewed by practicing scientists • Fast Publication! 4 weeks from acceptance to publication by guest on September 29, 2021 *average Subscription Information about subscribing to The Journal of Immunology is online at: http://jimmunol.org/subscription Permissions Submit copyright permission requests at: http://www.aai.org/About/Publications/JI/copyright.html Email Alerts Receive free email-alerts when new articles cite this article. Sign up at: http://jimmunol.org/alerts The Journal of Immunology is published twice each month by The American Association of Immunologists, Inc., 1451 Rockville Pike, Suite 650, Rockville, MD 20852 Copyright © 2005 by The American Association of Immunologists All rights reserved. Print ISSN: 0022-1767 Online ISSN: 1550-6606. The Journal of Immunology The Immunogenicity of Dendritic Cell-Based Vaccines Is Not Hampered by Doxorubicin and Melphalan Administration1 Anna Casati,2 Vale´rie S. Zimmermann,2 Fabio Benigni,3 Maria T. S. Bertilaccio, Matteo Bellone, and Anna Mondino4 Immunization of cancer patients is most effective in tumor-free conditions or in the presence of minimal residual disease. In the attempt to develop new strategies able to control tumor recurrence while allowing the development of protective immunity, we have investigated the immunogenic potential of two distinct vaccine formulations when provided alone or upon single and repeated treatment with chemotherapeutics drugs. Vaccine-induced T cell responses were first investigated by tracing Ag-specific T cell responses in mice bearing detectable frequencies of Ag-specific TCR transgenic CD4 and CD8 T cells. These studies indicated that immunization with peptide-pulsed dendritic cells and soluble Ag plus adjuvant elicited a comparable expansion and differentiation of CD4 and CD8 effector cells in the peripheral lymphoid tissues when provided alone or shortly after Doxorubicin or Melphalan Downloaded from administration. We also analyzed the potency of the combined vaccination in transgenic adenocarcinoma mouse prostate mice, which develop spontaneous prostate cancer. Dendritic cell-based vaccination elicited potent tumor-specific cytotoxic responses in mice bearing prostate intraepithelial neoplasia both in the absence and in the presence of Doxorubicin. Together our results indicate that Doxorubicin- or Melphalan-based chemotherapy and Ag-specific vaccination can be combined for adjuvant treat- ments of cancer patients. The Journal of Immunology, 2005, 174: 3317–3325. http://www.jimmunol.org/ onventional anti-cancer therapies (surgery and radio- and eliminate the minimal residual disease. The major limitation for chemotherapy) have gained a considerable clinical suc- combining antiblastic chemotherapy and immunotherapy is that C cess over the past years. Because of limitations imposed cytotoxic drugs are generally regarded as immunosuppressive be- by the given current treatments, tumor-free survival is not always cause of toxicity to the dividing immune cells in the bone marrow accomplished. For instance, surgery and radiotherapy are quite ef- and peripheral lymphoid tissues (5). However, certain chemother- fective in the treatment of localized tumors, but they usually play apeutic agents have shown immunomodulatory activities (6), and a palliative role in the treatment of disseminated diseases. Chemo- several combined approaches have already been attempted. For therapy in these cases is the treatment of choice, but severe toxic instance, chemotherapy has been proven to enhance the efficacy of effects toward normal tissues often limit its use. The identification tumor cell vaccines and immune cytokines, and to favor the ac- by guest on September 29, 2021 of tumor-specific Ag, tumor-specific lymphocytes, and tumor-spe- tivity of adoptively transferred tumor-specific T cells (7–18). A cific T cell responses in cancer patients led to the development of number of mechanisms have been proposed for the chemotherapy- immunotherapies aimed at augmenting antitumor immune re- triggered enhancement of immunotherapy response. For instance, sponses. Studies mostly performed in preclinical studies have in- chemotherapy may favor tumor cell death, and by that enhance dicated that both active and adoptive immunotherapies are quite tumor-Ag cross-presentation in vivo (19). Furthermore, drug-in- effective against small tumor burdens, but seem to be incapable of duced myelosuppression may induce the production of cytokines controlling large tumor masses (1, 2). The results generated in favoring homeostatic proliferation, and/or inhibit the activity of T clinical trials supported these findings and suggest that immuno- regulatory cells (7, 10). therapy is most effective in adjuvant settings (3, 4). Although supporting the feasibility of combining chemotherapy Together the available information indicates that both conven- and immunotherapy, previous studies did not provide qualitative tional treatment and immunotherapeutic strategies might benefit and quantitative information on vaccine-induced T cell responses from combined treatments aimed at controlling tumor growth, during chemotherapy administration. Thus, in this study, we have while allowing vaccine-induced immune responses to develop and quantified by ex vivo flow cytometry analyses the potency of Ag- specific vaccination when performed in combination with antiblas- tic chemotherapy in different animal models that allow the tracing Cancer Immunotherapy and Gene Therapy Program, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, DIBIT, Milan, Italy of Ag-specific CD4 and CD8 T cell responses in the context of Received for publication September 8, 2004. Accepted for publication December peripheral lymphoid tissues. In the first animal model, we took 14, 2004. advantage of the adoptive transfer (AT)5 of traceable population of The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page OVA-specific TCR transgenic (Tg) CD4 and CD8 T cells (20). We charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked advertisement in accordance measured the expansion and differentiation of T lymphocytes by with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact. flow cytometry analyses and functional assays performed on cells 1 This work was supported by a grant from the Italian Association for Cancer Re- search to A.M. (New Unit Start Up Grant) and M.B., from the Fondazione San Paolo Istituto Mobiliare Italiano to A.M., and from Ministero della Salute to M.B. 2 A.C. and V.S.Z. contributed equally to this study. 5 Abbreviations used in this paper: AT, adoptive transfer; DC, dendritic cell; DOXO, 3 Current address: BioXell S.p.A., 20132 Milan, Italy. Doxorubicin; LACK, Leishmania receptor for activated C kinase; LN, lymph node; 4 Address correspondence and reprint requests to Dr. Anna Mondino, Cancer Immu- MEL, Melphalan; mPIN, mouse prostate intraepithelial neoplasia; OVAp, chicken notherapy and Gene Therapy Program, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Via Olget- OVA-derived peptide; Tag, SV40 large T Ag; Tg, transgenic; TRAMP, transgenic tina, 58, 20132 Milan, Italy. E-mail address: [email protected] adenocarcinoma mouse prostate; WT, wild type. Copyright © 2005 by The American Association of Immunologists, Inc. 0022-1767/05/$02.00 3318 COMBINING CHEMOTHERAPY AND Ag-SPECIFIC VACCINATION obtained from the peripheral lymphoid tissues of AT mice vacci- after their AT into Ly-5.2ϩ C57BL/6 (H-2b) recipients, as similarly de- nated in the absence or in the presence of antiblastic chemother- scribed elsewhere (42). The frequency of Tg T cells in these mice was analyzed by flow cytometry analysis, which indicated that up to 97% of apy. In the second animal model, which allows the tracing of en- ϩ ϩ Ly-5.1 CD8 T cells expressed the V␣2V␤5 Tg TCR (data not shown). dogenous CD4 T cells specific for the model Ag Leishmania The 16.2␤ mice were previously described (21). T cells from these mice receptor for activated C kinase (LACK) (21), we investigated the express a TCR transgenic ␤-chain derived from a LACK-specific hybrid- possibility to perform vaccination upon repeated cycles of chemo- oma, and exhibit an increased frequency of LACK-specific CD4 T cells therapy. Finally, we traced tumor-specific cytotoxicity in trans- (21). Heterozygous TRAMP mice on a pure C57BL/6 background were typed for Tag expression by PCR-based screening assay, as described in genic adenocarcinoma mouse prostate (TRAMP) mice. TRAMP ͗www.jax.org͘. All mice were housed and bred in a specific pathogen-free mice are transgenic for the SV40 large T Ag (Tag) under the con- animal facility, treated in accordance with the European Union guidelines, trol of the rat probasin regulatory element. In the periphery, Tag is and with the approval of the Institutional Ethical Committee. selectively expressed in prostate epithelial cells under the influence All of the in vivo experiments were performed

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    10 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us