Odontogenic Tumors

Odontogenic Tumors

4/26/20 CONTEMPORARY MANAGEMENT OF ODONTOGENIC TUMORS RUI FERNANDES, DMD, MD,FACS, FRCS(ED) PROFESSOR UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA COLLEGE OF MEDICINE- JACKSONVILLE 1 2 Benign th 4 Edition Odontogenic 2017 Tumors Malignant 3 4 BENIGN ODONTOGENIC TUMORS BENIGN ODONTOGENIC TUMORS • EPITHELIAL • MESENCHYMAL • AMELOBLASTOMA • ODONTOGENIC MYXOMA • CALCIFYING EPITHELIAL ODONTOGENIC TUMOR • ODONTOGENIC FIBROMA • PINDBORG TUMOR • PERIPHERAL ODONTOGENIC FIBROMA • ADENOMATOID ODONTOGENIC TUMOR • CEMENTOBLASTOMA • SQUAMOUS ODONTOGENIC TUMOR • ODONTOGENIC GHOST CELL TUMOR 5 6 1 4/26/20 BENIGN ODONTOGENIC TUMORS MALIGNANT ODONTOGENIC TUMORS • PRIMARY INTRAOSSEOUS CARCINOMA • MIXED TUMORS • CARCINOMA ARISING IN ODONTOGENIC CYSTS • AMELOBLASTIC FIBROMA / FIBRO-ODONTOMA • AMELOBLASTIC FIBROSARCOMA • ODONTOMA • AMELOBLASTIC SARCOMA • CLEAR CELL ODONTOGENIC CARCINOMA • ODONTOAMELOBLASTOMA • SCLEROSING ODONTOGENIC CARCINOMA New to the Classification • PRIMORDIAL ODONTOGENIC TUMOR New to the Classification • ODONTOGENIC CARCINOSARCOMA 7 8 0.5 Cases per 100,000/year Ameloblastomas 30%-35% Myxoma AOT 3%-4% Each Ameloblastic fibroma CEOT Ghost Cell Tumor 1% Each 9 10 Courtesy of Professor Ademola Olaitan AMELOBLASTOMA • 1% OF ALL CYSTS AND TUMORS • 30%-60% OF ALL ODONTOGENIC TUMORS • 3RD TO 4TH DECADES OF LIFE • NO GENDER PREDILECTION • MANDIBLE 80% • MAXILLA 20% 11 12 2 4/26/20 AMELOBLASTOMA CLASSIFICATION AMELOBLASTOMA HISTOLOGICAL CRITERIA • SOLID OR MULTI-CYSTIC Conventional 2017 • UNICYSTIC 1. PALISADING NUCLEI 2 • PERIPHERAL 2. REVERSE POLARITY 3. VACUOLIZATION OF THE CYTOPLASM 4. HYPERCHROMATISM OF BASAL CELL LAYER 1 3 4 AmeloblAstomA: DelineAtion of eArly histopathologic feAtures of neoplasiA Robert Vickers, Robert Gorlin, CAncer 26:699-710, 1970 13 14 AMELOBLASTOMA CLASSIFICATION OF 3677 CASES AMELOBLASTOMA SLOW GROWTH – RADIOLOGICAL EVIDENCE Unicystic Peripheral 6% 2% Solid 92% ~3 yeArs After enucleAtion of “dentigerous cyst” P.A . Reichart, H.P. Philipsen and S. Sonner Eur J Cancer, Part B, Oral Oncol 31B:86-99, 1995 15 16 AMELOBLASTOMA AGGRESSIVE /DESTRUCTIVE BEHAVIOR 17 18 3 4/26/20 CASE# 1 19 YO WITH AMELOBLASTOMA AMELOBLASTOMA ASPIRATION 19 20 19 YO WITH AMELOBLASTOMA TUMOR RESECTION 21 22 POST-OPERATIVE APPEARANCE CASE #2 • 69 Y.O. MALE REFERRED WITH A BIOPSY PROVEN AMELOBLASTOMA OF THE MANDIBLE • HIS MEDICAL HISTORY AND SURGICAL HISTORY ARE NONE CONTRIBUTORY • OVERALL HEALTHY 23 24 4 4/26/20 Q: How would you maintain the mandibular relationship ? (no VSP) 25 26 27 28 Q: How would you reconstruct this defect? 29 30 5 4/26/20 1 year post surgery, removal of reconstruction plate 31 32 Overall recurrence rates: Facial appearance prior to dentures, vertical collapse consistent 5 year: 9.3% 10 year: 17.6% 15 year: 24.4% with edentulous upper and lower arches Resection Only Independent Prognostic Factor 33 34 AMELOBLASTOMA UNICYSTIC AMELOBLASTOMA AMELOBLASTOMA UNICYSTIC VARIANT First Report • GENERALLY A UNILOCULAR • 20 PATIENTS RADIOLUCENCY ASSOCIATED WITH AN IMPACTED TOOTH THAT IS DIFFICULT TO • PRESENTED WITH UNILOCULAR CYSTIC LESIONS DISTINGUISH FROM A DENTIGEROUS • LESIONS MIMICKED DENTIGEROUS CYSTS CYST. • SIMPLE ENUCLEATION • ROBINSON AND MARTINEZ, 1977 • LESS RECURRENCE I.E. LESS AGGRESSIVE BEHAVIOR ? • ASSOCIATED WITH A LOW RATE OF “RECURRENCE” AFTER ENUCLEATION Robinson L, Martinez MG AND CURETTAGE Unicystic ameloblastomA: a prognostically distinct entity. Cancer. 1977 Nov;40(5):2278-85. • GARDNER AND CORIO, 1984 35 36 6 4/26/20 UNICYSTIC AMELOBLASTOMA Cyst lined by IntrAmurAl nodulAr ameloblastomA ameloblastomA 50 % to 80% associated with an impActed tooth most commonly: mandibulAr 3rd molAr TreAtment: simple (luminAl or intrAluminAl): enucleation murAl or trAnsmurAl: rAdicAl IntrAmurAl infiltrAting IntrAluminAl resection ameloblastomA ameloblastomA Ackermann GL, Altini M, Shear M. The unicystic ameloblastoma: a clinicopathologic study of 57 cases. Journal of Oral Pathology 1988;17:541±546. 37 38 14 Y.O. WITH MANDIBULAR AMELOBLASTOMA 14 Y.O. WITH MANDIBULAR AMELOBLASTOMA 39 40 14 Y. O. WITH MANDIBULAR AMELOBLASTOMA 14 Y.O. WITH MANDIBULAR AMELOBLASTOMA 41 42 7 4/26/20 14 Y.O . WITH MANDIBULAR AMELOBLASTOMA 14 Y.O. WITH MANDIBULAR AMELOBLASTOMA 43 44 14 Y.O. WITH MANDIBULAR AMELOBLASTOMA • U OF MARYLAND’S EXPERIENCE & WORLD LITERATURE • UNDER AGE 20 YEARS • MARYLAND EXPERIENCE 11PTS • 8 PRIMARY, 3 RECURRENT LESIONS • AVERAGE AGE 15.5 Y • 9 OF 11 UNICYSTIC AMELOBLASTOMAS • WESTERN POPULATION 85PTS • AVERAGE AGE 14.3 • UNICYSTIC AMELOBLASTOMAS 76.5% • AFRICAN POPULATION 77PTS • AVERAGE AGE 14.7 • UNICYSTIC AMELOBLASTOMAS 19.5% • RECURRENCES AFTER ENUCLEATION OF UNICYSTIC AMELOBLASTOMAS • FOLLOWED FOR AT LEAST 5 YEARS OR UNTIL RECURRENCES SHOWED A RECURRENCE RATE OF 40% 45 46 STAGED IMMEDIATE IMPLANT PLACEMENT… BRAF and SMO negative 2 years post treatment 47 48 8 4/26/20 49 50 51 52 53 54 9 4/26/20 55 56 CASE #2 CASE # 2 • 39 Y.O. FEMALE NURSE REFERRED WITH A BIOPSY PROVEN AMELOBLASTOMA OF THE MANDIBLE • HIS MEDICAL HISTORY AND SURGICAL HISTORY ARE NONE CONTRIBUTORY • OVERALL HEALTHY • HIGH ESTHETIC DEMAND AND WISHES FOR A RAPID RETURN TO WORK AND DEFINITIVE SURGER 57 58 59 60 10 4/26/20 Q: How would you reconstruct this defect? 61 62 63 64 65 66 11 4/26/20 67 68 CALCIFYING EPITHELIA ODONTOGENIC TUMOR (PINDBORG TUMOR) • ACCOUNTS FOR LESS THAN 1% OF ALL ODONTOGENIC TUMORS • FEWER THAN 200 REPORTED CASES • PATIENTS BETWEEN 30 AND 50 YEARS OLD • 2/3RDS OCCUR IN THE MANDIBLE • PRESENT AS A PAINLESS SLOW GROWING MASS 69 70 CALCIFYING EPITHELIA ODONTOGENIC TUMOR ADENOMATOID ODONTOGENIC TUMOR (A.O.T.) (PINDBORG TUMOR) • UNCOMMON TUMOR • ACCOUNTS FOR 3 TO 7% • DISCRETE ISLANDS OF • YOUNG PATIENTS POLYHEDRAL SHEETS • VERY UNCOMMON IN PTS OLDER • LARGE AREAS OF AMYLOID LIKE THAN 30 Y MATERIAL • ALSO KNOWN AS THE 2/3RDS • CONCENTRIC CALCIFICATIONS TUMOR KNOWN AS LIESENGANG RINGS • 2/3 FEMALES • 2/3 MAXILLA • 2/3 IMPACTED CANINE Treatment: Resection with a 1 cm bony linear margin 71 72 12 4/26/20 A.O.T. HISTOLOGY A.O.T. TREATMENT • WELL DEFINED Due to the thickness of the • THICK CAPSULE capsule, the tumor may be • SPINDLE SHAPED CELLS treated by enucleation and curettage • WHORLED MASSES OF CELLS WITH SCANT FIBROUS STROMA Only one recurrence in the • ROSETTE-LIKE STRUCTURES literature WITH CENTRAL EMPTY SPACES 73 74 A.O.T. CASE EXAMPLE A.O.T. CASE EXAMPLE 75 76 A.O.T. CASE EXAMPLE 77 78 13 4/26/20 MYXOMA MYXOMA HISTOLOGY • UNCOMMON BENIGN NEOPLASM • STELLATE, SPINDLE SHAPED OF THE JAWS CELLS • DEVELOPS FROM • LOOSELY MYXOID STROMA ECTOMESENCHYME • SLOW GROWING WITH POTENTIAL • RESEMBLES STELLATE FOR AGGRESSIVE BEHAVIOR RETICULUM • HIGH RECURRENCE RATE AFTER • FEW COLLAGEN FIBRILS INADEQUATE THERAPY 79 80 MYXOMA RADIOGRAPHIC APPEARANCE 1 MYXOMA TREATMENT • UNILOCULAR OR MULTILOCULAR IN APPEARANCE • MAY DISPLACE OR CAUSE ROOT RESORPTION • TRABECULAE OF RESIDUAL BONE ARRANGED AT RIGHT ANGLES TO ONE ANOTHER “STEPLADDER” Patient with An expAnding mAss on the right mAxillA, diAgnosis: myxomA 81 82 MYXOMA TREATMENT 2 83 84 14 4/26/20 85 86 87 88 89 90 15 4/26/20 91 92 93 94 95 96 16 4/26/20 97 98 99 100 101 102 17 4/26/20 103 104 105 106 26 cases No statistical difference in recurrence between conservative vs radical treatment 107 108 18 4/26/20 Overall recurrence 5/39(13%) X10y Conservative tx 4/22(19%) X11y Resection 1/17(6%) x9y 109 110 AMELOBLASTOMA MALIGNANT AMELOBLASTOMA & AMELOBLASTIC CARCINOMA 111 112 MALIGNANT AMELOBLASTOMA VS. AMELOBLASTIC CARCINOMA WHO Classification 2005 • MALIGNANT (METASTASIZING) AMELOBLASTOMA • IS A NEOPLASM IN WHICH THE FEATURES OF AN AMELOBLASTOMA ARE SHOWN BY THE PRIMARY GROWTH IN THE JAWS AND BY ANY METASTATIC GROWTH. Malignant (Metastasising) Ameloblastoma • AMELOBLASTIC CARCINOMA • IS A NEOPLASM IN WHICH THERE HAS BEEN HISTOLOGICALLY MALIGNANT TRANSFORMATION, WITH OR WITHOUT METASTATIC DEPOSITS. Ameloblastoma Type 1 Primary intraosseous carcinoma, ex odontogenic cyst (Malignant types) Type 2 Primary intraosseous carcinoma, ex ameloblastoma Malignant ameloblastoma Ameloblastic carcinoma arising de novo, ex ameloblastoma, or ex odontogenic cyst Type 3 Primary intraosseous carcinoma arising de novo Non-keratinizing Ameloblastic Carcinoma Keratinizing Slootweg PJ, Muller H: MAlignAnt AmeloblAstomA or AmeloblAstic cArcinomA OrAl Surg 57:168-176; 1984 113 114 19 4/26/20 WHO Classification 2017 AMELOBLASTIC CARCINOMA • 8 CASES Malignant (Metastasising) Metastasizing Ameloblastoma Ameloblastoma • 7 CASES IN THE MANDIBLE, 1 CASE IN THE MAXILLA Benign Category • A DIAGNOSIS OF BENIGN AMELOBLASTOMA WAS MADE FOR ALL CASES BASED ON INCISIONAL BIOPSY Ameloblastoma • ONE CASE HAD CERVICAL METASTASIS AT THE TIME OF INITIAL (Malignant types) PRESENTATION • MOST COMMON PRESENTING SYMPTOMS INCLUDED RAPID GROWTH (6 CASES) AND PAIN (3 CASES) • 3 PATIENTS DEVELOPED RECURRENT DISEASE Ameloblastic Carcinoma Corio RL, GoldblAtt LI, Edwards PA, HartmAn KS. AmeloblAstic cArcinomA: A clinicopAthologic study And assessment of eight cases. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 64:570-6; 1987 115 116 AMELOBLASTIC CARCINOMA 117 118 119 120 20 4/26/20 121 122 123 124 PT WITH METASTATIC DISEASE OR NON-RESECTABLE DX TARGETED SYSTEMIC THERAPY � 125 126 21 4/26/20 MOLECULAR MARKERS IN MELANOMA • BRAF (B-RAF PROTO-ONCOGENE) MUTATIONS V600E • 50 – 70% BRAF • KIT (PROTO-ONCOGENE C-KIT) MUTATIONS • 10 – 15% MUCOSAL (SINONASAL AND CHRONICALLY SUN EXPOSED SKIN) • NRAS (NRAS PROTO-ONCOGENE) MUTATIONS • 15% SKIN WITH CHRONIC AND INTERMITTENT SUN EXPOSURE Sensitivity to agents that inhibit the BRAF or MAPK pathway 127 128 Timeline of treatment options for metastatic

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    23 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us