Contesting Capital: Critical Pedagogy and Globalism A Response to Michael Apple Peter McLaren University of California, Los Angeles Several paragraphs from this essay have been taken from “Critical pedagogy, postmodernism, and the retreat from class: Towards a contraband pedagogy” by Peter McLaren and Ramin Farahmandpur, in press, Theoria. Michael Apple (this issue) offers a perceptive diagnosis of the newpower bloc committed to neo-liberal marketized solutions to educationalproblems. The power bloc is an alliance among authoritarian populistreligious fundamentalists, neo-conservative intellectuals, the professionallyoriented new middle class, and neo-liberal policy makers. Education has responded by creating objectives that reveal a new set of ideological commitments--or discursive regimes--linked to the imperatives of the Hayekian cult of the free market. These are bolstered by often flawed researchthat serves as a "rhetoric of justification for preconceived beliefs about the supposed efficacy of markets or regimes of tight accountability". The state experiences a crisis in legitimacy after dominant economic groups shift the blame for their decision onto its shoulders, and it, in turn,attempts to "export the crisis outside of itself". Apple argues that the conservative alliance that has effectively produced this "reconstruction of common sense" and through its restorational policies and projects, the increase in power of the dominant educational models (i.e., national standards, national curricula and national testing with a programmatic emphasis on efficiency, speed, and cost-control as distinct from substantive social and ethical issues related to social justice), has not been adequately grasped by many progressive educators, "including many writers on critical pedagogy". I could not agree with Apple more that writers in critical pedagogy, in focusing mainly on school organization and classroom techniques(i.e., surveillance and social control), have ignored the most crucial aspects of the problem: the "exogenous, socioeconomic features" of educational restructuring under global capitalism and its twin, neo- liberalism. Infact, it is a point that I have been trying to make for some time now (see McLaren,1995, 1997, 1998, McLaren et al., 1998) and in the brief remarks here I want to follow and emphasize this theme in the interest of creating what Apple calls a "counter- hegemonic alliance". Undermining Social Agency Having confuted the socialism and Marxian optic of the Eastern bloc nations with a triumphalist "end of history" mockery, capitalism has found its most exalted place in the pantheon of quintessential bourgeois virtues celebrated by the apostolate of that great factory of dreams known as "America". The 1944 Bretton Woods conference at the now- famous Mt. Washington Hotel in Bretton Woods, New Hampshire, that created theWorld Bank, the International Monetary Fund, and shortly after, the GeneralAgreement of Tariffs and Trade, established the framework and political architecture necessary for the United States to acquire free access to the markets and raw materials of the Western Hemisphere, the Far East,and the British Empire (Korten, 1996). © 2002 Current Issues in Comparative Education, Teachers College, Columbia University, ALL RIGHTS RESERVED Current Issues in Comparative Education, Vol.1(2) 27 Peter McLaren The vision that emerged from this historic meeting laid the groundwork for the lurid transmogrification of the world economy into a global financial system overrun by speculators and "arbitrageurs" who act not in the interests of world peace and prosperity and the needs of real people, but for the cause of profit at any cost (Korten, 1996). As the world's "mentor capitalist nation" the United States has not only become detached from the struggles of its wide-ranging communities, but betrays an aggressive disregard for them. Of course, capitalism has not brought about the "end of history" as the triumphalist discourse of neo-liberalism has announced. Historically, capitalism has not carried humankind closer to "the end of ideology" or "end of history." Rather, as Samir Amin (1996, 1997,1998a,1998b) comments, in spite of the hymns to the glory of capital, the violence of the system's real contradictions was driving history not to its end as announced in triumphalist belle époque proclamations, but to worldwars, socialist revolutions, and the revolt of the colonized peoples. Re-established in post-First World War Europe, triumphant liberalism aggravated the chaos and paved the way for the illusionary, criminal response that fascism was to provide. As social agents within a neo-liberal capitalist regime, one whose link between international competitive forces and neo-liberal state policy tightens as market forces gain strength (Moody, 1997), we lack substance. Capitalism's history appears to have written us out of the story, displacing human agency into the cabinet of lost memories. The world shrinks while difference swells into a forbidding colossus, bringing us face- to-face with all that is other to ourselves. Global capitalism has exfoliated the branches of history, laying bare its riot of tangled possibilities, and hacking away at those roots that nourish a socialist latency. As capital reconstitutes itself á discrétion, as traditionally secure factory work is replaced by the feckless insecurity of McJobs, as the disadvantaged are cast about in the icy wind of world commodity price fluctuations, as the comprador elite expands its powerbase in the financial precincts of the postmodern necropolis, and as theWhite House redecorates itself in the form-fits-function architecture of neo-liberalism, capitalist hegemony digs its bony talons into the structure of subjectivity itself. Communications networks--the electronic servo-mechanisms of the state--with their propulsions and fluxes of information that have grown apace with capitalism, make this hegemony not only a tenebrous possibility but alsoan inevitability as they ideologically secure forms of exploitation so furious that every vulnerability of the masses is seized and made over into a crisis. Neo-liberalism is not simply an abstract term withouta literal referent. The current corporate downsizing, outsourcing, deregulation, and the poverty it has left in its wake is neo-liberalism in flagrante delicto. Look at the faces of the men and women who line up for food stamps in South Central and East Los Angeles, the slumped shouldersof the workers lining up at the gates of the malquiladores in Juarez, Mexico, and the wounded smiles of children juggling tennis balls, breathing fire, and washing car windows in the midst of a traffic jam in Mexico City, and you will have come face-to-face with the destructive power of neo-liberalism. Colonizing Workers The intensification of international competition among multinational corporations under the flagship of neo-liberal economic policies has the threatening tendency of colonizing 28 April 30, 1999 Contesting Capital: Critical Pedagogy and Globalism A Response to Michael Apple everyday life. It has created conditions in which declining living standards and increasing wage inequalities between the poor and the wealthy have become the norm. The new global economy is regulated by the growing service and retail industry, which relies significantly on the exploitation of unskilled immigrant labor in the Western industrial nations and workers in Third World countries. As a means of decreasing production costs, manufacturing jobs are exported abroad to Third World developing countries where a combination of cheap labor markets and weak labor unions create a ripe mixture for a massive accumulation of capital in a frictionless, deregulated industrial milieu. The "K-Marting of the labor force" has yielded unprecedented record profitibilityfor transnational corporations, especially in Third World countries wherea combination of cheap labor markets and weak unions has created extremely ripe conditions for economic exploitation of the working-class (Zukin,1991). Kim Moody (1997) reminds us that today's transnational corporations "are clearly predators waging class war to expand their world-wide empires and restore the legendary profit-ratesof decades ago" (p. 287). The replacement of the United States manufacturing industry by low wage employment in the service and retail industry has contributed in no insignificant way to the increasing social and economic inequalities. Much of the recent evisceration of social programs and the vicious assaults against trade unions by the neo-liberal comprador elite can be traced to the 1980s, when the capitalist class was given a dose of corporate Viagra through massive deregulation policies. According to Robert Brenner (1998): Capitalists and the wealthy accumulated wealth with such success during the 1980s largely because the state intervened directly to place money in their hands--enabling them to profit from their own business failure through lucrative bailouts, offering them massive tax breaks which played no small part in the recovery of corporate balance sheets, and providing them with an unprecedented array of other politically constituted opportunities to get richer faster through fiscal, monetary, and deregulation policies--all at the expense of the great mass of the population (p. 207). Of course, after the initial surge, the economy went flaccid, which put lie to the myth of deregulation. Brenner (1998) remarks: If, after more than two decades of wage-cutting, tax-cutting, reductionsin