ROBERT G. HALL TYRANNY, WORK AND POLITICS: THE 1818 STRIKE WAVE IN THE ENGLISH COTTON DISTRICT* SUMMARY: Critics of E. P. Thompson have questioned his emphasis on the ties between radicalism and trade unionism in early nineteenth-century England; histo- rians have likewise described the 1818 strikes as simple wage disputes in which the radicals played a negligible role. This essay challenges these assumptions about the 1818 strikes and radicalism. In the summer of 1818, when a wide range of grievances touched off the strike wave, the radicals rallied to the side of the trades and sometimes served as leaders of the strikes; that summer the radicals and striking trades also drew upon and contributed to a shared repertoire of old and new tactics and forms of action. On 1 September, near the end of the long, hot summer of 1818, five hundred mule spinners marched from Manchester to Sandy Brow, in Stock- port, where a crowd of several thousand had gathered for a meeting which marked the climax of the trade militancy and radicalism of that summer, a summer rife with rumors about plans for "a general insurrection of all the labouring classes".1 During the previous four months, almost a dozen trades had abandoned the workshops, pits, and factories of Manchester and its environs, and only three weeks before, over fifteen trades had joined together to form a general union of all trades, the Philanthropic Society, for "Trade and Reform".2 On that rainy afternoon at Sandy Brow, John Bagguley and Samuel Drummond, veterans of the radical campaign of * I am indebted to Jim Epstein, Doug Flamming, and Mel McKiven for their valuable comments on earlier versions of this article. All dates cited refer to the year 1818 unless otherwise specified. 1 Public Record Office [hereafter PRO], Home Office Papers [hereafter HO] 42/179 Ethelston to Sidmouth, 18 August. According to the Manchester Mercury, 4 August [hereafter MM], the summer of 1818 was the warmest one since 1779. There is a printed selection of Home Office papers on the 1818 strikes in A. Aspinall (ed.), The Early English Trade Unions: Documents from the Home Office Papers in the Public Record Office (London, 1949). J.L. and Barbara Hammond reprinted several 1818 trade addresses in their pioneering studies The Skilled Labourer, 1760-1832 (London, 1919; reprint edition, New York, 1967), and The Town Labourer, 1760-1832 (London, 1917; reprint edition, New York, 1967). 2 PRO, HO 42/179 "To all Colliers in Newton Duckinfield Hyde & Stayley Bridge", from James Fielding, 7 August, enclosed in Lloyd to Hobhouse, 22 August; see also, Hammonds, Skilled Labourer, pp. 103-104. International Review of Social History, XXXIV (1989), pp. 433-470 Downloaded from https://www.cambridge.org/core. IP address: 170.106.202.126, on 26 Sep 2021 at 05:57:57, subject to the Cambridge Core terms of use, available at https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020859000009469 434 ROBERTG.HALL The cotton district in 1821 Royton Saddleworth iddleton • / * • •Oldham L n Manchester Ashton under v LANCASHIRE «'9 . SalforcO>,* '^S Lyne 'Stalybridge Warrington* DERBY SHIRE CHESHIRE 100,000 to 120,000 inhabitants • under 10,000 inhabitants Liverpool 118,972 Ashton-under-Lyne 9,222 Manchester 108,016 Colne 7,274 Burnley 6,378 20,000 to 32,000 inhabitants Middleton 5,809 Leigh 5,190 Bolton 31,295 Stalybridge ±5,000 Rochdale 27,798 Todmorden 4,985 Salford 25,772 Royton 4,933 Preston 24,575 St. Helens 4,820 Blackburn 21,940 Glossop 4,130 Stockport 21,726 Hyde 3,355 Oldham 21,662 Clitheroe 3,213 Padiham 3,060 • 10,000 to 20,000 inhabitants Accrington 5,370 Macclesfield 17,746 Wigan 17,716 Saddleworth 13,902 Warrington 13,570 Bury 10,583 Source: PP (Commons) 1822 [502]XV. Downloaded from https://www.cambridge.org/core. IP address: 170.106.202.126, on 26 Sep 2021 at 05:57:57, subject to the Cambridge Core terms of use, available at https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020859000009469 TYRANNY, WORK AND POLITICS 435 1816-17, praised the striking spinners and weavers for their courageous resistance to the "tyranny" of their masters and likewise denounced the "tyrannical" government of Lord Liverpool.3 William Reddy and Charles Tilly have recently cautioned against judging these kinds of events, especially the turn outs of the early nineteenth century, by the standards of the twentieth-century world. Reddy, in his study of the French textile trade, has emphasized in particular the contin- ued importance of "nonmarket factors" in the strikes of the nineteenth century. With a few recent exceptions, the historians who have examined the events of the summer of 1818 have paid little attention to what Reddy has referred to as "nonmarket grievances" and have instead portrayed the 1818 strikes as straightforward wage disputes. The artisans and factory workers who launched the strike wave of that summer certainly focused on the issue of wages in their official addresses and often pointed to the state of the market to strengthen their case for an advance; however, as E. P. Thompson has pointed out, the central concern of the 1818 address of "A Journeyman Cotton Spinner" was not the "bread-and-butter" issue of wages but rather "changes in the character of capitalist exploitation".4 For the trades that turned out that summer, from the spinners and handloom weavers to the hatters and coal miners, the strikes clearly went beyond dissatisfaction over wage cuts and high prices and instead turned on a 3 Manchester Observer, 29 August [hereafter MO]; PRO, HO 42/180 Lloyd to Hob- house, 3 September; Report of John Livesey; A Full, Accurate, and Impartial Report of the Trial of John Bagguley, of Stockport, John Johnston, ofSalford, and Samuel Drum- mond, of Manchester (Manchester, 1819), pp. 20-35.1 am grateful to Jim Epstein for the reference to the trial. 4 William M. Reddy, The Rise of the Market Culture: the Textile Trade and French Society 1750-1900 (Cambridge, 1984), pp. 185-186,225-226; Charles Tilly, The Conten- tious French (Cambridge, MA, 1986), pp. 3-5, 390-398, and E. P. Thompson, The Making of the English Working Class (Vintage edition, New York, 1966), pp. 202-203. For accounts of the 1818 strikes, see Hammonds, Skilled Labourer, pp. 94-121; R. G. Kirby and A. E. Musson, The Voice of the People: John Doherty, 1798-1854 Trade Unionist, Radical, and Factory Reformer (Manchester, 1975), pp. 18-27; John Mason, "Mule Spinner Societies and the Early Federations", in Alan Fowler and Terry Wyke (eds), The Barefoot Aristocrats: A History of the Amalgamated Association of Operative Cotton Spinners (Littleborough, 1987), pp. 19-23; H. A. Turner, Trade Union Growth, Structure, and Policy: A Comparative Study of the Cotton Unions in England (Toronto, 1962), pp. 67-69; Duncan Bythell, The Handloom Weavers: A Study in the English Cotton Industry during the Industrial Revolution (Cambridge, 1969), pp. 193-197, and Robert Glen, Urban Workers in the Early Industrial Revolution (London, 1984), pp. 70- 75, 219-224. For the 1818 strikes as "the first ever attempt at a general strike" and the radicals' involvement, see Mick Jenkins, The General Strike of 1842 (London, 1980), pp. 30-32; John Foster, Class Struggle and the Industrial Revolution: Early Industrial Capitalism in Three English Towns (London, 1974), pp. 101-102 and John Belchem, "Orator" Hunt: Henry Hunt and English Working-Class Radicalism (Oxford, 1985), p. 86. Downloaded from https://www.cambridge.org/core. IP address: 170.106.202.126, on 26 Sep 2021 at 05:57:57, subject to the Cambridge Core terms of use, available at https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020859000009469 436 ROBERT G. HALL variety of grievances which ranged from bitter resentment over the "tyran- ny' ' of their masters and the recent defeat of Sir Robert Peel's factory bill to concerns about the artisan's loss of "independence" and moral views about an Englishman's right to what an Oldham weaver called "that fair reward for their labour, which both justice and humanity assign to them".5 In the summer of 1818, striking factory workers and artisans, journeymen spin- ners and hatters alike, shared not only these common grievances but also the outlook and institutions of the "respectable" artisan, and it was these shared grievances and values which made possible the formation of the Philanthropic Society and its fleeting vision of a general union, "the Work- ing Class of Society", to oppose "their avaricious Employers".6 While E. P. Thompson's classic work, The Making of the English Work- ing Class, has exerted a powerful influence in the debate over the emer- gence of the "Working Class of Society" in nineteenth-century England, a number of historians have challenged his account of the emergence of class consciousness in the 1830s and his emphasis on the links between radicalism and trade unionism in the early decades of the century. Several of his critics have in turn put forward what F. K. Donnelly has called the " 'compart- mentalist' interpretation of early English working-class history". Their response to Thompson's "holistic" interpretation of class and working-class protest has been to compartmentalize working-class grievances and aspira- tions into neatly segregated "political" and "industrial" categories.7 Al- 5 MO, 2 January 1819. For "independence" and the idea of a "fair" wage, see John Rule, "Artisan Attitudes: A Comparative Survey of Skilled Labour and Proletarianization Before 1848", Bulletin of the Society for the Study of Labour History, 50 (1985), pp. 25-26; Thompson, Making of the English Working Class, pp.