Pharmacological Therapy in Progressive Supranuclear Palsy

Pharmacological Therapy in Progressive Supranuclear Palsy

ORIGINAL CONTRIBUTION Pharmacological Therapy in Progressive Supranuclear Palsy K. Kompoliti, MD; C. G. Goetz, MD; Irene Litvan, MD; K. Jellinger, MD; M. Verny, MD Background: To our knowledge, previous reports on ticholinergics and selective serotonin inhibitors (1 pa- drug treatment in progressive supranuclear palsy have tient). Positive clinical response was detected in 7 of the not evaluated autopsy-confirmed cases. patients receiving dopaminergic drugs and in 1 patient each receiving tricyclics, methysergide, and 5-hydro- Objective: To evaluate pharmacological treatment re- xytryptophan, respectively. None of the patients re- sponses from detailed clinical records in patients with sponded markedly however, and there was no persis- autopsy-confirmed progressive supranuclear palsy. tent beneficial effect. Use of dopaminergic drugs most frequently improved parkinsonian features, but dis- Subjects and Methods: We reviewed medical records abling adverse effects included orthostatic hypotension for clinical presentation and pharmacological response (6 patients), hallucinations and delusions (3 patients), in 12 patients with autopsy-confirmed progressive supra- gastrointestinal complaints (3 patients), and dizziness nuclear palsy diagnosed using the National Institute of Neu- (1 patient). Only 1 patient developed dyskinesia. rological Disorders and Stroke pathologic criteria. For each drug class, exposure, global positive response, and specific Conclusion: Use of antiparkinsonian medications and positive response (parkinsonism, other movement disor- other neurotransmitter replacement therapies was largely ders, or gaze dysfunction) were recorded. ineffective and caused frequent adverse effects in this se- ries of patients with autopsy-confirmed with progres- Results: Drug classes examined were dopaminergics (all sive supranuclear palsy. patients), tricyclics (3 patients), methysergide maleate (3 patients), 5-hydroxytryptophan (2 patients), and an- Arch Neurol. 1998;55:1099-1102 ROGRESSIVE supranuclear response and detailed clinical records palsy (PSP) is a neurodegen- in a series of patients with autopsy- erative disease character- confirmed PSP assessed by specialists of ized by parkinsonism with movement disorder. prominent axial involve- Pment and postural reflex abnormality, bul- RESULTS bar symptoms, supranuclear ophthal- moplegia, and higher cortical dysfunction. The mean age of the 12 patients was 64 Dysfunction of multiple brain systems has years at onset of symptoms (range, 53-70 complicated attempts to treat the dis- years). Parkinsonism and ocular signs were ease. In PSP there is involvement of the present in all patients, bulbar signs and From the Rush-Presbyterian-St dopaminergic, cholinergic, GABAergic higher cortical dysfunction in 11 patients, Luke’s Medical Center, (g-aminobutyric acid), and to a lesser de- other movement disorders in 10, pyrami- Chicago, Ill (Drs Kompoliti and gree of the serotonergic and noradrener- dal signs in 2, and other signs in 1 patient Goetz); Neuroepidemiology gic systems.1,2 Pharmacological therapy (Table 1). Branch, National Institute of has focused on the manipulation of the Of the parkinsonian signs, bradyki- Neurological Disorders and central dopaminergic,3-6 cholinergic,7-12 nesia, rigidity, and gait abnormalities were Stroke, National Institutes of serotonergic,3,4,13,14 and more recently, nor- present in all, while tremor was found in Health, Bethesda, Md adrenergic systems.15 The clinical over- only 2 of 12 patients. All patients had su- (Dr Litvan); Ludwig Boltzmann Institute of Clinical lap of PSP with other neurodegenerative pranuclear gaze abnormalities, with 2 hav- Neurobiology, Vienna, Austria syndromes is significant, making conclu- ing additional ocular signs, consisting of (Dr Jellinger); and Hoˆpital sions regarding medication responses ten- blepharospasm, which was associated in Charles Foix, Paris, France tative. To identify putatively effective phar- 1 of the patients with eyelid retraction. One (Dr Verny). macotherapies, we assessed clinical patient developed delusional thinking ARCH NEUROL / VOL 55, AUG 1998 1099 ©1998 American Medical Association. All rights reserved. Downloaded From: https://jamanetwork.com/ on 09/23/2021 Table 1. Progressive Supranuclear Palsy: Clinical Features* PATIENTS AND METHODS Clinical Features No. of Patients Parkinsonism (n = 12) We collected clinical information on 12 patients from Bradykinesia 12 the Salpe`trie`re Hospital, Paris, France, and the Lud- Rigidity 12 wig Boltzmann Institute of Clinical Neurology, Vi- Tremor 2 enna, Austria. The diagnosis of PSP was made by 2 Gait problems 12 neuropathologists according to the National Insti- Ocular signs (n = 12) tute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke neuro- Supranuclear 12 pathologic criteria for typical PSP.16,17 Other 2 We reviewed the complete medical records of Bulbar function (n = 11) these 12 patients with regard to clinical presenta- Dysarthria 11 tion and response to dopaminergic therapeutic ma- Dysphagia 11 nipulations and exposure to other drugs. The data Both 11 were collected by the primary investigator (K.K.). Higher cortical function (n = 11) Signs were categorized into the following domains: Dementia 11 parkinsonism (at least 2 of bradykinesia, rigidity, Palilalia 7 tremor, and gait abnormalities), other movement dis- Frontal signs 2 orders (dystonia or myoclonus), gaze difficulties, bul- Delusions 1 bar signs, higher cortical signs, pyramidal signs, and Other movement disorders (n = 10) other. Minimal criterion for improvement was im- Dystonia 10 Axial 8 provement in at least 1 domain. Improvement or de- Neck 7 terioration were classified as either absent, modest, Both 6 or marked. Trismus 1 Myoclonus 1 Pyramidal (n = 7) Hyperreflexia 7 Other (n = 1) while receiving a stable dose of levodopa (400 mg/d) in Orthostatic hypotension 1 conjunction with a peripheral decarboxylase inhibitor for many months before the onset of the psychotic phenom- *N = 12. ena. Table 1 shows detailed information of the clinical presentation of this group of patients. The latter consisted of vertical supranuclear gaze palsy. All 12 patients received 1 or several types of dopa- The dyskinesias were observed toward the end of the 2- minergic medication. Treatment was initiated, on aver- year treatment with levodopa, were confined to the face, age, 2 years after onset of symptoms. Improvement from and lasted 2 to 4 months, resolving following discon- 1 dopaminergic agent did not predict response to the other tinuation of levodopa. Subsequently, therapy with bro- dopaminergic agents administered subsequently. Eleven mocriptine mesylate was initiated but without clinical re- received levodopa with a peripheral decarboxylase in- sponse. The patient succumbed to his disease 5 years from hibitor, 6 an agonist, and 5 amantadine (Table 2). Seven onset of symptoms. experienced clinical improvement. Levodopa with a pe- Dopamine agonists were given mostly in the form ripheral decarboxylase inhibitor produced improve- of bromocriptine, except for 1 patient who received piribe- ment in 4 of the 11 patients. This improvement was dil at a dosage of 1250 mg/d for 6 months. This treat- marked in 1 patient and modest in the other 3 patients. ment produced modest improvement of parkinsonism in The features improving were parkinsonism in 4 pa- 1 patient and marked deterioration of the primary con- tients, and dystonia and supranuclear gaze palsy in 1 pa- dition in another patient. tient, respectively. The patient who experienced im- Five patients received amantadine and 2 demon- provement of gaze palsy was treated with levodopa and strated questionable improvement of parkinsonism (both a peripheral decarboxylase inhibitor (400 mg/d of le- patients) and neck dystonia (1 patient). Three patients vodopa) 2 years after onset of disease. The improve- complained of deterioration of their primary condition, ment lasted 3 months. While receiving levodopa therapy, which was modest in 2 and marked in 1. Other medica- 4 patients experienced exacerbation of parkinsonism, bul- tions used were tricyclic antidepressants and methyser- bar symptoms, and higher cortical dysfunction, and 2 ex- gide in 3 patients, 5-hydroxytryptophan in 2, selective perienced exacerbation of supranuclear gaze palsy. serotonin reuptake inhibitors, anticholinergics, and mi- The patient with the levodopa-induced dyskine- anserin hydrochloride in 1 patient each. The tricyclic an- sias was initially diagnosed as having idiopathic Parkin- tidepressants used were amitriptyline hydrochloride in son disease and was started on a regimen of levodopa and 1 patient and chlomipramine in 2 patients. The patient a peripheral decarboxylase inhibitor 1 year after onset receiving amitriptyline experienced modest improve- of symptoms. He experienced a 60% improvement in re- ment of his parkinsonism. sponse to levodopa treatment and this remained stable Three patients received methysergide with modest for 2 years requiring dose increments in regular inter- clinical improvement in one and worsening of the un- vals. Postural instability and falls first occurred 2.5 years derlying condition in another. The elements that im- and supranuclear gaze impairment 3 years after onset. proved were parkinsonism and dystonia and the wors- ARCH NEUROL / VOL 55, AUG 1998 1100 ©1998 American Medical Association. All rights reserved. Downloaded From: https://jamanetwork.com/ on 09/23/2021 Table 2. Exposure to Medications and Specific Areas of Improvement* Duration of Improvement

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    4 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us