Mycena Species Can Be Opportunist-Generalist Plant Root Invaders 2 3 Christoffer Bugge Harder1,2, Emily Hesling3, Synnøve S

Mycena Species Can Be Opportunist-Generalist Plant Root Invaders 2 3 Christoffer Bugge Harder1,2, Emily Hesling3, Synnøve S

bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.03.23.436563; this version posted March 23, 2021. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license. 1 Mycena species can be opportunist-generalist plant root invaders 2 3 Christoffer Bugge Harder1,2, Emily Hesling3, Synnøve S. Botnen1,4, Bálint Dima5,6, Tea von 4 Bonsdorff-Salminen7, Tuula Niskanen5,8, Susan G. Jarvis9, Kelsey E. Lorberau10, Andrew 5 Ouimette11, Alison Hester12, Erik A. Hobbie11, Andy F.S. Taylor3,12, Håvard Kauserud1 6 7 1Department of Biosciences, University of Oslo, Box 1066 Blindern, 0316 Oslo, Norway, 2Lund 8 University, Department of Microbial Ecology, Sölvegatan 37, 223 62 Lund, 3School of Biological 9 Sciences, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK, 4Oslo Metropolitan University, PO Box 4 St. 10 Olavs plass, NO-0130 Oslo, Norway, 5Plant Biology, Department of Biosciences, University of 11 Helsinki, P.O. Box 56, Helsinki FI-00014, Finland, 6Department of Plant Anatomy, Institute of 12 Biology, Eötvös Loránd University, Pázmány Péter sétány 1/C, H-1117 Budapest, Hungary, 13 7Botany Unit, Finnish Museum of Natural History LUOMUS, P.O. Box 7, FI-00014 University of 14 Helsinki, Finland 8Jodrell Laboratory, Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, Surrey TW9 3AB, UK, 9 UK 15 Centre for Ecology & Hydrology, Lancaster, LA1 4AP, UK, 10Department of Arctic and Marine 16 Biology, UiT - The Arctic University of Norway, Tromsø, Norway, 11Earth Systems Research 17 Center, University of New Hampshire, Durham, New Hampshire, 03824, USA, 12The James 18 Hutton Institute, Aberdeen, UK. 19 20 Corresponding author: Christoffer B: Harder, Phone: +46704565065, e-mail: 21 [email protected]. Originality significance statement: This is the first study to apply a dual 22 approach of systematic metabarcoding of plant roots and stable isotope signatures on dried 23 field material to the large and common saprotrophic fungal genus Mycena. This is significant as 24 it shows that members of this genus, normally not expected to be found inside plant roots at all, 25 are in fact associated eith multiple plant hosts. The study furthermore shows that species in this 26 genus may occupy different ecological roles in the field besides being saprotrophic. That a large 27 and common fungal genus known to be a quantitatively important litter decayer can be an 28 opportunistic root invader and interact with host plants is of interest to all mycologists and 29 ecologists working on plant-fungus/microb symbiosis. 30 31 Summary 32 Recently, several saprotrophic genera have been found to invade/interact with plant roots in 33 laboratory growth experiments, and this coincides with reports of abundant saprotrophic fungal 34 sequences in plant roots. However, it is uncertain if this reflects field phenomena, and if reports 35 on coincidentally amplified saprotrophs are simply coincidental. 36 We investigated root invasion by presumed saprotrophic fungi by focusing on the large genus 37 Mycena in 1) a systematic analysis of the occurrence of saprotrophic fungi in new and bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.03.23.436563; this version posted March 23, 2021. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license. 38 previously published ITS1/ITS2 datasets generated from roots of 10 mycorrhizal plant species, 39 and 2) we analysed natural abundances of 13C/15N stable isotope signatures of fungal/plant 40 communities from five comparable field locations to examine the trophic status of Mycena 41 species. 42 Mycena was the only saprotrophic genus consistently found in 9 of 10 plant host roots, with high 43 within-host variation in Mycena sequence proportions (0-80%) recovered. Mycena carpophores 44 displayed isotopic signatures consistent with published 13C/15N profiles of both saprotrophic or 45 mutualistic lifestyles, with considerable intraspecific variation, resembling the patterns seen in 46 growth experiments. These results indicate that multiple Mycena species opportunistically 47 invade the roots of a range of plant species, possibly forming a spectrum of interactions. This 48 potentially challenges our general understanding of fungal ecology. 49 50 Introduction 51 Among ecologists, a consensus is emerging that the classical assignment of fungal species into 52 single trophic groups with a mycorrhizal, saprotrophic or pathogenic lifestyle may be too 53 restrictive (Baldrian and Kohout, 2017; Selosse et al., 2018). Some otherwise free-living fungi 54 have been shown to invade plant roots and exist as either asymptomatic endophytes (neither 55 harmful nor beneficial), and then switch from endophytic into becoming pathogenic (e.g. 56 Fusarium graminearum, Lofgren et al., 2018), or into forming AM mycorrhizas (Piriformospora 57 indica, Weiß et al., 2016) or ericoid mycorrhizal associations (Meliniomyces spp., Martino et al., 58 2018). 59 A wide range of saprotrophic fungal genera have been screened for their ability to colonise 60 Pinus sylvestris and Picea abies seedling roots in vitro (Smith et al., 2017), and several, 61 including Mycena, Gymnopus, Phlebiopsis, Marasmius or Pleurotus, invaded roots apparently 62 without decomposing dead tissue in the process. However, beyond the invasion, the nature of 63 the interactions with the plant host (if any) remains unknown. 64 For Mycena, however, there are several lines of direct and indirect evidence for their ability to 65 invade and interact with living plant roots, at least in vitro. Mycena species have been identified 66 as potential orchid mycorrhizal symbionts (Ogura-Tsujita et al., 2009; Zhang et al., 2012), 67 endophytes in photosynthetic moss tissue (Davey et al., 2013) and non-mycorrhizal 68 brassicaceous plants (Glynou et al., 2018). They have also been shown to form mycorrhiza-like 69 structures in roots of Vaccinium corymbosum in growth studies (Grelet et al., 2017). Recently 70 and perhaps most importantly, Thoen et al. (2020) showed that multiple species and individual 71 strains of Mycena could colonise roots of Betula pendula seedlings in vitro, and formed a 72 gradient of interactions from harmful to neutral to beneficial, with some species/strains being 73 able to transfer nutrients to the plant host. This is significant, as prior to this Mycena sensu 74 stricto (Moncalvo et al., 2002) (henceforth simply "Mycena"), which is one the largest genera in bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.03.23.436563; this version posted March 23, 2021. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license. 75 Agaricales (over 500 species), widespread across habitats and climate zones (Kühner, 1938; 76 Maas Geesteranus, 1992; Rexer, 1994; Robich, 2003; Aronsen and Læssøe,2016), was known 77 primarily as quantitatively important litter and wood debris decomposers (Boberg et al., 2008; 78 Baldrian et al., 2012; Kyaschenko et al., 2017). The spectrum of interactions seen in Thoen et 79 al. (2020) is further noteworthy in the light of the "Waiting room hypothesis" (van der Heijden et 80 al. 2015) on mycorrhizal evolution, which suggests that the mycorrhizal habit evolves from 81 saprotrophs gradually via neutral endophytic intermediate states. This hypothesis has remained 82 controversial even though it is accepted that the mycorrhizal habit has evolved on numerous, 83 independent occasions from saprotrophic ancestors (Tedersoo and Smith 2013, Kohler et al. 84 2015). Thus, the genus Mycena may represent a promising research model for studying both 85 ecological versatility in fungi and the possible ongoing evolution of fungi traditionally believed to 86 be purely saprotrophic en route to developing mycorrhizal abilities. 87 Most of this evidence for trophic versatility in Mycena originates from in vitro studies, 88 and it is uncertain to what extent this translates to the field. To investigate the trophic mode of 89 fungi in natural environments, analysis of the natural abundance of 13C:12C and 15N:14N ratios 90 (isotope ratios, expressed as d13C and d15N values relative to known standards) can be applied 91 directly to fungal carpophores and other field material. Mycorrhizal fungi are generally more 92 enriched in 15N and depleted in 13C than saprotrophic fungi (Taylor et al., 1997; Kohzu et al., 93 1999; Hobbie et al., 1999; Hobbie et al., 2001; Griffith, 2004; Mayor et al., 2009). Based on 94 comparisons between fungi of known trophic status, natural abundance of 15 and 13C can also 95 give strong indications of the nutritional mode of fungi with unknown trophic status. Thus, 96 Halbwachs et al. (2018) recently used this approach to strongly suggest that Hygrocybe, 97 another genus traditionally believed to be saprotrophic, was most likely biotrophic with plants. 98 The occurrence and abundance of Mycena sequences retrieved from wild plant roots also 99 suggests interactions with plant roots in situ. There are scattered reports of Mycena identified 100 from inside wild plant roots, particularly in the Arctic plants, including Bistorta vivipara, Cassiope 101 tetragona, Dryas octopetala, and Salix polaris (Blaalid et al., 2014; Botnen et al., 2014; 102 Lorberau et al., 2017). In some cases, Mycena sequences comprised >30-50% of the total 103 reads, suggesting that they are not simply casual colonisers. It has been suggested that the 104 harsh and oligotrophic Arctic environments stimulate otherwise free-living fungal genera 105 (including Mycena) to explore new ecological niches (Jumpponen and Trappe, 1998; Ryberg et 106 al., 2009; Ryberg et al., 2011; Timling et al., 2012; Botnen et al., 2014; Lorberau et al., 2017).

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    30 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us