Upper Ocean Velocities in the Beaufort Gyre

Upper Ocean Velocities in the Beaufort Gyre

GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH LETTERS, VOL. 25, NO. 2, PAGES 183-186, January 15, 1998 Upper ocean velocities in the Beaufort Gyre A. J. Plueddemann1 , R. Krishfield1 ,T.Takizawa2 K. Hatakeyama2 and S. Honjo1 Abstract. A 23 month time series of upper ocean veloci- The IOEB was deployed from the Arctic Leads Exper- ties in the Beaufort Gyre was obtained from an autonomous iment ice camp in the Beaufort Sea [LeadEx Group, 1993] drifting buoy equipped with an Acoustic Doppler Current and tracked for 4 years while executing a broad, anticy- Profiler. The buoy was deployed in the Beaufort Sea and clonic arc centered on the Canada Basin. The long-term drifted over the Canada Basin, Chukchi Shelf, and Chukchi drift was consistent with the mean pattern of ice motion esti- Plateau. Time-evolving spectral analysis was used to exam- mated from satellite-tracked drifters [Colony and Thorndike, ine velocity variability in three frequency bands: an eddy 1984] and indicated that the buoy was captured within the band (2–5 day periods), a diurnal band, and a semidiurnal wind-driven Beaufort Gyre [Pfirman et al., 1997]. Dur- band. The eddy band and the semidiurnal band dominated ing most of the first two years, the IOEB transmitted the horizontal kinetic energy. Although eddy energy was data from meteorological sensors, a current profiler, and a clearly confined to the Beaufort Sea and Canada basin, ed- transmissometer-fluorometer logger. Shorter duration time dies were found further to the south and west than in previ- series were obtained from ice thermistor strings and subsur- ous observations. The semidiurnal band was dominated by face conductivity-temperature loggers [Honjo et al., 1995]. near-inertial motions with amplitude that varied seasonally This paper focuses on data transmitted from the current (largest in late summer and smallest in late winter). Diurnal profiler during the first two years. The IOEB traversed sev- tides were weak (< 1cms−1) except over a shallow portion eral distinct geographic regions during this period (Fig. 1). of the Chukchi Shelf. 140W 160W 150W Introduction 765 675 Despite decades of exploration, the velocity field beneath 645 the pack ice of the Arctic Ocean is not well described. 735 795 705 78N A network of satellite-tracked drifting buoys frozen into 615 the ice provides an assessment of surface motion [Colony and Thorndike, 1984], but subsurface velocities are not ob- CHUKCHI 585 served. Subsurface velocities have been measured from ice 555 PLATEAU camps, but the most comprehensive experiments are often of short duration [CEAREX Drift Group, 1990; LeadEx Group, 76N 1993]. In this paper we report the results of long-duration, 525 subsurface velocity measurements from a drifting buoy de- ployed in the Beaufort Gyre. CANADA In April 1992 an autonomous drifting buoy was frozen NORTHWIND RIDGE BASIN 465 into the Arctic pack ice about 150 miles north of Prudhoe 495 435 405 Bay, Alaska. The buoy was one in a series of Ice-Ocean 74N Environmental Buoys (IOEBs) designed for long-term mea- 375 315 surement of meteorological and oceanographic variables in 285 345 the Arctic [Krishfield et al., 1993; Honjo et al., 1995]. The 255 165 CHUKCHI 195 IOEB consisted of a flotation collar and electronics package SHELF 135 225 at the surface connected mechanically and electronically to BEAUFORT a string of instruments suspended below. The surface ele- SEA ment contained meteorological sensors, ice sensors, and two antennas for satellite communications. Below the surface was a string of sensors for measurement of water properties, Barrow currents, and particle flux. Sensor data were collected and processed by a controller in the surface electronics package ALASKA and then transmitted to Argos satellites. 1Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution, Woods Hole, Mas- 0 0.2 0.5 1.0 2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0 sachusetts, USA 02543 depth (km) 2Japan Marine Science and Technology Center, Yokosuka, Japan 237 Figure 1. Drift track of the IOEB superimposed on bathymetry. The track has been smoothed over 6 days prior Copyright 1998 by the American Geophysical Union. to plotting. Symbols are plotted every 3 days. Annotated Paper number 97GL53638. symbols give the year day starting from 14 May 1992 (day 0094-8534/98/97GL-53638$05.00 135). 1 2 PLUEDDEMANN ET AL.: VELOCITIES IN THE BEAUFORT GYRE The buoy remained in the northwest Beaufort Sea for about domain filtering. Attempts to separate near-inertial motion 2 months after deployment. The drift during the next 6 and semidiurnal tidal constituents using complex demod- months was westward across the Canada Basin and past the ulation [Pease et al., 1995] were not successful. However, southern foot of the Northwind Ridge. During the next 2 results from the high-resolution tidal model of Kowalik and months the drift track crossed the northern Chukchi Shelf, Proshutinsky [1993; 1994 ] provided a practical solution. The passing over the shallow, northward projection of the shelf predicted S2 and M2 tides along the drift track were seldom near 76◦ N, 168◦ W. The buoy partially crossed the Chukchi as large as the ADCP noise level (0.5 cm s−1 ). This im- Plateau several times during the next 7 months, finally set- plied that nearly all of the observed semidiurnal energy was tling on its westward slope during the last 2 months. due to near-inertial motion (the inertial period varied from 12.55 to 12.21 hours along the track). The exceptions were when the buoy passed over the shallowest portions of the Methods Chukchi Shelf and Plateau, where the predicted S2 and M2 −1 An RD Instruments 150 kHz Acoustic Doppler Current amplitudes were between 0.5 and 1.0 cm s . Inertial-band Profiler (ADCP) was suspended at 8 m depth below the sur- amplitudes in these regions were interpreted with caution. face with the transducers pointing downwards. Forty acous- The time-varying amplitude of the diurnal tidal con- tic transmissions were averaged within the ADCP to pro- stituents O1 and K1 were estimated using complex de- duce an ensemble every 15 min. Forty depth cells of 8 m modulation [McPhee, 1980a; Pease et al., 1995]. Clockwise length were recorded for each ensemble, giving a nominal and counter-clockwise rotating components for the two con- profiling range of 26 to 338 m depth. Because the data pro- stituents were determined from the same 15 day segments duced by the ADCP far exceeded the transmission capacity used for spectral estimation. of the Argos system, a Data Processing Module (DPM) was developed to reduce the data [Plueddemann et al., 1992]. Results The DPM collected 15 min ensembles from the ADCP, av- eraged the velocities over 2 hours in time and 3 bins in depth, The time-evolving frequency spectrum (Fig. 2) showed and combined the ancillary data into a small number of qual- distinct temporal variability in several frequency bands. Pe- ity flags. riodic increases and decreases in energy were seen in the in- The DPM provided velocities for the first 10 averaged ertial band, with relative maxima near days 250 and 600. depth bins to the IOEB controller in two separate data The diurnal band showed intermittent, weak energy max- streams, one containing even numbered bins and the other ima. Low-frequency energy dominated the early part of containing odd bins. The two data streams were transmitted the record, decreased dramatically when the buoy left the to Argos on separate channels. Unfortunately, the channel Canada Basin (day 405), and then increased slightly as the transmitting the even bin data failed after about one month. buoy entered the Chukchi Plateau region (day 540). Spec- The data presented here are from the odd bins, with bin cen- tral levels at all frequencies showed a minimum as the buoy ters at 58, 106, 154, 202 and 250 m depth. An estimate of crossed the southern foot of the Northwind Ridge and ap- velocity at the surface was made from the buoy positions. proached the Chukchi Shelf (days 420–500). Variability in This drift velocity was smoothed with a 6 hour triangle fil- the inertial, diurnal, and eddy bands are discussed in more ter, interpolated to 2 hours, and then removed from the detail below. ADCP data in post-processing to yield absolute subsurface The principal characteristic of the inertial-band ampli- velocities. The absolute velocities were accurate to only a tude (Fig. 3a) was seasonal variability, presumably due to few cm s−1 due to uncertainty in the Argos positions. The seasonal changes in the pack ice [McPhee, 1980b]. Frag- velocity precision was limited by noise in the 2 hour ADCP mented summer ice supports very little internal stress. As velocities, estimated to be about 0.5 cm s−1. a result, surface winds generate inertial currents and down- Data were processed for a 23 month period from 6 May ward propagating near-inertial waves analogous to those in 1992 to 29 March 1994 (days are subsequently referred to by the open ocean. In winter much of the wind stress is con- sequential year day from 135 [14 May 1996] to 810 [20 March verted to internal stress in the tightly packed ice and inertial 1994]). Frequency spectra for the surface and each depth bin currents are weak or absent. The air temperature from the were estimated from successive 15 day sections, stepped for- IOEB (Fig. 3b) illustrates the change of season during the ward in time by 3 days. A frequency band dominated by drift. Inertial amplitudes were largest in late summer and eddy variability (2–5 day periods, subsequently called the smallest in late winter. “eddy band”) was identified in the spectra and isolated by The buoy spent the first summer in the Canada Basin frequency domain filtering.

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    4 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us